Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Joe Quatrochi
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).
- Questions
- 84on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 1%1 of 84 questions
- Companies
- 12questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 9with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 84 of 84 questions from 12 companies
KLACKLA Corporation14 questions · 8 reporting periods · 0 of 14 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I think last quarter you talked about Maybe Foundry Logic being in the low 60% of semi PC systems for 26.
Show response
Updated the 2026 mix to low to mid-60s and flagged memory rising in the December quarter.
just wondering if you could talk about your lead times and how do we think about just the cadence of capacity that is
Show response
Gave specific lead-time ranges and noted customer conversations have moved to 2H27 deliveries on larger products.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I was wondering if you could maybe talk about your own lead times and just kind of thinking about your own supply chain
Show response
CFO acknowledged first-half supply chain constraints from faster-than-expected ramp slope but said KLA is much better positioned for second-half and 2027, with tremendous focus on ensuring capacity.
is that a bigger driver for potential incremental like process control system sales for you? Or is it largely flowing through the service line?
Show response
CEO confirmed yield-driven demand drives both process control sales and services, with Intel publicly increasing metrology usage and the whole industry squeezing yield from existing capacity.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Any way that you can kind of help us understand just what could growth has potentially kind of been first half or second half if you didn't have those supply constraints?
Show response
Bren identified optical components as the primary constraint rather than DRAM, with decisions made last summer affecting first-half shipments. Rick noted supply constraints are industry-wide, not KLA-specific, so no share loss risk.
it seems like maybe based on the guidance, March is is kind of the bottom and we move higher from here
Show response
Bren confirmed March as the likely margin trough, with improvement driven by mix, tariff burden diminishing through process optimization, and memory DRAM cost situation expected to be transitory. Pricing is value-oriented rather than cost-based.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I was curious just to think about just the advanced packaging process control intensity. I think just based on some of the things you put out there or talked about in the past, it's like high teens...
Show response
Bren corrected the high-teens assumption, noting KLA's packaging share went from 1% to approaching 6% of the $11B market, with continued growth expected as density and process complexity increase.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Can you help us just understand like what's driving that?
Show response
Bren cited China merchant mask investment, requalification from high design mix, single-die reticle inspection growth, and broadband plasma Gen 5 print check adoption.
Do we just think about that as being maybe the peak to trough is less steep on a new node ramping?
Show response
Rick explained the traditional ramp-then-run-off model is broken because multiple designs create compounding ramps, with some customers even back-porting more process control to prior nodes.
Calendar 2025 Q1
can you just help us like understand kind of what's giving you the confidence there to increase it?
Show response
Bren attributed margin improvement to favorable product mix from new platforms resetting cost of ownership, plus scale benefits in advanced packaging offsetting prior inflation pressures.
is cleaner in space of potential kind of gating factors as you look into '26?
Show response
Rick sees no clean room gating factors, with silicon at the leading edge being the governing factor and steady capacity growth expected over the next several years.
Calendar 2024 Q4
do we just take that, I guess, quarterly kind of run rate impact all in the March quarter and then grow from there?
Show response
Rick confirmed the services impact from China export controls is front-loaded in March quarter and then services grow from that new base.
can you talk about just the difference in HBM process control intensity, relative to conventional DRAM
Show response
Rick explained HBM drives process control intensity up 100-150 basis points from the historical 9-10% range due to bigger die, less redundancy, and more complex logic circuitry.
Calendar 2024 Q3
Is there any color that you can really share there and how we think about sample rates to 3-nanometer?
Show response
Wallace detailed rising process-control intensity at 2nm -- more inspection points and higher sampling as process windows tighten.
MPWRMonolithic Power Systems12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
give us an update on how you are thinking about automotive demand in the second half of this year?
Show response
Reaffirmed the flat first half and second half ramp, added the mid teens year over year end market view, and stressed the breadth of the socket base.
I think last quarter, you talked about your plans to enter the RCD market. And starting to sample with customers?
Show response
Confirmed sampling with some revenue already, and Tony Balow set expectations directly by ruling it out as a 2026 model driver.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I think you talked about $150 of content like for humanoid back at the Analyst Day. Is that the right way to think about it? Or are those expanding opportunities
Show response
Michael described varied content across battery management, GPU power, sensors, actuators. Dollar content varies by application (chips vs modules). Declined to confirm specific content figure.
Wondering if you could just share any of the puts and takes on the guide. It seems like obviously very positive revenue acceleration in kind of not a ton of follow through on gross margin
Show response
Tony noted 4Q flat at 55.5% (low end), Q2 incrementally raised on better backlog visibility. H2 headwinds warrant caution. Michael noted module yield improvements are ongoing.
Calendar 2025 Q4
are you seeing anything related to just kind of, you know, memory prices increasing and just kind of maybe some pressure
Show response
Tony noted PC business expected down from strong 2025 due to selective margin participation. Memory impact too early to assess.
how much of that is related to, like, traditional server CPU demand that it seems like it is accelerating
Show response
Tony noted both categories trending well but lines are blurry. Michael added they use the same power supply now, making separation difficult.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Embedded within the 4Q guide, is there any help you can kind of provide in just thinking about the end markets?
Show response
Bernie confirmed no fundamental change in positioning since Q2 call, suggesting previous enterprise data expectations still hold.
can you talk about what drove that and how you think about the revenue opportunity ramping there
Show response
Tony confirmed 2026 revenue ramp but not individually a needle mover. Called it the start of a wave of full solution design wins. Michael noted AI-assisted robotics is the catalyst.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how are you thinking about traditional server CPU demand this year?
Show response
Michael highlighted server refresh cycles driving consistent growth. MPS expects to gain an even higher percentage of the server market next year.
just given like the abnormal seasonality, strength that you saw in 1Q, how do we think about that business kind of throughout the rest of this year?
Show response
Michael noted growth was evenly spread across DDR5, SSD, HDD, notebook, and desktop segments. Tony indicated no sharp Q2 falloff expected.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Wondering this, you know, what's driving that? Is that strength from are starting to see pull for AIPCs or is it channel refill?
Show response
Bernie attributed notebook strength to AI-related design wins but acknowledged the Q1 ramp was atypical and lacked definitive explanation.
are you still largely seeing those as being lateral power opportunities or those starting to move to more vertical solutions?
Show response
Tony declined to discuss architectural specifics, citing customer confidentiality. Michael noted customers explicitly don't want lateral vs vertical disclosed.
ARMArm Holdings9 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how do we think about the gross margin structure relative to kind of what you were thinking about
Show response
Jason reiterated high 30% to low 40s percent for the first generation and said 50% is expected over the next couple of years as work is brought in-house.
can you give us a little bit more detail on just the confidence that's increased in terms of the upside
Show response
Rene answered directly, citing improvement across wafers, substrates, test capacity and memory, with demand now north of $2 billion.
Calendar 2026 Q1
as we think about, I guess, like the royalty rate growth for 1Q and then just thinking about the full year, is there any help that you can provide
Show response
Jason acknowledged mobile unit growth turned negative but expects data center demand to more than offset weakness. Automotive continues double-digit growth. Overall royalty outlook positive.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how do we think about the puts and takes of this royalty revenue growth and the risks that are associated with the potential like demand destruction that we're seeing
Show response
Jason quantified that a 20% unit volume decline would impact smartphone royalties by only 2-4% because constraints hit low-end v8 devices while premium CSS/v9 is protected. Total royalty impact would be 1-2%, more than offset by cloud AI growth.
how you view Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares' role and the role of the CPU in AI and cloud data centers and just how does that change as we start to see more proliferation of AI agents
Show response
Rene explained that agentic AI workloads are persistent, always-on, and power-constrained, making them ideal for CPUs. Hyperscalers are responding with higher core counts. Combined with power efficiency requirements, this creates a strong tailwind for Arm.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I noticed in the filing you announced your intention to acquire DreamBig Semiconductor
Show response
Rene explained DreamBig's Ethernet controller IP is critical for high-speed data center networking, broadening Arm's offering to end customers in scale-up and scale-out environments.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Any help in the context of like what that was last year?
Show response
Rene explained the jump from ~18% to ~50% was driven by Grace Blackwell replacing x86 in AI data centers plus continued general-purpose compute gains from Graviton, Axion, and Cobalt.
Calendar 2025 Q1
just trying to understand not giving a fiscal '26 guide and just trying to understand the context there
Show response
Jason explained partners are providing less visibility than normal due to tariff uncertainty, making any full-year range too wide to be helpful.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how should we think about the contribution to royalty revenue ramping as we enter fiscal '26
Show response
Jason confirmed strong CSS momentum and first material CSS revenue quarter but deferred FY26 quantification to next quarter's guidance.
ASMLASML Holding9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
provide maybe just a little additional color on the capacity expansion that you need beyond the 30% you talked about
Show response
Christophe said opportunities are easier to enable in 2028 than near term but declined to give new 2027 or 2028 output numbers.
how to think about just the kind of trajectory of gross margin from here?
Show response
Roger said price increases are agreed with some 2027 effect and full impact from 2028, citing volume, mix and pricing as tailwinds and ramp costs and upgrades as swing factors.
Calendar 2026 Q2
is that the ceiling of what you think you can support and your supply chain can support next year
Show response
Roger said 85 tools reflects today's demand-supply balance and ASML would revisit and roll up its sleeves if customers request meaningfully more.
Calendar 2025 Q2
on the gross margin side, I think if you kind of look at the implied December quarter guide, any sort of help on just like what's kind of driving the -- I think gross margin will take a bit of a st...
Show response
Roger confirmed Q4 gross margin step-down reflects more High NA rev rec, lower upgrade contribution, and the absence of 1H one-off cost benefits.
I wanted to ask one on 2026, your commentary. I guess I wanted to try to better understand what has changed over the last 90 days just in your customer conversations.
Show response
Christophe pointed to ongoing tariff uncertainty (incl. the H20 flip-flop), the 232 review, and customers waiting as long as possible before committing, leading ASML to become more cautious on 2026.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how many of the 3600 are still left that you prebuilt, I think, last year in inventory? Is there anything that we should think about like, in terms of the salability of those tools
Show response
Roger said the remaining 3600 prebuilds will work down through 2025 and there are no concerns about the salability of the inventory.
Is there any interest in altering delivery schedules?
Show response
Christophe said tariff announcements have not shifted customer business conversations and Roger added that customer clean-room space, not inventory, is the real gating item, so opportunistic pull-ins are not even feasible for most customers.
Calendar 2024 Q4
the cost of High NA installs this past quarter was a bit lower than expected. As we look in the second half and you talked about gross margin maybe a little bit higher in the first half.
Show response
Roger treated the Q4 High NA cost favorability as a one-off, already embedded in the 51–53% 2025 gross-margin range, and reiterated 2H margin is expected to step down as High NA revenue recognition skews to the back half.
if customers are able to build capacity for AI, then you think you can hit the high end of your revenue guide? How do we think about that relative to your lead times?
Show response
Christophe said ASML is provisioning for upside in its supply plan and will decide whether to actually build the incremental tools as the AI capacity opportunity firms up through the year.
CDNSCadence Design Systems7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
You talked about Agentic AI as being a long-term TAM expansion opportunity. Is there any quantification
Show response
Devgan described the three-layer framework and 4 super agents but gave no TAM number; Wall added guidance assumes no step function.
Calendar 2026 Q1
How should we think about EDA's contribution to that or percent of that
Show response
Devgan said there is real potential for 11% share to increase with agentic AI. Big customer CEOs want to invest in more automation and compute.
Calendar 2025 Q4
On the verification and emulation hardware cycle, any sort of help on just kind of where you think you are at in that cycle?
Show response
Anirudh said every year is a record for hardware, expects trend to continue. Big customers buying almost annually. Current Z3 supports 1T transistor designs. Taking share across hardware, IP, EDA, 3D-IC, and first to market in agentic AI.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I was wondering if you could just maybe help us understand like the OpEx dynamics. I think 3Q is a bit better than expected, but 4Q is a bit worse than expected
Show response
John Wall attributed Q3 benefit to small restructure and healthy hardware gross margins. Q4 slightly higher due to new acquisition expenses. Overall year slightly ahead of expectations.
Calendar 2025 Q2
can you help us understand what would have RPO been had the restrictions not been in place exiting the quarter
Show response
John Wall said $50M revenue raise and $0.12 EPS raise driven by strength across all regions, not just China. Apples-to-apples vs prior guide since restrictions rescinded.
Calendar 2025 Q1
You mentioned that you were developing a full stack Agentic AI solution. I was wondering if you could talk about just the areas of the design workflow
Show response
Anirudh prioritized verification (SimAI 5-20x improvement), digital implementation (Cerebrus), package/PCB design (Allegro X AI), and analog migration.
Calendar 2024 Q4
was there any change into the RPO balance from the export restrictions? And then two, I guess on that flat kind of expectation for 2025
Show response
John Wall confirmed no material RPO impact from China restrictions. Acknowledged hardware weakness in China drove 2024 decline. Anirudh noted strong design activity in Chinese EV companies.
ONON Semiconductor7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
prioritizing data center demand over auto industrial in the quarter. Was that any sort of impact to revenue?
Show response
Hassane acknowledged prioritizing AI data center pulled from auto and industrial short term, but said there was no real customer impact and supply catches up in H2.
Calendar 2025 Q4
your opportunity, you're talking about, you know, what that looks like per rack in 2030, which is a pretty significant increase
Show response
El-Khoury said increased content from more products mapping to rack opportunity. SiC JFET, vGaN, SPS, point-of-load all expanding addressable content. Investment over the last year capitalizing on AI opportunity.
Just curious if there's any targets that we should be thinking about for this year.
Show response
Trent said FCF margin target is 25-30%, delivered 24% in 2025. Expects to expand FCF margin. Plan to return 100% of FCF to shareholders via $6B repurchase authorization.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I was wondering if you could talk about the rate of short lead time orders that you're seeing and how that compares in the third quarter
Show response
Trent said lead times extended to ~20 weeks from mid-teens. No significant change to short lead time orders. Order patterns continuing to improve giving confidence in stabilization.
any sort of color you could provide on your expectations for silicon carbide revenue growth this year?
Show response
El-Khoury declined to provide SiC guidance but said it's tracking expectations. Gaining share with NIO new brand and broader China EV deployment through a leading Tier 1.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how you're thinking about the growth opportunity in 2025 with the potential acceleration from the JFETs business.
Show response
El-Khoury confirmed AI data center will continue growing in 2025 with designed-in platforms ramping. Treo will accelerate portfolio introductions.
are there any end markets or geographies in particular that we should think about as being more price-sensitive
Show response
El-Khoury said non-core exits are product-driven, not region-driven. No local pricing practices by region.
Show 6 more companies
SNPSSynopsys7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
is AI becoming a larger piece or in offsetting kind of the non-AI?
Show response
Ghazi said non-AI design starts have stabilized over the last two quarters after a prior slowdown, while AI design starts continue to accelerate.
Calendar 2026 Q2
of the $35 million increase to the full year guide on the revenue outlook from business performance how much of that was related to EDA versus IP
Show response
Sassine attributed broad strength to AI semiconductor demand across EDA, hardware verification, and IP but did not break out the $35M between segments specifically.
How should we think about, like, just the structure of those contracts
Show response
Sassine outlined subscription-plus-consumption model for agentic engineers as upside to existing license base, with 20 customers currently evaluating across 25+ specialized AI agents.
Calendar 2025 Q3
are we to think about, you know, you looking at different business models in terms of royalty, and things of that nature similar to some of your competitors
Show response
CEO confirmed royalty discussions with customers specifically for subsystem delivery. In early phase but represents business model evolution from traditional NRE+use fee.
what's the right level of cash balance that you need, you know, day to day as we think about just the debt pay down and the pace
Show response
CFO stated cash well above minimum. Interest payments this year, principal paydown starting FY26 on term loans due in FY27-28. Additional cash expected from OSG/PowerArtist divestitures.
Calendar 2025 Q1
How should we think about just the growth trajectory there, the pipeline. And then in the context of I think your inventory increased a decent amount this quarter
Show response
CFO explained inventory build is for new HAPS 200/ZeBu 200 platforms with demand exceeding supply. Hardware year is Q4-weighted due to availability.
For the non-AI customers, have you seen like the rate of change over the past few quarters in terms of design activity
Show response
CEO detailed tape-out timeline compression for AI/HPC (18→12 months) vs consumer/auto seeing slower road map pace, providing granular design activity context.
AMATApplied Materials6 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I think the prior target had included the 200-millimeter business that's now moved into Systems
Show response
Brice confirmed 200mm business has been moved and financials recast. Clean AGS growth outlook is mid-teens with higher rate this year from utilization and new fab ramps.
I would assume given that the portfolio depth and just the number of new greenfield fab projects expanding into next year
Show response
Brice confirmed most tracked projects are greenfield where Applied has strongest intensity. NAND upgrades are the exception where they participate less.
Calendar 2025 Q4
what was the size of the advanced packaging business in fiscal '25? And how did that grow
Show response
Brice noted packaging roughly flat at about $1.5B in FY25 vs FY24 due to lower HBM burst capacity shipments. Gary reaffirmed on track to double to $3B+ over next few years with strong positions in HBM, hybrid bonding, and future packaging architectures.
Calendar 2025 Q3
as non-China ICAPS, have you started to see that business stabilize
Show response
Brice acknowledged lower ICAPS utilization but noted green shoots with pickup on the industrial side and rest-of-world investments in ICAPS increasing. Long-term ICAPS growth expected but timing of China digestion unknown.
Calendar 2025 Q1
if you could talk a little bit more about your expectations for DRAM growth
Show response
Brice confirmed continued strong DRAM momentum driven by HBM and advanced compute. Gary noted customers say it takes three times the wafers for HBM, supporting longer-term growth.
Calendar 2024 Q4
are you seeing customers look to add capacity for conventional DRAM? I just want to make sure I understand that comment
Show response
Brice confirmed overall DRAM capacity additions but couldn't split HBM vs conventional; noted 10% of DRAM wafers allocated to HBM with 30% growth rate.
MCHPMicrochip Technology5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
as you think about 2027, how should we think about just the potential for accelerating growth?
Show response
Steve quantified Data Center Solutions design wins rising from 6 to 14 (12 Gen 6 switch, 2 Gen 6 retimer) with many more in the works.
Calendar 2026 Q1
any sort of help on the growth of the megatrends in general in fiscal 2026?
Show response
Rich said megatrend revenue increased as a percentage of total but declined to break it out, citing data center, communications, ADAS, and networking growth.
Any sort of color you could provide on where those areas are that you are increasing capacity?
Show response
Steve clarified MCHP is not broadly adding capacity (CapEx ~$100M, mostly maintenance) but is adding targeted test capacity for data center Gen6, FPGA, and Ethernet.
Calendar 2025 Q3
is there any specific end markets that you can point to that you're seeing this kind of push, pull more than others
Show response
Steve said strong bookings are broad-based across segments but deliveries are being scheduled for March quarter. Eric noted they don't break out end markets quarterly, describing this as a broad-based phenomenon.
being at 3-nanometer, what's your kind of line of sight in terms of wafer availability as you look to ramp that in the second half of next year
Show response
Brian McCarson confirmed healthy long-term strategic relationship with TSMC for 3-nanometer supply and line of sight to capacity needed to support customer needs.
LRCXLam Research4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
I was wondering if you could talk a little bit about just your position for high band with flash
Show response
Tim said 3D scaling architectures expand Lam's SAM with conductor etch, dielectric etch, and ALD opportunities, though exact process flows are still being finalized.
if you could talk a little bit just about where your lead times sit today
Show response
Doug confirmed lead times are stretching with strong demand; second Malaysia factory coming online H2 2026, approximately same size as the first (largest in network).
Calendar 2025 Q4
Is there any area of your supply chain where you're pushing suppliers maybe that that could be a potential area of shortage?
Show response
Tim said no significant supply chain problems are visible, though the accelerated demand and customer pull-in requests require hard work across the global supply chain.
Calendar 2024 Q4
For the December quarter, the strength that you saw in NAND revenue, I just wanted to clarify, was there anything
Show response
Doug confirmed there was no indigenous Chinese NAND customer contribution to December quarter strength.
NXPINXP Semiconductors2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
what are the particulars that the customers are excited about
Show response
Rafael described TTTech Auto accelerating SDV architecture delivery with Sono systems by year-end plus MotionWise middleware. Kinara + i.MX creating physical AI platform with strong customer traction and expected design wins in 2026.
is there any color you can share just geographically on the demand you're seeing in the fourth quarter
Show response
Rafael highlighted Q4 auto within 1% of 2023 peak, Q1 guided up YoY with only 1 month of sensor revenue included. Sequential decline close to normal seasonality. No regional differences flagged.
TXNTexas Instruments2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
Just any update on just how to think about free cash flow per share for this year. Any change there?
Show response
Haviv said $8 FCF/share for 2026 is very probable with upside given 15-20% first-half growth. Referenced capital management framework showing $1B incremental revenue driving higher FCF/share tiers.
I was curious if you could maybe just help us understand, given the resegmentation of revenue, especially on the industrial side, what is normal seasonality now for the June quarter?
Show response
Mike noted Q2 and Q3 are typically stronger quarters. Haviv characterized the 8% sequential guide as slightly above seasonal, noting data center mix is changing seasonality patterns.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| KLAC KLA Corporation | 14 | 0%none of 14 questions |
| MPWR Monolithic Power Systems | 12 | 8%1 of 12 questions |
| ARM Arm Holdings | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions |
| ASML ASML Holding | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions |
| CDNS Cadence Design Systems | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| ON ON Semiconductor | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| SNPS Synopsys | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| AMAT Applied Materials | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| MCHP Microchip Technology | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| LRCX Lam Research | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
- KLACKLA Corporation · 14 questions0%none of 14 questions
- MPWRMonolithic Power Systems · 12 questions8%1 of 12 questions
- ARMArm Holdings · 9 questions0%none of 9 questions
- ASMLASML Holding · 9 questions0%none of 9 questions
- CDNSCadence Design Systems · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- ONON Semiconductor · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- SNPSSynopsys · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- AMATApplied Materials · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- MCHPMicrochip Technology · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- LRCXLam Research · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
Show all 12 companies
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2024 Q4 | 12 | 0%none of 12 questions | 8 |
| 2025 Q1 | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions | 7 |
| 2025 Q2 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q3 | 12 | 0%none of 12 questions | 8 |
| 2025 Q4 | 13 | 0%none of 13 questions | 8 |
| 2026 Q1 | 12 | 8%1 of 12 questions | 7 |
| 2026 Q2 | 14 | 0%none of 14 questions | 9 |
| 2026 Q3 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
- 2024 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2024 Q412 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 12 questions) · 8 companies
- 2025 Q111 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 11 questions) · 7 companies
- 2025 Q26 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q312 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 12 questions) · 8 companies
- 2025 Q413 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 13 questions) · 8 companies
- 2026 Q112 questions · challenge rate 8% (1 of 12 questions) · 7 companies
- 2026 Q214 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 14 questions) · 9 companies
- 2026 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand35
- Cloud & AI20
- Revenue Growth19
- Innovation & R&D15
- Margin11
- Supply Chain11
- Capex Investment10
- Competitive Dynamics9
- Product Launch8
- Pricing4
Show all 19 topics
- Guidance Reliability4
- Trade Tariffs4
- Macroeconomic3
- Capital Allocation3
- Geographic Expansion3
- M&A2
- Cost Pressure1
- Inventory1
- Regulation Policy1