Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Joe Quatrochi

Wells Fargo · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).

Questions
84on tracked calls
Challenge rate
1%1 of 84 questions
Companies
12questioned at least once
Reporting periods
9with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 84 of 84 questions from 12 companies

KLACKLA Corporation14 questions · 8 reporting periods · 0 of 14 challenging
KLAC company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I think last quarter you talked about Maybe Foundry Logic being in the low 60% of semi PC systems for 26.

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Updated the 2026 mix to low to mid-60s and flagged memory rising in the December quarter.

just wondering if you could talk about your lead times and how do we think about just the cadence of capacity that is

Supply ChainCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Gave specific lead-time ranges and noted customer conversations have moved to 2H27 deliveries on larger products.

Calendar 2026 Q1

I was wondering if you could maybe talk about your own lead times and just kind of thinking about your own supply chain

Supply ChainCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

CFO acknowledged first-half supply chain constraints from faster-than-expected ramp slope but said KLA is much better positioned for second-half and 2027, with tremendous focus on ensuring capacity.

is that a bigger driver for potential incremental like process control system sales for you? Or is it largely flowing through the service line?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

CEO confirmed yield-driven demand drives both process control sales and services, with Intel publicly increasing metrology usage and the whole industry squeezing yield from existing capacity.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Any way that you can kind of help us understand just what could growth has potentially kind of been first half or second half if you didn't have those supply constraints?

Supply ChainDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Bren identified optical components as the primary constraint rather than DRAM, with decisions made last summer affecting first-half shipments. Rick noted supply constraints are industry-wide, not KLA-specific, so no share loss risk.

it seems like maybe based on the guidance, March is is kind of the bottom and we move higher from here

Show response

Bren confirmed March as the likely margin trough, with improvement driven by mix, tariff burden diminishing through process optimization, and memory DRAM cost situation expected to be transitory. Pricing is value-oriented rather than cost-based.

Calendar 2025 Q3

I was curious just to think about just the advanced packaging process control intensity. I think just based on some of the things you put out there or talked about in the past, it's like high teens...

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Bren corrected the high-teens assumption, noting KLA's packaging share went from 1% to approaching 6% of the $11B market, with continued growth expected as density and process complexity increase.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Can you help us just understand like what's driving that?

Innovation & R&DDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Bren cited China merchant mask investment, requalification from high design mix, single-die reticle inspection growth, and broadband plasma Gen 5 print check adoption.

Do we just think about that as being maybe the peak to trough is less steep on a new node ramping?

DemandInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Rick explained the traditional ramp-then-run-off model is broken because multiple designs create compounding ramps, with some customers even back-porting more process control to prior nodes.

Calendar 2025 Q1

can you just help us like understand kind of what's giving you the confidence there to increase it?

Show response

Bren attributed margin improvement to favorable product mix from new platforms resetting cost of ownership, plus scale benefits in advanced packaging offsetting prior inflation pressures.

is cleaner in space of potential kind of gating factors as you look into '26?

Capex InvestmentSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Rick sees no clean room gating factors, with silicon at the leading edge being the governing factor and steady capacity growth expected over the next several years.

Calendar 2024 Q4

do we just take that, I guess, quarterly kind of run rate impact all in the March quarter and then grow from there?

Trade TariffsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Rick confirmed the services impact from China export controls is front-loaded in March quarter and then services grow from that new base.

can you talk about just the difference in HBM process control intensity, relative to conventional DRAM

DemandInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Rick explained HBM drives process control intensity up 100-150 basis points from the historical 9-10% range due to bigger die, less redundancy, and more complex logic circuitry.

Calendar 2024 Q3

Is there any color that you can really share there and how we think about sample rates to 3-nanometer?

Innovation & R&DDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Wallace detailed rising process-control intensity at 2nm -- more inspection points and higher sampling as process windows tighten.

MPWRMonolithic Power Systems12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 12 challenging
MPWR company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

give us an update on how you are thinking about automotive demand in the second half of this year?

DemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Reaffirmed the flat first half and second half ramp, added the mid teens year over year end market view, and stressed the breadth of the socket base.

I think last quarter, you talked about your plans to enter the RCD market. And starting to sample with customers?

Product LaunchRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Confirmed sampling with some revenue already, and Tony Balow set expectations directly by ruling it out as a 2026 model driver.

Calendar 2026 Q1

I think you talked about $150 of content like for humanoid back at the Analyst Day. Is that the right way to think about it? Or are those expanding opportunities

Innovation & R&DDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Michael described varied content across battery management, GPU power, sensors, actuators. Dollar content varies by application (chips vs modules). Declined to confirm specific content figure.

Wondering if you could just share any of the puts and takes on the guide. It seems like obviously very positive revenue acceleration in kind of not a ton of follow through on gross margin

ChallengingMarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Tony noted 4Q flat at 55.5% (low end), Q2 incrementally raised on better backlog visibility. H2 headwinds warrant caution. Michael noted module yield improvements are ongoing.

Calendar 2025 Q4

are you seeing anything related to just kind of, you know, memory prices increasing and just kind of maybe some pressure

Show response

Tony noted PC business expected down from strong 2025 due to selective margin participation. Memory impact too early to assess.

how much of that is related to, like, traditional server CPU demand that it seems like it is accelerating

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Tony noted both categories trending well but lines are blurry. Michael added they use the same power supply now, making separation difficult.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Embedded within the 4Q guide, is there any help you can kind of provide in just thinking about the end markets?

Show response

Bernie confirmed no fundamental change in positioning since Q2 call, suggesting previous enterprise data expectations still hold.

can you talk about what drove that and how you think about the revenue opportunity ramping there

Innovation & R&DProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Tony confirmed 2026 revenue ramp but not individually a needle mover. Called it the start of a wave of full solution design wins. Michael noted AI-assisted robotics is the catalyst.

Calendar 2025 Q1

how are you thinking about traditional server CPU demand this year?

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Michael highlighted server refresh cycles driving consistent growth. MPS expects to gain an even higher percentage of the server market next year.

just given like the abnormal seasonality, strength that you saw in 1Q, how do we think about that business kind of throughout the rest of this year?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Michael noted growth was evenly spread across DDR5, SSD, HDD, notebook, and desktop segments. Tony indicated no sharp Q2 falloff expected.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Wondering this, you know, what's driving that? Is that strength from are starting to see pull for AIPCs or is it channel refill?

Show response

Bernie attributed notebook strength to AI-related design wins but acknowledged the Q1 ramp was atypical and lacked definitive explanation.

are you still largely seeing those as being lateral power opportunities or those starting to move to more vertical solutions?

Innovation & R&DCloud & AITranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Tony declined to discuss architectural specifics, citing customer confidentiality. Michael noted customers explicitly don't want lateral vs vertical disclosed.

ARMArm Holdings9 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
ARM company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

how do we think about the gross margin structure relative to kind of what you were thinking about

Show response

Jason reiterated high 30% to low 40s percent for the first generation and said 50% is expected over the next couple of years as work is brought in-house.

can you give us a little bit more detail on just the confidence that's increased in terms of the upside

DemandSupply ChainTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Rene answered directly, citing improvement across wafers, substrates, test capacity and memory, with demand now north of $2 billion.

Calendar 2026 Q1

as we think about, I guess, like the royalty rate growth for 1Q and then just thinking about the full year, is there any help that you can provide

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Jason acknowledged mobile unit growth turned negative but expects data center demand to more than offset weakness. Automotive continues double-digit growth. Overall royalty outlook positive.

Calendar 2025 Q4

how do we think about the puts and takes of this royalty revenue growth and the risks that are associated with the potential like demand destruction that we're seeing

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Jason quantified that a 20% unit volume decline would impact smartphone royalties by only 2-4% because constraints hit low-end v8 devices while premium CSS/v9 is protected. Total royalty impact would be 1-2%, more than offset by cloud AI growth.

how you view Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares' role and the role of the CPU in AI and cloud data centers and just how does that change as we start to see more proliferation of AI agents

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Rene explained that agentic AI workloads are persistent, always-on, and power-constrained, making them ideal for CPUs. Hyperscalers are responding with higher core counts. Combined with power efficiency requirements, this creates a strong tailwind for Arm.

Calendar 2025 Q3

I noticed in the filing you announced your intention to acquire DreamBig Semiconductor

Show response

Rene explained DreamBig's Ethernet controller IP is critical for high-speed data center networking, broadening Arm's offering to end customers in scale-up and scale-out environments.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Any help in the context of like what that was last year?

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Rene explained the jump from ~18% to ~50% was driven by Grace Blackwell replacing x86 in AI data centers plus continued general-purpose compute gains from Graviton, Axion, and Cobalt.

Calendar 2025 Q1

just trying to understand not giving a fiscal '26 guide and just trying to understand the context there

MacroeconomicTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Jason explained partners are providing less visibility than normal due to tariff uncertainty, making any full-year range too wide to be helpful.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how should we think about the contribution to royalty revenue ramping as we enter fiscal '26

Revenue GrowthInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jason confirmed strong CSS momentum and first material CSS revenue quarter but deferred FY26 quantification to next quarter's guidance.

ASMLASML Holding9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
ASML company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

provide maybe just a little additional color on the capacity expansion that you need beyond the 30% you talked about

Capex InvestmentSupply ChainTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Christophe said opportunities are easier to enable in 2028 than near term but declined to give new 2027 or 2028 output numbers.

how to think about just the kind of trajectory of gross margin from here?

Show response

Roger said price increases are agreed with some 2027 effect and full impact from 2028, citing volume, mix and pricing as tailwinds and ramp costs and upgrades as swing factors.

Calendar 2026 Q2

is that the ceiling of what you think you can support and your supply chain can support next year

Supply ChainCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Roger said 85 tools reflects today's demand-supply balance and ASML would revisit and roll up its sleeves if customers request meaningfully more.

Calendar 2025 Q2

on the gross margin side, I think if you kind of look at the implied December quarter guide, any sort of help on just like what's kind of driving the -- I think gross margin will take a bit of a st...

Show response

Roger confirmed Q4 gross margin step-down reflects more High NA rev rec, lower upgrade contribution, and the absence of 1H one-off cost benefits.

I wanted to ask one on 2026, your commentary. I guess I wanted to try to better understand what has changed over the last 90 days just in your customer conversations.

DemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Christophe pointed to ongoing tariff uncertainty (incl. the H20 flip-flop), the 232 review, and customers waiting as long as possible before committing, leading ASML to become more cautious on 2026.

Calendar 2025 Q1

how many of the 3600 are still left that you prebuilt, I think, last year in inventory? Is there anything that we should think about like, in terms of the salability of those tools

MarginProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Roger said the remaining 3600 prebuilds will work down through 2025 and there are no concerns about the salability of the inventory.

Is there any interest in altering delivery schedules?

Trade TariffsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Christophe said tariff announcements have not shifted customer business conversations and Roger added that customer clean-room space, not inventory, is the real gating item, so opportunistic pull-ins are not even feasible for most customers.

Calendar 2024 Q4

the cost of High NA installs this past quarter was a bit lower than expected. As we look in the second half and you talked about gross margin maybe a little bit higher in the first half.

Show response

Roger treated the Q4 High NA cost favorability as a one-off, already embedded in the 51–53% 2025 gross-margin range, and reiterated 2H margin is expected to step down as High NA revenue recognition skews to the back half.

if customers are able to build capacity for AI, then you think you can hit the high end of your revenue guide? How do we think about that relative to your lead times?

Guidance ReliabilityCloud & AIDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Christophe said ASML is provisioning for upside in its supply plan and will decide whether to actually build the incremental tools as the AI capacity opportunity firms up through the year.

CDNSCadence Design Systems7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
CDNS company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

You talked about Agentic AI as being a long-term TAM expansion opportunity. Is there any quantification

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Devgan described the three-layer framework and 4 super agents but gave no TAM number; Wall added guidance assumes no step function.

Calendar 2026 Q1

How should we think about EDA's contribution to that or percent of that

Cloud & AICapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Devgan said there is real potential for 11% share to increase with agentic AI. Big customer CEOs want to invest in more automation and compute.

Calendar 2025 Q4

On the verification and emulation hardware cycle, any sort of help on just kind of where you think you are at in that cycle?

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Anirudh said every year is a record for hardware, expects trend to continue. Big customers buying almost annually. Current Z3 supports 1T transistor designs. Taking share across hardware, IP, EDA, 3D-IC, and first to market in agentic AI.

Calendar 2025 Q3

I was wondering if you could just maybe help us understand like the OpEx dynamics. I think 3Q is a bit better than expected, but 4Q is a bit worse than expected

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

John Wall attributed Q3 benefit to small restructure and healthy hardware gross margins. Q4 slightly higher due to new acquisition expenses. Overall year slightly ahead of expectations.

Calendar 2025 Q2

can you help us understand what would have RPO been had the restrictions not been in place exiting the quarter

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

John Wall said $50M revenue raise and $0.12 EPS raise driven by strength across all regions, not just China. Apples-to-apples vs prior guide since restrictions rescinded.

Calendar 2025 Q1

You mentioned that you were developing a full stack Agentic AI solution. I was wondering if you could talk about just the areas of the design workflow

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Anirudh prioritized verification (SimAI 5-20x improvement), digital implementation (Cerebrus), package/PCB design (Allegro X AI), and analog migration.

Calendar 2024 Q4

was there any change into the RPO balance from the export restrictions? And then two, I guess on that flat kind of expectation for 2025

Trade TariffsGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

John Wall confirmed no material RPO impact from China restrictions. Acknowledged hardware weakness in China drove 2024 decline. Anirudh noted strong design activity in Chinese EV companies.

ONON Semiconductor7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
ON company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

prioritizing data center demand over auto industrial in the quarter. Was that any sort of impact to revenue?

DemandSupply ChainTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Hassane acknowledged prioritizing AI data center pulled from auto and industrial short term, but said there was no real customer impact and supply catches up in H2.

Calendar 2025 Q4

your opportunity, you're talking about, you know, what that looks like per rack in 2030, which is a pretty significant increase

Cloud & AIProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

El-Khoury said increased content from more products mapping to rack opportunity. SiC JFET, vGaN, SPS, point-of-load all expanding addressable content. Investment over the last year capitalizing on AI opportunity.

Just curious if there's any targets that we should be thinking about for this year.

Capital AllocationMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Trent said FCF margin target is 25-30%, delivered 24% in 2025. Expects to expand FCF margin. Plan to return 100% of FCF to shareholders via $6B repurchase authorization.

Calendar 2025 Q3

I was wondering if you could talk about the rate of short lead time orders that you're seeing and how that compares in the third quarter

Show response

Trent said lead times extended to ~20 weeks from mid-teens. No significant change to short lead time orders. Order patterns continuing to improve giving confidence in stabilization.

any sort of color you could provide on your expectations for silicon carbide revenue growth this year?

Product LaunchRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

El-Khoury declined to provide SiC guidance but said it's tracking expectations. Gaining share with NIO new brand and broader China EV deployment through a leading Tier 1.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how you're thinking about the growth opportunity in 2025 with the potential acceleration from the JFETs business.

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

El-Khoury confirmed AI data center will continue growing in 2025 with designed-in platforms ramping. Treo will accelerate portfolio introductions.

are there any end markets or geographies in particular that we should think about as being more price-sensitive

Competitive DynamicsPricingTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

El-Khoury said non-core exits are product-driven, not region-driven. No local pricing practices by region.

Show 6 more companies
SNPSSynopsys7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
SNPS company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

is AI becoming a larger piece or in offsetting kind of the non-AI?

DemandCloud & AIMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Ghazi said non-AI design starts have stabilized over the last two quarters after a prior slowdown, while AI design starts continue to accelerate.

Calendar 2026 Q2

of the $35 million increase to the full year guide on the revenue outlook from business performance how much of that was related to EDA versus IP

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Sassine attributed broad strength to AI semiconductor demand across EDA, hardware verification, and IP but did not break out the $35M between segments specifically.

How should we think about, like, just the structure of those contracts

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Sassine outlined subscription-plus-consumption model for agentic engineers as upside to existing license base, with 20 customers currently evaluating across 25+ specialized AI agents.

Calendar 2025 Q3

are we to think about, you know, you looking at different business models in terms of royalty, and things of that nature similar to some of your competitors

Competitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CEO confirmed royalty discussions with customers specifically for subsystem delivery. In early phase but represents business model evolution from traditional NRE+use fee.

what's the right level of cash balance that you need, you know, day to day as we think about just the debt pay down and the pace

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CFO stated cash well above minimum. Interest payments this year, principal paydown starting FY26 on term loans due in FY27-28. Additional cash expected from OSG/PowerArtist divestitures.

Calendar 2025 Q1

How should we think about just the growth trajectory there, the pipeline. And then in the context of I think your inventory increased a decent amount this quarter

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CFO explained inventory build is for new HAPS 200/ZeBu 200 platforms with demand exceeding supply. Hardware year is Q4-weighted due to availability.

For the non-AI customers, have you seen like the rate of change over the past few quarters in terms of design activity

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CEO detailed tape-out timeline compression for AI/HPC (18→12 months) vs consumer/auto seeing slower road map pace, providing granular design activity context.

AMATApplied Materials6 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
AMAT company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I think the prior target had included the 200-millimeter business that's now moved into Systems

Show response

Brice confirmed 200mm business has been moved and financials recast. Clean AGS growth outlook is mid-teens with higher rate this year from utilization and new fab ramps.

I would assume given that the portfolio depth and just the number of new greenfield fab projects expanding into next year

Capex InvestmentCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Brice confirmed most tracked projects are greenfield where Applied has strongest intensity. NAND upgrades are the exception where they participate less.

Calendar 2025 Q4

what was the size of the advanced packaging business in fiscal '25? And how did that grow

Innovation & R&DRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Brice noted packaging roughly flat at about $1.5B in FY25 vs FY24 due to lower HBM burst capacity shipments. Gary reaffirmed on track to double to $3B+ over next few years with strong positions in HBM, hybrid bonding, and future packaging architectures.

Calendar 2025 Q3

as non-China ICAPS, have you started to see that business stabilize

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Brice acknowledged lower ICAPS utilization but noted green shoots with pickup on the industrial side and rest-of-world investments in ICAPS increasing. Long-term ICAPS growth expected but timing of China digestion unknown.

Calendar 2025 Q1

if you could talk a little bit more about your expectations for DRAM growth

Show response

Brice confirmed continued strong DRAM momentum driven by HBM and advanced compute. Gary noted customers say it takes three times the wafers for HBM, supporting longer-term growth.

Calendar 2024 Q4

are you seeing customers look to add capacity for conventional DRAM? I just want to make sure I understand that comment

DemandCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Brice confirmed overall DRAM capacity additions but couldn't split HBM vs conventional; noted 10% of DRAM wafers allocated to HBM with 30% growth rate.

MCHPMicrochip Technology5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
MCHP company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

as you think about 2027, how should we think about just the potential for accelerating growth?

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Steve quantified Data Center Solutions design wins rising from 6 to 14 (12 Gen 6 switch, 2 Gen 6 retimer) with many more in the works.

Calendar 2026 Q1

any sort of help on the growth of the megatrends in general in fiscal 2026?

Revenue GrowthCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Rich said megatrend revenue increased as a percentage of total but declined to break it out, citing data center, communications, ADAS, and networking growth.

Any sort of color you could provide on where those areas are that you are increasing capacity?

Show response

Steve clarified MCHP is not broadly adding capacity (CapEx ~$100M, mostly maintenance) but is adding targeted test capacity for data center Gen6, FPGA, and Ethernet.

Calendar 2025 Q3

is there any specific end markets that you can point to that you're seeing this kind of push, pull more than others

Show response

Steve said strong bookings are broad-based across segments but deliveries are being scheduled for March quarter. Eric noted they don't break out end markets quarterly, describing this as a broad-based phenomenon.

being at 3-nanometer, what's your kind of line of sight in terms of wafer availability as you look to ramp that in the second half of next year

Supply ChainCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Brian McCarson confirmed healthy long-term strategic relationship with TSMC for 3-nanometer supply and line of sight to capacity needed to support customer needs.

LRCXLam Research4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
LRCX company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

I was wondering if you could talk a little bit about just your position for high band with flash

Innovation & R&DDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Tim said 3D scaling architectures expand Lam's SAM with conductor etch, dielectric etch, and ALD opportunities, though exact process flows are still being finalized.

if you could talk a little bit just about where your lead times sit today

Supply ChainCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Doug confirmed lead times are stretching with strong demand; second Malaysia factory coming online H2 2026, approximately same size as the first (largest in network).

Calendar 2025 Q4

Is there any area of your supply chain where you're pushing suppliers maybe that that could be a potential area of shortage?

Supply ChainDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Tim said no significant supply chain problems are visible, though the accelerated demand and customer pull-in requests require hard work across the global supply chain.

Calendar 2024 Q4

For the December quarter, the strength that you saw in NAND revenue, I just wanted to clarify, was there anything

Revenue GrowthRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Doug confirmed there was no indigenous Chinese NAND customer contribution to December quarter strength.

NXPINXP Semiconductors2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
NXPI company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

what are the particulars that the customers are excited about

M&AInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Rafael described TTTech Auto accelerating SDV architecture delivery with Sono systems by year-end plus MotionWise middleware. Kinara + i.MX creating physical AI platform with strong customer traction and expected design wins in 2026.

is there any color you can share just geographically on the demand you're seeing in the fourth quarter

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Rafael highlighted Q4 auto within 1% of 2023 peak, Q1 guided up YoY with only 1 month of sensor revenue included. Sequential decline close to normal seasonality. No regional differences flagged.

TXNTexas Instruments2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
TXN company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

Just any update on just how to think about free cash flow per share for this year. Any change there?

Capital AllocationMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Haviv said $8 FCF/share for 2026 is very probable with upside given 15-20% first-half growth. Referenced capital management framework showing $1B incremental revenue driving higher FCF/share tiers.

I was curious if you could maybe just help us understand, given the resegmentation of revenue, especially on the industrial side, what is normal seasonality now for the June quarter?

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Mike noted Q2 and Q3 are typically stronger quarters. Haviv characterized the 8% sequential guide as slightly above seasonal, noting data center mix is changing seasonality patterns.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
KLAC KLA Corporation140%none of 14 questions
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems128%1 of 12 questions
ARM Arm Holdings90%none of 9 questions
ASML ASML Holding90%none of 9 questions
CDNS Cadence Design Systems70%none of 7 questions
ON ON Semiconductor70%none of 7 questions
SNPS Synopsys70%none of 7 questions
AMAT Applied Materials60%none of 6 questions
MCHP Microchip Technology50%none of 5 questions
LRCX Lam Research40%none of 4 questions
  • KLAC
    KLA Corporation · 14 questions
    0%none of 14 questions
  • MPWR
    Monolithic Power Systems · 12 questions
    8%1 of 12 questions
  • ARM
    Arm Holdings · 9 questions
    0%none of 9 questions
  • ASML
    ASML Holding · 9 questions
    0%none of 9 questions
  • CDNS
    Cadence Design Systems · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • ON
    ON Semiconductor · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • SNPS
    Synopsys · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • AMAT
    Applied Materials · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • MCHP
    Microchip Technology · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • LRCX
    Lam Research · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
Show all 12 companies
CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
NXPI NXP Semiconductors2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
TXN Texas Instruments2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • NXPI
    NXP Semiconductors · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • TXN
    Texas Instruments · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q310%none of 1 question1
2024 Q4120%none of 12 questions8
2025 Q1110%none of 11 questions7
2025 Q260%none of 6 questions4
2025 Q3120%none of 12 questions8
2025 Q4130%none of 13 questions8
2026 Q1128%1 of 12 questions7
2026 Q2140%none of 14 questions9
2026 Q330%none of 3 questions2
  1. 2024 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2024 Q412 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 12 questions) · 8 companies
  3. 2025 Q111 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 11 questions) · 7 companies
  4. 2025 Q26 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
  5. 2025 Q312 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 12 questions) · 8 companies
  6. 2025 Q413 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 13 questions) · 8 companies
  7. 2026 Q112 questions · challenge rate 8% (1 of 12 questions) · 7 companies
  8. 2026 Q214 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 14 questions) · 9 companies
  9. 2026 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand35
  • Cloud & AI20
  • Revenue Growth19
  • Innovation & R&D15
  • Margin11
  • Supply Chain11
  • Capex Investment10
  • Competitive Dynamics9
  • Product Launch8
  • Pricing4
Show all 19 topics
  • Guidance Reliability4
  • Trade Tariffs4
  • Macroeconomic3
  • Capital Allocation3
  • Geographic Expansion3
  • M&A2
  • Cost Pressure1
  • Inventory1
  • Regulation Policy1