Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
John DiFucci
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).
- Questions
- 35on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 11%4 of 35 questions
- Companies
- 9questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 9with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 35 of 35 questions from 9 companies
AKAMAkamai Technologies11 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
let's say, a year deal, or whatever it is, when is it that you achieved that profit?
Show response
McGowan said colocation costs come ahead of revenue but accounting straight-lines both; ramp to full profitability is roughly a quarter, up to 5-6 months on the long end.
Calendar 2026 Q1
are you accountable for, for example, higher memory costs if those rise in the future?
Show response
Ed said supply chain is secured with all goods expected within twelve months, majority in 2026. Contracts include mechanisms for price changes. Revenue model is set capacity with no usage component, straight committed deal over seven years. Revenue starts as capacity ramps, with partial year in 2026 and 2027, then full run rate for remaining six-plus years. Effectively looks like a subscription despite being consumption-related technology.
OpenAI confirmed they shut down their AI video generation system, Sora. Do you expect that to have any effect on your delivery or compute business forecast?
Show response
Tom said OpenAI has never been an Akamai customer. The partnership with OpenAI is limited to security vulnerabilities, helping define them and protecting customers from associated attacks. No impact on delivery or compute forecast.
Calendar 2025 Q4
with this deal, have you started recognizing revenue yet from that customer?
Show response
Ed clarified the social networking consolidation deal is a different customer from the $200M AI deal. The $200M deal will be fairly even revenue, starting Q4 2026 as GPUs are deployed and customer testing begins. The prior $100M deal from last year started generating some revenue in Q4 2025 and will ramp throughout 2026. Some seasonal variation in compute tied to sports seasons but no major lumpiness.
How much of that fourth quarter restructuring charge of $55 million, was any of that in cash for this quarter?
Show response
Ed said weaker cash flow was a timing issue from cash receipts, payments, and large year-end tax payments. For the $55M restructuring, a little over half was intangible asset impairments with no cash impact. Severance (less than half) will be paid out in Q1 2026.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you just walk us through how you're thinking about the hiring of additional reps for the remainder of this year?
Show response
Tom said transformation will be largely done by beginning of next year. Continued hiring through at least first half of next year for increased hunting capacity in security and compute.
Calendar 2025 Q2
do you think you're seeing an incremental benefit from the exit of some of your CDN peers in recent years
Show response
Tom confirmed four major competitors gone since pre-pandemic. Better pricing environment, improved traffic trends. Looking at mid-single-digit decline going forward with long-term goal of stable delivery revenue.
Calendar 2025 Q1
are you taking steps to really ramp that up to drive growth with new channel partners?
Show response
Tom listed new channel partners: Presidio, WWT, Optiv, GuidePoint, DefenseX, IBM, Deloitte, Macnica, OCD, Accenture, Carso. Ed added 80-90% of new logo acquisition comes through channel, over half of security business is channel-driven.
is this an opportunity to -- through those new channel partners to also sell like your -- the slower-growing parts of security
Show response
Tom confirmed new customer sales often lead with Guardicore or API security but the whole security platform can then be included and grown. Partners are effective at cross-selling the full portfolio.
Calendar 2024 Q4
the guidance for next year implies 3% growth. And I think there's a 1% of FX headwind, so that's about 4%
Show response
Ed broke down the path: delivery drag moderating, security maintaining 10% growth from newer products, compute reaccelerating to 20% CAGR led by cloud infrastructure.
Is it as simple as you're utilizing underutilized assets across your network? Or is there something more to it
Show response
Tom cited three advantages: efficient data movement/lower egress, distributed platform for performance, and managed containers in 700+ cities. Ed added four synergies: backbone, operations, engineering, and go-to-market.
ORCLOracle Corporation9 questions · 8 reporting periods · 2 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
how should we think about gross margins going forward in addition to operating margins, that whole ecosystem?
Show response
Hillary framed operating margin as the North Star and said gross margin should flatten as the ramp finishes, but deferred specific guidance to the October investor day.
Calendar 2026 Q2
this is a second question I get a ton of questions on. You have long term targets out there.
Show response
Hillary gave a full reconfirmation of the long-term CAGR targets, citing the building RPO as support.
You spent a little bit more this quarter on CapEx than we expected.
Show response
Clayton attributed the CapEx increase to timing, not component prices, and described pass-through cost mechanisms that protect Oracle's margins when prices rise.
Calendar 2026 Q1
can you talk about what seems to be an underlying momentum building in these businesses? Am I right to be thinking of this
Show response
Mike confirmed halo effect across apps (AI embedded), OCI budget creation for customers, and Sovereign AI pipeline. Doug deferred FY27 CapEx specifics but highlighted decoupling of CapEx from Oracle capital requirements.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Mike, you said applications are gonna accelerate this year. Why the confidence in this business when all your large SaaS peers are seeing just the opposite
Show response
Mike argued Oracle's complete suite strategy (back-office, industry, front-office) with baked-in AI differentiates against best-of-breed competitors. Deferred revenue up 14% vs 11% in-quarter growth supports acceleration thesis.
Calendar 2025 Q3
can you talk about what else, a little more detail about what else is driving these pretty amazing forecasts
Show response
Larry emphasized inferencing demand as much larger than training, with unprecedented calls for any available capacity worldwide. Also highlighted non-AI growth from companies like TIMU.
Calendar 2025 Q2
is Stargate part of the more than 70% growth you expect in IaaS in fiscal 2026
Show response
Safra clarified Stargate is still forming and existing OpenAI business is relatively small. Larry added that if Stargate materializes as advertised, RPO growth is understated.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Those 40, I guess, does that get you there for that? And when -- like when do those 40s get deployed?
Show response
Safra explained hyperscaler partners are highly motivated to deploy quickly but timing is not fully in Oracle's control. Larry said primary/backup coverage in key regions within ~12 months.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Can you give us an update on the progress of that, especially given the massive growth you're seeing?
Show response
Safra confirmed OCI gross margins continue to improve but did not provide a specific updated number. Attributed improvement to software-driven automation and operational leverage as a core software company.
WDAYWorkday, Inc.5 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
when do you think you will get to the point where you can say, we have arrived as an AI platform?
Show response
Aneel said Workday is arriving now via hard, deeply embedded agents; Gerrit and Gabe framed it as a continuous, long-term loop of adoption and ROI.
Calendar 2026 Q2
is it possible to do that while leveraging the leadership presence you have built since the last paradigm shift
Show response
Garrett cited the Travel Agent and Sana for ITSM as examples of AI enabling Workday to expand beyond traditional HR and finance. Aneel added that AI resets competitive boundaries and Workday can make bets in new markets leveraging its robust data model.
Calendar 2026 Q1
your guide implies a $25 million sequential decline in subscription in 1Q, which doesn't really seem to make sense for a subscription model
Show response
Zane explained Q1 sequential decline from DIA contract not continuing, fewer days in Q1, and some Q4 deal pushes. Gross retention remains at 97%. Guidance philosophy unchanged. Pushed back on analyst's suggestion of additional conservatism.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Is Global Payroll Connect, is that part of what's happening to? Are you seeing any benefit from that yet, or is that just still too early
Show response
David confirmed 150 deals and 22+ partners since October launch, with a strong pipeline of additional partners looking to build on GPC.
are we now at a point where the numbers are doable? And if, when things improve, meaning things you don't have control over
Show response
Carl confirmed AI selling (30%+ attach), full suite (30%+ new wins, 50%+ in focus industries), and partner sourcing (15%+ of ACV) are all paying off. Record partner impact and create-and-close momentum.
ARMArm Holdings3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
how does AI affect your business other than driving demand? In other words, how should we think of how you'll leverage AI? In the design of chips and systems
Show response
Rene emphasized that AI cannot replace physical chips and that enterprise AI adoption is still in very early stages. Cited Google's $180 billion CapEx as evidence of unprecedented demand. Called AI the 'final frontier' in productivity transformation and expressed strong long-term excitement.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how does that change your view on Arm's opportunity as it pertains to AI, if at all?
Show response
Rene argued lower inference costs expand compute demand into power-constrained endpoints where Arm dominates. Noted no hyperscaler is pulling back on AI spend.
Calendar 2024 Q3
shouldn't we expect to continue to see that v9 mix grow? And if not, what would cause it not to grow?
Show response
Rene guaranteed v9 mix will be considerably higher than 25% a year out, driven by PCs, the flagship-to-midrange waterfall, and all-v9 data center; the flat quarter was a mid-market growth mix effect.
CRWDCrowdStrike2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
where are we In the actual adoption of AI in the enterprise? Are enterprises still trying to figure out
Show response
George said it is still early innings, deepest among developers, with security adoption front-run by AI adoption and not yet enterprise-wide.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you explain to us what's making this coupling diverge?
Show response
Burt explained the temporary ARR-revenue divergence: CCPs with extended time hit ARR immediately but revenue impact lags, creating a short-term decoupling.
PANWPalo Alto Networks2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 1 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
is it really the core PAM from CyberArk? Are you seeing any machine identity actually taking hold yet?
Show response
Nikesh detailed a measured integration: protect the top line, take out overlap for margin, then deliver new product capability.
Calendar 2026 Q1
when are we going to see it? Because it doesn't show up in the number
Show response
Nikesh drew cloud security analogy where numbers lagged 2-3 years. Prisma AIRS following XSIAM trajectory but volume not yet there. Urged patience given $600 billion data center build-out still underway.
Show 3 more companies
CRMSalesforce, Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
How stable or sticky is that foundation of your recurring revenue?
Show response
Benioff added a third leg to the low-attrition and high net new AOV story: new AI-driven value added. Milano said the whole company was aligned this fiscal year on net new AOV outpacing AOV, pipeline is at record levels, and organic revenue re-acceleration in Q3 is already math, with Q4 nearly so. Washington cited durable seat growth in sales and service as a proof point.
SNOWSnowflake Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
But I'm more curious about that core market. There's still a huge part of this market that's still on-premise.
Show response
Sridhar affirmed a strong, sustainable core with a large on-prem migration opportunity, requiring innovation on both fronts.
ZSZscaler1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
that's going to affect 3% of your employees. Can you give more color around this
Show response
Jay framed the reduction as a reallocation of resources toward areas with better leverage and AI investments, while adding to specialty take-up teams and account executives, especially in the thinner-covered lower end of the enterprise. Kevin quantified the restructuring at about 3% of employees and $30-33 million in charges, and said Mike Rich is adding dedicated new-logo hunters against a target base of about 4,600 of 20,000 companies.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| AKAM Akamai Technologies | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 9 | 22%2 of 9 questions |
| WDAY Workday, Inc. | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions |
| ARM Arm Holdings | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| CRWD CrowdStrike | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| PANW Palo Alto Networks | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| ZS Zscaler | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- AKAMAkamai Technologies · 11 questions0%none of 11 questions
- ORCLOracle Corporation · 9 questions22%2 of 9 questions
- WDAYWorkday, Inc. · 5 questions20%1 of 5 questions
- ARMArm Holdings · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- CRWDCrowdStrike · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- PANWPalo Alto Networks · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- CRMSalesforce, Inc. · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- SNOWSnowflake Inc. · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- ZSZscaler · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2024 Q4 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q1 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q2 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q3 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q4 | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q1 | 5 | 40%2 of 5 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q2 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q3 | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions | 4 |
- 2024 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2024 Q45 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q15 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q44 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q15 questions · challenge rate 40% (2 of 5 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q26 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q34 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 4 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Cloud & AI16
- Revenue Growth14
- Competitive Dynamics10
- Demand7
- Guidance Reliability6
- Margin5
- Innovation & R&D3
- Capex Investment3
- Cost Pressure3
- Supply Chain1
Show all 15 topics
- Labor Market1
- M&A1
- Product Launch1
- Geographic Expansion1
- Pricing1