Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Jon Petersen

Jefferies · covers Real Estate

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2025 Q2 – 2026 Q2 (5 quarters).

Limited coverage. Only 9 questions of coverage. Treat these numbers as directional — sample too small for reliable averages.
Questions
9on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 9 questionsLimited sample
Companies
4questioned at least once
Reporting periods
5with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 9 of 9 questions from 4 companies

DLRDigital Realty5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
DLR company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

can you help us out on timing of how quickly you could potentially sign a lease and deliver capacity there

Geographic ExpansionCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Wright said the Kansas City ramp starts in 2028 across over 1,400 acres toward over 2 gigawatts, calling it analogous to Charlotte and likely the seventh largest data center market in the U.S.

Calendar 2026 Q1

can you talk through what the operating expense line items are that are maybe pulling down organic growth

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Mercier attributed the 2.5% CC same-store growth to a low prior-year R&M and labor comp, expecting acceleration through remaining quarters to hit 4-5% full-year guidance.

Calendar 2025 Q4

talk about the decision-making when you enter a new market on going with more, like, interconnection-focused colo

Geographic ExpansionCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Wright detailed acquisitions of most highly connected assets in Malaysia, Portugal, and Israel, alongside US land parcels in Charlotte, LA, and other tier-one markets.

Calendar 2025 Q3

are you starting to see examples of any latency-sensitive hyperscaler AI applications coming to DLR markets

Show response

Power highlighted 7 consecutive quarters with a different top signing customer; McLean confirmed largest pipeline on record with active conversations for 2026-2027 deliveries.

Calendar 2025 Q2

What do you think is driving the inflection in growth in the 0-1 megawatt category?

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Power attributed success to years of investment in global platform, go-to-market revamp, and growing market with share gains; McLean cited strong 300-600KW and 600KW+ enterprise participation.

PLDPrologis2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
PLD company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I just want to make sure I understand the development start guidance correctly. So you increased it by about $1 billion

Guidance ReliabilityCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Letter confirmed the guidance uplift comes from logistics; Caton added the build-to-suit pipeline is up about 10%, 12% quarter-over-quarter.

Calendar 2025 Q3

you said you're exploring additional capitalization strategies. Can you talk more about what that might look like

Cloud & AICapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Letter laid out data center business status with experienced dedicated team built from industry continuing into 2026. Operational synergies between core business and data center team including procurement platform and distributed energy. Pipeline significant with 1.4 gigawatts secured or under construction and 3.8 gigawatts in advanced stages. Continuing build-to-suit strategy with hyperscalers. Active discussions and lease dialogue across entire pipeline. Land bank of 14,000 acres and 6,000 buildings positioned for current AI demand wave and next inference wave. Arndt added balance sheet capable of taking out large volume with almost $2 billion under construction.

DOCHealthpeak Properties1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
DOC company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

I'm just curious for an update on how you're thinking about that portfolio as a long-term hold on your balance sheet

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Brinker said compounded NOI growth of ~9% including the downturn. LCS doing incredible job as operator. Portfolio needs capital investment but will hold for foreseeable future.

EQIXEquinix1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
EQIX company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

Can you give us just some more details on if any 1 or 2 of those sites are particularly larger than the others

Capex InvestmentGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Adaire confirmed London and Chicago lands skewing xScale (to be contributed to JV), with Amsterdam also significant. Noted megawatt split between retail and xScale is somewhat fungible across the product continuum.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
DLR Digital Realty50%none of 5 questions
PLD Prologis2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
DOC Healthpeak Properties1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
EQIX Equinix1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • DLR
    Digital Realty · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • PLD
    Prologis · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • DOC
    Healthpeak Properties · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • EQIX
    Equinix · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2025 Q210%none of 1 question1
2025 Q340%none of 4 questions4
2025 Q410%none of 1 question1
2026 Q110%none of 1 question1
2026 Q220%none of 2 questions2
  1. 2025 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 4 companies
  3. 2025 Q41 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  4. 2026 Q11 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  5. 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Geographic Expansion3
  • Capex Investment3
  • Competitive Dynamics2
  • Cloud & AI2
  • Demand2
  • Capital Allocation2
  • Guidance Reliability1
  • Margin1
  • Cost Pressure1