Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Jordan Alliger
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 39on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 3%1 of 39 questions
- Companies
- 7questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 39 of 39 questions from 7 companies
ODFLOld Dominion Freight Line8 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
let us know if that would be off of the reported OR, or any adjustments related to that net property gain?
Show response
Confirmed the third quarter framework is normalized for the property gain and quantified it at 150 to 200 basis points off the 70.1% base.
Calendar 2026 Q1
have you seen then a shift in sort of that excess terminal capacity? Has it come in a little bit as we've seen volumes look a little better?
Show response
Adam confirmed excess capacity still above 35% but framed it as opportunity for operating leverage as sequential volumes improve.
sort of in the context of some of those trends you've been seeing maybe continue on the trend thought and share some color or thoughts on direction of OR
Show response
Adam directly guided to 300-350bps OR improvement Q1 to Q2, consistent with 10-year average, noting it would be fourth straight quarter meeting or beating normal sequential change.
Calendar 2025 Q4
can you provide some sort of thoughts and perspective on both, any indication on demand and what you're seeing and hearing from customers and thoughts around possible better tone to volume as we mo...
Show response
Adam highlighted weight per shipment as key recovery indicator: rose from ~1,450 lbs in Sep/Oct to 1,489 in November and 1,520 in December, both above seasonal norms. January at 1,492 lbs in line with seasonality. ISM turning positive viewed as encouraging.
Calendar 2025 Q3
your perspective thinking ahead over the next year or so on inflection timing, what could drive it?
Show response
Adam noted tax bill and interest rate cuts as positives but trade clarity still needed. Expects spring 2026 as earliest realistic inflection. Year-over-year declines may continue through Q1 2026.
Calendar 2025 Q2
given the easy comps, I think, that are coming up, both in terms of tonnage per day and revenue per day
Show response
Adam framed Q3 revenue range: down ~4% at flat per day, down ~1.5% at full seasonality. July outperforming normal sequential trend (down 2% vs usual 3% decline from June).
Calendar 2025 Q1
is a way to think about seasonality as we go from first quarter to second quarter and then just sort of maybe involved with that
Show response
Adam guided ~100bp OR improvement Q1-to-Q2 if revenue per day stays flat with April trend, implying about $1.4B Q2 revenue. Normal 300-350bp improvement requires ~8% revenue growth.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how you're thinking about 4Q to 1Q seasonality on OR?
Show response
Adam gave specific OR guidance: flat to up 50bp vs normal 100-150bp sequential increase, helped by insurance normalization.
FDXFedEx7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I am just curious if how much of that was sort of tied to macro stuff versus the verticals you are targeting.
Show response
Carere credited profitable market share across all four key verticals plus AI/data center wins from APAC, noting some inventory restocking too.
Calendar 2026 Q1
the ground commercial business, which I think has been up 1% or so for the last couple of quarters. Presumably, there's
Show response
Carere identified ground commercial growth drivers: automotive vertical, weekend coverage expansion for commercial use, data center parcel demand, and continued SMB market share opportunity. Field sales team increasingly focused on ground commercial products.
Calendar 2025 Q4
The $19 are at the high end. Is there a way you could frame up you know, what would push it
Show response
Dietrich declined to specify single drivers, noting stronger revenue and better cost environment would push toward the top. Comfortable with assumptions and focused on maximizing within the range.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is it simply a function of where it comes out in that revenue range? Or is there other things that could help impact where it winds up sitting
Show response
Dietrich clarified the EPS range depends on multiple variables including global trade evolution, industrial economy health, U.S. domestic demand, and B2B vertical traction, not simply revenue level.
Calendar 2025 Q2
do you expect to see an emergence of a China plus one and even a plus two strategy from a logistics perspective
Show response
Subramaniam highlighted growth from Vietnam, Asia to Europe, Latin America inbound, and India. FedEx's global scale means minimal network changes needed. Carere noted continuation of post-COVID regionalization trend.
Calendar 2025 Q1
where do you think what should LTL margins look like sort of more in the medium and long-term
Show response
Subramaniam expressed confidence in margin expansion potential but did not provide specific targets, noting 90% of LTL revenue is B2B-linked and positioned for recovery when industrial economy turns.
Calendar 2024 Q4
give a little more color around the Network 2.0 rollout, the progression that's planned from here
Show response
Raj provided specifics on 200 stations optimized, 130 in Canada, 10% P&D cost reduction in fully rolled out markets, and targeting 250 by end of FY25.
UPSUnited Parcel Service7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
can you maybe go into a little bit more on your confidence level around the structural change on domestic margin?
Show response
Tome gave the automation percentage and cost-per-piece delta; Dykes added a 50 to 100 bps RPP-CPP spread as the forward margin algorithm.
Calendar 2026 Q1
can we push back into a high teens margin level what will it take to get that margin uplift again
Show response
Carol said APAC margin down 500bps is temporary from tariff impacts. Trade lanes normalizing as tariffs adjust. Also investing in premium European commercial volume and moving away from low-margin e-commerce.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you maybe talk a little bit more about what underpins, I think you said, mid-single-digit type of package growth in the second half.
Show response
Carol cited stabilizing small package market, improving manufacturing outlook, and favorable year-over-year comparisons from exiting Amazon and Chinese e-commerce volume. Brian highlighted healthcare and automotive wins showing up in network. Carol detailed RFID SmartPackage initiative: all U.S. package cars RFID-enabled, 5,500 UPS stores processing 1.3M packages daily with RFID labeling, Q4 domestic business wins 25% higher than prior year.
Calendar 2025 Q3
when we sort of lap Liberation Day next year, could we get back to more normal sort of trajectories or patterns? Or is it permanent shifts?
Show response
Brian acknowledged some permanent trade lane shifts until new equilibrium settles. Kate highlighted 16 of top 20 non-U.S. export lanes growing, with strong Asia-to-Asia and Asia-to-Europe flows. International SMBs growing 9% in many regions.
Calendar 2025 Q2
is it possible if the consumer stays resilient that your peak season surge as people need faster air could actually give some tailwind
Show response
Carol confirmed air-freight tailwind scenario is possible but peak plans not yet submitted. Better visibility expected by end of Q3.
Calendar 2025 Q1
any updates on sort of your secular viewpoint for domestic and international volume growth, sort of factoring out Amazon
Show response
Carol cited U.S. small package market at low single-digit growth, international TAM of $99 billion growing mid-single digits, healthcare at $18 billion growing high single digits.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you touch a little bit, is this -- some of this bringing SurePost in house, designed in part at least to replace or infill some of the Amazon business
Show response
Carol confirmed SurePost insourcing was driven by USPS service deterioration and cost increases, not Amazon backfill. Nando added multi-day matching capability smooths dispatch.
JBHTJ.B. Hunt6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I think you had mentioned the shape of the peak could look similar
Show response
Brad Hicks pointed to a record dedicated pipeline and long sales cycle without a specific EBIT number; Spencer said peak shape mirrors 2025.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how you are thinking about that profit profile for brokerage as you think ahead given the puts and takes with purchased transportation versus selling price
Show response
Nick Hobbs said ICS volume up 10% against a market down 3-5%, with direct expense down 1%. Platform, technology, and people leveraging well. Customer retention strong with excellent brand reputation for operational excellence.
Calendar 2025 Q3
is there any way you could sort of put that together a little bit and think through sort of loads and volumes for you guys relative to what we just saw in the third quarter
Show response
Spencer distinguished ocean peak (already passed) from inland peak (holiday-driven, on schedule). Noted last year's comps were artificially inflated by East Coast strike concerns driving 20% higher West Coast port volumes. Expects tough comps through March 2026.
Calendar 2025 Q2
can you maybe drill down a little bit deeper on how you think peak seasonal develop? Can you get positive volume growth
Show response
Spencer described highly varied customer expectations for peak: some expect similar size, others extended or uneven. Implemented early surcharge programs to be prepared for any scenario.
Calendar 2025 Q1
over the next 90 days with this pause, there'll be actually a step up in pull forward and if so, what could that mean for the back half of this year
Show response
Darren Field said direct customer feedback on pull-forward remains limited, though some Mexico pull-forward occurred. Spencer noted customers are finding efficiencies through highway-to-intermodal conversion.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I'm assuming the bulk of the dollar drop off sequentially 4Q to 1Q, is going to come in Intermodal
Show response
Brad Delco declined to break down the sequential decline by segment. Reiterated that pricing for H1 2025 is already set and bid season work will be reflected in Q3 exit rate.
CSXCSX Corporation4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
can you maybe talk a little bit more about the double stack opportunity, perhaps sort of update if anything on the sizing
Show response
Mary Claire outlined three Howard Street opportunities: new Southeast-to-Northeast lanes, improved Chicago-Baltimore service, and efficient West Coast double-stack through to Baltimore. Noted it typically takes a couple bid cycles to fully ramp.
Calendar 2025 Q3
any read from folks you might be speaking to externally in terms of giving you thoughts on what you know, what might be good from a competitive standpoint
Show response
Steve effectively deflected by saying he has not had competitive positioning discussions with customers in his brief tenure, offering no further detail on the merger implications.
Calendar 2025 Q1
are you actually hearing that maybe there's some thought about accelerating decisions to go ahead
Show response
Kevin said potential upside comes from existing projects ramping faster if demand supports it. Metal production timing from tariffs could be very favorable but rules need to be set for real acceleration.
Calendar 2024 Q4
what gets it to the upper-end of that mid to high-single-digit? Is it more of a volume issue? Is it a productivity issue
Show response
Sean identified cost efficiency initiatives, PS&O discipline, and volume upside from trucking cycle turn and industrial development ramp as key levers to reach the upper end of guidance range.
UNPUnion Pacific Corporation4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
is there a way you could maybe give some thoughts at least on how you're thinking about revenue per carload
Show response
Vena pointed to a 58% operating ratio ex-noise; Rocker said pricing follows the service value proposition.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I was just curious if you could dig a little more in on the $2 billion of targeted net revenue gains from the expected merger
Show response
Jim emphasized the 2M carload growth target is conservative, translating to roughly 38,000 weekly carloads or about 10-15 additional daily trains on a network running 2,000+ movements. Eric noted this represents only a 6% increase in combined operating inventory with ample buffer capacity.
Calendar 2025 Q2
do you actually pre-discuss or engage in like premerger chats with the Surface Transportation Board around this
Show response
Jim declined to discuss any STB engagement, reiterating that the press release contained all information they would share.
Calendar 2024 Q4
if volumes are perhaps down, can that provide a favorable net positive in terms of mix, margin, EBIT dollars
Show response
Jennifer cautioned against focusing on one commodity line, while Jim expressed bullishness on domestic intermodal but declined to forecast H2 offsets.
Show 1 more company
NSCNorfolk Southern Railway3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
the intermodal service composite has been sort of like 85%, which is off from the high of low 90s
Show response
John said he's never pleased with any metric but is encouraged by sequential improvement over last year. Ed added they are laser-focused on high-potential lanes to deliver exceptional service product.
Calendar 2025 Q3
thinking through sort of like total yields or revenue per carload as we look ahead to the fourth quarter, maybe talk about some of the puts and takes overall
Show response
CMO confirmed pricing plan intact and ahead of inflation. Mix headwinds from coal RPU pressure, NGLs, sand, and scrap diluting merchandise RPU. Automotive volume expected to decline from key supplier disruption. More utility coal but less export coal volume expected.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I think a week or so ago, you put out a release talking about industrial development across your network
Show response
CEO highlighted eight new locations and four facility expansions in Q4 with robust 2025 pipeline, representing long-term growth from industrial development that manifests throughout the year.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| ODFL Old Dominion Freight Line | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| FDX FedEx | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| UPS United Parcel Service | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| JBHT J.B. Hunt | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| CSX CSX Corporation | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| UNP Union Pacific Corporation | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| NSC Norfolk Southern Railway | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions |
- ODFLOld Dominion Freight Line · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- FDXFedEx · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- UPSUnited Parcel Service · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- JBHTJ.B. Hunt · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- CSXCSX Corporation · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- UNPUnion Pacific Corporation · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- NSCNorfolk Southern Railway · 3 questions33%1 of 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 7 |
| 2025 Q1 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q2 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q3 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q4 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q2 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 5 |
- 2024 Q47 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 7 companies
- 2025 Q15 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q25 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q36 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q45 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q16 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q25 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 5 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand20
- Margin13
- Macroeconomic7
- Revenue Growth7
- Trade Tariffs5
- Competitive Dynamics4
- Guidance Reliability4
- Capex Investment4
- Pricing3
- Supply Chain3
Show all 15 topics
- M&A3
- Cost Pressure2
- Geographic Expansion1
- Innovation & R&D1
- Regulation Policy1