Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Ken Newman
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 27on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 4%1 of 27 questions
- Companies
- 5questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 27 of 27 questions from 5 companies
URIUnited Rentals13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 13 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
is it fair to assume that you'd expect some improvement in sequential rental rates into the back half?
Show response
Matt said supply-demand dynamics support continued positive fleet productivity and rate, especially to offset inflation.
Calendar 2026 Q1
can you maybe just talk a little bit about your ability to maybe accelerate fleet growth if needed? And if you can still be price/cost positive if inflation starts to ramp further from here?
Show response
Matt confirmed prices locked for the year with flex-up ability contractually. Very disciplined about sticking to original deal on surcharges. Vendors' ability to flex capacity is an important part of supplier relationships.
How active is the pipeline versus when we last talked to you a quarter ago? And I'm curious if the macro environment today makes it harder or easier to do deals
Show response
Matt said pipeline hasn't changed over past couple of years ex-COVID. Challenge is finding willing partners at acceptable returns. Leaning toward specialty and new products but will do gen rent tuck-ins. Plenty of dry powder.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I think you mentioned in your prepared remarks having to hold on to some high-time used equipment, which impacted used sales volumes this quarter. Can you give a little more color on that?
Show response
Ted explained shortfall was concentrated in Q4. Certain regions ran too busy with high-time assets (aerials, telehandlers) to pull them for sale. Full year OEC sold was $2.73B vs $2.8B guide.
just any help on how to think about the margin progression? Is that something that you expect to take place more materially in the back half?
Show response
Matt said cost benefits will build through the year. Repositioning mitigation works best in peak activity quarters (Q2/Q3). Some noise expected in Q1 before benefits materialize.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how do you think about balancing those 2 dynamics, right, to keep time yet strong into next year?
Show response
Matt acknowledged some equipment categories are running hand-to-mouth. Better customer communication on fleet needs could reduce emergency repositioning. Will embed learnings in 2026 guidance.
is there any reason to think that you can't drive flow-through kind of in line with your more normalized type of margins
Show response
Ted confirmed core profitability performing as expected. Underlying business on track. Margin variability driven by customer responsiveness, not operational deterioration.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I'm curious if you could just talk about the smaller local accounts, what those have done sequentially from the first quarter to second quarter
Show response
Matt said local accounts improved seasonally Q1 to Q2 but stabilized on YoY basis, not growing in aggregate. Stability of macro matters as much as rate cuts for local investment.
There's a thought out there that the accelerated phaseout for renewable tax credits could drive some pull forward on the construction time lines
Show response
Ted noted renewables is a small fraction of power; core opportunity is conventional generation, transmission, distribution. No great insight on potential solar pull-forward.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Can you just talk about what you're seeing in the smaller local accounts and just the expectation for that to the rest of the year?
Show response
Matt noted local accounts are smaller share so variability has limited impact. Ground-up field forecasting gives confidence in guidance ranges. National account alignment buffers downturns.
I know you depreciate those assets at Yac to zero, I think, over a two or three-year period. Obviously, lumber is much higher on a year-over-year basis
Show response
Matt said URI hasn't experienced significant lumber cost impact in their specific wood types. Comfortable Yac can maintain margins.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I'm curious if the guide assumes a similar growth profile in '25? And I guess, additionally, on top of that, if there's any way to quantify
Show response
Matt confirmed 2025 gen rent growth profile expected similar to 2024. Ted added no appreciable shift in mix expected, 2025 likely to look similar to 2024.
is there a way to talk about the magnitude of demand between the national and the local accounts, particularly as I think about just the rate differential
Show response
Matt declined to break out rate/time/mix or customer segments, noting they put all components together in fleet productivity. Said national account leveraging is not as differentiated as outsiders think.
GWWW. W. Grainger5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
any help on just how to think about the operating profit or loss in the other segment now that Cromwell is divested
Show response
Dee estimated ~20 basis point annualized operating margin improvement from U.K. exit.
there was a pretty sizable increase in midsize customer growth in High-Touch U.S. this quarter. Is that primarily a price versus volumes mix
Show response
Dee attributed most of midsize acceleration to softer prior-year comps. DG added they see opportunity but not a huge inflection yet.
Calendar 2025 Q2
is the confidence that volumes don't have another -- don't have a negative response as you introduce these price increases
Show response
DG acknowledged inflation will weigh on market demand in back half; but Grainger not uniquely exposed, confident in price realization.
kind of implies Endless Assortment grows similar on a total sales, maybe like in that high teen to low 20%
Show response
Dee confirmed EA back half moderation is mainly a comping dynamic from Zoro's stronger back half 2024.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how much the fourth quarter ADS was impacted by the timing of holidays and extended customer shutdowns
Show response
Dee quantified hurricane benefit at 80bps and holiday timing at 50bps; normalizing takes Q4 daily growth from 4.7% to ~4.5%.
ZBRAZebra Technologies5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
help us quantify if there -- if you saw any indications of a pull forward
Show response
Burns confirmed no pull-forward. Q1 upside was broad-based across regions, verticals, and segments. Momentum continues into Q2. Unconstrained demand pushes toward high end of guidance. Winters added the Q1 upside was driven by asset visibility strength in manufacturing, which did not have price increases. Pricing benefit of 1pt offset by lower volume assumptions from memory constraints.
Calendar 2025 Q2
any idea or color on how much of their manufacturing is international and then how to think about potential tariff exposure
Show response
Winters said Elo's supply chain is similar to Zebra's with one key difference: an owned world-class manufacturing facility in China for touchscreens and monitors. Elo uses contract manufacturers in Southeast Asia for final assembly. Has tariff mitigation plan in place via pricing and production moves.
Is there a way to just talk about how much pricing you were able to drive in 2Q
Show response
Winters quantified Q2 pricing at under $10M, below expectations. Higher list prices on mobile computing maintained but managed through concessions. Goal remains full tariff mitigation at some point in 2026. Waiting for more stability on rates, electronics exemptions, and semiconductor tariffs before next moves.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I think you were looking for a $7 million headwind, and it came in around $3 million. Can you start a little bit about the moving pieces
Show response
Winters attributed the beat to front-loading purchases ahead of effective dates and some inventory capitalization timing. Very little pricing benefit in Q1.
There a way to think about how to quantify that $70 million full-year impact between the two segments
Show response
Winters said impact is fairly balanced with slightly heavier weighting to AIT since print faces full tariff rates while mobile computing benefits from electronics exemptions.
EMREmerson Electric2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Is there a way to help frame how much of the total project funnel today is for new greenfield versus brownfield?
Show response
Ram said the bulk of the $12.4B funnel is greenfield; brownfield modernization is tracked separately and carries better pricing.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how does that translate to the second half sales that are expected to be softer? Is that just driven more by mix or higher conservatism?
Show response
Karsanbhai clarified that sales accelerate in second half (not softer), from ~2% first half to ~4% full year, supported by order ramp.
FASTFastenal2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
I'm curious, Max, if you had any color on what that impact on holiday timing or extended shutdowns were to ADS in the month of December
Show response
Max noted November-to-December sequential decline was 9.3% vs 8.7% last year. Dan provided detailed vending analysis: Christmas week was slightly better than last year but New Year's week saw customer shutdowns double from ~10% to ~20%. First two weeks of January showed complete normalization back to low single-digit shutdowns.
is it correct to assume that you saw that a similar dynamic this quarter as well?
Show response
Dan struggled to quantify the price-volume trade-off. Philosophically emphasized that Fastenal prioritizes growth and will take on new business even with short-term margin challenges. Max added that no aggressive pricing actions are needed right now.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| URI United Rentals | 13 | 0%none of 13 questions |
| GWW W. W. Grainger | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions |
| ZBRA Zebra Technologies | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| EMR Emerson Electric | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| FAST Fastenal | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q1 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q2 | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q3 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q4 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q1 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q2 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
- 2024 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q15 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q26 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand10
- Pricing7
- Margin6
- Revenue Growth5
- Trade Tariffs4
- Competitive Dynamics4
- Capex Investment3
- M&A3
- Cost Pressure3
- Capital Allocation2
Show all 14 topics
- Guidance Reliability2
- Supply Chain2
- Macroeconomic1
- Regulation Policy1