Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Kevin MacCurdy
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 36on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 0%none of 36 questions
- Companies
- 7questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 36 of 36 questions from 7 companies
EXEExpand Energy11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
When you forecast that $200 million a year, is that driven by kind of historical EBITDA
Show response
Marcel said $200M is the ratable base EBITDA; high-volatility years run 1.5x-2x, with value driven by logistics optimization.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I wonder if you had any comments on leading edge well costs are you still making progress on efficiencies?
Show response
Josh cited fastest-ever Utica well plus ongoing focus on perfecting three-mile laterals in Haynesville. Haynesville rig count increase from competitors has not impacted costs yet. Service costs stable outside diesel inflation from Iran conflict.
is there anything you can share with us on what you saw in the first well
Show response
Josh confirmed encouraging early results from first well online since early March. Confirmed good overpressured reservoir from pilot well. Second well spudded 50 miles north for acreage appraisal. Already on lower end of competitor cost curve on first well with expectation of further cost reduction.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you talk a little bit about how that program progressed, when you will be drilling, and what you are looking for in results?
Show response
Josh reported first horizontal well drilled at very low end of competitor costs in the Western Haynesville. Being completed with first production expected late Q1 to early Q2 2026. Two additional wells planned for acreage appraisal. Key focus on longer-term decline parameters.
It looks like there were some improvements to your maintenance capital compared to last quarter
Show response
Josh emphasized $225 million maintenance CapEx improvement in one year. Business efficient up to 7.75 Bcf per day but production level driven by mid-cycle price view of $3.50 to $4. The $0.50 range is significant and production will flex based on price environment.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you kind of expand on what you saw in that vertical well and what was attractive about this particular area of the Western Haynesville?
Show response
Josh detailed 1.5 decades of data integration, calibrated models, and vertical well validation. Selected area with less structural complexity. Acknowledged uncertainty remains around long-term decline. First horizontal well in Q4. Can be measured given 20 years of Louisiana inventory.
without giving away your secrets, do you know what you're doing different that is causing that well cost saving?
Show response
Josh highlighted drilling improvements exceeding expectations plus two completion advantages: self-sourced sand mine (pays out in just over a year, enables 2-4 frac crews) and Gen 1 through Gen 3 completion design evolution with each generation outperforming the last.
Calendar 2025 Q2
is there anything in the near-term gas markets that would lead you to maybe pull back on that productive spending? And when would you need to make that decision?
Show response
Nick distinguished between capital spend (driven by long-term fundamentals, not changing) and production decisions (flexible based on near-term conditions). Productive capacity framework designed to build optionality rather than commit to production levels.
do you feel like your balance sheet and organization are in a spot where you would consider more M&A?
Show response
Nick firmly redirected to integration focus, noting high-bar nonnegotiables have worked historically. Signaled no near-term appetite for additional M&A.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Do you have any color or expectations for how that market at Gillis is shaping up and how that could impact your margins
Show response
Dan cited Plaquemines ramping, Golden Pass expected 2026, Louisiana LNG announced, all driving premium pricing at Gillis. Expects basis to widen favorably with pull across Haynesville.
Any color that you can share on the expectations for the back half of the year as it compares to Q1 and Q2 for CapEx
Show response
Josh confirmed Q3 and Q4 CapEx trajectory roughly in line with Q2, consistent with full-year ~$3 billion target.
FANGDiamondback Energy9 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
It looked like it fell below $6 a barrel and partially drove the EBITDA beat this quarter
Show response
Kaes clarified the LOE beat was volume-driven with flat OpEx dollars and guided to circling the $6 range.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can you provide any color on the cadence of the net lateral footage per quarter throughout the year and also the lateral length per well
Show response
6.2M lateral feet for full year; 1.5-1.6M per quarter back half. Q1 lateral length lighter at 11.5%, full year target 12.9%, ramping through year.
any updates on the surfactant [indiscernible]
Show response
5 wells tested with variable results (0 to 400-500 bpd uplift, avg 100). Studying what drove success vs failure. Version 1.0, could be mega theme extending basin life by a decade or 2.
Calendar 2025 Q4
guidance -- 2026 guidance is for a small increase for both LOE and GP&T. And I wonder if you could address those
Show response
Kaes cited EDS drop-down impact on LOE, higher unhedged power prices ($0.10-0.20 headwind), and increased workover/P&A spending. GP&T increase from CPI escalators and more molecules taken in kind.
Will there be a separate rig dedicated to that program? And just to confirm, will those wells be geographically separate from your cube development
Show response
Danny said Barnett needs an upgraded rig package due to depth and mud properties. Some areas like Spanish Trail will overlap with shallow development where they share facilities.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I wonder if you could just kind of expand on the benefits you see to FANG beyond just the cash flow contributions for the minerals
Show response
Kaes emphasized Viper's private data as a huge, underappreciated asset, allowing FANG to study and replicate peer developments faster than anyone else at scale.
Calendar 2025 Q2
your letter warrants of 25% casing cost inflation from tariffs. Can you remind us if you have any of that locked in
Show response
Danny confirmed 15% casing inflation already absorbed with more anticipated; procurement agreement reprices quarterly on a formula basis.
Calendar 2025 Q1
are there other ways that you guys are kind of thinking about taking advantage of industry distress on the M&A front
Show response
Kaes said FANG is focused on debt and share count reduction rather than M&A; anything pursued would need to be extremely cheap.
Calendar 2024 Q4
a breakdown of the twenty twenty-five CapEx plan for the legacy assets versus the CapEx for Double Eagle
Show response
Kaes provided clean breakout: $200M for Double Eagle, leaving $3.6-4.0B for legacy, tying to $900M-$1B Q1 CapEx guide.
DVNDevon Energy5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is there any operational reasons that you would keep that equity interest?
Show response
Clay said WaterBridge relationship remains operationally important but equity ownership is option value; no obligation to hold or sell.
what do you make of the interest in that basin? And what do you think is driving kind of the renewed interest?
Show response
Clay acknowledged gas-driven Anadarko interest and structural pricing advantages vs Waha; Board regularly evaluates all portfolio options.
Calendar 2025 Q1
you've lowered your average rig count in the Delaware from 14 to about 12% this year. Your turn-in-line count is still the same. Will that have any impact
Show response
Clay confirmed 2026 productivity not sacrificed; efficiency gains (16→14→11 rigs) maintain same output.
if oil prices continue to lag and gas stays strong, are there any areas where you would consider shifting activity towards or away from
Show response
Clay described monthly evaluation cycle; acknowledged current headwinds feel 'stickier' than recent 24-month volatility.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I wanted to ask what changed on your 2025 capital plan over the last several months that you were able to lower your guidance?
Show response
Clay cited Williston/Grayson $600K/well savings and BPX dissolution as key drivers, with no assumed deflation.
COPConocoPhillips4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
on slide five of your deck you show some potential variance regarding the macro Middle East uncertainty. Can you expand on that a little bit?
Show response
Andy attributed the CapEx range primarily to NFE/NFS timing uncertainty and potential non-operated Lower 48 ballots. Framed as general uncertainty rather than a specific risk scenario.
Calendar 2025 Q4
You highlighted that the 104 WA Surmont pad was ahead of schedule. I wonder if you could talk about the financial and operational impacts
Show response
Kirk Johnson described 104 WA coming online a month early. Next pad 104 WB expected in ~12 months. New pads every 12-18 months at level-loaded pace. Gross volumes climbing despite higher royalties after payout. Capital and production tracking on trend.
Calendar 2025 Q3
if you could provide anything kind of high level on how you get there in terms of margins, productions, maintenance CapEx in that first year
Show response
Kirk Johnson outlined CapEx declining from ~$2B to ~$500M sustaining post first oil, with CFO from 100% oil at Brent premium driving the $4B FCF improvement.
Calendar 2025 Q1
looks to be driven by cash taxes. Can you talk a little bit about why the cash taxes were higher in the first quarter
Show response
Bill Bullock explained higher effective tax rate from income mix shift to higher-tax jurisdictions and discrete deferred items from Lower 48 dispositions.
EQTEQT Corporation4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
At your 40% risk case, how early would you expect prices to react to this increased demand?
Show response
Knop expected Appalachian basis divergence to become more real over the next year as demand sinks show up, though futures markets aren't yet pricing it.
Calendar 2025 Q4
the 2026 turning line count is higher year-over-year. And just curious on the cadence of those turning lines throughout the year
Show response
Jeremy clarified higher TIL count reflects combo development lumpiness not growth setup; any intentional growth beyond efficiency-driven gains will be explicitly communicated.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Can you talk about the midstream assets that you acquired and the effect on the OpEx? And any information on the sales points
Show response
Jeremy detailed roughly $80M of Olympus EBITDA from midstream, with assets sold at M2 pricing and potential to move volumes into the more premium M3 market via TeCo.
Is that just timing of spending? Or is there something on the cost of that project that is increasing
Show response
Jeremy clarified MVP capital contribution change is purely an accounting reclassification between distributions and contributions with no net impact on economics.
CTRACoterra2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
Will you pay off the term loan first and then buy back shares? Or can you do them concurrently.
Show response
Tom Jorden confirmed parallel approach with debt repayment front-loaded and buybacks back-loaded. Cited historical 90% and 76% returns to shareholders as enabled by low leverage.
what is the rate reduction due to your DUC backlog by the end of the year? And do you have to manage that operationally as you enter into 2026?
Show response
Michael Deshazer confirmed healthy DUC inventory with no frac line issues from Harkey-to-Wolfcamp swap. At 7 rigs long-term, maintaining a third frac crew would be difficult, but ample market capacity for spot work.
Show 1 more company
OXYOccidental Petroleum1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
Do you view the PVC oversupply and price decrease is temporary? And how is that factored into your outlook for a big free cash flow uplift in chems next year
Show response
Management acknowledged Chinese PVC exports grew from almost nothing in 2020 to almost 30%. Integrated margins near variable cost of international producers. 2026 more likely to resemble 2025 conditions than a recovery.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| EXE Expand Energy | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions |
| FANG Diamondback Energy | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions |
| DVN Devon Energy | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| COP ConocoPhillips | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| EQT EQT Corporation | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| CTRA Coterra | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| OXY Occidental Petroleum | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- EXEExpand Energy · 11 questions0%none of 11 questions
- FANGDiamondback Energy · 9 questions0%none of 9 questions
- DVNDevon Energy · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- COPConocoPhillips · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- EQTEQT Corporation · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- CTRACoterra · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- OXYOccidental Petroleum · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q1 | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q2 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q3 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q4 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q1 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q2 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 3 |
- 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q110 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q36 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q46 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q15 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Capex Investment16
- M&A7
- Innovation & R&D6
- Margin5
- Cost Pressure5
- Capital Allocation5
- Pricing4
- Demand4
- Competitive Dynamics4
- Macroeconomic3
Show all 14 topics
- Revenue Growth2
- Guidance Reliability1
- Supply Chain1
- Trade Tariffs1