Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Kingsley Crane

Canaccord Genuity · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Limited coverage. Only 9 questions of coverage. Treat these numbers as directional — sample too small for reliable averages.
Questions
9on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 9 questionsLimited sample
Companies
3questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 9 of 9 questions from 3 companies

PATHUiPath Inc.4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
PATH company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

is the customer typically renewing at a much higher rate? Is it happening where they'll adopt AI

Subscriber GrowthCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Ashim said it is all of the above; customers expand into AI at renewal, and POCs bolster renewal confidence across verticals and geos.

Calendar 2025 Q4

from an integration activity perspective, how is heterogeneity trending?

Competitive DynamicsCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Daniel said no clear perception shift yet; UiPath continuously assesses frontier LLMs and uses a mixture, GPT-5 for document structure/intent, Gemini for specific extraction.

to what extent did this directly translate into proof improved results in Q3?

Competitive DynamicsCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Ashim called co-development a leading indicator that shows UiPath's relevance, but reiterated there was no meaningful near-term revenue impact from agentic in Q3.

Calendar 2024 Q4

within your cloud business, could you provide a directional comment on the mix of hybrid cloud and pure SaaS

Cloud & AIProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Ashim declined a precise SaaS/hybrid split, noting most installations remain hybrid on-prem/cloud while cloud adoption grows.

QBTSD-Wave Quantum Inc.4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
QBTS company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

what level of engineering work is required to operationalize the results of the paper?

Show response

Baratz said the Nature result, demonstrated on the 8-qubit dual-rail system, plus the Lambda-10 simulations give confidence in reaching the 2,000-fold error reduction at 181 qubits.

Calendar 2025 Q4

I am wondering if you have a sense of what you think an ideal net retention rate for that segment can be

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Management did not publish retention rates but said QCaaS deals are getting larger, moving toward enterprise licenses like the $10M Fortune 100 deal.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Could this just become a blueprint to future deals and establishing points of presence across the world.

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Baratz said the shared-capacity-then-purchase model, used first at Jülich, is a good way to build global presence and step toward system sales.

Calendar 2025 Q2

how the tenor in the U.S. government has shifted, specifically with respect to quantum annealing in the past couple of quarters?

Show response

Baratz said DARPA's QBI excludes annealing, which he called a mistake, and that broader US government progress is real but slow.

MDBMongoDB, Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
MDB company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

to what extent do you think feature sets like that Voyage can drive workload creation within AI apps

Cloud & AIProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Dev said Voyage AI closes the customer trust gap via higher-quality retrieval and accuracy, while the skills gap is met with a solutions approach; quantization also cuts vector storage cost.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
PATH UiPath Inc.40%none of 4 questions
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc.40%none of 4 questions
MDB MongoDB, Inc.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • PATH
    UiPath Inc. · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • QBTS
    D-Wave Quantum Inc. · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • MDB
    MongoDB, Inc. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q410%none of 1 question1
2025 Q110%none of 1 question1
2025 Q210%none of 1 question1
2025 Q310%none of 1 question1
2025 Q430%none of 3 questions2
2026 Q110%none of 1 question1
2026 Q210%none of 1 question1
  1. 2024 Q41 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2025 Q11 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  3. 2025 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  4. 2025 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  5. 2025 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  6. 2026 Q11 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  7. 2026 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Cloud & AI5
  • Competitive Dynamics2
  • Product Launch2
  • Demand2
  • Subscriber Growth1
  • Innovation & R&D1
  • Revenue Growth1
  • Geographic Expansion1
  • Regulation Policy1