Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Kyle Boucher

TD Cowen · covers Healthcare

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2025 Q2 – 2026 Q1 (4 quarters; questions recorded in 3).

Limited coverage. Only 6 questions of coverage. Treat these numbers as directional — sample too small for reliable averages.
Questions
6on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 6 questionsLimited sample
Companies
1questioned at least once
Reporting periods
3with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 6 of 6 questions from 1 company

TECHBio-Techne6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
TECH company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

I guess beyond biotech performance, I mean, is there anything else that's sort of getting worse?

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Kim provided comprehensive end market flyby: pharma strong, academic stabilizing, China positive four quarters running. Cell therapy ex-2 customers at 50% growth, spatial at mid-double digits with COMET at 65%. Only biotech remains the detractor.

how sustainable do you think these levels of growth are going forward? I mean, do they face easy comps year-over-year?

Revenue GrowthProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Kim noted customer count up 3% with pipeline progression from Phase I to II (15 to 18 programs). Cell therapy trials globally increasing with mix shift from gene to cell therapy. 20% TTM growth is the minimum bar. Wilson Wolf grants show 50% attachment rate with Bio-Techne cytokines.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Was there any catch-up in fiscal Q1 from some of those disruptions you saw at the end of the last fiscal year?

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Kim confirmed no catch-up effect, spatial improvement reflects broad activity-level recovery in RNAscope reagents and growing instrument order book rather than one-time timing.

next quarter, assuming the same level of growth, minus 1%, what does that sort of imply for the EBIT margin

MarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Jim declined specific Q2 margin guidance but noted additional productivity actions taken in Q1 to prepare for Q2 cell therapy headwinds. Expressed confidence in full-year 100bp expansion target with potential upside.

Calendar 2025 Q2

how does pharma sort of fit within that framework?

DemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Jim explained the low-single-digit guide assumes more of the same Q4 dynamics: double-digit large pharma offset by weak biotech and academic. Acknowledged MFN risk could soften pharma but sees academic potentially being overly conservative as an offset.

Could you quantify how much maybe pull forward you saw in the fiscal fourth quarter?

MacroeconomicTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Kim attributed China strength to both stimulus funding release and pre-tariff pull-forward purchasing behavior. Cautioned against extrapolating double-digit results, expecting stable modest growth trajectory excluding one-time factors.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
TECH Bio-Techne60%none of 6 questions
  • TECH
    Bio-Techne · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2025 Q220%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q320%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q4No questions recorded——
2026 Q120%none of 2 questions1
  1. 2025 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  2. 2025 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  3. 2025 Q4No questions recorded
  4. 2026 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Revenue Growth3
  • Guidance Reliability3
  • Demand2
  • Product Launch1
  • Margin1
  • Macroeconomic1
  • Trade Tariffs1