Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Lars Kjellberg

Stifel · covers Consumer Cyclical

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2025 Q2 (3 quarters).

Limited coverage. Only 6 questions of coverage. Treat these numbers as directional — sample too small for reliable averages.
Questions
6on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 6 questionsLimited sample
Companies
1questioned at least once
Reporting periods
3with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 6 of 6 questions from 1 company

SWSmurfit WestRock6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
SW company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

where are we on this now? Are we starting to see any of that equal to at least the synergies coming through in the current year

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Tony confirmed operational improvements already in H1 numbers via corrugated system improvement. US margin growth driven by synergies plus box system improvement. European margins at mid-to-low teens vs historical 18-19%, expected to recover when demand improves, timing uncertain (2026 or H1 2027).

The rating upgrade, does that mean anything to you from a financing point of view

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Ken noted bonds already priced at BBB+ level, so small savings on revolver and commercial paper but not material economically.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Are you starting to see any directional changes on your customer's business due to those tariffs

Trade TariffsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Tony quantified $100M annualized direct tariff cost without offsets. Supply chains adjusted to produce in-country rather than cross-border. Demand destruction from tariffs cited as the bigger risk than direct costs. Seeing customer nervousness but no material impact yet.

can you give us a sense of how you should think about incremental self-help benefits into, you know, '26, '27 as the synergies literally will be on the books already exiting '25

Cost PressureCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Ken described quick-win program delivering returns in 18-24 months, particularly effective in high-cost environments. Small projects across individual locations adding up to meaningful system-wide benefit. Tony noted these are just selected projects, far more exist but are being phased deliberately.

Calendar 2024 Q4

How should we think about this as the year develops? I mean, you've taken out a chunk of fixed costs et cetera and last year and which of course should be in the numbers now broadly speaking

Show response

Ken provided specific phasing: ~$30M net synergies in Q1, ~$150M net for full year 2025 (after $235M cost to achieve). The additional $400M operational improvements are not CapEx-dependent and should begin flowing through as contracts come up for renewal.

Was there any other consideration than just getting back to the old Smurfit Kappa dividend or anything else behind that big increase in Q4

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Ken explained the dividend represents SK 2023 level plus 5% progressive increase, representing 22-25% of pre-CapEx cash flow, balancing two legacy policies.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
SW Smurfit WestRock60%none of 6 questions
  • SW
    Smurfit WestRock · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q420%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q120%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q220%none of 2 questions1
  1. 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  2. 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  3. 2025 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Cost Pressure3
  • Capital Allocation3
  • Margin1
  • Trade Tariffs1
  • Demand1
  • M&A1