Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Lawson Winder
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 48on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 2%1 of 48 questions
- Companies
- 4questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 48 of 48 questions from 4 companies
NUENucor15 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 15 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
It suggests the capacity utilization around 75% and I mean would you push back on us putting 75% capacity utilization
Show response
Brad Ford confirmed upside to the 75% assumption and detailed new grades (API line pipe, armor, ABS shipbuilding) that were previously unavailable.
your view on flat rolled benchmark pricing and the CSP, it was up another $10 yesterday
Show response
Leon and Noah Hanners answered directly, framing the buying pattern as demand-driven and citing sheet imports falling from 9 million tons in 2024 to about 4.5 million.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can you just speak to some of the strength and weakness that you're seeing in the underlying market for that business?
Show response
Warehouse market in steady state but data center market continues very strong, driving price increases and backlog improvement expected to continue through the year.
is there room to push that higher in 2026? And how are you thinking about that?
Show response
Q1 return was under 40% due to earnings beat. Jack indicated they will close the gap and potentially exceed the 40% target while balancing reinvestment opportunities.
Calendar 2025 Q4
could you just speak to your current view on CapEx for 2027?
Show response
Steve guided maintenance CapEx closer to $800M annually (up from prior $600M guidance) due to post-COVID inflation and larger company size. Leon emphasized the culmination of West Virginia will absorb majority of CapEx moving into 2027.
Are there areas of the business that you might be able to highlight today as places where you actually might consider some expansionary capital beyond '26?
Show response
Leon highlighted data centers (Nucor supplies 95% of steel demand), energy infrastructure, border wall, and towers & structures as growth platforms. Signaled shift from heavy core CapEx to adjacency M&A and lower-capital-intensity growth.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Yesterday, Nucor's CSP was $10 higher. I mean was that factored in?
Show response
Leon noted most sheet deliveries are contract-based with Q4 reflecting softer Q2 order book pricing, but lean service center and mill inventories will enable faster Q1 realization of current increases.
how would you characterize that in terms of product and region or segment upstream versus downstream?
Show response
Leon outlined M&A filters: steel-centric synergy, converter model, low capital intensity, high margins, countercyclical to steel cycles. Shift from core investments to expand-beyond adjacencies in coming years.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Could you speak to the preoperating start-up costs and the period-by-period outlook for those assets
Show response
Steve noted pre-op costs came down significantly QoQ driven primarily by Brandenburg reaching breakeven, guiding $140-150M per quarter for H2. Leon highlighted the tsunami of earnings power approaching as projects ramp.
What utilization rate is the asset now currently operating? And then just how do you see that trending for Q3 and Q4?
Show response
Brad Ford emphasized capability over capacity, noting Q2 records expected to be broken each quarter forward. Bridge, onshore wind, power transmission, and line pipe all robust demand drivers.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Can you provide any color on the magnitude of what those start-up costs might look like this year
Show response
Steve guided Q2-Q4 startup costs similar to recent quarters ($160-170M/quarter), with five projects coming online in 2025.
what are you guys penciling in for utilization at year-end 2025?
Show response
Brad Ford highlighted record production months, ABS certification for shipbuilding, and first X70 API grade trials for line pipe, confirming EBITDA positive track by summer.
how do you think about the split between higher margin, higher value-add product versus more commoditized product
Show response
Leon described a balanced commercial plan across three plate mills, pursuing both volume ramp and higher-grade qualifications. ABS timing aligns with Section 301 ships executive order.
Calendar 2024 Q4
How are you guys thinking about the incremental impact from that business now going forward?
Show response
Leon tripled the prior Investor Day guidance from $50M to at least $150M annual EBITDA for Towers & Structures, citing highly automated plants with significant cost advantages.
is there some concern emerging within Nucor, this market is heading to a place of being oversupplied?
Show response
Leon clarified the Pacific Northwest mill pause was about capital deployment timing, not market oversupply concerns. Randy Spicer noted new domestic supply will be absorbed by infrastructure and reshoring demand.
NEMNewmont13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 13 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Does that hold when you add the Red Chris CapEx, assuming you’ll proceed with that project?
Show response
CFO stated Red Chris would be incremental to the 2026 development figure and deferred the 2027 outlook to February.
how should the market think about imputing a capital value on Newmont Corporation’s interest in the processing assets
Show response
CEO confirmed the offset exists in principle but gave no quantification, and the analyst asked for more color on a future call.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can I ask about the cost pressures? I mean, I think it's notable, the impressive unit cost results in Q1
Show response
CEO outlined two key levers: productivity improvements (including equipment parking to reduce consumption) and continued cost discipline to offset gold-price-linked royalties and worker participation.
the M&A outlook. We've seen some activity from one of your peers already this week
Show response
CEO clearly prioritized internal operations and brownfield expansion over external M&A, noting acquisitions would need to compete for capital within the broader portfolio.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Have the two entities had any further discussion on Fourmile and a potential mechanism for vending that into the joint venture? Where does that currently stand?
Show response
Natascha redirected away from Fourmile, saying discussions with Barrick have been predominantly about improving NGM performance. Described the relationship as constructive but gave no specifics on Fourmile.
Just the CapEx as it sounds like there could be some potential upside through Red Chris and Merian. Could you just talk to those two projects and the update that we're going to be getting on those ...
Show response
Natascha confirmed sustaining/development capital averages and noted the capital allocation framework allows for value-accretive project decisions. Red Chris update expected in H2 2026. Merian exploration update also coming later in the year.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how do you think about those 2 investment options? Is one preferred over the other?
Show response
Goldrush already in NGM portfolio with capital forecasted. Fourmile option exciting but awaiting Barrick's feasibility study to make informed decision. Will compete for capital against all other projects.
How do you think about acting on asset or company acquisition opportunities? Is that something that's still within the wheelhouse of potential capital allocation?
Show response
Natascha firmly reiterated internal focus, best investment is in own assets and buybacks. Three priorities remain: balance sheet strength, project investment, and shareholder returns.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Is there an appetite for further acquisitions at Newmont? And then further to that, is copper still viewed as a strategic metal for Newmont
Show response
Tom was emphatic: internal focus only, best use of capital is buybacks. Copper exposure will come organically from Red Chris block cave, Boddington and Cadia. No M&A appetite.
Calendar 2025 Q1
is that run rate production level of 275,000 to 325,000 ounces expected to be achieved in that year?
Show response
Tom confirmed 2026 ramp-up targets are robust but no upside expected. Ahafo North uses a proven flowsheet similar to Merian and Ahafo South.
what are you thinking now as a long-term sustainable level of gold production for that asset?
Show response
Tom said Lihir will stay near current levels through 2027 stripping campaign, then see ~30% production increase from 2028 when higher grades from Phase 14a are accessed.
Calendar 2024 Q4
is $1,700 per ounce, the gold price at which that is sustainable? Or is that still a $1,400?
Show response
Tom decoupled the dividend from any specific gold price, $1/share annual dividend is fixed regardless of gold price assumptions.
I just wanted to ask your thinking around the provision of one-year guidance. And so, I understood that you would consider maybe doing three years
Show response
Tom explained the one-year guidance is deliberate post-transformation. Focused on stabilization and high-confidence delivery before committing to multi-year outlook.
FCXFreeport-McMoRan10 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Are you seeing some offsetting operating level benefits that would offset that higher CapEx?
Show response
Kathleen detailed operating-model efficiencies, off-site labor and prefab work offsetting higher capital; answered directly.
Calendar 2026 Q1
key cost items for your business, are there other places where you feel there's some level of insulation
Show response
Quirk noted cost inflation has been very regional with most significant impact in Indonesia and Asia. Many consumables are contractually negotiated providing near-term insulation, but lagging effects could emerge.
it looks like diesel sensitivity has actually increased. Can you maybe just walk through why that would happen
Show response
Quirk explained the higher diesel base assumption mechanically increases the dollar impact of a 10% sensitivity move. The 2027-2028 forecasts now embed higher diesel costs.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you maybe give us a sense of a more precise timing this year for the update?
Show response
Quirk detailed plan to secure fixed vendor pricing by midyear to support investment decision. Added $150M in capital for front-end engineering. Key factors: workforce readiness, autonomous fleet performance, capital plan confidence, and operating efficiency.
Calendar 2025 Q3
is there any consideration for hardening the flow of the material, perhaps through cemented tailings or cemented backfill?
Show response
Mark Johnson explained mud is at pit bottom with poor surface access. Additive approach discussed but discounted. Drilling and pumping approaches deemed more effective for mud removal.
Does that include PB1C, or is PB1C additional upside from that guidance?
Show response
Quirk confirmed PB1C is included in 2028-2029 numbers but represents only 2-3% of copper and 3-5% of gold production. Pre-incident it was closer to 7%.
Calendar 2025 Q2
brownfield expansion at Miami, would make more sense? Or would it possibly make more sense to build a greenfield smelter
Show response
Quirk said looking at Miami expansion (~30% increase) but greenfield would be very challenging citing 10-year Indonesia smelter timeline. Near-term focus on leach for refined copper growth.
the potential just to ship refined copper from Indonesia to the U.S. and take advantage of that spread
Show response
Quirk said near-term plans are to sell Indonesia cathode in Asia but FCX has flexibility with no long-term contracts. US company ownership provides security of supply option.
Calendar 2025 Q1
does it make sense for Freeport to potentially be accumulating assets in the US today?
Show response
Quirk noted FCX already has large US resource position plus integrated smelter/tankhouse infrastructure that could provide synergies. Will look opportunistically.
Calendar 2024 Q4
What do -- you think about the right copper price for that to work and what's the right IRR to justify that investment?
Show response
Quirk said El Abra economics work below $4 copper with higher IRR hurdle to compensate for Chile risk. EIS submission expected by year-end, permitting process takes several years.
STLDSteel Dynamics10 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
How should we think about the pricing or the margin outlook for the second half of 2026?
Show response
Management said improved backlog pricing won't be realized until the next six to nine months, with strong volume offsetting near-term realized pricing.
Calendar 2026 Q1
can you make a compelling case today for a material expansion there
Show response
Mark confirmed broad pipeline of strategic opportunities across all spaces. Aluminum industry reminds them of steel 30 years ago, hasn't earned cost of capital, reinvested, or grown. Massive supply deficit that will continue to grow. Sees tremendous opportunity in aluminum alongside continued steel innovation projects. Investment decisions guided by value-add differentiation.
Calendar 2025 Q4
do you see the potential for Steel Dynamics to add additional aluminum rolling capacity
Show response
Mark confirmed aluminum as a growth platform alongside continued steel expansion. Cited supply-demand dislocation as providing phenomenal opportunities. Team maintains pipeline of value-add opportunities across both steel and aluminum.
do you see any other investment considerations that might constrain the extent to which the dividend could be increased this year
Show response
Theresa explained dividend grows with structural cash flow increases. Aluminum contribution could drive increase this year or next. In absence of dividend change, lean into variable share repurchase program.
Where do you kinda see the upper limits of your comfort level
Show response
Theresa confirmed considerable balance sheet capacity with current leverage well under 2x and $1.4B of incremental through-cycle EBITDA not yet realized adding further capacity. Committed to investment-grade ratings with significant room within current ratings. Declined to specify exact upper limit but confirmed under 2x on through-cycle basis.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you give us a flavor of where there might be opportunities to improve the business through M and A
Show response
Mark stated M&A focus would be downstream value-add opportunities, coating, painting, and value-add manufacturing that leverages core strengths and provides pull-through volume. No upstream interest. OmniSource already the largest North American recycler. Might see small regional yard additions but no major raw material moves.
Calendar 2025 Q2
are you seeing this overhang dissipate at all now into Q3? And could this potentially mean a sales flow-through benefit into Q3
Show response
Barry confirmed inventories declining with no new material coming behind. AD/CVD cases establish long-term precedents through sunset reviews. Expects return to normal profitability levels for value-added coated products.
can you elaborate on what was driving the suppliers' decision to limit that supply
Show response
Barry explained pipeline oxygen supply arrangement was disrupted by vendor maintenance problem affecting the entire Texas petroleum region. Evaluating on-site technology investments for reliability. Not expected to be a recurring issue.
Calendar 2024 Q4
could capital return accelerate then just given the setup for 2025
Show response
Theresa emphasized growth orientation, investment grade commitment, and that consistent cash flow enables meaningful shareholder returns. Expects continued buybacks at attractive valuation.
Are there any new projects in the pipeline that could possibly be green lit in 2025
Show response
Mark stated focus is on execution, getting Sinton profitable and ramping Aluminum Dynamics. No imminent large organic growth or M&A, though they continue evaluating opportunities.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| NUE Nucor | 15 | 7%1 of 15 questions |
| NEM Newmont | 13 | 0%none of 13 questions |
| FCX Freeport-McMoRan | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions |
| STLD Steel Dynamics | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions |
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q1 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q2 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q3 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q4 | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q1 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q2 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 4 |
- 2024 Q47 questions · challenge rate 14% (1 of 7 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q16 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q27 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q37 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q48 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q17 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q26 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Capex Investment18
- Capital Allocation13
- Competitive Dynamics10
- M&A9
- Cost Pressure6
- Demand5
- Product Launch4
- Pricing4
- Supply Chain3
- Revenue Growth3
Show all 18 topics
- Margin2
- Guidance Reliability2
- Trade Tariffs2
- Geographic Expansion2
- Macroeconomic1
- Cloud & AI1
- Credit1
- Innovation & R&D1