Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Maher Yaghi

Scotiabank · covers Real Estate, Industrials

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2025 Q2 – 2026 Q1 (4 quarters; questions recorded in 3).

Limited coverage. Only 6 questions of coverage. Treat these numbers as directional — sample too small for reliable averages.
Questions
6on tracked calls
Challenge rate
17%1 of 6 questionsLimited sample
Companies
2questioned at least once
Reporting periods
3with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 6 of 6 questions from 2 companies

TRIThomson Reuters Corporation5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
TRI company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

could you provide some KPIs that prove that AI is lifting net revenues and not just increasing usage

ChallengingRevenue GrowthCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Eastwood pointed to law firm revenue ex-government accelerating from 9% to 11% as the most tangible proof of AI revenue uplift, with highest growth ever across large, mid, and small law segments.

Can you give us maybe some -- like a bridge that helps us understand where the improvement in the margins year-on-year will be coming from in the second half

Show response

Eastwood cited operating leverage from higher revenues, accelerating AI automation productivity gains, M&A dilution lapping, and LLM cost normalization as H2 margin drivers.

Calendar 2025 Q3

can you tackle maybe how you see AI advances affecting your tax business? Do you believe that business has similar defensive capabilities

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Steve outlined three tax advantages: no billable hour business model hurdle, acute talent shortage drives receptivity, and tax engines handle math while agents automate shoulder activities. Ready to Advise enables move to advisory services.

can you maybe just let us know which segment of the Big 3 you're expecting to see most of the acceleration coming from?

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Mike identified TAP as largest acceleration driver citing SafeSend/Additive/Materia scaling, Ready to Advise and Ready to Review launches, Dominio (20% CAGR over 11 years), and UltraTax strength.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Could you provide us some puts and takes on working cap and the payments

Capital AllocationRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Mike explained Q1 annual bonus payment is the largest working capital drag. For revenue, H2 benefits from strong bookings, healthy pipelines, and easier Reuters and TAP comps.

DLRDigital Realty1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
DLR company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

do you think the drive to build bigger and bigger campuses is moving projects to private developers

Competitive DynamicsCreditTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Power confirmed leaning towards $1 trillion+ investment-grade counterparties for large-scale projects, with neo cloud business staying in smaller megawatt-range capacity blocks.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
TRI Thomson Reuters Corporation520%1 of 5 questions
DLR Digital Realty1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • TRI
    Thomson Reuters Corporation · 5 questions
    20%1 of 5 questions
  • DLR
    Digital Realty · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2025 Q210%none of 1 question1
2025 Q330%none of 3 questions2
2025 Q4No questions recorded——
2026 Q1250%1 of 2 questions1
  1. 2025 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2025 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  3. 2025 Q4No questions recorded
  4. 2026 Q12 questions · challenge rate 50% (1 of 2 questions) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Revenue Growth3
  • Cloud & AI3
  • Competitive Dynamics2
  • Margin1
  • Credit1
  • Guidance Reliability1
  • Capital Allocation1