Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Mariana Mora
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 26on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 8%2 of 26 questions
- Companies
- 6questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 26 of 26 questions from 6 companies
PLTRPalantir Technologies14 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 14 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
When all this AI revolution started, right, it was really clear for enterprises that data and proprietary data
Show response
Sankar framed it as efficacy first then control of the weights and metadata; Karp attributed Palantir's edge to deep customer alignment and valuing early, artistic insights over a standard playbook.
Calendar 2026 Q1
What is happening right now with the AI labs getting into enterprise? How many customers understand that value
Show response
Sankar argued labs see only potential while Palantir lives at the edge where AI translates to economic value. Karp added customers should test competitors but most come back to Palantir because operational results require an ontology platform.
How much of that growth depends on that budget being appropriated, and how much can actually keep growing
Show response
Sankar noted CRs are historically normal for Palantir and that the department is pulling procurement into 2026. He emphasized the stakes are high and Palantir's role is existential to the department's modernization.
How easy or hard is it actually to get the right engineers to keep being able to incorporate all that
Show response
Karp acknowledged the talent race is fierce but expressed confidence, noting Palantir alumni can get any job in the world. He highlighted interest in neurodivergent talent and allies who choose to come to America.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Shipbuilding has not been the only thing that the Pentagon has struggled to ramp up
Show response
Shyam confirmed expansion beyond shipbuilding to pharmaceuticals, data centers, and multiple weapon systems including fighters, bombers, surface vessels, and munitions.
the markets have already decided that 2026 is the show-me story for AI. Have you seen that in the customers
Show response
Ryan emphasized closing 61 deals over $10M driven by demonstrated impact, while Alex noted customers now arrive knowing Palantir works and ask how to accelerate.
Calendar 2025 Q3
what changed from a behavioral perspective, from a customer perspective to see this accelerated appetite
Show response
Ryan cited network effects among customers sharing impact, while Alex explained customers see competitors succeeding with Palantir and realize alternatives don't work.
how do you think about opportunities like Golden Dome going forward adding up to this
Show response
Shyam acknowledged great opportunities but couldn't comment on specifics, citing NGC2, Maven growth, and America's involvement in three active conflicts as demand drivers.
Calendar 2025 Q2
How do you make sure that you are ahead of everyone else and keep attracting the right people
Show response
Shyam emphasized access to meaningful problems as the key differentiator, with Alex adding that Palantir has become the most important credential in tech.
One on the AI action plan that the White House put out a couple of weeks ago
Show response
Shyam highlighted the plan removes regulatory friction and validates the importance of an American AI tech stack, energizing the entire industry.
Calendar 2025 Q1
are you interested on applying that as these European countries build up their own defenses and catch up on industrial capabilities
Show response
Shyam expressed willingness but noted European adoption depends on customers recognizing their existing manufacturing stack is broken; green shoots emerging.
TITAN is a great example how -- on how, like, software actually played a role that was more intuitively hard work
Show response
Shyam highlighted classified programs using software-first approach and noted next-gen defense programs are adopting build-lethal-software-first methodology.
Calendar 2024 Q4
when you see this demand, where do you invest to make sure that you are prepared to actually execute on it?
Show response
Dave emphasized quality engineering talent over headcount growth, while Shyam highlighted culture preservation and new partnership discussions as key investments.
everyone is really concerned about Dodge with the change of administration, I could imagine like, focus on efficiencies, focus on software modernization
Show response
Shyam positioned DOGE as positive for Palantir since meritocracy and transparency favor their results-driven model over traditional system integrators.
LDOSLeidos6 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Could you mind discussing the nature of those opportunities? Are there new opportunities for Leidos?
Show response
Bell said the $12 billion pipeline over the next 12 months includes follow-ons (MUSV, small cruise missile, LCCM production) and new counter-UAS work; the Huntsville workforce grew 13% this year.
Calendar 2025 Q2
how should we think about the SES exposure to nonintrusive machines as well as CBP also builds up that capability
Show response
Cage confirmed VACIS border equipment is core to SES portfolio with decades-long CBP relationship. Awards expected in fall timeframe. Complemented by counter UAS and radar capabilities.
is that a driver of the favorable mix at SES? Or what is driving that improving profitability
Show response
Cage attributed SES margin improvement to management execution, improved global service footprint, solidified supply chains, and favorable ports and borders mix.
This business was growing slower than expected back then when you bought it. Could you please like tell us like how is that going
Show response
Bell acknowledged Dynetics integration took longer than hoped but now performing well with IFPC, hypersonics, and Black Arrow cruise missile programs. Cage noted second best quarter of organic growth and double-digit margins in certain quarters.
Calendar 2025 Q1
the risk of actually having a continued resolution -- long continued resolution into fiscal year 2026
Show response
Bell emphasized existing programs of record like IFPC can be extended without new starts, positioning Leidos well under a continuing resolution. Existing franchises provide insulation.
Calendar 2024 Q4
a focus on border security and the IRON DOME, you guys have like capabilities across the board from like screening solutions to like counter UAS
Show response
Bell enthusiastically outlined Leidos capabilities across space surveillance, counter-cruise missile, border security equipment, and low-altitude UAV detection. Noted active engagement with Capitol Hill and administration.
HIIHuntington Ingalls Industries2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
How do you think about, like, investing your own dollars, owning that IP, and actually getting, I don't know, out of this, like, mid-single-digit, like, cost-plus type of, like, margins
Show response
Kastner sees upside from unmanned and software integration but noted Odyssey is open-source and designed to Navy standards, complicating the IP argument. Unmanned is the company's highest IRAD investment area.
how should we think about the share or the mix towards, like, unmanned solutions, autonomy, and those things in that portfolio.
Show response
Kastner declined to break out specific growth rates but confirmed unmanned is doing very well. HII is positioned at the intersection of manned and unmanned with Odyssey autonomy software, 750+ UUVs delivered, and new ROMULUS USV line.
HWMHowmet Aerospace2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
how we think about, I'll say, on the commercial aero part, destocking trends and aftermarket trends or spare engine trends despite like this ramp that we are all expecting on OE
Show response
Plant confirmed destocking essentially done. 2026 spares to be another very strong year across CFM56, LEAP, and GTF engines. OE demand also expected higher from both narrow and wide body.
Could you mind like giving us some color around like how is that today? And how you think about risks on raw materials and pricing and pass-throughs going into next year?
Show response
Plant confirmed net tariff impact still sub-$5M for 2025, expected to disappear in 2026. Pass-through capabilities solid under existing contracts and new customer agreements.
GDGeneral Dynamics1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
what is the pipeline of opportunities in Europe, especially because we continue to see headlines on like increased commitment to build up their defenses?
Show response
Confirmed accelerating defense spending discussions across Eastern and Central Europe since Ukraine invasion, with each government increasing resource allocation
RTXRTX Corporation1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
How are we seeing the impact so far after these new metal tariffs that were recently announced, and also the Supreme Court ruling on IEEPA?
Show response
Mitchill confirmed no change to tariff outlook. IEEPA tariffs replaced by Section 122/232 with net impact about the same. RTX paid ~$500M in IEEPA tariffs and awaiting refund process, not included in guidance.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| PLTR Palantir Technologies | 14 | 14%2 of 14 questions |
| LDOS Leidos | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| HII Huntington Ingalls Industries | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| HWM Howmet Aerospace | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| GD General Dynamics | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| RTX RTX Corporation | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- PLTRPalantir Technologies · 14 questions14%2 of 14 questions
- LDOSLeidos · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- HIIHuntington Ingalls Industries · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- HWMHowmet Aerospace · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- GDGeneral Dynamics · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- RTXRTX Corporation · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q1 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q2 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q3 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q4 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q1 | 4 | 50%2 of 4 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q2 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
- 2024 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q25 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q14 questions · challenge rate 50% (2 of 4 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand14
- Regulation Policy7
- Cloud & AI5
- Product Launch4
- Competitive Dynamics4
- Innovation & R&D4
- Margin3
- Trade Tariffs2
- Geographic Expansion2
- Labor Market1
Show all 15 topics
- Cost Pressure1
- Revenue Growth1
- Supply Chain1
- Pricing1
- Capex Investment1