Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Mark Weintraub
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 57on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 7%4 of 57 questions
- Companies
- 4questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 57 of 57 questions from 4 companies
WYWeyerhaeuser16 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 16 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
we're going through this massive spend. But it's on AI infrastructure. Are there ways that you are participating at all?
Show response
Devin cited solar/renewables demand, marketing data center sites on WY land at large premiums to timber value, and pushing mass timber into data center construction.
Calendar 2026 Q1
it looked like your lumber cost per unit were the lowest they've been for several years
Show response
Devin attributed cost performance to continued OpEx vigilance and return to normalized operating rates after H2 2025 curtailments. No reason this can't continue. Controllable cost discipline particularly tight in challenging environment.
what might you be seeing on like the solar leasing front
Show response
Devin reported strong momentum: 1 operating, 1 about to operate, 3 under construction, could reach 4-6 under construction by year-end. Wave of new solar and wind options signed recently.
Calendar 2025 Q4
what type of single-family starts or housing starts level do you think are required in the different businesses to sort of sustain balance
Show response
Devin assessed lumber and OSB as not far from balance after significant mill closures. EWP different, no meaningful curtailments yet. Silver lining: when housing demand picks up, stretched supply typically creates strong pricing run.
what you're seeing in repair and remodel and what type of pull-through maybe you've already started to see
Show response
Devin noted no material pickup in R&R activity yet, partly due to recent Southern weather event. Customers expecting low single-digit year-over-year growth, an improvement over the last couple of years.
any implications and maybe there's not much, but that you think having them as competitor instead of 2
Show response
Devin saw no meaningful competitive impact from the combined entity. WY competed with them individually and will continue to do so collectively.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is that a function of just the mix of what you're selling? Or is it that you're seeing higher pricing for like properties
Show response
Devin confirmed both mix effects and genuine like-for-like price appreciation are contributing to higher HBU prices per acre.
Does that color your appetite to be more aggressive on the sell side than on the buy side
Show response
Dave Wold confirmed several billion dollars of unplaced capital pursuing timberland assets. Deferred specifics on bridging NAV gap to December Investor Day. Devin noted both buy and sell transactions reflect WY's high-quality portfolio assembled over 100 years.
Calendar 2025 Q2
any intelligence on how you think that might play out
Show response
Devin confirmed European lumber is tariff-exempt during 232 investigation. Noted administration focus on domestic manufacturing could imply some chance of additional tariffs but no specific intelligence on timing or scope.
are you surprised there haven't been -- hasn't been more response on the capacity side to date
Show response
Devin speculated competitors are waiting for duty clarity before making curtailment decisions. If pricing expected to rise after duties take effect, logical to wait rather than make big operating moves.
why that wouldn't be a good visual on just how distressed you would think most other manufacturers would be at this juncture
Show response
Devin confirmed WY views itself as a low-cost producer. Implied that if WY is at $11M EBITDA, most others are likely at or below breakeven.
Calendar 2025 Q1
on that OSB annual plan maintenance, order of magnitude, how much impact would you expect that to have in 2Q?
Show response
Devin quantified impact as less than $10M with operating rates expected in low-to-mid 90s, consistent with Q1.
you are expecting a healthy share of your income to come from your TRS this year
Show response
Dave Wold confirmed full year tax rate driven by TRS earnings mix. Given lumber price strength and potential duty increases, solid Wood Products year is achievable if employment holds.
so that was $11 million in the first quarter. So does that $11 million disappear in the second quarter?
Show response
Devin confirmed facility largely back to normal. Small Q2 impact remaining with most lost volume expected to be recovered over second half of 2025.
Calendar 2024 Q4
it looks like you're probably up 3% to 4% in the U.S. South in 2025 versus 2024
Show response
Devin confirmed increase driven by both Alabama acquisitions and volume rollover from weather-impacted 2024, all within sustainable harvest range.
it sounds like in lumber, you actually have a fair bit of flexibility maybe you could make a little more wood in the U.S.
Show response
Devin clarified limited OSB upside since running at high 90s utilization. TimberStrand and Parallam produced in Canada would be subject to tariffs but products are well received.
IPInternational Paper15 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 15 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
is Pine Hill included in the updated $3.2 billion to $3.4 billion guide and if -- and/or recoupment of insurance
Show response
Lance answered cleanly: Pine Hill sits outside the guide, with recovery of the majority expected in the second half.
how are you feeling about kind of the $4.5 billion, $5 billion that you've talked about for a while
Show response
Andy declined to update the 2027 aspiration, citing Middle East uncertainty and spin-related limits on forward-looking statements, deferring detail to Q4.
Calendar 2026 Q1
if I could quickly on NORPAC, $360 million. I mean, technically 3 big paper machines, so a lot of production capacity. So hard from the outside to square away all the numbers
Show response
NORPAC fits strategic shift: closed underperforming mills (Savannah, Red River) and redirected capital to high-performing assets. Mansfield turnaround described as remarkable with new capabilities, team members and investments. NORPAC addresses West Coast paper shortfall, adds lightweight recycled containerboard capacity. Expected high teens or better ROIC on full year basis in 2027.
it sounds like there's sort of a lot of quasi onetime stuff here that's like the transformation, the contract cost. Is there a ballpark number as to how much that might be impacting this year
Show response
At least $100M of quasi-onetime transformation costs impacting 2026 including: contract costs on underperforming assets, asset holding/maintenance costs during extended shutdown timelines, and specialty business reliability issues. These provide high-confidence carryover benefit into 2027.
What we're not seeing is the reliability part of the equation playing out? Are you seeing things now that can give us confidence that, that's going to start showing up?
Show response
Core large assets showing measurable productivity gains driven by reliability. 7-8% overall improvement since fall 2024. Misses are in ancillary/transformation costs: network distribution, asset holding costs, underperforming contracts (one ending in April costing $20M more than expected), and specialty business underperformance. These are solvable but worse than expectations.
Calendar 2025 Q4
any specific reason why and and maybe this is normal course of both normal course, but why twelve to fifteen months to complete this process?
Show response
Primarily an accounting exercise, not operational untangling like the prior Sylvamo spin. No large legal entity issues. Precedents suggest 12-15 months but intent is to move as fast as possible.
you've got this big step up in the second half of next year, particularly in in North America, and and you you lay it out very clearly
Show response
Vast majority of H2 benefit from already-actioned items, closure tail costs falling off, supply chain/procurement improvements, lighthouse model rollout in mills. Cost counted at penny-level granularity for impacted facilities and people. Acknowledged many moving parts but executing well.
Calendar 2025 Q3
there was a lot of opportunity in North America to take out excess capacity that had developed in the system, and you basically didn't have to walk away from any business
Show response
EMEA has excess box capacity rather than mill capacity. Complexity sits in above-country structure rather than corporate center. Proportional cost opportunity as large or larger than NA but in different buckets. Commercial challenges in EMEA are more about refocusing resources on key customers rather than repricing contracts.
In the bridging to '27, so I guess we're kind of starting if we need like another $1.4 billion if we have like the $3.6 billion run rate already identified
Show response
Bridge to 2027 is roughly 50-50 net between cost and commercial, more cost on gross basis due to inflation. One more price revision expected in NA to reach mid-cycle. Modest European price improvement expected. The $3.6B bridge to 2026 does NOT include market growth, pricing, or future unexecuted actions.
Calendar 2025 Q2
can you remind us the GCF timeline? I think you mentioned you're still kind of on track. What was the timeline again?
Show response
Confirmed goal to close GCF divestiture by year-end. Said they are well into the process with no reason to believe timeline won't hold, though acknowledged tough financing markets.
the one question that I have is the mill reliability issues. As you're taking this journey, that's also incredibly important. And you've been there now a year plus
Show response
Silvernail acknowledged issues stem from years of underinvestment, not new problems. Redeploying capital from Red River and non-strategic assets into mills with competitive advantage. Described it as foundational work requiring consistent investment.
Calendar 2025 Q1
what type of tailwind should we expect in Europe from price changes, recognizing things could change?
Show response
Silvernail is confident first European price increase will flow through but cautious on second due to weak demand. European market has longer lag from paper price to box price.
it kind of suggests like a $500 million, $600 million pickup in the second half
Show response
Silvernail explained H2 ramp is from cost actions already taken (Red River, matrix org) flowing through, not new initiatives. Q2 is same EBITDA level as Q1 but higher quality earnings.
Calendar 2024 Q4
you also mentioned like a $350 million lack of productivity, reliability type of thing. Can you maybe provide more color
Show response
Silvernail broke it into ~$175-200M of mill reliability issues and the balance in productivity. Root causes are a decade of underinvestment in maintenance and workforce experience changeover.
in the past, you've talked about that there would still be negative year-over-year for the -- maybe through the middle of next year
Show response
Silvernail confirmed volume recovery timeline on track, expects gap to close in back half of 2025. Noted box plant service improvements showing up in NPS and quoting opportunities.
PKGPackaging Corporation of America13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 13 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how much of it then would of the 50 would have shown up in your box prices in the second quarter
Show response
Kent laid out realization: roughly 70 to 75% of the first increase in Q3, with the second increase weighted to Q4.
Calendar 2026 Q1
How much additional firepower is there relative to what we've seen in Greif over the last 6 months
Show response
Kent forecast conservative ~$0.10 sequential improvement Q1-to-Q2 from mix, productivity, and some price. Expect accretion in Q2 and further improvement in Q3 with stronger seasonality. Tom noted initial mill difficulties are behind them and performance significantly better.
it does seem in this particular instance that the good stuff is really showing up in 3Q in a big way
Show response
Mark confirmed the big pricing benefit comes into Q3. Some benefit late in Q2 but majority in Q3. Both Mark and Tom agreed this is the correct way to model it.
Calendar 2025 Q4
can we also contrast how the containerboard box markets feel now relative to how they felt this time last year?
Show response
Tom described much improved conditions, tariff uncertainty cleared, GDP up 4%+ with 5%+ forecast, wages ahead of inflation for first time in 4+ years. Year-ago had new administration uncertainty, potential tariffs, many question marks.
Could you share those types of metrics this time around?
Show response
Kent quantified Q4-to-Q1 cost step-up at $0.45-$0.50 per share, with a little under half recovered in Q2 excluding Wallula. Wallula cost improvements kick in more in Q2, providing additional benefit.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Just want to reconfirm in terms of CapEx related to those assets, I think you in the past talked about $50 million to $60 million
Show response
Mark confirmed tens of millions CapEx still good estimate. Similar to International Falls playbook over 14 years. Sheet feeders and box plants well capitalized. Kent confirmed bonus depreciation on PP&E allocation significantly reduced Q3 cash taxes.
Have you had business wins of late that you have visibility on that can give us confidence that you can continue to outperform on the volume side?
Show response
Tom confirmed continued business wins through existing account growth. Not getting lift from economy due to tariff uncertainty and starts/stops throughout the year. Beef and building products are the drags, not competitive losses.
are you actually feeling any more tightness because of the closures of containerboard capacity?
Show response
Tom said industry right-sizing to demand. PCA also rationalizing poor assets on corrugated side. Two box plant closures in Q4, facilities where capitalization isn't the answer, customers will be served from larger/better-equipped nearby plants. Mark noted PCA has closed 20+ plants over last 16 years while making 25 acquisitions.
Calendar 2025 Q2
that would actually seem to suggest continued sequential pretty strong sequential improvement. And I just want to make sure I'm getting that right
Show response
Tom said Q3 2025 vs Q3 2024 expected roughly flat on shipments. Risks skewed to upside once tariff uncertainty clears. Pent-up demand from lean customer inventories.
I just wanted to clarify that and whether you think that's a reasonable type of number and whether that was included in your synergies or not?
Show response
Tom confirmed Greif EBITDA estimates already above $212M from price increases. Dallas synergies built in conservatively with tremendous expansion upside.
Calendar 2025 Q1
you mentioned you expected volumes to be significantly higher in the second half than the first half. Maybe a bit more color there
Show response
Tom said it's both macro seasonality and customer pipeline from new facilities. Second half historically heavier for PCA's mix. Glendale ramping up with lined-up customers.
Can you share kind of roughly speaking, how much of your box business is non-contract and/or has that share increased meaningfully over time?
Show response
Non-contract is ~30%. Beat came from faster non-contract implementation and outside liner/medium sales. Contract side rolling through on normal 90-day cycle.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how much of the higher box prices that would come as a part of the containerboard price increase initiative that's been announced for January, would -- is incorporated in your 1Q guidance?
Show response
Tom said they took a conservative approach on RISI-tied contracts in Q1. Non-contractual price increases being implemented. Confirmed upside exists if RISI recognizes increase.
SWSmurfit WestRock13 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 13 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
have those prices roll through into boxes, can you give us a flavor as to where the EMEA margin would be
Show response
Tony pointed to prior-cycle margins above 18% as achievable but explicitly would not commit to timing, saying whether Q1 or Q2 next year he did not know.
the price increases in Europe have largely been cost reactive? Is that how we should be interpreting these increases too
Show response
Tony split the answer cleanly by grade and confirmed under follow-up that no kraftliner increase has been announced yet.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Does that mean you could potentially be up 5% in the fourth quarter? And are you I mean it sounds like you're doing really well in regaining business. Are you on the trajectory that you hoped you h...
Show response
Tony wouldn't commit to specific 5% number (depends on market) but very happy with trajectory. Not all plants perfect yet, still need investments, people changes. Bringing every NA manager through operating model course. Standout performers emerging. Aspiration remains 8-12% corrugated margins, question is timing not whether.
you're sold out. You're not making enough money in that business relative to what you think you should be. You've announced price increases broadly in a number of the other grades
Show response
Tony described SBS sold-out position as relatively new phenomenon (not expected even in February). Selectively announced some SBS price increases. Timing of broader moves depends on market conditions. Not comfortable with profitability in current position, keeping a weather eye on the situation. Acknowledged it's not just up to SW, market must support it.
Calendar 2025 Q4
just to understand downtime kind of in the thought process because obviously, that was costly this year. Is that a big component of potential upside
Show response
Ken described proactive downtime management philosophy, better to manage inventory than build unnecessary stocks. Q1 always heavy for maintenance downtime. Beyond that, will wait to see how demand develops. Tony highlighted stock reduction as a big opportunity, grade optimization reducing widths (LatAm went from 18 to 3, NA starting from ~200 targeting 40).
pricing, you're not using that as sort of an ingredient on what you have is an improvement '26 over 2025. Presumably, inflation is going to be working against us as it always is. Can you help us, i...
Show response
Ken quantified 2026 discrete items: remaining synergies $40-50M, energy headwind $60-70M, fiber tailwind ~$50M. Cost takeout programs designed to offset wage/labor inflation, treated as one bucket. Second half expected to be progressively better than first half. Range of $5.0-5.3B designed for flexibility given early February visibility.
Calendar 2025 Q3
do you have a sense as to when you think you might be inflecting more positively versus the industry
Show response
Tony expects volume inflection from Q3 2026 as unprofitable contracts expire in Q1/Q2 2026. Described colossal pipeline of new quality business already being landed but requiring qualification time.
What have you been doing vis-a-vis outside sales of containerboard in North America into either export or domestic channels
Show response
Tony described export market as weak with high customer inventories in South America. Expects a sharp price recovery at some point. Domestic outside sales continue with important long-term customers, no real change from legacy approach.
is it pretty easy to switch back and forth between the grades depending on the variables at play
Show response
Tony confirmed switching is straightforward with minor machine adjustments. Customers report SBS runs better than CRB on their machines due to cleaner sheet, though CRB producers would likely disagree.
Calendar 2025 Q2
What has sort of held you back from this leading to perhaps a little bit more optimism on the outcome for the year
Show response
Tony cited demand uncertainty as key holdback: no US volume pickup yet, Germany weak, transition period of replacing lost business. Several cost items improved but volume visibility insufficient to raise guidance.
we've obviously had a very big move in the euro relative to the dollar over the course of this year. Can you explain to us a little bit how that's impacted results
Show response
Ken disclosed only $8M net FX impact on EBITDA as European and LatAm moves offset. Sensitivity: every $0.01 euro/dollar move = ~$12M EBITDA impact, ~$30M on debt side.
Calendar 2025 Q1
we've had some big moves in dollar, euro. I would have thought just on a translation basis that might have some implications
Show response
Ken confirmed slightly negative FX impact, particularly in Latin America, but not material. Offered to provide modeling sensitivities for euro/dollar.
I wanted just to come back to the first half to second half bridge, if I could. You're essentially assuming about 100 million to 300 million pickup in EBITDA
Show response
Ken detailed cost headwinds: energy ~$350M YoY, labor/inflation ~$200M, other raw materials ~$100M, downtime ~$150M YoY. Offsets: NA box pricing up ~8% YoY, NA OCC relief of $100-150M. Tony explained European OCC spike was triggered by panic bidding at Italian auction by new capacity entrant.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| WY Weyerhaeuser | 16 | 13%2 of 16 questions |
| IP International Paper | 15 | 13%2 of 15 questions |
| PKG Packaging Corporation of America | 13 | 0%none of 13 questions |
| SW Smurfit WestRock | 13 | 0%none of 13 questions |
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q1 | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q2 | 9 | 33%3 of 9 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q3 | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q4 | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q1 | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q2 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 4 |
- 2024 Q45 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q19 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 9 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q29 questions · challenge rate 33% (3 of 9 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q310 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q49 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 9 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q19 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q26 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Pricing15
- Demand13
- Competitive Dynamics13
- Margin12
- Cost Pressure10
- M&A9
- Guidance Reliability7
- Revenue Growth6
- Macroeconomic5
- Capital Allocation4
Show all 17 topics
- Capex Investment4
- Supply Chain4
- Trade Tariffs2
- Cloud & AI1
- Geographic Expansion1
- Innovation & R&D1
- Regulation Policy1