Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Megan Alexander
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 57on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 5%3 of 57 questions
- Companies
- 9questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right. See how we grade analysts on earnings-call questions.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 57 of 57 questions from 9 companies
HASHasbro12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
could you just put a finer point on what we should expect for the second quarter
Show response
Goetter provided clear phasing: CP Q2 growth moves from expected double-digit to low single-digit due to cyber shift, with most of $40-60M moving to Q3. Wizards Q2 expected to be robust behind Strixhaven and Marvel Super Heroes.
can you just help us understand whether the guidance iteration at this point is just consistent with your typical approach
Show response
Cocks confirmed it is standard practice to hold guidance after Q1, citing strong tailwinds but also headwinds from oil costs and tariff uncertainty. Goetter added cyber remediation is still in progress.
Calendar 2025 Q4
can you just talk a little bit about what's driving the momentum in this expanded partnership slate
Show response
Cocks described Hasbro's hedgehog concept: uniquely engaging consumers from age 2 to 99. Partners choose Hasbro for multigenerational reach. Goetter confirmed 2026 as CP inflection point with growth continuing into 2027-2028.
can you just kind of take a step back and unpack some of the assumptions that are underlying your Magic guide for the year?
Show response
Cocks cited distribution growth (WPN up 20% last year, double-digits again in 2026), player growth (organized play 20%+ but casual growing faster), and stickiness driving backlist. Goetter noted most growth front-half loaded due to Q4 comp.
Calendar 2025 Q3
It does seem like versus the third quarter, both segments are contributing. So can you just walk through some of the puts and takes by segment as we think about 3Q versus 4Q profitability?
Show response
Cocks noted CP will see toy growth offset by MY LITTLE PONY licensing comp. Goetter detailed Wizards raise driven by revenue momentum; CP shipments expected to outpace POS creating margin leverage.
how are you thinking about capital allocation priorities as we head into '26 with the balance sheet now at your leverage target?
Show response
Goetter confirmed unchanged priorities: invest in growth, dividend, debt paydown. Still sees opportunity to bring leverage below 2.5x for more optionality. Will update in 2026.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Can we just take the high end of your updated outlook for this year. You could achieve most of that this year alone.
Show response
Goetter acknowledged over-delivery vs February targets but declined to update midterm outlook. Noted tariff net impact expected bigger in 2026-27 as a headwind not known in February.
I think $44 million is the highest contribution you've ever recognized in a quarter game to date. So can you just talk a little bit about what you're seeing there?
Show response
Cocks cited excellent user metrics, savvy Scopely partnerships (Star Wars collab), and lower-than-expected user acquisition costs. Goetter guided $12-14M/month for back half, up from prior $10M.
Calendar 2025 Q1
is that meant to say that the exposure or the kind of headwind that Gina talked about this year, could that get worse next year?
Show response
Cocks confirmed incremental 2026 tariff exposure if duties persist (first 4-5 months deferred in 2025). Also noted supply chain moves have transitional costs but will become cost-neutral over time.
Is there any way to kind of parse out what is being raised for one queue versus the rest of the year
Show response
Cocks confirmed both Q1 outperformance and improved outlook for rest of year. Goetter noted Q2 revenue will be down due to licensing settlement comp and Baldur's Gate/Monopoly Go lapping.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Excluding that 4-point headwind from NERF and Transformers, you're implying the rest of the portfolios kind of flat to up 4%, which is pretty strong.
Show response
Cocks gave detailed POS outlook by category (trading cards/building blocks driving, others down low-single-digits) and cited specific innovation areas. Goetter explained closeout volume impact on share metrics.
Is that 50 to 100 bps per year cumulative, i.e., 150 to 300 over three years? Or is it that the goal to grow 50 to 100 basis points per year kind of regardless of the starting point?
Show response
Goetter confirmed cumulative 150-300bps margin expansion over 3 years. Explained video game monetization will help profit dollars and cash but hurt margin via depreciation of capitalized expenses.
HSYHershey Company (The)9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
has anything changed in April so far? Or are you still embedding that same level of conservatism on elasticity
Show response
Steve confirmed elasticities holding favorably. Q1 pull-forward from Easter sell-through and international customer pre-buying explained. Nothing structurally different for Q2.
the backdrop has gotten more challenging. You talked in your remarks, there's elevated geopolitical uncertainty
Show response
Kirk provided detailed SNAP analysis across 5 states with mild impact. GLP-1 and gas price effects tracking within plan. Overall macro within guidance assumptions.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how do you think about kind of the need or desire for incremental reinvestment, you know, beyond what you're doing in '26
Show response
Kirk described investments as both near-term growth drivers and multiyear foundation builders. 2027 will also balance margin recovery with growth investment. More detail at March Investor Day.
how should we think about cocoa within the framework? Were you able to kind of capture any benefit from what we've seen over the last month
Show response
Kirk noted cocoa markets finally reflecting fundamentals described for 18 months. Hedging in great shape for 2026. Hedged above current levels meaning 2027 upside potential. New equilibrium likely above historic levels.
Calendar 2025 Q3
would you say that anything has changed that would affect that view? Cocoa has obviously come down
Show response
Steve noted feeling marginally better on cocoa and optimistic on tariff trade deals. Modeled $200M incremental tariffs and cocoa inflation for 2026 but level of inflation moderating.
could you just maybe give us what you're expecting for the fourth quarter explicitly
Show response
Steve confirmed international timing is biggest Q4 factor. Additional investment behind Halloween sell-through and holiday. Cocoa hedge timing less favorable than Q3.
Calendar 2025 Q2
is it fair to say at this point, you do expect you could deliver on-algo growth versus the updated '25 guide in 2026
Show response
Steve confirmed on-algorithm expectation for 2026 based on current visibility, acknowledging tariff fluidity.
you could just expand on what you've seen in that nonseasonal portfolio in the second quarter and what's driving the acceleration
Show response
Michele cited innovation driving value perception, emotional well-being correlation in stressed times, and soft comps. IC programs showing strong growth. Category may not sustain Q2 levels in H2.
Calendar 2025 Q1
if we put tariffs aside, you would feel -- you would have felt better about the ability to grow EPS next year
Show response
Steve confirmed unequivocally better without tariffs. Still sees path to base business earnings growth based on where cocoa sits, requiring aggressive mitigation. Follow-up confirmed $100M unmitigated tariff estimate assumes 10% paused rate.
MDLZMondelez International9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
what you're seeing in the competitive environment today? Clearly, it's been a big focus.
Show response
Dirk confirmed no price movements in market, strong Easter, improving share trends. Base business share turned from loss to slightly positive. Comprehensive answer.
what's your kind of assessment of cocoa as we sit here today?
Show response
Luca detailed fundamentals unchanged, mid-crop positive, industry gone longer with average coverage exceeding 10 months. Expects possible surplus and potentially lower prices ahead.
Calendar 2025 Q4
should we think about the net price cost relationship embedded in the guide as roughly neutral to the year
Show response
Luca confirmed chocolate pricing net of cost planned as slightly positive to neutral for 2026. Pricing flat but pipeline cost locked at lower level than 2025. Inventory accounting causes Q1 headwind but relationship improves through year.
Calendar 2025 Q3
the guide does imply a step-up in the fourth quarter from an organic sales perspective. It sounds like that's mostly driven by Europe
Show response
Luca confirmed Europe rebound from Christmas activation, EM continuing with chocolate elasticity at just 0.3x in Q3. US projected at -4% volume but pricing actions and promo fine-tuning helping top and bottom line. Overall Q4 step-up expected across regions.
you talked about in the prepared remarks the new multiyear North America supply chain program
Show response
Luca described program addressing US bakery costs with more automated lines, reducing capacity constraints and improving cost structure. Second element: optimizing DSD logistics with fewer distribution centers and branches. Material impact starting 2027. Within existing cash flow goals.
Calendar 2025 Q2
There was a comment in the prepared remarks just about some of these headwinds reducing your flexibility
Show response
Luca explained reduced flexibility from unpredictable heat wave and US destocking. Europe weather now cooperating. NA category still down 3%. Biscuits ex-NA up 7% YTD. Being prudent and cautious.
How are you thinking about whether or not you might have to do a little bit more pricing, some more RGM
Show response
Luca said new crop data will clarify cocoa direction. If stays elevated, existing actions plus potential H2 pricing sufficient. If falls, material P&L upside with volume rebound. Exiting 2025 with GP per kilo that he likes.
Calendar 2025 Q1
you mentioned in your prepared remarks, the profit dollar generation in the quarter was a bit better than you expected
Show response
Luca cited three drivers: slightly better pricing outside US, productivity ahead of schedule (procurement), and favorable commodity procurement. Tariff impact manageable, hitting Q4 NA. Cadence broadly unchanged.
you have made a lot of progress over the last couple of quarters on your share. But at the same time, you're a category leader
Show response
Dirk outlined plan: sub-$3 price points, strong activations (July 4, Labor Day, Selena Gomez Oreo), push multi-packs, plus destocking to subside. Expects gradual improvement in H2.
SJMJ.M. Smucker Company (The)8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
you mentioned that the outlook does not assume any impact from tariff refunds at this point.
Show response
Tucker declined to quantify refunds, citing uncertain scope and realization and the decision to exclude them from the outlook.
can you maybe just unpack a bit more about where those investments are focused specifically?
Show response
Tucker tied investments to distribution, innovation, marketing, and capacity, with pricing both strategic and inflation-recovery.
Calendar 2026 Q1
It's still quite wide, I think, for this point in the year. I think historically, you've narrowed it a bit with one quarter left
Show response
Tucker explains wide range maintained for prudence. Coffee upside covering SBS shortfall. Balance of business in line. Most confident at midpoint.
I think it's now you're expecting flat to slightly down versus flat prior. Can you just unpack a little bit more what changed there
Show response
Tucker attributes SG&A improvement to general efficiencies and prudent spend management, not structural changes.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how are you feeling about outside of coffee, kind of the rest of the U.S. Retail portfolio contributing to or getting back to algo OSG
Show response
Tucker avoids promising specific exit rate but highlights: comparable growth ~6% ex-co-manufacturing. Momentum across away-from-home, pet resilience, SBS stabilization, Uncrustables growth.
Can you talk a little bit about how you're thinking about the pacing of coffee margins in 3Q and 4Q
Show response
Tucker provides specific margin trajectory: Q2 18.2%, Q3 slight improvement but below 20%, Q4 above 20% but likely not reaching 25%. $75M tariff costs predominantly in Q3.
Calendar 2025 Q3
which segments we should expect to see kind of sequential improvement how we think about that in terms of the reported sales
Show response
Tucker walks through each segment: coffee momentum, Uncrustables growth, pet cat food momentum, SBS stabilization, and away-from-home as bright spot.
I wanted to ask about the increased free cash flow outlook. It seems like there's a onetime benefit coming through this year
Show response
Tucker corrects: the $100M FCF increase is ongoing from the one big beautiful bill act, not one-time. Supports continued debt paydown toward 3x leverage by end of FY2027.
CPBCampbell Soup Company6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
give us some context on where you are hedged today for fiscal
Show response
Cunfer said H1 inflation is largely locked high, with the second half dependent on whether the conflict eases.
could things get worse before they get better on the salty side
Show response
Beekhuizen conceded near-term salty pressure, with simplification and execution improvements taking longer to land.
Calendar 2026 Q1
should we still be thinking about Snacks declining in the fourth quarter?
Show response
CFO quantified H2 Snacks organic decline at approximately -4%, fairly balanced between Q3/Q4 with Q4 slightly better. Not anticipating significant sequential improvement on net sales line but margin profile expected to get better by year-end.
if Q3 operating EBIT growth performance looks similar to Q2, obviously an improvement expected in the fourth quarter
Show response
CFO outlined Q4 margin drivers: Sovos ERP timing lap brings volume back to Q4, Snacks margin sequential improvement, tariff lapping begins in Q4 reducing YoY headwind, and lower advertising spend in Q4 (up in Q3, down in Q4 YoY).
Calendar 2025 Q2
Are there some incremental actions that you're taking that might mean that's not the case anymore
Show response
CFO confirmed Snacks margin expectation lowered to 13% for full year (from prior 13.5%). Still expects sequential improvement from H1 to H2 but slower snacks recovery constrains margin recovery.
I don't think I saw you reiterate the expectation for RAYO's growth to be slightly above 10% this year
Show response
CEO modestly lowered Rao's growth outlook to high-single-digits from slightly above 10%. Year-to-date consumption at ~10%, Q3 at 2%. Latest four-week data shows sauce +9% and overall brand +11%.
CAGConagra Brands5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
the op margin, you're now expecting at the high end of the guide. Could you maybe just talk about what's driving that?
Show response
Dave attributed margin performance to inflation tracking expectations, strong productivity, encouraging pricing elasticities. Free cash flow conversion raised to 105% from 100%, driven by cash tax efficiency, Ardent cash maintained, and inventory reduction via AI tools.
as we think about the fourth quarter, maybe you can just help us with some of the building blocks as we think about top line and should shipments generally match consumption
Show response
Sean explained 2-year shipments track consumption closely despite quarterly lumpiness. Dave confirmed positive Q4 organic growth expected with innovation shipments starting, plus operating margin inflection from lower A&P percentage and 53rd week leverage.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Would you expect that two-year reported trend in R and F to accelerate versus the first half?
Show response
Sean confirmed good H2 expected for frozen with underlying trends inflecting, market shares at or near highs, and significantly stronger promotional programming than prior-year H2 when supply constraints limited activity.
what are kind of the key swing factors or uncertainties that remain that justified keeping the EPS range wider now that we are halfway through the year rather than narrowing it?
Show response
Sean characterized the wider range as standard timing rather than signaling uncertainty, noting ranges are typically narrowed later in the fiscal year. Committed to updating next quarter.
Calendar 2025 Q1
can you just help us unpack the underlying expectation as it relates to consumptions in the context of, you know, flattish shipments
Show response
Sean explained consumption weakness from low inventories and out-of-stocks is temporary, not from weakened consumer pull. Easter timing also affects Q4 comparison.
Show 3 more companies
KHCKraft Heinz4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
anything else in the quarter in terms of upside versus your expectations to call out
Show response
CFO identified 40-50 bps nonrecurring Q1 gains from excess byproduct sales, deferred factory maintenance to summer, and better-than-expected cheese commodity costs. Maintaining full-year gross margin headwind guidance of 25-75 bps.
Can you talk about whether anything you have seen so far has changed how you are thinking about concentrating some of those investments
Show response
CEO cited specific launches: Power Mac & Cheese at 35K accounts, Capri Sun Hydrate in new doors, Lunchables renovation next month, Philadelphia Lactose Free in H2. Investing against brands with right to win while plugging leaky buckets in meats.
Calendar 2025 Q2
maybe you can just update us on how you're thinking about timing of getting back to just maybe stabilization first and foremost, in North America retail
Show response
CEO cited Brand Growth System expansion from 10% to 40% of business by year-end, with Capri Sun as proof point of renovation success. Did not provide specific quarter for North America stabilization.
would you be able to just update us on what base input cost inflation is versus tariffs, if that's changed at all
Show response
CFO separated base commodities peaking in Q2 with relief starting Q4 from tariff impact of ~100 bps in 2025 annualizing to ~180 bps. Meat and coffee remain pockets of high inflation. Confirmed some tariff carryover into 2026.
GISGeneral Mills3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
I wanted to ask about the higher cost of volume that you called out in the prepared remarks
Show response
Kofi cited cost of volume and pace of volume recovery as the two biggest determinants of where GIS lands within full-year guidance range, alongside ongoing external volatility from tariffs, shutdown, SNAP, and consumer sentiment.
I was just curious if you could give us an update on how the category growth within the quarter trended?
Show response
Jeff Siemon noted category volumes improved from down 1% in Q1 to down ~0.5pt in Q2. Dana highlighted cereal pounds still down 3% vs historical -1% to -2%, driven by consumer shift to high-protein alternatives; Cheerios Protein at 0.9% share, on track for $100M.
Calendar 2025 Q3
could you just clarify how category performance has evolved thus far year-to-date relative to your initial expectations?
Show response
CEO confirmed top 10 categories performing about a point better than expected; GLP-1 impact small but creating opportunities in protein-rich products like Cheerios Protein.
HOGHarley-Davidson, Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2024 Q4
you're expecting an inventory reduction of more than 30% in the first quarter for touring as you did in 2024
Show response
Root gave the shape of the destock: front half down over 30%, year-end down 10% plus, with wholesale down in the first half and up in the back half.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| HAS Hasbro | 12 | 8%1 of 12 questions |
| HSY Hershey Company (The) | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions |
| MDLZ Mondelez International | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions |
| SJM J.M. Smucker Company (The) | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions |
| CPB Campbell Soup Company | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions |
| CAG Conagra Brands | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| KHC Kraft Heinz | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| GIS General Mills | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| HOG Harley-Davidson, Inc. | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- HASHasbro · 12 questions8%1 of 12 questions
- HSYHershey Company (The) · 9 questions0%none of 9 questions
- MDLZMondelez International · 9 questions0%none of 9 questions
- SJMJ.M. Smucker Company (The) · 8 questions13%1 of 8 questions
- CPBCampbell Soup Company · 6 questions17%1 of 6 questions
- CAGConagra Brands · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- KHCKraft Heinz · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- GISGeneral Mills · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- HOGHarley-Davidson, Inc. · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q1 | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q2 | 10 | 10%1 of 10 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q3 | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q4 | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions | 6 |
| 2026 Q1 | 14 | 7%1 of 14 questions | 7 |
| 2026 Q2 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 2 |
- 2024 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q16 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q210 questions · challenge rate 10% (1 of 10 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q39 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 9 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q411 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 11 questions) · 6 companies
- 2026 Q114 questions · challenge rate 7% (1 of 14 questions) · 7 companies
- 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Guidance Reliability18
- Margin17
- Revenue Growth16
- Demand12
- Cost Pressure11
- Competitive Dynamics8
- Trade Tariffs5
- Pricing5
- Macroeconomic3
- Supply Chain3
Show all 16 topics
- Capital Allocation2
- Product Launch2
- Capex Investment2
- Innovation & R&D1
- M&A1
- Inventory1