Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Michael Blum
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q1 (6 quarters).
- Questions
- 49on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 12%6 of 49 questions
- Companies
- 6questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 6with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 49 of 49 questions from 6 companies
OKEONEOK12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
Wondering if you can give us a sense specifically on butane blending, if that's the case as well, if you're 75% hedged going into the year? And then is there any kind of seasonality to these hedges?
Show response
Sheridan confirmed strong Q1 hedging on butane-RBOB, with Q4 hedges added at higher prices post-Middle East conflict. Increased gasoline volumes and synergy projects provide further blending tailwinds.
I just wanted to ask the status of the potential Sunbelt Connector project. As I'm sure you're aware, Western Gateway appears close to moving forward.
Show response
Sheridan sees room for only one project and believes either one benefits OKE through longer-haul Gulf Coast to Mid-Continent volumes plus Gulf Coast to El Paso tariffs.
Calendar 2025 Q4
can you remind us how much open capacity you have to capture Waha basis spreads and what Waha spread is assumed in the guidance
Show response
Sheridan declined to specify open capacity but confirmed excess Eiger capacity, current spreads above forecast, with upside if spreads hold through Q3 before new pipelines come online.
the ranges are fairly wide. So I wonder if you could just speak to what you think will drive that towards the lower or higher end of those ranges
Show response
Sheridan explained wide ranges reflect pad timing variability and commodity sensitivity, higher crude prices would drive additional rigs and volumes toward upper end.
Calendar 2025 Q3
can you capture that from your EnLink assets? Or do you have more open capacity on WesTex to capture those spreads
Show response
Sheridan confirmed positive impact from Waha-Katy spread via combined ONEOK/EnLink capacity, with parking loans and additional gas marketing opportunities.
you removed the mid-single digit to high single-digit growth language. So I just wanted to make sure I understand the change there
Show response
Pierce declined to restate specific growth rates for 2026, noting 2026 guidance will be finalized in early Q1 2026 but expressed confidence in positive trajectory.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Just wondering if you can discuss the performance of BridgeTex this quarter. And then obviously, you've increased your position there
Show response
Sheridan highlighted growing crude volumes, connectivity to East Houston, and strategic advantage of directing Medallion/EnLink gathering volumes to owned pipelines.
kind of where does volume or utilization stand today? And how do you see the path filling that up?
Show response
Sheridan noted base contracted volumes provide good returns with additional volume coming from Shadowfax plant, Delaware expansions, new Big Horn plant, and third-party discussions.
Calendar 2025 Q1
So just wondering how you're seeing the rest of the year trending. And I recognize now that Bakken is a smaller piece of the overall pie, but how much Bakken growth do you need
Show response
Sheridan confirmed only low single-digit Bakken growth needed for guidance, with strong momentum coming out of winter and confidence building.
how sensitive is that to market pricing? So like if we see a prolonged kind of weakness, for example, would that have an impact?
Show response
Sheridan explained ethane recovery is price-driven with flexibility to pull volumes off-system if needed, with some pre-locked positions and continued strong China demand.
Calendar 2024 Q4
is this kind of a new run rate for the Company?
Show response
Walt characterized 2025 as peak CapEx with baseline expected to decline in 2026-2027, though higher than pre-acquisition levels.
if you can just sort of clarify for us where are synergies are tracking for, let's say, Magellan and EnLink and Medallion versus your original targets
Show response
Walt confirmed 2024 synergies exceeded $175M target with another $125M layered on top for 2025, reflecting increased opportunities from team integration.
KMIKinder Morgan11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
is it fair to assume that the return on this project will need to compete with your gas pipeline investments?
Show response
Dang confirmed Western Gateway competes on same risk-adjusted return basis as natural gas projects. No change in capital allocation strategy or return targets.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Are there more noncore assets that you're actively looking to sell
Show response
Kim explained EagleHawk sale was opportunistic, partner approached to sell, price achieved (8.5x multiple) made reinvestment below cost of capital. Not part of a planned asset sale program. Portfolio well-suited with 2/3 natural gas, 26% products/terminals, 7% CO2. Comfortable with current asset suite.
can you talk about how meaningful a customer they are
Show response
Kim said Bakken is only 3% of total EBITDA. Continental is just one of many customers. Impact very manageable because volumes came in stronger than expected year-to-date and Continental will continue completing wells through August.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I wanted to ask you about the behind-the-meter opportunities
Show response
Kim stated clearly that KMI is unlikely to invest behind the meter in power generation. Growth is focused on high-quality infrastructure backed by take-or-pay contracts. Sital clarified KMI would still supply gas to consortiums providing reliable power but would not invest in power assets directly.
where do you stand on committed initial volumes? And where do you think that can go
Show response
Sital said Hiland Express conversion on track for Q1 2026 initial commitment. Facing aggressive competition from incumbent. Repurposing assets to position for incremental barrels. Declined further detail pending announcements expected soon.
Calendar 2025 Q2
How do we think about a $500 million investment in KinderHawk
Show response
Kim explained risk-reward framework: longer take-or-pay contracts with creditworthy counterparties earn returns at lower end of target range, while commodity/volume-exposed investments like gathering require higher-end returns.
an update how you're thinking about behind-the-meter opportunities
Show response
Kim said most concrete activity from regulated utilities putting capacity in rate base. IPPs have not announced many projects yet but are in discussions. Sital described partnership model: KMI brings gas supply and storage, partners handle power generation, hyperscalers build data centers. Exploring key sites for behind-the-meter projects.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Can you provide an update on any progress in Arizona regarding either an expansion of EPNG
Show response
Sital confirmed need and pursuit of both brownfield and greenfield but declined specifics due to competitive situation. Will announce when customer commitments secured.
How would you characterize the pace of discussions with customers
Show response
Sital said data center site selection still evolving but utility discussions active. Kim noted 70% of Q1 backlog additions are power-related and 50% of total backlog is power. Most concrete activity from regulated utilities.
Calendar 2024 Q4
President Trump's AI data center announcement includes a large data center in Abilene, Texas
Show response
Sital confirmed KMI pipeline footprint is well-positioned near Abilene but noted many competitors will also pursue the opportunity.
Can you just tell us how that's progressing and the potential scope of that project
Show response
Sital confirmed binding commitments secured. First phase contracted and positioned for future expansion into the Louisiana corridor. Separate from but connected to the Trident project.
EPDEnterprise Products Partners L.P.10 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
you didn't really think you'd see any permanent shifts in where global buyers are gonna source their hydrocarbons
Show response
Natalie confirmed producers staying disciplined; Jim noted India showing interest but geographic challenges for LPG remain post-conflict.
would you maintain that 50% or 60% allocation to buybacks versus debt paydown
Show response
Randy confirmed 50-60% buyback split for 2026 holds even with upside; noted 2027 could be different.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I wonder if you could just remind us how EPP is impacted by changes in Waha prices in in both directions
Show response
Todd explained EPD benefits in both directions, low Waha via west-to-east transport spreads, high Waha via storage assets monetizing volatility.
I'm wondering if you can just give us a little color on what you're producer customers are telling you in terms of their plans for 2026
Show response
Natalie reported record well connects of 590 in Midland and 500 estimated in Delaware this year. Delaware growth curve steepening.
Calendar 2025 Q3
How much of this is just your view that the macro is less constructive with oil prices lower, drilling slowing, et cetera
Show response
Randy emphasized this is a natural cycle, elevated CapEx for large projects followed by return to mid-cycle, similar to 2015-2016. Not a macro call.
how you're going to basically balance the potential increase in buybacks with any tax ramifications for your unitholders
Show response
Randy clarified tax impact is only on selling unitholders, not remaining holders, removing a potential concern about the buyback program expansion.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I've been reading a little bit about potentially an uptick in activity in the San Juan Basin
Show response
Natalie said Enterprise's San Juan position is pretty stable, flat to slight small growth. Not seeing meaningful changes in their footprint.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Would you consider slowing some of your NGL expansion projects? Or are those just kind of fully contracted committed customers
Show response
Jim and Randy confirmed projects are well-contracted and won't slow down. Even if crude production goes flat, 1.5 Bcf/day of gas growth yields 200K bbl/day NGL growth.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how active what's out there for you and do you expect this to be an active year for Enterprise
Show response
Randy noted 2024 was active; they see more asset packages later in 2025. Prefers asset purchases over public M&A for driving cash flow per unit growth.
Just if you're thinking about buybacks any differently as a component of capital return, should we expect the cadence we've seen in the last couple of years
Show response
Randy outlined path to ~$1B+ excess DCF after growth CapEx by 2026, providing significantly more flexibility for buybacks and debt retirement.
TRGPTarga Resources10 questions · 6 reporting periods · 3 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
I'm curious if you're seeing any change in producer conversations or planned activity in light of the higher price deck
Show response
Matt noted no dramatic changes yet but expects tailwinds as prices stay elevated. Volumes on track despite 200-400 MMcf/d shut-ins.
if you think you'll see higher rates or perhaps longer contracts going forward in light of just the global volatility
Show response
Ben highlighted record inbound interest for multiyear LPG contracts and potential for additional chiller expansion at Galena Park.
Calendar 2025 Q4
can you just remind us how much open pipeline capacity you have to take advantage when spreads widen? And then I guess on the flip side, in your prepared remarks, you said you're going to benefit a...
Show response
Meloy noted significant transport positions to multiple locations, creating basis position opportunities. Declined to quantify exactly as it's always changing. Higher Waha would benefit fee floor economics, while weak Waha provides marketing offset. Upside in either direction vs current guidance assumptions.
I was wondering if you could talk a little bit more about Slide 16, which references deeper zone development and maybe what your producers are seeing there
Show response
Meloy noted early activity in Barnett/Woodford deeper zones with positive well results. Viewed as upside over the next several years. Some modest contribution in 2026, potentially more going forward as more producers get active.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Would you say volumes for this quarter were basically seasonally in line with your expectations? And can you give us an update on end market demand and specifically where you might be seeing areas ...
Show response
Pryor noted normal seasonal Q2/Q3 dip, with fundamentals unchanged. Continued global demand growth. Small balancing project now online provides flexibility and reliability. 2027 export expansion tied to expected global demand growth.
Can you discuss the decision to increase the dividend 25% next year versus leaning more heavily into buybacks?
Show response
Meloy described the dividend increase as part of a balanced all-of-the-above approach, with multi-year room to grow dividends further while maintaining opportunistic buyback capacity. Year-to-date repurchases already at $642M.
Calendar 2025 Q2
the volumes were down sequentially the last 2 quarters. I think you're below your total existing capacity. So just wondering if you can just kind of square that
Show response
Pryor reaffirmed integrated supply advantage from wellhead to dock. Long-term contracts with ramping volumes complement the expansion timeline. Ben Branstetter reinforced the integrated volume story.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I'm wondering if you're seeing any change in the destination of where those cargoes are going versus historical patterns
Show response
Pryor noted some cargo switching from China to Japan/Korea with backfill from Saudi, but overall demand unchanged. Ethane excluded from China tariffs; LPG exclusion discussions ongoing.
how you're thinking about buybacks? Would you be more cautious trying to protect the balance sheet
Show response
Meloy emphasized opportunistic approach unchanged, stepping into April dislocation. Balance sheet at 3.6x provides ample capacity for continued repurchases.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Your Permian volumes sequentially were up only a little bit, you know, only modestly Q3 to Q4, and that's despite that you've been bringing on plants
Show response
Kneale explained a low-margin contract rollover created noise. Actual growth trajectory across 2024 was strong at 277, 311, then 83 Mcf/d sequentially.
BEBloom Energy Corporation5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 2 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
should we expect most of your business is gonna be in the US going forward, or is there a meaningful international
Show response
Sridhar declined the mix disclosure but conceded international will lag the US on LNG availability, and pivoted to 135% C&I backlog growth.
Projecting 30% growth CAGR to 2030 for Bloom Energy. So I'm wondering if you could just speak to that
Show response
Sridhar disavowed the supplier's projection directly and argued the visible horizon in AI infrastructure is at best six months.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you give us a sense of the size of that opportunity set? And how exactly Bloom will play a role in that partnership
Show response
Sridhar declined to size Oracle, pointing only to Oracle's own press release language that the first project was the first of many.
Calendar 2024 Q4
We saw the first 100 megawatts were deployed in Ohio. Is there anything beyond that in '25 guidance
Show response
Sridhar redirected to AEP's own public comments and gave nothing on the remaining 900 megawatts.
on the gross margin guidance for 2025, it's roughly flat with '24. Can you speak to any puts or takes
Show response
Berenbaum conceded the analyst had framed the dynamics correctly and cited third-party gear content, but gave no margin bridge.
GEVGE Vernova1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you speak to why most of the backlog increase or slot reservations as opposed to orders? Is that just a function of timing? Are there other dynamics going on there? And then can you just level ...
Show response
Strazik explained SRAs grow faster because equipment is secured first while customers work EPC, gas pipelines, and permits in parallel. GEV's conservative classification requires those milestones before moving to backlog. Both SRAs and orders carry nonrefundable cash deposits. Low volatility seen in both categories.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| OKE ONEOK | 12 | 8%1 of 12 questions |
| KMI Kinder Morgan | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions |
| EPD Enterprise Products Partners L.P. | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions |
| TRGP Targa Resources | 10 | 30%3 of 10 questions |
| BE Bloom Energy Corporation | 5 | 40%2 of 5 questions |
| GEV GE Vernova | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- OKEONEOK · 12 questions8%1 of 12 questions
- KMIKinder Morgan · 11 questions0%none of 11 questions
- EPDEnterprise Products Partners L.P. · 10 questions0%none of 10 questions
- TRGPTarga Resources · 10 questions30%3 of 10 questions
- BEBloom Energy Corporation · 5 questions40%2 of 5 questions
- GEVGE Vernova · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 9 | 22%2 of 9 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q1 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q2 | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q3 | 10 | 20%2 of 10 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q4 | 10 | 10%1 of 10 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 4 |
- 2024 Q49 questions · challenge rate 22% (2 of 9 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q17 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q26 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q310 questions · challenge rate 20% (2 of 10 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q410 questions · challenge rate 10% (1 of 10 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q17 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 4 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand20
- Capital Allocation12
- Capex Investment10
- Macroeconomic7
- Pricing6
- Guidance Reliability6
- Margin5
- Competitive Dynamics5
- Revenue Growth5
- Cloud & AI5
Show all 15 topics
- Geographic Expansion4
- M&A4
- Trade Tariffs2
- Supply Chain1
- Innovation & R&D1