Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Mike Grondahl
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).
- Questions
- 26on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 8%2 of 26 questions
- Companies
- 3questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 9with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 26 of 26 questions from 3 companies
APLDApplied Digital Corp.15 questions · 8 reporting periods · 2 of 15 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
the perception of North Dakota as a market and the receptivity you're seeing from hyperscalers
Show response
Wes cited 3 customers already in the state, a ~1 GW hyperscaler self-build, and talks with other Tier 1 hyperscalers.
Can you talk about current options you're seeing for investment-grade hyperscaler debt funding?
Show response
Saidal named project finance and IG bond structures beyond high yield, favoring terms refinanceable within 1-2 years post-construction.
Calendar 2026 Q2
Can you talk about your strategy around managing the cost of capital really on both the debt and the equity side?
Show response
Saidal laid out a three-part financing flywheel: Applied's balance sheet/revolver, the Macquarie JV equity (3/4), and site-specific project debt rolled to permanent financing.
the 3 recent leases for 810 megawatts and the lower yields or yield to development cost
Show response
Wes defended the lease economics as mid-to-high band for the customer quality/scale and cited ~$2B+ of annual contracted NOI as the payoff.
Calendar 2026 Q1
could you give us a little bit maybe more insight into the restructured leases at PF1?
Show response
Saidal detailed the lease restructuring benefits -- the investment-grade CoreWeave offtake, a lockbox structure with Applied first in the waterfall, and a springing parent guarantee -- and said borrowing costs should move in line with an investment-grade tenant, citing favorable bond trading levels.
drilling down a little bit on the demand environment. How would you say it's changed over the last 90 days?
Show response
Wes said demand shifts quarter to quarter by who is aggressive, but every hyperscaler they target remains engaged aggressively; he noted it is hard to give a total market view and spoke to the locations they are marketing with multiple hyperscalers interested.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you talk a little bit about how many sites you're having advanced discussions about like how many megawatts
Show response
Wes disclosed advanced discussions on 3 sites totaling 900 megawatts.
how are you thinking about the pipeline today? How would you characterize that pipeline?
Show response
Wes called the pipeline robust and said scaling and execution across multiple sites, not demand, is the key constraint for the business.
Calendar 2025 Q2
How are terms looking on that project financing? Are those kind of coming in with how you expected?
Show response
CEO said terms are largely coming in as expected; CFO detailed investment-grade pricing in the high 2s to low 4s with 70% loan-to-cost.
Calendar 2025 Q1
for the 100 megawatts, are you still talking to multiple hyperscalers for that?
Show response
Direct, pricing stable over the last 90 days but up year-over-year, and said discussions continue with basically all hyperscalers across multiple campuses.
there was a fair bit of pressure from your hyperscale potential customers to exit that business
Show response
Partial, acknowledged the pressure characterization was fair but reframed the exit as a long-planned separation of two distinct businesses.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Could you remind us exactly how much money you had invested in Ellendale, HPC and how much you'll be able to pull out
Show response
CFO said over $700 million is invested in Ellendale and the financing should return in excess of $300 million of cash to the parent.
demand sounds pretty good with all these hyperscalers, but what's the pricing environment look like?
Show response
Wes said pricing reflects strong demand, citing recent hyperscaler spend, and put the non-Ellendale pipeline at 1.6 gigawatts with 2026/2027 power.
Calendar 2024 Q3
would you think you have an LOI in calendar '24 or early '25, any rough guess as to when that LOI is possible?
Show response
Partial: management expects a possible additional-site LOI by the end of calendar '24, citing a very dynamic market with power timelines being pushed out.
after the 400 megawatts are leased up. Have you already started talking to potential customer Number #2 or Number #3?
Show response
Direct: since the prior call, inbound interest jumped from three additional hyperscalers pushing for 2025-26 capacity; a second-site LOI is likely in the Dakotas.
RIOTRiot Platforms, Inc.8 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can you talk a little bit about the financing structure you envisioned for AMD
Show response
Jason Chung noted positive lender feedback driven by AMD's investment-grade credit, attractive development yield, and relative scarcity of AMD debt supply supporting competitive spreads.
Can you talk about some of the initial data center revenue this quarter, how that related to the initial 25 megawatts you're delivering
Show response
Jason Chung broke down $33.2M into $32.2M tenant fit-out (5% margin) and $900K operating lease (91% margin), noting margins will normalize toward 80%+ target as AMD scales and O&M costs increase through Q3-Q4.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I believe Riot's power is approved at Corsicana. But can you confirm that. And then secondly, does ERCOT's batch process affect Riot in any way going forward
Show response
Management confirmed full power approval from Q4 2022 with the site already operational, noting the new ERCOT batch process only affects unapproved loads and further validates the scarcity value of Riot's existing approvals.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Do you have any internal goals what you could expand that pipeline to by year-end 2026 or '27
Show response
Management declined to disclose specific pipeline targets but confirmed expanding power beyond Corsicana and Rockdale is a strategic priority, with next 120 days focused on Core & Shell construction and tenant engagement.
Calendar 2025 Q2
What would you say his top 2 priorities are this summer and fall
Show response
Management identified two parallel priorities: building the data center team with credible hyperscale expertise, and completing the Corsicana basis of design to advance tenant discussions.
Calendar 2025 Q1
any interesting or helpful feedback you're getting from them on the Corsicana site
Show response
Management noted feedback drove land, water, and fiber improvements but declined to identify specific tenants, saying the full hyperscaler landscape is potential.
Calendar 2024 Q4
on the 400 megawatts at Corsicana and the 700 at Rockdale, have you gotten specific interest for that power yet
Show response
Management confirmed general interest from hyperscalers but noted inquiries have not been site-specific; more about needing power fast.
And then secondly, any operational goals for 2025 on the mining side
Show response
Management targets 38.4 EH/s by year-end 2025 (+22%), driven by Kentucky expansion, with continued focus on operational excellence and power strategy.
CLSKCleanSpark, Inc.3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
what you learned from leasing Sandersville and how you are applying that to this process for the Texas sites?
Show response
Logan Hennen, on for Mike Grondahl, asked what CleanSpark learned from leasing Sandersville; Matt said the tenant praised CleanSpark's energy-market DNA and collaborative execution, and the Texas exclusivity terms mirror the Sandersville lease as a rinse-and-repeat template.
Calendar 2026 Q1
just wanted to get an update on how demand has kind of evolved for some of your smaller sites
Show response
Matt Schultz said demand for smaller 60-megawatt-plus sites is rising as mega-site minimum thresholds drop, citing a Neocloud seeking 8 gigawatts; a direct, upbeat answer.
Calendar 2025 Q4
if you could talk a little bit about the demand environment you're seeing for HPC
Show response
Management said demand is escalating, citing positive conference feedback and Amazon's $200B 2026 AI infrastructure commitment; answered directly.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| APLD Applied Digital Corp. | 15 | 13%2 of 15 questions |
| RIOT Riot Platforms, Inc. | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| CLSK CleanSpark, Inc. | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2024 Q4 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q1 | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q2 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q3 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2025 Q4 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q1 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q2 | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
- 2024 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2024 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q13 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2025 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q15 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q23 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand11
- Capital Allocation8
- Cloud & AI6
- Geographic Expansion4
- Credit4
- Pricing3
- Competitive Dynamics3
- Capex Investment2
- Margin1
- Revenue Growth1
Show all 12 topics
- Regulation Policy1
- Guidance Reliability1