Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Mike Ha
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 20on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 20%4 of 20 questions
- Companies
- 5questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 20 of 20 questions from 5 companies
UHSUniversal Health Services8 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
can you talk about your thoughts on the durability of long-term pricing? Should we think about '28 as sort of that starting year of more incremental changes lower?
Show response
Filton said DPP reimbursement still increasing through 2027 via new program approvals and Medicaid utilization growth. Outpatient growth serves as natural hedge since outpatient margins better and payer mix more commercial-weighted versus Medicaid. Planning to maximize DPP benefit before 2028 phase-down begins.
Calendar 2025 Q3
On behavioral volumes, I just wanted to confirm, you're now expecting 2% to 3% growth in fourth quarter, but closer to the low end. And then should we expect next year to be consistently in that 2%...
Show response
Filton reiterated long-term model: acute 5-6% same-store revenue (2.5-3% price + 2.5-3% volume), behavioral 6-7% revenue (3.5-4.5% price + 2-3% volume). Confirmed near-term behavioral volume expectations at lower end of 2-3% range.
Calendar 2025 Q2
how you're thinking about the potential ripple effect of Medicaid work requirements onto UHS
Show response
Filton noted the targeted population (young, healthy males) may not be heavy users of UHS services. Behavioral side has more optionality to manage payer mix versus acute ER-driven Medicaid volumes.
we should be thinking about behavioral health long-term margin targets as unchanged
Show response
Filton expressed confidence in ability to shift programming and revenue sources but acknowledged it's difficult to make specific long-term margin commitments given the 2028-2032 timeline.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Are we talking an immediate large step-up in 2Q or is something more modest and then larger step-ups in 3Q, 4Q?
Show response
Filton highlighted the 100+ bps leap day headwind in Q1 that diminishes through the year. Of 3 prior headwinds, only labor remains persistent; redetermination and specific facility issues resolved.
I think they already submitted filed the CMS to raise the DPP payments to average commercial rates. Just any update there?
Show response
Filton described a two-track dynamic: administrative CMS approval process appears restarted, separate from potential legislative restrictions on future programs.
Calendar 2024 Q4
it be fair to say you're you might only be about a year or two away from getting back to the pre COVID levels. And then what is that path look like?
Show response
Filton cautioned structural headwinds (150bp physician fee increase, inpatient-to-outpatient shift) may prevent full acute margin recovery, though consolidated pre-COVID margins achievable in a couple years.
is the total current, I guess, payment upside $169 million across the two. And what do you typically recognize in terms of the flow through down into earnings
Show response
Filton confirmed DPP numbers are net of provider tax and generally flow through to the bottom line, compensating for historically inadequate Medicaid reimbursement.
CNCCentene Corporation4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I was wondering if you could provide just more granularity around what you mean by low utilizer today
Show response
Asher gave directional colour on zero utilizers falling toward pre-PHE levels but declined the requested MLR-range definition and cohort distribution granularity.
Calendar 2025 Q2
was there anything included on CMS has identified duplicative members, how that could impact the risk pool
Show response
Sarah noted duplicative members tracked closely but not expected to be a huge shift. On OB3, emphasized more disruptive provisions like per capita caps and block grants were taken off the table, showing Medicaid bipartisan support.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Regarding the exchanges, So firstly, I'm having a little bit of trouble bridging to your expected $5 billion of additional revenue
Show response
Drew bridged $10.1B Q1 to $39B full-year with attrition to high 4M. Sarah addressed fraud concerns, noting agent-of-record lock pioneer status and utilization by new members as positive sign.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how much of a potential difference you think there could be now versus the next few months as you hit those checkpoints
Show response
Sarah emphasized original program integrity assumptions are baked in; results so far are more muted than assumed, reducing surprise risk.
HUMHumana4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 2 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
Would it be fair to make this comparison and say the year-to-year set up into '27 actually feels even better than '25
Show response
James confirmed transformation efforts are more mature and provide broader array of operational levers beyond benefits. Every year the logic is: assess funding gap vs trend, apply operational improvements, then determine necessary benefit adjustments to achieve target margin. More momentum on transformation side than 2 years ago, but still must address both operational and benefit levers.
Calendar 2025 Q3
if your reach fee-for-service cost trend for '25 is 8.5%, usually a pretty strong leading indicator for the rate notice
Show response
Celeste declined to speculate on 2027 rate notice, noting historical imprecision of such forecasts. Will see first look at beginning of next year.
Calendar 2025 Q2
is there any level of membership growth percentage that you think if growth starts tracking to like 15%, 20%, 25%, where it could begin to potentially compromise earnings
Show response
James acknowledged theoretical operational limits but said likelihood is low. Will monitor and adjust. Focused on long-term value not afraid of year-1 economics. Celeste added late-year membership pickup has marketing cost headwind.
Calendar 2025 Q1
In your prepared remarks, you mentioned remaining committed to individual MA margins of at least 3% over time. That change in wording from '27 to overtime
Show response
James confirmed no change from prior 2027 target. No structural V28 impairment to CenterWell J curves. Celeste clarified put-call is complex calculation unrelated to V28.
ELVElevance Health3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
what we just experienced with redeterminations, the large disenrollment from procedural reasons. And now with the new timeline starting '27
Show response
Felicia cited Indiana and Georgia work requirement experience as positive precedents. Emphasized operational support to states for efficient implementation to minimize procedural disenrollment risk.
Calendar 2025 Q1
what percent of your MA Part D members are ready through their matching out-of-pocket limits. How does that compare to your expectations
Show response
Mark did not provide specific percentages but confirmed no substantial variation from plan. Noted risk corridors and rebates would offset any hypothetical higher utilization.
Calendar 2024 Q4
for the investors who may still push back and say, okay, Elevance only achieved this healthy growth level through aggressive plan suppression tactics, and that the company still mispriced the business
Show response
Gail pushed back firmly, framing retention as the key metric and emphasizing group MA growth from a long-standing client relationship, not suppression.
UNHUnitedHealth Group Incorporated1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
how do you expect the impact to Optum Health versus industry average?
Show response
Bobby supported modernization and advocated for chart linking finalized in final rule. Krista said too early for 2028 impact, noted puts and takes for complex populations in proposed changes, reiterated commitment to value-based care as foundational for CMS goals.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| UHS Universal Health Services | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| CNC Centene Corporation | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions |
| HUM Humana | 4 | 50%2 of 4 questions |
| ELV Elevance Health | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions |
| UNH UnitedHealth Group Incorporated | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q1 | 5 | 40%2 of 5 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q2 | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q4 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2026 Q1 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q2 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
- 2024 Q44 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q15 questions · challenge rate 40% (2 of 5 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q25 questions · challenge rate 20% (1 of 5 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q41 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2026 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Regulation Policy11
- Margin9
- Cost Pressure4
- Subscriber Growth4
- Competitive Dynamics3
- Demand3
- Pricing2
- Guidance Reliability2
- Revenue Growth1
- Labor Market1