Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Mike Matson
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (8 quarters).
- Questions
- 31on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 6%2 of 31 questions
- Companies
- 5questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 8with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 31 of 31 questions from 5 companies
STESteris15 questions · 8 reporting periods · 0 of 15 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I wanted to ask one on the Nubis AI collaboration that was announced in March. What is your view of robotics and AI in sterile processing?
Show response
Dan called the Nubis AI collaboration early-stage but promising, seeing potential to automate tasks in the labor-challenged sterile processing department, while declining to size the revenue opportunity yet.
in AST, capital declined again. I know it's a tiny part of that business, one, can you explain what happened? Two, can you just remind us what the capital is that you're selling in that business?
Show response
Dan explained AST capital is electron beam accelerators sold to med tech customers, a lumpy $18 million to $30 million-a-year business driven by shipment timing that is too small to focus on.
Calendar 2026 Q1
What is your expectation for the USMCA renegotiation this year? And what have you assumed in your guidance with regard to that?
Show response
Karen stated no USMCA assumptions are embedded in guidance, expecting status quo with July 1 joint review deadline but no real movement yet.
with the rollback or potential rollback of the ethylene oxide regulations under the new administration, what does that mean for STERIS?
Show response
Dan noted minimal financial impact since STERIS is already nearly fully invested in EO facility upgrades, with only potential timing relief on compliance deadlines.
Calendar 2025 Q4
it's been I think it's been a few years since you've done an acquisition
Show response
Dan said STERIS has been active on smaller bolt-on and channel acquisitions but has a disciplined approach on larger transformative M&A. Leverage at 1.2x provides capacity but financial criteria and customer value-add requirements are strict.
if you've been paying tariffs for basically all four quarters of '26, does that imply that kind of any incremental tariff impact in '27 will be small
Show response
Karen confirmed that at current tariff rates, FY27 incremental impact would be roughly one additional quarter of exposure as FY26 already absorbed four quarters. Acknowledged some rate fluctuation during H1 FY26.
Calendar 2025 Q3
can you just give us an update on your capacity there? And are you currently capacity constrained?
Show response
Dan noted 2-3 year lead time for new AST plants. Multiple expansions completed, in-process, and planned. Currently well-positioned across all geographies after 8 years of steady capacity additions.
I'm just wondering if you could give us any more detail around geographies, types of customers, hospitals versus ASCs, product lines
Show response
Dan said growth is broad-based globally with U.S. particularly strong. No specific geography, customer type, or product line stood out as a weakness.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I assume that's mainly driven by working capital. Is that right
Show response
Mike confirmed the $50M FCF guidance increase is from working capital improvements in both inventory and receivables, carrying through Q1 outperformance.
there's been some cuts in vaccine spending, kind of reduced recommendations there. And then, broadly, we're seeing kind of a pullback
Show response
Dan noted vaccine decline is already in the base, while growth in biologics and cell/gene therapy continues to drive demand regardless of macro pharma shifts.
Calendar 2025 Q1
your cash flow guidance is a little bit down from '25. I know you called out the working capital improvement
Show response
Mike identified $40M ETO legal settlement payment and lower inventory reduction expectations as key drivers of lower FY26 FCF guidance.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I think you've talked about that being sort of a growth driver in the past. Is that still the case
Show response
Dan confirmed the migration to ASCs is a continuing trend with a dedicated portfolio and channel in place to capitalize on it.
are you hearing any concerns about potential policy changes with the new administration
Show response
Dan noted no impact from policy uncertainty, emphasizing STERIS products are procedural utilities, not reimbursed items. Healthcare orders up 14% YoY.
Calendar 2024 Q3
is this just sort of lagging kind of some of the other, I guess, costs? Or is there something else going on here
Show response
Mike confirmed labor inflation is lagging and should anniversary during the fiscal year; energy costs are out of their control with a pass-through timing lag.
bioprocessing, I just was wondering if you can give us a sense of how much of AST that is
Show response
Dan sized bioprocessing at 6-8% of AST revenue after reduction, projected to grow nicely from the reset base.
SYKStryker Corporation11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
is the idea that, that would -- those products once they're approved and everything largely be sold through the Inari sales team
Show response
Kevin confirmed AVS will leverage the existing peripheral vascular sales force given the same call point, with potential for additional reps and future specialization as indications expand.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Last year, you said you would fully absorb that. Is that the case again this year? And, you know, is there any ability to mitigate any of the impact
Show response
Preston Wells confirmed $200M is already net of mitigation efforts. Kevin Lobo emphasized they're still driving meaningful margin expansion despite $400M total tariff impact, something he couldn't have said seven or eight years ago.
with Mako four, are you getting pricing increase relative to the older version
Show response
Kevin Lobo declined to share Mako 4 pricing for competitive reasons but confirmed every new application (shoulder, spine) requires a one-time software license fee, consistent with their longstanding approach.
Calendar 2025 Q3
the PEERLESS II trial, just can you give us an update on where things stand with that and when we could potentially see the results
Show response
Kevin Lobo said Artix is performing as good or better than expected. Jason Beach noted PEERLESS II trial results expected sometime next year.
is this a sign that Stryker has interest in kind of the broader advanced wound care market
Show response
Kevin Lobo pushed back on reading this as a wound care strategy play. Compared to Zipline, it's a call-point tuck-in for existing reps, not a new business expansion.
Calendar 2025 Q2
you mentioned this Broadway large for catheter. Can you just talk a little bit more about the timing on that?
Show response
Kevin described proprietary manufacturing method with improved trackability, 0.084 lumen size. Approved and launching in U.S. Cleared for aspiration use.
I think shoulders have also started to move into the ASC setting, total shoulders. So what are you seeing there
Show response
Kevin acknowledged slight ASC pricing pressure but offset by volume gains. Unique products (pyrocarbon, Shoulder iD, Blueprint) differentiate. Mako Shoulder full launch next year.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I don't know if you guys are willing to disclose how much you got for that business? I assume we'll see something in the second quarter cash flow statement
Show response
Preston declined to disclose sale price. Proceeds will be split over milestones and used for debt reduction or future M&A.
you're calling out a slightly unfavorable foreign exchange impact. Can you maybe explain what that means? Because I guess I thought that this was constant currency growth?
Show response
Preston clarified organic growth is constant currency; FX impact is on total reported revenue and EPS only.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how the Mako and Enabling Technologies partnership will sort of work. I know one of your competitors tried to be something similar when they spun out their Spine business
Show response
Kevin explained the existing capital/implant split already existed. VB Spine replaces Stryker Spine reps. Exclusive partnership initially, open system possible later.
how much of your manufacturing is coming from either of those two countries? And how much flexibility do you have to move production elsewhere
Show response
Glenn noted one plant out of 40 in Mexico, assembly only. Medical devices may be excluded from tariffs. Monitoring developments.
HOLXHologic2 questions · 1 reporting period · 2 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2024 Q3
NovaSure sounds like it's declining in the U.S. So can you talk about why
Show response
Essex acknowledged market-wide decline in endometrial ablation due to IUD alternatives. Hologic maintaining share but expects continued slow U.S. decline offset by international growth.
why isn't this something that will cannibalize MyoSure to some degree?
Show response
Essex clarified Gynesonics targets different fibroid types (mid-range) than MyoSure (small polyps/type 2) or Accesa (large fibroids), filling a portfolio gap.
RMDResMed2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2024 Q4
Do you think that's representative of the growth in patients? Or are you getting some kind of pricing benefit up there on top of that?
Show response
Mick confirmed ResMed is growing several hundred basis points above mid-single-digit market rate through demand gen, rePAP, and ReSupply. Default market growth is mid-single-digit devices, high-single-digit masks.
Calendar 2024 Q3
with the new N30i with that fabric over the straps, is that a technology that you can apply to other masks in your portfolio
Show response
Mick confirmed fabric technology is extensible to other masks. Pricing will be slightly higher due to higher manufacturing costs but expects better fit rates, lower returns, and higher adherence.
ZBHZimmer Biomet1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
can you maybe just talk about what you're hearing from the FDA in terms of iodine coatings, what you're going to have to do to get that launched
Show response
Ivan confirmed Japan launch of iodine hip in late 2025 with a U.S. pathway being developed. Declined to speculate on U.S. timeline. Also investing in faster surgery technology and external infection-prevention companies.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| STE Steris | 15 | 0%none of 15 questions |
| SYK Stryker Corporation | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions |
| HOLX Hologic | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| RMD ResMed | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| ZBH Zimmer Biomet | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 5 | 40%2 of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2024 Q4 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q1 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q2 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q3 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q4 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q1 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q2 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
- 2024 Q35 questions · challenge rate 40% (2 of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2024 Q45 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand9
- Innovation & R&D7
- Regulation Policy5
- Competitive Dynamics5
- M&A5
- Revenue Growth4
- Trade Tariffs4
- Capital Allocation4
- Pricing4
- Product Launch4
Show all 19 topics
- Capex Investment2
- Guidance Reliability2
- Cloud & AI1
- Margin1
- Macroeconomic1
- Cost Pressure1
- Labor Market1
- Fx1
- Supply Chain1