Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Mike Matson

Needham · covers Healthcare

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (8 quarters).

Questions
31on tracked calls
Challenge rate
6%2 of 31 questions
Companies
5questioned at least once
Reporting periods
8with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 31 of 31 questions from 5 companies

STESteris15 questions · 8 reporting periods · 0 of 15 challenging
STE company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I wanted to ask one on the Nubis AI collaboration that was announced in March. What is your view of robotics and AI in sterile processing?

Innovation & R&DCloud & AITranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Dan called the Nubis AI collaboration early-stage but promising, seeing potential to automate tasks in the labor-challenged sterile processing department, while declining to size the revenue opportunity yet.

in AST, capital declined again. I know it's a tiny part of that business, one, can you explain what happened? Two, can you just remind us what the capital is that you're selling in that business?

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Dan explained AST capital is electron beam accelerators sold to med tech customers, a lumpy $18 million to $30 million-a-year business driven by shipment timing that is too small to focus on.

Calendar 2026 Q1

What is your expectation for the USMCA renegotiation this year? And what have you assumed in your guidance with regard to that?

Trade TariffsRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Karen stated no USMCA assumptions are embedded in guidance, expecting status quo with July 1 joint review deadline but no real movement yet.

with the rollback or potential rollback of the ethylene oxide regulations under the new administration, what does that mean for STERIS?

Regulation PolicyCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Dan noted minimal financial impact since STERIS is already nearly fully invested in EO facility upgrades, with only potential timing relief on compliance deadlines.

Calendar 2025 Q4

it's been I think it's been a few years since you've done an acquisition

Capital AllocationCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Dan said STERIS has been active on smaller bolt-on and channel acquisitions but has a disciplined approach on larger transformative M&A. Leverage at 1.2x provides capacity but financial criteria and customer value-add requirements are strict.

if you've been paying tariffs for basically all four quarters of '26, does that imply that kind of any incremental tariff impact in '27 will be small

Trade TariffsGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Karen confirmed that at current tariff rates, FY27 incremental impact would be roughly one additional quarter of exposure as FY26 already absorbed four quarters. Acknowledged some rate fluctuation during H1 FY26.

Calendar 2025 Q3

can you just give us an update on your capacity there? And are you currently capacity constrained?

Capex InvestmentDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Dan noted 2-3 year lead time for new AST plants. Multiple expansions completed, in-process, and planned. Currently well-positioned across all geographies after 8 years of steady capacity additions.

I'm just wondering if you could give us any more detail around geographies, types of customers, hospitals versus ASCs, product lines

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Dan said growth is broad-based globally with U.S. particularly strong. No specific geography, customer type, or product line stood out as a weakness.

Calendar 2025 Q2

I assume that's mainly driven by working capital. Is that right

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Mike confirmed the $50M FCF guidance increase is from working capital improvements in both inventory and receivables, carrying through Q1 outperformance.

there's been some cuts in vaccine spending, kind of reduced recommendations there. And then, broadly, we're seeing kind of a pullback

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Dan noted vaccine decline is already in the base, while growth in biologics and cell/gene therapy continues to drive demand regardless of macro pharma shifts.

Calendar 2025 Q1

your cash flow guidance is a little bit down from '25. I know you called out the working capital improvement

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Mike identified $40M ETO legal settlement payment and lower inventory reduction expectations as key drivers of lower FY26 FCF guidance.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I think you've talked about that being sort of a growth driver in the past. Is that still the case

DemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Dan confirmed the migration to ASCs is a continuing trend with a dedicated portfolio and channel in place to capitalize on it.

are you hearing any concerns about potential policy changes with the new administration

Regulation PolicyMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Dan noted no impact from policy uncertainty, emphasizing STERIS products are procedural utilities, not reimbursed items. Healthcare orders up 14% YoY.

Calendar 2024 Q3

is this just sort of lagging kind of some of the other, I guess, costs? Or is there something else going on here

Cost PressureLabor MarketTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Mike confirmed labor inflation is lagging and should anniversary during the fiscal year; energy costs are out of their control with a pass-through timing lag.

bioprocessing, I just was wondering if you can give us a sense of how much of AST that is

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Dan sized bioprocessing at 6-8% of AST revenue after reduction, projected to grow nicely from the reset base.

SYKStryker Corporation11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 11 challenging
SYK company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

is the idea that, that would -- those products once they're approved and everything largely be sold through the Inari sales team

M&ACompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Kevin confirmed AVS will leverage the existing peripheral vascular sales force given the same call point, with potential for additional reps and future specialization as indications expand.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Last year, you said you would fully absorb that. Is that the case again this year? And, you know, is there any ability to mitigate any of the impact

Trade TariffsMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Preston Wells confirmed $200M is already net of mitigation efforts. Kevin Lobo emphasized they're still driving meaningful margin expansion despite $400M total tariff impact, something he couldn't have said seven or eight years ago.

with Mako four, are you getting pricing increase relative to the older version

PricingInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Kevin Lobo declined to share Mako 4 pricing for competitive reasons but confirmed every new application (shoulder, spine) requires a one-time software license fee, consistent with their longstanding approach.

Calendar 2025 Q3

the PEERLESS II trial, just can you give us an update on where things stand with that and when we could potentially see the results

Innovation & R&DProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Kevin Lobo said Artix is performing as good or better than expected. Jason Beach noted PEERLESS II trial results expected sometime next year.

is this a sign that Stryker has interest in kind of the broader advanced wound care market

M&ACompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Kevin Lobo pushed back on reading this as a wound care strategy play. Compared to Zipline, it's a call-point tuck-in for existing reps, not a new business expansion.

Calendar 2025 Q2

you mentioned this Broadway large for catheter. Can you just talk a little bit more about the timing on that?

Product LaunchInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Kevin described proprietary manufacturing method with improved trackability, 0.084 lumen size. Approved and launching in U.S. Cleared for aspiration use.

I think shoulders have also started to move into the ASC setting, total shoulders. So what are you seeing there

Show response

Kevin acknowledged slight ASC pricing pressure but offset by volume gains. Unique products (pyrocarbon, Shoulder iD, Blueprint) differentiate. Mako Shoulder full launch next year.

Calendar 2025 Q1

I don't know if you guys are willing to disclose how much you got for that business? I assume we'll see something in the second quarter cash flow statement

Capital AllocationM&ATranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Preston declined to disclose sale price. Proceeds will be split over milestones and used for debt reduction or future M&A.

you're calling out a slightly unfavorable foreign exchange impact. Can you maybe explain what that means? Because I guess I thought that this was constant currency growth?

FxGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Preston clarified organic growth is constant currency; FX impact is on total reported revenue and EPS only.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how the Mako and Enabling Technologies partnership will sort of work. I know one of your competitors tried to be something similar when they spun out their Spine business

M&AInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Kevin explained the existing capital/implant split already existed. VB Spine replaces Stryker Spine reps. Exclusive partnership initially, open system possible later.

how much of your manufacturing is coming from either of those two countries? And how much flexibility do you have to move production elsewhere

Trade TariffsSupply ChainTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Glenn noted one plant out of 40 in Mexico, assembly only. Medical devices may be excluded from tariffs. Monitoring developments.

HOLXHologic2 questions · 1 reporting period · 2 of 2 challenging
HOLX company page →

Calendar 2024 Q3

NovaSure sounds like it's declining in the U.S. So can you talk about why

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Essex acknowledged market-wide decline in endometrial ablation due to IUD alternatives. Hologic maintaining share but expects continued slow U.S. decline offset by international growth.

why isn't this something that will cannibalize MyoSure to some degree?

ChallengingM&ACompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Essex clarified Gynesonics targets different fibroid types (mid-range) than MyoSure (small polyps/type 2) or Accesa (large fibroids), filling a portfolio gap.

RMDResMed2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
RMD company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

Do you think that's representative of the growth in patients? Or are you getting some kind of pricing benefit up there on top of that?

DemandPricingRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Mick confirmed ResMed is growing several hundred basis points above mid-single-digit market rate through demand gen, rePAP, and ReSupply. Default market growth is mid-single-digit devices, high-single-digit masks.

Calendar 2024 Q3

with the new N30i with that fabric over the straps, is that a technology that you can apply to other masks in your portfolio

Product LaunchPricingInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Mick confirmed fabric technology is extensible to other masks. Pricing will be slightly higher due to higher manufacturing costs but expects better fit rates, lower returns, and higher adherence.

ZBHZimmer Biomet1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
ZBH company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

can you maybe just talk about what you're hearing from the FDA in terms of iodine coatings, what you're going to have to do to get that launched

Innovation & R&DRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Ivan confirmed Japan launch of iodine hip in late 2025 with a U.S. pathway being developed. Declined to speculate on U.S. timeline. Also investing in faster surgery technology and external infection-prevention companies.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
STE Steris150%none of 15 questions
SYK Stryker Corporation110%none of 11 questions
HOLX Hologic2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
RMD ResMed2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
ZBH Zimmer Biomet1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • STE
    Steris · 15 questions
    0%none of 15 questions
  • SYK
    Stryker Corporation · 11 questions
    0%none of 11 questions
  • HOLX
    Hologic · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • RMD
    ResMed · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • ZBH
    Zimmer Biomet · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q3540%2 of 5 questions3
2024 Q450%none of 5 questions3
2025 Q140%none of 4 questions3
2025 Q240%none of 4 questions2
2025 Q340%none of 4 questions2
2025 Q440%none of 4 questions2
2026 Q130%none of 3 questions2
2026 Q220%none of 2 questions1
  1. 2024 Q35 questions · challenge rate 40% (2 of 5 questions) · 3 companies
  2. 2024 Q45 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
  3. 2025 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
  4. 2025 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
  5. 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
  6. 2025 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
  7. 2026 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  8. 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand9
  • Innovation & R&D7
  • Regulation Policy5
  • Competitive Dynamics5
  • M&A5
  • Revenue Growth4
  • Trade Tariffs4
  • Capital Allocation4
  • Pricing4
  • Product Launch4
Show all 19 topics
  • Capex Investment2
  • Guidance Reliability2
  • Cloud & AI1
  • Margin1
  • Macroeconomic1
  • Cost Pressure1
  • Labor Market1
  • Fx1
  • Supply Chain1