Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Mike Zaremski
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 173on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 16%27 of 173 questions
- Companies
- 17questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 173 of 173 questions from 17 companies
ACGLArch Capital Group18 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 18 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
any color on a you know, what loss industry estimate you are using, or is this very kind of, idiosyncratic to you all?
Show response
Papadopoulo reaffirmed the roughly $3 billion industry estimate; Morin framed further losses as case-by-case rather than an aggregate exposure.
Can you quantify how we should what that impact was and if we should be run-rating that
Show response
Morin gave a usable run-rate anchor: current quarter is the starting point, flat U.S. MI premium with growth coming from the international book.
Calendar 2026 Q1
the underlying loss ratio continues to show some healthy improvement. Is that -- if you can kind of talk about some of the drivers
Show response
Francois attributed the ex-cat loss ratio improvement mainly to benign attritional losses in London/international book. MCE non-renewal impact not yet visible in earned results, relatively small part of $8B insurance book. Encouraged viewing trailing 12-month rolling numbers for performance assessment.
Maybe you can kind of just elaborate on the Iran conflict, how you guys are thinking about that? Is it all IBNR, are there real losses or...
Show response
Francois said nothing paid yet but real losses exist in London specialty lines (terror, political violence). Took first stab at reserves based on March activity, expects more losses in Q2. Reported as man-made cat within overall cat load. Absorbed within seasonal cat expectations.
Calendar 2025 Q4
If we're looking at the underlying loss ratio trend, it's it's nudging a bit higher into the low to low fifties.
Show response
Nicolas confirmed reinsurance margins are definitely under pressure from both pricing on excess of loss and ceding commission increases. Still like the business, diversified platform allows finding attractive pockets. But acknowledged margins were very high and are compressing.
you said they North America rate environment largely keeping pace with trend, but international probably slightly below. I think I thought that was a bit of a provocative statement
Show response
Nicolas clarified his comments are specific to Arch's portfolio. North America skews casualty where rates are above trends. International is different mix. When taking entire portfolio together, the two offset each other at this market stage.
are there any items that would other than we could see the shrinkage in top line growth that could free up more capital
Show response
Francois said MI capital not a constraint, able to distribute meaningful dividends from MI companies. Investment portfolio asset allocation is one lever that impacts capital requirements. Reinsurance purchasing decisions affect net retained premium. Doesn't expect drastic changes, 2026 should be continuation of 2025 approach.
Calendar 2025 Q3
curious if your views on a normalized loss ratio is different than what it was in the past if we think about kind of the current cycle and the next cycle coming.
Show response
Francois maintained 20% normalized loss ratio across the cycle. Home prices, the key driver, remain strong nationally with lack of inventory supporting them for the foreseeable future. Actual performance has outperformed that 20% for extended period. Nicolas added FICO distributions are getting better, which should drive even better outcomes.
do you have a view on what has also been the kind of exponential growth of the MGA marketplace and kind of how it's been impacting Arch
Show response
Nicolas expressed skepticism about MGA growth, historically hasn't turned out well with exceptions. Concerned about lack of incentive alignment and delayed information flow to carriers/reinsurers. Called it the flavor of the last few years and questions what the outcome will be.
Has anything changed quarter-over-quarter on maybe inorganic opportunities? Is U.S. small commercial still something that's on the retail small commercial still high up on the wish list?
Show response
Francois said long wish list but M&A doesn't happen often. Won't hold excess capital for potential M&A, leverage ratio at lowest ever with strong flexibility. If good opportunities arise, will execute. Middle market is obvious focus area.
Calendar 2025 Q2
has anything changed over the last couple of quarters in terms of the mortgage outlook other than I think we clearly know the top line in the U.S. is going to continue to be negative.
Show response
Francois said viewpoint unchanged. Portfolio intentionally underweight geographies seeing home price pressure. Constructed to avoid high-risk areas, high LTV, high DTI loans. Strategy paying off so far.
Would you say that expected ROEs are -- I don't know if you're willing to kind of put a corridor around them in the 20s, down from the 30s?
Show response
Nicolas said ROEs are still very attractive. Florida competition concentrated at top of towers. FHCF attachment point increase created demand below, where pricing was flat. Rates have declined from 100% increases a year ago but margins remain strong.
is there kind of a specific pocket that's really high up on the wish list like U.S. retail, traditional main market? Or is it kind of a broad appetite to just go continue going kind of down market ...
Show response
Nicolas said focus is upper middle market via the Allianz acquisition. Strategic thesis even more compelling today than when deal was done. Francois added that true small business is not an immediate action item, different technology, systems, and distribution required.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Maybe can you kind of unpack what you mean by the London specialty market and maybe kind of help frame which lines in particular
Show response
Nicolas explained London pressure from two sources: more appetite in traditional Lloyd's lines (terror, marine, energy) and local markets in Australia/Asia absorbing more risk. But consolidation around leaders benefits Arch.
Any kind of updates to your cat load guide, I believe it was 7 to 8 points when you updated us last, should we expect that number to move up a bit?
Show response
Francois confirmed 7-8 point cat load guidance unchanged. Nicolas added Florida outlook is flattish with potential demand increase from FHCF retention rising $1.5B.
Calendar 2024 Q4
if it if a DTA was influx, would it change materially or just a little bit?
Show response
Francois outlined worst case: only 20% of the $1.2B Bermuda DTA may be realizable under OECD guidance, potential write-off in 2026-2027. But Bermuda law hasn't changed yet.
Any comments on whether you know, what you're seeing And you're GL book. I know that, you know, you guys are one of the more honest ones.
Show response
Francois said no adverse reserve development; targeted loss pick increases in specific areas driven by current rate environment, not signals of prior-year misses.
the catastrophe load guidance. Seven to eight it Probably just obvious, but that so that includes right. It's higher than the historical six day mostly because of the the one q California losses
Show response
Francois clarified the higher cat load is partly from Midcorp's heavier property book in different zones, not primarily from California fires.
CINFCincinnati Financial18 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 18 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
kind of specific guidance on -- on cost efficiencies due to newer technologies, et cetera. Is that -- any comments on
Show response
Sewell confirmed technology and AI work is underway but explicitly ruled out issuing forward ratio guidance, consistent with company practice.
any quantification you want to offer us so we can better understand what the reversal was and how to think about the
Show response
Sewell identified commissions as the main driver but declined to quantify, pointing instead to a sub-30% expense ratio objective over multiple quarters.
Is it fair to say there was a bump in there from the portfolio rebalancing, unlocking some equity capital? Or is it
Show response
Sewell acknowledged the rebalancing timing and benchmarked 2.4 million year-to-date shares against a prior 3.7 million year, but did not separate the two drivers.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Does that just mean maybe the hit rate could be a bit lower on the larger premium stuff
Show response
Spray candidly admitted that larger account strategy faces both lower win rates and retention pressure in current competitive environment.
We saw elevated share repurchase levels—I think the highest we have seen in a while
Show response
Sewell characterized buyback as maintenance-plus, noting last comparable Q1 was 2020. Full-year share repurchase levels have been consistent at 1.1-1.3M shares recently.
Would you say you are getting over the hump of more rearview-mirror there, or is it still to be determined
Show response
Spray gave a candid answer: confident in pricing and risk selection but explicitly said not over any hump. Commercial auto is the epicenter. Monitoring tort reform but tremendous uncertainty remains.
is it fair, if we paint a broad brush, to say pricing power in commercial lines is still biased downwards
Show response
Spray declined to project forward but confirmed pressure concentrated in large accounts and commercial property. Emphasized underwriter execution on policy-by-policy segmentation.
Calendar 2025 Q4
In terms of the new reinsurance program that you detailed
Show response
Sewell and Spray described program structure across commercial and personal, highlighted 7% rate decline with expanded coverage; touched lightly on workers comp reserve discipline.
Calendar 2025 Q3
is, there a fast and hard kind of ratio that if the equity markets still keep going up
Show response
Soloria described normal trim-and-prune practice; Sewell addressed capital deployment philosophy but declined to discuss specific excess-capital math.
Calendar 2025 Q2
you don't feel like we're going to enter a soft marketplace
Show response
Spray firmly rejected soft-market framing, emphasizing risk-by-risk underwriting discipline with pricing precision and willingness to walk away from inadequate pricing.
The accident year loss ratio in work comp appears to be picked at a much higher level than in recent quarters and years
Show response
Spray attributed work comp to prudent long-tail picks not frequency changes; for commercial auto cited legal system abuse and prudent IBNR additions despite clean paid/case development in 2024-2025.
should we be still thinking that the guide on the expense ratio is kind of trying to get below 30%
Show response
Sewell reaffirmed sub-30% target and signaled a new 29% target once they sustainably achieve below 30%; Spray emphasized premium-over-expense growth leverage with 4 of last 5 years at double-digit NWP growth.
Calendar 2025 Q1
anything in personal lines, maybe umbrella, other personal lines with large losses or anything that came through with the loss ratio there you'd like to call out?
Show response
CEO directly identified a single inland marine watercraft claim driving 14 points of the current accident year ex-cat loss ratio in the other personal lines category.
would should we be thinking about that dynamic in terms of kind of your response would maybe be a tiny bit slower, if the tariffs do end up being impactful
Show response
CEO directly addressed the concern by breaking down which lines have three-year locks and explaining that annual exposure adjustments and inflation guards provide mitigation.
Is Cincy considering buying additional reinsurance temporarily to protect itself through the remainder of the contract reinsurance terms?
Show response
CEO explained that the reinstated tower is adequate, noting they went through about half the property cat tower in the wildfires and have no current plans for additional purchases.
when we has your mood or outlook changed a bit in terms of the top line growth trajectory in personal lines?
Show response
CEO emphatically stated zero change in enthusiasm, calling personal lines a once in a lifetime opportunity, while acknowledging they have been more conservative on new California personal lines business.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how much of that would you say is a reaction to since he's contractors industry exposure
Show response
Spray said most social inflation comes through umbrella off commercial auto, not construction itself; construction book is small/mid-market trade contractors.
You just talk about the lost cost inflation trend that you're seeing now and how that's changed throughout the year
Show response
Spray (via 'Dan on for Mike') reaffirmed pricing exceeds loss costs in all lines except workers' comp, declined to disclose specific loss cost numbers.
MRSHMarsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.14 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 14 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Any texture you'd be willing to provide on kind of producer headcount growth?
Show response
Doyle declined to give specific producer headcount targets but said the first half was strong for attracting production talent in key markets and expects that to continue, citing strong colleague retention.
are you all continuing to kind of invest in your analytics and continue to upgrade them
Show response
Doyle was skeptical of the competitor's 40% win-rate claim and emphasized Marsh is leading, not keeping up, citing the Marsh Risk Companion analytics suite launched at RIMS and its proprietary data advantage.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Curious a couple of your peers have talked about the Claims Advocacy Group, and they've offered some stats around the how the Claims Advocacy Group has made sure your clients get their claims paid
Show response
All four business CEOs provided AI examples. Studer: Claims IQ analyzes $200B of loss info, Marsh Risk Cortex analytics engine with new applications launching, 50% increase in sales velocity in pilot areas. Klisura: GC Quotebox for document ingestion. Tomlinson: Mercer Fiber for real-time health benefit planning. Moynihan: Quotient fastest-growing practice, helping clients deploy $50B+ in AI capital.
on the the pace of Marsh's hiring in terms of the producer level, do you expect that trajectory to change materially
Show response
Doyle noted strong brand in the market for talent. Start with the best and most talent. Colleague retention strong, engagement outstanding. Colleague value proposition is key to retention.
Calendar 2025 Q4
When we think about Thrive, would you say that that encompasses a lot of the new AI technologies that you all are deploying, or should we expect kind of a more to come
Show response
Doyle noted BCS bringing operations and technology together under Paul Beswick. Dozens of productivity tools introduced, focus on ramping adoption. SaaS-like market-facing tools like Centrisk and Ada in development for revenue growth. Some job families will be more impacted than others.
should we expect consulting to lead the pack on organic while maybe risk runs a bit lower given the backdrop in P&C
Show response
Doyle declined to guide by segment. Emphasized 15% GAAP growth and 4% underlying at Marsh Risk for the year. Sees good opportunity across all businesses. MMA strong and front-footed. McGriff team settled. Complex macro environment creates opportunity for unique capability set.
Calendar 2025 Q3
are you kind of telling us we should be kind of expecting at least the U.S. side of organic to be kind of running along the current trend line
Show response
Doyle noted talent issues not material to company. Large client hesitancy driven by macro uncertainty. M&A market beginning to pick up. 16% GAAP growth at Marsh, 4% underlying feels good.
that's a really good ratio versus many of your peers and maybe even you all historically. So is there maybe you can you know, usually, like, there's more cost
Show response
McGivney noted savings are continuation of existing low-cost location strategy. High confidence in estimates. Doyle confirmed majority of savings will flow to bottom line.
Calendar 2025 Q2
you still feel like there's uncertainties at a level where you feel comfortable being able to manage the profit margin piece of the business
Show response
Doyle confirmed comfort managing margins through scenario planning for both upside and downside. Expects conditions to persist in H2. Won't damage medium-term business for short-term savings.
Usually, we think nominal GDP is kind of the biggest corollary and very secondary kind of would be pricing power levels
Show response
Doyle confirmed nominal GDP plus pricing as key drivers. Noted U.S. large account clients deferring project work, construction, M&A, IPOs, and hiring all slowing. Marsh and GC 5% ex-fiduciary income.
Calendar 2025 Q1
would you expect at a macro level global property rates that continue to be a negative territory
Show response
Doyle noted strong underwriting results making insurers more growth-oriented. South detailed 3% index decline in Q1 with property down 6%. Dean provided April 1 reinsurance color showing continued competitive conditions.
are you guys adopting a similar playbook right now given the uncertainty to kind of manage your expenses
Show response
Doyle detailed expense levers: incentive comp naturally falls, discretionary spending can slow, hiring can decelerate, voluntary attrition harvested. Won't damage medium-term business for short-term savings.
Calendar 2024 Q4
now you told us the Marsh index, pricing index is down too. And so, I'm assuming there's some right sensitivity to your revenues
Show response
Doyle clarified pricing exposure is primarily in middle market which remains stable. Identified fiduciary income as the primary driver of the guidance language, not pricing softness.
the $4.5 billion of deploy guide for '25 and no change year-over-year
Show response
McGivney emphasized $4.5B represents normal capital deployment with significant M&A flexibility even after McGriff. Doyle noted ability to do bigger deals if opportunity arises.
AJGArthur J. Gallagher & Co.13 questions · 5 reporting periods · 2 of 13 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
do you feel like the RPC we've kind of based here in terms of pricing
Show response
Pat framed the current cycle as a property reset, not a broad soft market, and pointed to strong new business and retention to argue organic durability.
should we be just glide pathing that up to the GAAP tax rate over time, or is it more of a cliff in outer years?
Show response
Doug said amortization refreshes with ongoing M&A and there are many years left of tax credits, with potential to keep generating them.
some of these AI solutions might not have kind of locked down long-term costs that are known
Show response
Doug argued prior investment in centralizing data and processes means incremental AI cost is small relative to peers starting from scratch.
Calendar 2025 Q4
when pricing falls like it is today, your organic actually decouples and it stays, you know, usually positive. So I'm just curious in a market that you're describing of properties very soft and cas...
Show response
Pat described cycles within cycles: property softening, casualty firming, D&O bottoming, comp flat for a decade. Doug noted property pricing down only 4-5% overall (not 20% like headlines suggest). Opt-in coverage purchases and underinsured replacement costs provide organic buffers.
you showed $882 million and $171 million of M&A divestitures and other, you know, for 2025 versus last year. Think that includes life sales, assumption changes, etcetera. I mean, do we need help br...
Show response
Doug explained all the life sales and deferred revenue noise nets to $25M of EBITDA on $4.8B total, immaterial on a full-year basis. Quarterly noise was the real issue, which the new organic disclosure framework now addresses.
Calendar 2025 Q3
should we not be focusing on kind of the RPC as much as we used to because there's kind of other levers you have to pull on organic to be able to do so well next year on a decelerating kind of pric...
Show response
Doug emphasized the opt-in dynamic: as rates decline, clients buy more coverage, drop deductibles, raise limits. Believes significant underbuying over past 5 years will unwind. Replacement cost also remains an upside catalyst as carriers haven't fully addressed insurance-to-value gaps.
on the organic viewpoint next year, what's your estimate of embedded in there on lumpy life sales
Show response
Doug sees 2026 as more favorable for life sales than 2025, either rates drop (fueling demand) or rates stabilize (removing incentive to wait). Has not influenced the base organic pick but could be upside.
Calendar 2025 Q1
The RPC stat that you began giving out in recent years, which is helpful, I think it was 4% this past quarter. And organic, obviously tremendous, five-plus points above
Show response
Pat attributed the wider gap to more fee-based large accounts, better sales tools like Gallagher Drive, and stronger new business production versus a market that's not chaotic.
the one point of timing benefit in Brokerage organic, is that in addition to the $26 million reversal on Page 6 of the CFO commentary
Show response
Doug clarified the $26M is a separate purchase accounting conforming adjustment from 2024, not related to the 1pt timing. Both are levelizing effects.
Calendar 2024 Q4
health inflation for employers, at least some of the stats we've seen, it's expected to rise 25 versus 24
Show response
Pat confirmed medical cost inflation is rising and emphasized Gallagher's consulting capabilities in the commercial middle market where competition is lighter.
maybe a mix on reinsurance? Do you potentially have a greater mix towards casualty or specialty Europe-focused
Show response
Doug confirmed Gallagher Re is underweighted on property and more casualty-weighted relative to peers, which benefits from current pricing dynamics.
cadence of organic growth next year. Loud and clear, 6-8, no change. I guess, yes, for both segments
Show response
Doug explained reinsurance customers buying more offsets price declines, and first quarter may be seasonally stronger due to reinsurance renewals.
the company you're purchasing kind of didn't fully leverage its fiduciary income in that it was direct pay relationships
Show response
Doug confirmed the fiduciary cash opportunity and expects to capture it within 18 months of closing.
AIGAmerican International Group12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
is that having a noticeable difference yet, or is that still kind of more of a work in progress?
Show response
Eric Andersen described Underwriting by AIG Assist and Claims by AIG Assist driving more and faster submissions, plus emerging broker-level insights that help AIG steer resources toward better-performing distribution partners. He called it early days but industry-leading, focused on better rather than merely more submissions.
How big of a factor is the high single-digit to low double-digit premium growth to get to that range in terms of operating leverage ultimately?
Show response
Eric Andersen called first-half growth of 13% excellent but stressed cycle management and selectivity across the three segments. Jon Hancock added that AIG's globally diverse portfolio, Global Specialty leadership, and growing Accident & Health business provide offsetting opportunities to play both offense and defense.
Calendar 2026 Q1
You've done a great job explaining why the reinsurance helps ameliorate some of the downward pricing impacts
Show response
Zaffino acknowledged mix shift toward Casualty and Everest Financial Lines will increase loss ratios, and E&S Property could see some attritional deterioration. But emphasized reinsurance savings are on same-store sales with no risk compromise, and that expense ratio improvement will offset loss ratio mix effects.
Would you say there are some major changes or major projects you feel strongly about starting once you're in your seat
Show response
Andersen emphasized continuity, stating he was excited about the Investor Day strategy coming in and feels even more strongly 90 days later. Focus is on execution of existing strategy, organic growth, transaction integration, client relationships, rather than new strategic pivots.
Calendar 2025 Q3
whether we, as analysts should start embedding some -- a bit of loss ratio degradation as a result into our models
Show response
Zaffino cautioned against index-based modeling. Emphasized cumulative rate history, differentiation between E&S and retail, flight-to-quality dynamics. Casualty strong, Property and Specialty have headwinds but remain profitable. Company-specific analysis matters more than market indices.
over time, as this technology is deployed throughout the entire organization that it will likely result in kind of a material change to the top line revenue trajectory relative to market conditions
Show response
Zaffino confirmed GenAI will drive growth through faster data ingestion, more data sources, and speed to execution. Also positions AIG for market turns. Emphasized rapid advancement in LLMs and agentic orchestration from tech capex. Feels advanced versus Investor Day guidance.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Should we be thinking that the improvement is going to be a bit more kind of back-end loaded given the top line being weighted -- weighed down a bit by property rates
Show response
Zaffino indicated Q2 expense ratio not a good run rate, back half should improve as parent cost pushdown comparisons ease and AIG Next savings fully earn in. Walsh added three supporting data points showing positive operating leverage.
given property is correcting a bit off of very healthy levels, we shouldn't eventually the retailers look to kind of find capacity and move some of that property out of the E&S market
Show response
Zaffino pushed back strongly on the idea of E&S-to-retail migration. Noted wholesale brokers have evolved beyond pure E&S placement, Lexington Middle Market property held up better than retail, and no evidence of submission slowdown.
Calendar 2025 Q1
the process for an insurer to transform using AI. Is there a high cost of entry? Does it take a long time to get your data on the right form to be able to adopt?
Show response
Zaffino explained multi-year GenAI journey from AIG 200 foundation through pilots to live production. Emphasized data quality as prerequisite, partnership ecosystem with Palantir and Anthropic, and end-to-end organizational buy-in.
Some of the competitors have talked about kind of seeing a decline in property, which has caused pricing to move down a bit as well. Is that accurate for AIG as well?
Show response
Zaffino acknowledged property headwinds but emphasized cumulative 113% retail and 96% wholesale rate increases over 5 years. Brought in Bailey and Hancock for detailed segment commentary. Bailey noted casualty rate picking up momentum, Financial Lines showing improvement signs.
Calendar 2024 Q4
are you experiencing any acceleration in casualty pricing, either excess or retail? And do you still feel that I feel like a couple of quarters ago, you mentioned this might be an area you're willi...
Show response
Zaffino gave detailed casualty pricing data: Lexington 14%, retail excess 15% for fifth consecutive year of double-digit increases, above loss cost trend. Positioned AIG as industry-leading underwriter.
just curious if you're willing to give any specific more specific guidance on kind of what type of expense ratio level or acquisition expense ratio level we should be thinking about
Show response
Zaremski pushed for specific expense ratio guidance but Zaffino pivoted to explaining AIG Next savings vs absorbed corporate costs. No specific forward ratio provided, though improvement expected in 2025.
BROBrown & Brown12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 8 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
when we look at total revenues for the quarter, you know, kind of ex the organic delta versus The Street
Show response
CFO gave the quarterly Accession revenue split and framed July placement seasonality, then quantified the ~35% margin profile of the acquired business.
on the cash flow impact from Accession, I think you said in your prepared remarks, which were helpful
Show response
Directly confirmed one-time nature and reaffirmed the 24% to 26% long-term cash flow conversion range.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Really is it just more of an issue of Brown being a bit overweight property and property's under a lot of pressure?
Show response
Powell candidly listed four factors (acquisition integration, startup disruption, property rate declines, pharmacy model change) explaining organic running slightly below peers.
Calendar 2025 Q4
does that include contingency and exclude investment income?
Show response
Andy confirmed underlying flat margin guidance excludes investment income impact but includes contingents. Viewed as strong given puts and takes including lower contingents.
the $23 million of lost revs, that's -- that's all we're going to see from the lost employees for the most part
Show response
Powell cautioned that $23M is the current known amount and departures could impact retention going forward. Impact will take several quarters to fully play out.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I believe you have some businesses. I know this is maybe just hopefully short term, but that are impacted by the government shutdown
Show response
Andy acknowledged impacts in Medicare social security set-asides and flood program (new policy writes paused), but noted revenue typically catches up over time and renewals are frontloaded.
should we be thinking about kind of that margin correlation? Or are there just -- there's a lot of moving pieces with the acquisition and just other structural things going on in the company?
Show response
Andy cautioned against a direct organic-to-margin correlation, noting contingent commissions were $46 million this quarter vs $40 million organic growth. Reiterated 30-35% EBITDAC margin range.
is there a trend we should just keep in the back of our heads as we think past 4Q about the lender-placed business just slowing or somehow maybe giving back some market share?
Show response
Powell confirmed lender-placed growth is slowing from strong prior gains and competitive pressure on accounts. Andy noted 12-36 month sales cycles and lumpy account onboarding.
Calendar 2025 Q2
is there any underlying causes that's just causing the decel to be so much faster than I think we've seen historically?
Show response
Powell emphasized this is a normal insurance cycle, not unusual. Admitted rates were 5-10% last year which was abnormal; now normalizing. Speed of Q2 CAT property decline was the surprise.
if we do go into a low singles organic environment about a moderating profit margin kind of downward trajectory as well potentially?
Show response
Andy declined to change margin guidance, noting diversification and contingent income offset organic headwinds. BRO focuses on long-term profitable growth.
Calendar 2025 Q1
is it fair to kind of put in a bit of headwind from downwards property pricing, especially I think Brown is a bit of overweight Florida
Show response
Andy pushed back on the CAT property narrative, unpacking multiple growth drivers including lender-placed, captives, and storm claims. Warned Q4 organic could be near 0 on tough flood comp.
did that come through in the Retail organic this quarter? And maybe you can size up how much seasonality there is
Show response
Powell confirmed benefits revenue recognition is front-loaded in Q1 and expressed satisfaction with Retail organic given the expected timing headwind.
Show 11 more companies
EGEverest Group12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
is there a bridge you can kind of talk about that caused the improvement? Is it all mix of business?
Show response
Habayeb attributed the improvement to mix and loss experience and stressed that long-tail prudence was left untouched.
Just on the catastrophe load guidance, some of your peers are talking about kind of towards the higher end of the range
Show response
Habayeb clarified Annapurna is casualty and specialty only, then restated the cat load figures by segment with no change from prior framing.
Calendar 2026 Q1
is it fair for us to kind of put a small placeholder for some capital return from that transaction as well
Show response
Kociancic confirmed Canadian retail sale settlement approximately 6 months away and will be accretive to capital return discussion.
is it fair for us to kind of bump up our cat loads a bit as we think about '26?
Show response
Kociancic kept cat load around 7% ZIP code from 2023 Investor Day, noted it could mechanically increase slightly as legacy premium diminishes. Williamson added that actual net PMLs across most peak zones are declining.
Calendar 2025 Q4
it appears that you guys can do billions more buyback than the consensus is estimating at least starting in the back
Show response
Mark said elevated capital management is the baseline given discount to book and softer growth environment; will communicate more as wind season and reserves develop.
if this year was somewhat of a below average cat year, maybe disagree with that, at about $800 or so million of cats
Show response
Jim said industry loss of $110-130B is the new normal; EG's Q4 cat was within expectations despite US hurricane absence due to Caribbean cat 5, Australia storms and Southeast Asia flooding.
Calendar 2025 Q2
once that's over, would that book start growing at kind of low doubles because that's where pricing is?
Show response
Jim said remediation completes Q3 and he's not opposed to casualty re-growth eventually but only where pricing, terms, conditions and underwriting quality meet standards.
Is this now behind us? Or is there still some limit or, I guess, potential for movement there?
Show response
Jim said the aviation loss is done and dusted barring unexpected future legal decisions; the $98M reserve was set conservatively and unrelated to prior reserve actions.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Is that being funded at all with the -- this federal home loan bank borrowings
Show response
Mark said FHLB is a legacy spread trade unrelated to buybacks, which are funded strictly out of excess capital.
I thought historically, you do a ground-up on each line-of-business once per year
Show response
Jim clarified that reserve deep dives are still annual; only the loss trend assumption review cadence was increased for tariffs.
Calendar 2024 Q4
could you walk through that same dynamic maybe for the $750 million you walked away from
Show response
Jim said the reinsurance walk-aways were about underwriting confidence and cedent claims processes, not dramatically inferior loss ratios like insurance.
quantify how much worse of a loss ratio is associated with the non-renewed business versus the retained business
Show response
Mark (responding to Dan on for Mike) cited triple-digit loss ratios in the other segment (sports/leisure) and varying 100%-120% in problem insurance classes.
TRVThe Travelers Companies, Inc.12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 2 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
any prior quarter adjustments that impacted the actual loss ratio that we should be considering?
Show response
Dan said no for Business Insurance, quantified the half-point underlying loss ratio improvement, and disclosed a couple of points of favorable prior quarter re-estimation in personal auto.
why pricing appears to be bucking the downwards trend line that the medium and larger accounts are experiencing
Show response
Greg attributed the Select uptick to state rate filing timing rather than strategy, and Michael added that outside national property the pricing environment was stable.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I believe you said that pricing would start to move to mid-single digits. If we look at The Travelers Companies, Inc. historical loss trend in home, it looks like it is well into the double digits
Show response
Michael Klein explained pricing moderation reflects achieved rate adequacy, completed insurance-to-value catch-up, and return to normal property inflation levels. Lower inflation factor on 2026 renewals explains most of the quarter-to-quarter RPC drop.
your reserve releases over the last year or more, it kind of implies that loss trend has been a bit below the historical stated trend. Would you agree with that
Show response
Dan said favorable development is mostly comp-driven (frequency and medical severity) and does not imply improving loss trend in liability lines. Alan added that headline loss trend is too blunt, noting mix changes, exposure changes, and estimation nuances.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Would you be able to share what you maybe roughly expect your organic headcount growth or shrinkage to be
Show response
Alan declined to project headcount but said premium per employee is already rising due to productivity and efficiency initiatives and is expected to continue climbing.
in casualty commercial, maybe non-workers' comp, was the change in pricing kind of sequentially?
Show response
Greg confirmed umbrella RPC remains in the double digits and GL RPC has been running in the mid-single digits, the two key non-comp casualty components.
Calendar 2025 Q3
If you can kind of remind us what do we expect RPC to eventually fall? Are those terms and conditions changes going
Show response
Michael said RPC will drop into single digits in early 2026 once insured limits have caught up with replacement costs; also confirmed terms and conditions changes (deductibles, coverage A caps) are contributing to home profitability progress.
Curious if your view on loss cost inflation has changed at all or directionally, is it the I feel like you've only
Show response
Dan said loss trend has been pretty stable for a while with some lines up and some down over time, and nothing in Q3 particularly surprised Travelers on loss activity.
Calendar 2025 Q1
unpack kind of the reacceleration we've seen in pricing. Do you feel this is more a traveler-specific
Show response
Michael said the jump from mid-teens to high-teens RPC in home is driven by insurance limit increases on rising labor, materials and roofing costs, a broad industry trend Travelers is responding to.
It appears that social inflation levels are rising. Would you agree with that viewpoint
Show response
Alan confirmed social inflation remains elevated across the industry and Travelers is seeing it, but said Travelers' observed levels are generally consistent with its expectations baked into loss picks.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Most releases we've seen in a couple of years, good to see. Any -- I heard the prepared remarks, the high level
Show response
Dan said workers' comp was the main driver of favorable BI PYD (consistent long-term favorable story), with one noteworthy piece of unfavorable development from strengthening in the abuse and molestation runoff book.
is it just fair to assume, given the workers' comp pricing is still a bit negative on real pricing?
Show response
Alan said workers' comp pure rate is slightly negative but exposure growth gets Travelers to slightly positive RPC; the overall line is stable with fluctuations quarter-to-quarter.
HIGHartford (The)11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
surprised by the stability in kind of the especially on the smaller end in terms of pricing
Show response
Christopher gave granular pricing detail (BI 5.8%, GL 9.9%, small 7% flat) and said no surprises beyond normal non-cat property volatility.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Do you feel that HIG's operating strategy would kind of pivot or change materially to the extent the market continues to soften materially
Show response
Chris confirmed no dramatic strategy change for market cycles. Will grow where price/terms/conditions support good returns, and accept lower growth otherwise. Business model consistent across cycles.
Just curious if -- what caused that, if it's worth talking about
Show response
Chris attributed to wholesale primary liability and excess casualty discipline. Moe confirmed rest of book (financial lines, marine) fairly stable; wholesale casualty standout in the quarter.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Will this cause technology to be a much bigger differentiator than the past? And if yes, you know, could it cause, you know, M&A
Show response
Chris affirmed AI as game changer where scale matters. Analogized to life insurance top-20 controlling 80-90% of flows. Could see similar consolidation in P&C. Moe added this will set the bar in a different place for serving agents/brokers.
directionally if you'd be willing to kind of size up, you know, more than a less than a point maybe this quarter and for the full year
Show response
Chris confirmed roughly one point favorable non-CAT property for full year. Beth noted some favorability existed in 2024 as well, so year-over-year compare slightly less than full point.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Mo made some comments about further opportunity for consolidation in that space. If you could elaborate, that would be great
Show response
Moe confirmed <5% market share in small business so no friction yet. CIAB feedback reinforced technology advantage, consistent appetite, service capabilities. Agents consolidating to fewer markets benefits Hartford.
Would you say folks in our seat might be focusing a bit too much on the ROE of the industry being healthy, whereas loss cost trend appears to be much more elevated
Show response
Chris argued P&C insurance ROEs still below other financial services given long-term risk and loss cost variability. Focus on maintaining margins and compounding returns over time. Not a bad thing if comp pricing lower when returns still adequate.
Calendar 2025 Q2
that annualized investment yield ex LPs has kind of drifted in the mid-4s for over a year now despite the reinvestment yields being meaningfully higher
Show response
Chris confirmed no change to asset allocation philosophy. Beth explained variable rate pressure dampening overall yield plus some non-LP investment volatility. Purchases had longer average life than sales.
is it fair to say that over long periods of time, you're kind of trying to hit kind of a mid-80s versus the lower 80s today
Show response
Moe differentiated: small historically mid-80s with small business closure churn; middle slightly lower retention expected due to more competitive churn. Current levels on plan with expectations.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Are you able to kind of unpack how what's is it you know, are you kind of using relationships with, like, programized relationships with some of the big ENS carriers
Show response
Moe split E&S into binding (technology transfer + location-by-location expansion) and brokerage (construction relationships enabling cross-sell into marine, non-construction casualty, property).
Do you feel that we're gonna continue to see pricing kind of move north on that line of business, which could offer some potential growth opportunities for Hartford
Show response
Chris confirmed no trend changes in social inflation. GL pricing accelerated in Q1. Moe added GL primary accelerated, umbrella strong and flat, excess lines strong admitted and non-admitted.
PGRProgressive Corporation11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 3 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
Are you willing to kind of maybe elaborate more on why Progressive chose a very large special dividend earlier this year
Show response
Bauer detailed capital allocation framework: reinvest in business first, evaluate buybacks vs fair value, corporate development, then dividends for remaining excess. 3.5x P/S approval generated extra excess capital.
Maybe you can elaborate on what specific technologies are driving those efficiency gains
Show response
Griffith confirmed multiple Gen AI solutions in production but declined specifics. Three-year strategic plan targets continued non-acquisition expense ratio reduction through technology.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I'm curious if advances in recent months or quarters have kind of materially changed Progressive's view on the ability for the, let's say, the combined ratio, the LAE ratio to benefit from efficien...
Show response
Tricia highlighted Gaussian Splatting in claims, the Drive Like an Animal AI-generated commercial, and the new AI Strategy Council looking 3-5 years ahead, emphasizing both efficiency gains and product transformation.
just kind of curious where should we expect that ratio to stay negative in '26 or maybe it will revert back to positive territory later in the year
Show response
Tricia cited Florida, mix normalizing back to pre-COVID levels and more 6-month policies (half the premium per policy) as drivers of the spread between net premium and PIF growth.
Calendar 2025 Q3
slightly negative for a while now, which appears to be different from the kind of the flattish pricing you've been speaking to
Show response
Tricia attributed AWP softness to rate decreases (Florida in particular), mix effects and the upcoming December Florida reduction.
were you signaling a change in capital management tone by stating the buyback language?
Show response
Tricia reiterated the 10b5-1 buyback framework and said the Board will discuss a potential variable dividend in December.
Calendar 2025 Q2
you mentioned that the 8.9 product model and about 50% of your premiums is demonstrating favorable conversion results and elasticity.
Show response
Pat Callahan said product-model elevations happen alongside rate actions so 8.9 effects are hard to isolate, while 9.0 is now in its first state and targets more preferred runway.
are shopping levels still materially above kind of what you -- what Progressive would consider the normal long-term trend line?
Show response
Tricia said the hard market persists and acknowledged uncertainty about whether post-pandemic shopping behavior has permanently reset upward.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I'm curious you don't call out severity being higher due to that mix shift as well.
Show response
Tricia walked through frequency decomp (Gregorian calendar ~1pt, weather, preferred mix) and said collision severity is in line adjusted for Q1 2024 sub/salvage recoveries.
Calendar 2024 Q4
the tailwind from pricing increases has looks like it's meaningfully moderated.
Show response
Tricia reframed as being in the desired small-bites-of-the-apple position and reiterated confidence in 2025 without directly addressing the mean reversion concern.
On policy growth seasonality, historically, this time of the year exhibit faster growth.
Show response
Tricia confirmed Q1 is the bigger shopping season and pointed to the 18% PIF increase in January results as supportive.
MAXMediaAlpha, Inc.8 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Is there a price sensitivity to the extent the stock did continue to move north?
Show response
Pat reiterated intent to complete the vast majority of the $45M remaining authorization and called the stock an attractive opportunity; direct.
Is there more potential for those to happen? I believe there are other counterparties other than Insignia
Show response
Pat said ~$55M of TRA liability remains across founders, early employees, and a third party, and further repurchases would be evaluated on IRR; direct.
Calendar 2026 Q1
on the removing transaction value, I'd say investors did find that helpful
Show response
Pat said transaction value had shown scale (about 3x nearest competitor) but revenue, contribution, and adjusted EBITDA are the peer-comparable metrics going forward.
Did you specify the new terms on the debt so we can calculate the potential savings?
Show response
Pat attributed weak Q1 cash flow to the final $11.5M FTC payment plus annual bonus and TRA payments, with debt economics largely unchanged after refinancing.
Calendar 2025 Q4
would that profile make that insurance carrier more likely to test the waters to offer their pricing to third parties
Show response
Steve said only smaller independent-agent carriers are likely to expose rates to LLMs, leaving the majority captive/direct segment absent, like a Kayak missing major airlines.
are we not seeing as much seasonality as you had maybe thought 6 months ago or 3 months ago?
Show response
Pat said Q4 was slightly less robust and Q1 a bit muted, with smaller carriers leaning in while some larger ones eased off; still optimistic on the year.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Is that the result this quarter and kind of the change going forward, mostly attributable to the under-65 business being smaller?
Show response
Pat walked through take-rate compression drivers (under-65 mix, private shift, new lower-take-rate partner) and the improving contribution-to-EBITDA conversion.
Calendar 2025 Q1
in your 2Q guide, did you embed any conservatism from tariffs?
Show response
Pat said the Q2 tariff impact should be muted with April in the books, and Steve attributed the 1Q beat to carrier conservatism wearing off.
WRBW. R. Berkley Corporation8 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
would you say it is also coming with maybe a better view of loss cost trend as well?
Show response
Management reframed around margin visibility and loss-pick room rather than directly confirming a changed loss cost trend view.
Calendar 2026 Q1
can you maybe remind us, are there like circumstances when you are increasing your leverage
Show response
Confirmed willingness to increase leverage when market opportunities arise, but comfortable at current 22.6% level. Historical average above 30% shows significant capacity for opportunistic deployment.
how Berkley views loss trend in GL, umbrella, commercial auto
Show response
Declined to share specific trend assumptions by product line, stating it's not public information. Emphasized using both traditional and nontraditional data sets and the role of jurisdiction/territory in risk selection.
Calendar 2025 Q4
from just -- as a competitor, though, have you seen this kind of cycle before that until there's real pain and ROEs start eroding
Show response
Rob said GL and excess & umbrella are not yet showing undisciplined softening despite social inflation risk; the cyclical turn will come eventually but isn't here yet.
Calendar 2025 Q3
is that if to the extent pricing continues to moderate, should we would it be normal for the policy growth
Show response
Rob said E&S opportunity will become more weighted toward liability lines as property softens further, and WRB's liability-heavy E&S book insulates it from the property waterfall.
Calendar 2025 Q2
pivoting, Rob, to the medical inflation environment as it pertains to your work comp
Show response
Rob flagged the rumored 200% pharmaceutical tariff as an additional wildcard for workers' comp medical costs but said WRB's sensitivity analysis shows they can manage through that.
Calendar 2025 Q1
going back to the macro crashing that, you know, with the tariffs
Show response
Rob said wage inflation had provided a tailwind for workers' comp post-COVID, but cautioned that medical costs at 50%+ of claims could cut the other way in a slowdown.
Calendar 2024 Q4
why is Rob bearish on kind of workers' comp if profits are so good and still continues to release a lot of reserves
Show response
Rob acknowledged he had misjudged workers' comp frequency trend and gave credit to wage inflation, but kept his concern about medical cost inflation intact.
ALLAllstate7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
are there potential legislative changes in certain states that if things were enacted
Show response
Wilson pointed to Florida, Louisiana and Georgia tort reform progress and said politicians think on 4-5 year cycles so changes can happen quickly.
Auto claims process improvements, which have you know, clearly been supporting profitability in a big way
Show response
Merten placed Allstate in the middle innings of claims transformation, said capabilities are proprietary and not outsourced, with AI as the later innings.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Do you expect that engine to be very different or much larger over time?
Show response
Wilson said Direct will grow as big as customers want, with 1/3 of new business already direct; total marketing is up YTD with better economics thanks to sophistication and brand consideration.
do you agree that there's kind of the winds at your back because of the competitive environment
Show response
Wilson emphasized Allstate's durable homeowners edge and Rizzo highlighted the ASC homeowners product in 16 states and Custom360 IA opportunity.
Calendar 2025 Q1
why not write it a slightly worse combined ratio, trade off some ROE for enable more sustainable organic growth
Show response
Wilson said Allstate has historically run 5 points better than the industry CR while still growing and believes growth is the unlock to better valuation multiples.
Calendar 2024 Q4
are you able to kind of elaborate on what the building blocks are going forward to to to continue the improvements
Show response
Wilson said Allstate is about 60% of the way done on expense reduction, with digitization, the new technology platform, marketing effectiveness, and distribution cost as the remaining levers.
Curious if you think this could cause Allstate to also rethink its ambitions of growing or or just just overall growth in in California
Show response
Wilson said Allstate has no California homeowners growth aspirations and uses Texas as proof that a functional market can exist, but California needs a structure that fairly passes reinsurance costs through.
CBChubb Limited7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
has your views changed in recent months given advances in technology on the kind of the pace of the cadence of the digital transformation
Show response
Goals unchanged and on track. Greenberg highlighted agentics and enterprise LLM solutions as exciting emerging capabilities that will accelerate and lower costs.
What's causing the competition this time? Is it just simply what you've seen before and folks are getting excited about increasing their top line growth
Show response
Greenberg identified structural difference as volume-based MGA incentive systems backed by reinsurance and alternative capital, with excessive intermediation bites.
Calendar 2025 Q2
just large account property, investors have asked us a lot of questions about just the extent of the price
Show response
Evan: large-account property is a capacity-play 'dog bowl' for trading; cycle responds to major CATs and frequency loss; timing depends on cat severity, economics don't change.
Is there a way to kind of tease out or estimate how much of that is attributed to litigation finance
Show response
Evan: Chubb does private tracking, can measure state-by-state via comparative negligence law variation, but litigation financing itself still isn't transparent enough.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I'm curious if you can kind of give us some flavor of what you think catastrophe inflation is
Show response
Evan declined crystal-ball prognostication but pointed to ongoing CAT-by-peril repricing as the discipline. Deflected guidance framing.
much of our incoming from investors is focused on North America commercial social inflation, reserve releases
Show response
Evan pushed back on NA-only framing, described releases as amalgamation of smaller long-tail cohorts reviewed this quarter. Declined specifics.
Calendar 2024 Q4
you’re painting a picture that Chubb’s competitive advantages are growing versus some of its peers
Show response
Evan reaffirmed organic SME focus; inorganic purely opportunistic, not core strategy. Clear answer.
AONAon4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
Do you envision a future where Aon's productivity per employee could accelerate to much higher levels
Show response
Greg emphasized AI reinforces strategy with revenue and service improvement prioritized over pure cost efficiency. Edmund noted multiyear tailwinds from data center and workforce solutions.
Just want to make sure we shouldn't get over our skis given we know that 2Q is one of the biggest property quarters
Show response
Edmund reaffirmed 0-2 point net market impact expectation for Q2, noting product and geographic diversity offsets property rate pressure. Greg emphasized 4 consecutive quarters at 6%+ Commercial Risk.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is this mostly fee-based? And is Aon getting a disproportionate share of this, you think? Or is it most of it going to the E&S market?
Show response
Greg emphasized very early stages and the need to access all capital, primary, admitted, E&S, and alternative markets. Declined to frame current share, saying the opportunity is global and extends beyond hyperscalers to builders and capital providers.
On the accelerating Aon United program, can you give us a flavor of how much cash spend remains? And is that kind of evenly spread out over the next 5 quarters?
Show response
Edmund disclosed just over $600 million in cumulative cash spend against the $900 million total program. Savings on track: $110M in 2024, $150M targeted for 2025, building toward $350M run rate by 2026.
WTWWillis Towers Watson4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 2 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
thinking about the very healthy acceleration in organic and R&B, maybe you can add more texture on what drove that?
Show response
Carl Hess and Lucy Clarke answered fully, naming geographies, specialty lines and the small amount of delayed Q1 activity that moved forward.
would you be willing to discuss whether lower end or higher end of mid-single-digit growth
Show response
Lucy Clarke declined to narrow the range at all, giving no additional colour on where within mid-single digits R&B lands.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Looking at the interest income levels, very healthy, better than expected. Is that the run rate or any one-timers we should be considering?
Show response
Andrew confirmed no specific one-timers but noted geographic mix of cash balances and varying interest rates can create quarter-to-quarter variability.
is project-based mean like more nonrecurring or onetime that we should kind of be considering in our run rate on a go forward?
Show response
Lucy acknowledged one-time nature but emphasized it's a normal, recurring feature of specialty business mix. Simply saw increased contributions this quarter from multiyear project placements.
LMNDLemonade, Inc.2 questions · 1 reporting period · 1 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
does Lemonade have a goal to kind of lower that gross combined ratio materially over time towards the industry average?
Show response
Roughly 60-point improvement in combined ratio. Gross loss ratio at 62% (52% ex-cat). On track for EBITDA breakeven in Q4 2026. Upfront customer acquisition cost expensing is a structural headwind for the expense ratio.
Does it have something to do with -- on an NAIC statutory basis, we've always seen that Lemonade's claims, we call it denial rates, so claims closed with no payment has been materially higher
Show response
No direct link between denial rates and LAE. High denial counts skewed by large renters policy base with newer-to-insurance customers filing non-covered claims. NPS and satisfaction scores among best in industry.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| ACGL Arch Capital Group | 18 | 0%none of 18 questions |
| CINF Cincinnati Financial | 18 | 11%2 of 18 questions |
| MRSH Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. | 14 | 7%1 of 14 questions |
| AJG Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | 13 | 15%2 of 13 questions |
| AIG American International Group | 12 | 8%1 of 12 questions |
| BRO Brown & Brown | 12 | 67%8 of 12 questions |
| EG Everest Group | 12 | 8%1 of 12 questions |
| TRV The Travelers Companies, Inc. | 12 | 17%2 of 12 questions |
| HIG Hartford (The) | 11 | 9%1 of 11 questions |
| PGR Progressive Corporation | 11 | 27%3 of 11 questions |
- ACGLArch Capital Group · 18 questions0%none of 18 questions
- CINFCincinnati Financial · 18 questions11%2 of 18 questions
- MRSHMarsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. · 14 questions7%1 of 14 questions
- AJGArthur J. Gallagher & Co. · 13 questions15%2 of 13 questions
- AIGAmerican International Group · 12 questions8%1 of 12 questions
- BROBrown & Brown · 12 questions67%8 of 12 questions
- EGEverest Group · 12 questions8%1 of 12 questions
- TRVThe Travelers Companies, Inc. · 12 questions17%2 of 12 questions
- HIGHartford (The) · 11 questions9%1 of 11 questions
- PGRProgressive Corporation · 11 questions27%3 of 11 questions
Show all 17 companies
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| MAX MediaAlpha, Inc. | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| WRB W. R. Berkley Corporation | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions |
| ALL Allstate | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| CB Chubb Limited | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| AON Aon | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions |
| WTW Willis Towers Watson | 4 | 50%2 of 4 questions |
| LMND Lemonade, Inc. | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- MAXMediaAlpha, Inc. · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- WRBW. R. Berkley Corporation · 8 questions13%1 of 8 questions
- ALLAllstate · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- CBChubb Limited · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- AONAon · 4 questions25%1 of 4 questions
- WTWWillis Towers Watson · 4 questions50%2 of 4 questions
- LMNDLemonade, Inc. · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 23 | 13%3 of 23 questions | 11 |
| 2025 Q1 | 26 | 19%5 of 26 questions | 14 |
| 2025 Q2 | 24 | 13%3 of 24 questions | 12 |
| 2025 Q3 | 24 | 25%6 of 24 questions | 12 |
| 2025 Q4 | 23 | 4%1 of 23 questions | 12 |
| 2026 Q1 | 29 | 17%5 of 29 questions | 14 |
| 2026 Q2 | 24 | 17%4 of 24 questions | 12 |
- 2024 Q423 questions · challenge rate 13% (3 of 23 questions) · 11 companies
- 2025 Q126 questions · challenge rate 19% (5 of 26 questions) · 14 companies
- 2025 Q224 questions · challenge rate 13% (3 of 24 questions) · 12 companies
- 2025 Q324 questions · challenge rate 25% (6 of 24 questions) · 12 companies
- 2025 Q423 questions · challenge rate 4% (1 of 23 questions) · 12 companies
- 2026 Q129 questions · challenge rate 17% (5 of 29 questions) · 14 companies
- 2026 Q224 questions · challenge rate 17% (4 of 24 questions) · 12 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Margin55
- Pricing49
- Revenue Growth46
- Competitive Dynamics43
- Cost Pressure26
- Guidance Reliability19
- Capital Allocation19
- Cloud & AI13
- Macroeconomic11
- Innovation & R&D11
Show all 19 topics
- M&A10
- Regulation Policy9
- Credit8
- Demand4
- Capex Investment2
- Trade Tariffs2
- Labor Market1
- Product Launch1
- Geographic Expansion1