Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Nathan Stein

Deutsche Bank · covers Financial Services

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2025 Q3 (4 quarters; questions recorded in 3).

Limited coverage. Only 6 questions of coverage. Treat these numbers as directional — sample too small for reliable averages.
Questions
6on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 6 questionsLimited sample
Companies
2questioned at least once
Reporting periods
3with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 6 of 6 questions from 2 companies

HBANHuntington Bancshares4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
HBAN company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

how can I think about your operating assumptions for NII on a stand-alone basis relative to up 10 to 11% this year

Revenue GrowthMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Zach outlined 2026 NII framework: mid-to-high single digit loan growth plus at least 10bp NIM expansion should drive strong spread revenue outcome, similar to 2025 model.

the expansion markets are really ultra competitive. And can you just talk about how you're continuing to grow in those regions

Geographic ExpansionCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Steve emphasized experienced hires with average 20-year tenure, strong relationship networks, and accelerated profitability in both Carolinas and Texas. Opened handful of branches in Carolinas this year, couple dozen planned for next year. Number one SBA lender in Texas.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I heard you say modestly lower NIM in the first quarter, but can you elaborate on your NIM outlook for the full year?

Show response

Zach detailed approximately flat NIM at 3% through 2025, with fixed asset repricing providing about 10bp benefit, offset by variable yield impacts and hedge dynamics.

can you talk about the securities repositioning you did this quarter? You sold $1 billion of securities

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Zach indicated no further repositioning likely since Huntington's prior hedging program left limited opportunities compared to peers.

KEYKeyCorp2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
KEY company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

Can you just elaborate more on what kinds of markets and customers you're targeting and how would you gain share during periods of volatility

Competitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Chris gave CRE bridging example: when CMBS market is choppy, Key can bridge transactions for existing clients and take out to CMBS later.

could you talk briefly about the commercial real estate gross charge-offs, which were a little elevated in the first quarter?

Show response

Clark attributed Q1 CRE charge-offs to just two name-specific resolutions, not broad-based deterioration. Overall CRE portfolio health improving with paydowns and declining criticized levels.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
HBAN Huntington Bancshares40%none of 4 questions
KEY KeyCorp2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • HBAN
    Huntington Bancshares · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • KEY
    KeyCorp · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q420%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q120%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q2No questions recorded——
2025 Q320%none of 2 questions1
  1. 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  2. 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  3. 2025 Q2No questions recorded
  4. 2025 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Margin2
  • Competitive Dynamics2
  • Revenue Growth1
  • Geographic Expansion1
  • Credit1
  • Capital Allocation1