Neal Dingmann

are those areas where you consider sort of at the front of the potential exploration line

is your gas takeaway capacity at all limiting potential future oil growth.

Anything you would talk about here in the near term

how many workover rigs are you currently running, and would you consider boosting the workover count

could you talk a little bit about just Permian inventory, how the potential sensitivity is, especially around some of your gassy assets

Is the 100% of that $230 million in suggested capital for the year strictly focused on the GranMorgu

would you characterize every opportunity that fit your requirements as better or worse than, you know, you saw this time last year

I'm just wondering maybe for Blake. Just, you know, like, are you seeing this maybe talk about potential further opportunities both in the Permian

I'm specifically wondering will the focus continue to be primarily on Lower Marcellus? Will you be able to co-develop several of the areas

I'm just wondering, was that more driven by -- I know you had more turnarounds that you talked about having about 25% less of those this year?

as we continue to see negative Waha prices, how much does this impact your future Permian decisions based on what you are seeing there

Do you anticipate continuing to take positions in additional geothermal or other newer-type ventures?

is there plans to target even longer laterals and potentially upspace the wells to boost results? And then I'm just wondering, will you continue to be as active on the ground game

does that cause you to think about differently maybe one of your other plays like the Anadarko or PRB where you have less scale

you guys did a great job on the ground game being active on New Mexico lease sales. So I'm just wondering, with that said, do you all anticipate the ground game

you've stepped up the CapEx a little bit. I think you're saying around a billion with four rigs. And I'm just wondering, given your planned focus here on Grayson Mills

your midstream infrastructure situation appears to continue to be very strong with no takeaway issues. And I'm just wondering, is this performance largely due to contract?

are you all actively speaking into some of these hyperscalers?

I'm wondering how you think about the Western side of the black oil window

I'd love to hear you guys always give a pretty good forecast on what you're thinking the commodity wise, both I'd say gas NGLs and oil

Looks like that the processing spread and others have stayed or I guess they were pretty stable for the remainder of last year. Are you expecting more of that this year

is there potential for these contracts that is maybe structured whereby you all would think about participating

do you anticipate those being structured any differently than Homer City now any of your previous deals

are you seeing anything different for this year when you look at those '26 expectations? Or is the guide more just kind of being conservative

Am I correct I'm thinking this is still -- I mean, what are you thinking around timing around that?

could you give us some details of what specific transactions make the most sense in the coming months?

is there something you all would consider doing with, I do not know, either monetizing a bit of the inventory or drilling carry

Would you pull back on the rig count and just sort of continue to bank that free cash flow, or would you continue to potentially boost the production

am I correct in thinking that you all will continue to strategically grow production well

how do you believe capital for M&A stacks up maybe against buybacks or simply the near-term debt repayment

could you just address maybe talk about inventory replenishment and reinvestment in your existing asset base

your Barnett wells, you're talking about kind of a 36 MBOE per 1,000 foot 12-month cum versus 22 for the core Midland, yet you have the -- you talked about maybe the $100 per lateral foot Barnett

specifically what differentiates your development style versus others? Is it the larger projects? I mean does that factor in?

does sort of others, I guess, lack of capital discipline cause you to think about changing your plans given you all are a lower operator

noticed you'll continue to complete several more wells than you drill like you did last year, maybe just discuss that

Suggesting now around sixty-seven dollars a barrel produced the same free cash flow of seventy-six last year

would you all consider selling down some energy transition assets to fund these gas initiatives

does that give you more do you think opportunities to, I don't know, necessarily buy distressed assets

do you still have sort of the same expectations for production in some of your key areas as you did last year?

are you all seeing additional opportunities to accelerate and maybe just how customer demand is looking there also

Is the larger projects contribute to that? Or what was the main driver of that exceptionally low cost

what type of returns? I assume the returns around some of that incremental upside would be very positive

you think most of the higher quality domestic assets have now transacted. And if so, you know, would that your thoughts around that

what type of service cost are you all assuming in there and, you know, how much operational efficiencies because you certainly have continued to see

what's the timing and when would you all need new capital there, maybe along with, you know, how you all are using offloads to bridge that need

how this fits into the overall integrated NGL strategy. And if, you know, again, of course, for the right price, would you all consider selling