Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Neal Dingmann

William Blair · covers Energy

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters; questions recorded in 6).

Questions
47on tracked calls
Challenge rate
2%1 of 47 questions
Companies
14questioned at least once
Reporting periods
6with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 47 of 47 questions from 14 companies

FANGDiamondback Energy9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 9 challenging
FANG company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

am I correct in thinking that you all will continue to strategically grow production well

MacroeconomicDemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Kaes tied the growth bias directly to draining global inventories needing to be refilled; a full, direct answer.

Calendar 2026 Q1

how do you believe capital for M&A stacks up maybe against buybacks or simply the near-term debt repayment

Capital AllocationM&ATranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CEO walked through all options: organic growth (hitting lever), M&A (quiet for foreseeable future), dividends (increased), debt paydown (priority), cash for rainy day.

how much, if any, will at negative Waha prices impact what you might or might not do? And then the same question with oil service prices

ChallengingCost PressureSupply ChainTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CEO addressed gas hedging protection; COO said no service pricing pressure yet, still capacity in rig/completion space. Inflation minimal in consumables tied to commodity.

Calendar 2025 Q4

could you just address maybe talk about inventory replenishment and reinvestment in your existing asset base

Capex InvestmentCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Kaes noted avg lateral lengths up 600 ft YoY, all inventory added without outside capital. FANG built its position from very little inventory over 15 years and continues to replenish organically.

your Barnett wells, you're talking about kind of a 36 MBOE per 1,000 foot 12-month cum versus 22 for the core Midland, yet you have the -- you talked about maybe the $100 per lateral foot Barnett

Innovation & R&DCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Kaes outlined the path: core at $510-520/ft, Barnett at $1,000/ft needing to reach $800/ft. Danny detailed cost reduction levers: multi-well pad development, simul-frac, extended laterals targeting 15,000+ feet.

Calendar 2025 Q3

specifically what differentiates your development style versus others? Is it the larger projects? I mean does that factor in?

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Kaes highlighted Slide 8 as the most important slide, co-development of all zones yields more PV per acre at a lower cost structure, combining Endeavor's inventory with Diamondback's execution.

does sort of others, I guess, lack of capital discipline cause you to think about changing your plans given you all are a lower operator

Competitive DynamicsCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Kaes reiterated conviction in the plan, citing 36% reinvestment rate at mid-60s oil as an unheard-of outcome from 6-7 years ago.

Calendar 2024 Q4

noticed you'll continue to complete several more wells than you drill like you did last year, maybe just discuss that

Capex InvestmentInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Travis explained the DUC drawdown reflects Endeavor and TRP acquired DUCs, while noting frac fleet efficiency rose from 80 to 100 wells/year.

Suggesting now around sixty-seven dollars a barrel produced the same free cash flow of seventy-six last year

Capital AllocationCost PressureTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Travis directly attributed the $9/bbl improvement to the Endeavor deal's FCF per share accretion and improved capital efficiency.

DVNDevon Energy7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
DVN company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

as we continue to see negative Waha prices, how much does this impact your future Permian decisions based on what you are seeing there

PricingSupply ChainTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Clay and Jeff explained proactive pipeline participation (Blackcomb coming online), pulling back high-GOR well production during negative pricing, and using financial hedges showing up in other line items.

Do you anticipate continuing to take positions in additional geothermal or other newer-type ventures?

Innovation & R&DGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Clay and Trey confirmed Fervo focus with S-1 filed; bullish on power demand story; interested as technology gets de-risked but primary focus is Fervo partnership success.

Calendar 2025 Q4

is there plans to target even longer laterals and potentially upspace the wells to boost results? And then I'm just wondering, will you continue to be as active on the ground game

Capex InvestmentInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Clay confirmed continued focus on landing zones, technology, recovery improvement, and opportunistic ground game from position of strength.

Calendar 2025 Q3

does that cause you to think about differently maybe one of your other plays like the Anadarko or PRB where you have less scale

Capital AllocationM&ATranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Clay acknowledged they won't be in 5 basins forever; regular Board discussions about portfolio optimization for long-term value but no specifics.

you guys did a great job on the ground game being active on New Mexico lease sales. So I'm just wondering, with that said, do you all anticipate the ground game

M&ACapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Clay confirmed active participation in state and upcoming federal lease sales; Devon's flywheel and boots-on-ground presence give competitive advantage.

Calendar 2024 Q4

you've stepped up the CapEx a little bit. I think you're saying around a billion with four rigs. And I'm just wondering, given your planned focus here on Grayson Mills

Capex InvestmentRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Clay explained Grayson will run flat with 3 rigs, while Powder River does more science work to unlock potential.

your midstream infrastructure situation appears to continue to be very strong with no takeaway issues. And I'm just wondering, is this performance largely due to contract?

Supply ChainCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Jeff confirmed years of proactive work on gathering, processing, and takeaway capacity with no roadblocks seen.

APAAPA Corporation6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
APA company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

are those areas where you consider sort of at the front of the potential exploration line

Geographic ExpansionCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

John ranked Block 58 and Alaska at the top as de-risked, with Uruguay a high-quality frontier prospect.

is your gas takeaway capacity at all limiting potential future oil growth.

Capex InvestmentSupply ChainTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Ben said capacity exceeds equity production, with GCX and PHP extension options preserving optionality.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Anything you would talk about here in the near term

Geographic ExpansionInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Christmann said Crab Dagu appraisal wells derisked an entire exploration play. Multiple prospects identified. Exploration drilling could extend plateau or identify targets for incremental infrastructure. Very excited about returning to Suriname exploration.

how many workover rigs are you currently running, and would you consider boosting the workover count

Geographic ExpansionCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Riney said mid-to-high teens workover rigs, consistent with recent quarters. Workover rigs used for both new well completions and workovers. Christmann said secondary projects and waterflood performance keeping profile flat. Egypt needs both oil and gas for energy security.

Calendar 2025 Q4

could you talk a little bit about just Permian inventory, how the potential sensitivity is, especially around some of your gassy assets

Show response

Christmann confirmed inventory assessment focused on oil, pure gas locations not included and will be separate. Riney provided detailed methodology: 10% ROR including all D&C, equipping, facilities and central infrastructure costs. 40-50% of technical upside is shallow Delaware (Avalon, Bone Springs). Two recent First Bone Spring wells breaking even at $41 WTI.

Is the 100% of that $230 million in suggested capital for the year strictly focused on the GranMorgu

Capex InvestmentGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Christmann confirmed $230M is entirely for GranMorgu development. Exploration drilling is separate in the $70M exploration budget. Development drilling will start with multiple rigs coming on late 2026/early 2027.

EXEExpand Energy4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
EXE company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

Am I correct I'm thinking this is still -- I mean, what are you thinking around timing around that?

Show response

Mike described two buckets: near-term (premium markets and volatility, happening now as seen in the $90 million Q1 result) and longer-term (LNG and power demand facilitation, approximately three years). A lot of value to capture immediately while building longer-term positions.

could you give us some details of what specific transactions make the most sense in the coming months?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Mike prioritized LNG value chain as nearest-term and closest opportunity given Haynesville interconnectivity. Power generation in Northeast PA also being pursued actively. Focus is on marketing as the key value creation lever for this moment.

Calendar 2025 Q4

is there something you all would consider doing with, I do not know, either monetizing a bit of the inventory or drilling carry

Capital AllocationCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Mike acknowledged the stock does not fully reflect the value of the 2 million-plus acre position. Said if someone wants to overpay for assets, the company is open, but not actively pursuing inventory monetization.

Would you pull back on the rig count and just sort of continue to bank that free cash flow, or would you continue to potentially boost the production

Capex InvestmentMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Josh said decision would depend on market fundamentals. Business efficient up to 7.75 Bcf per day. Until market fundamentals shore up, plan is to execute the 7.5 Bcf per day at $2.85 billion CapEx as laid out.

OXYOccidental Petroleum4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
OXY company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

Is the larger projects contribute to that? Or what was the main driver of that exceptionally low cost

Cost PressureCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jackson credited both Midland Basin scale from CrownRock integration and renegotiated service contracts. Currently running short contract terms, actively working 2026 positioning with service partners.

what type of returns? I assume the returns around some of that incremental upside would be very positive

Innovation & R&DMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jackson confirmed 25-35% current returns on EOR with potential improvement as production uplift increases. Capital allocation driven by portfolio competition between unconventional and conventional opportunities.

Calendar 2024 Q4

you think most of the higher quality domestic assets have now transacted. And if so, you know, would that your thoughts around that

M&AGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Hollub emphasized organic growth in existing positions: Algeria expansion and exploration, Oman gas opportunities, Abu Dhabi blocks, and Gulf of America AI applications.

what type of service cost are you all assuming in there and, you know, how much operational efficiencies because you certainly have continued to see

Cost PressureCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Jackson detailed 12% D&C improvement in 2024 (half scope/performance, half market deflation). Targeting 7% further in 2025 through efficiency and NPT reduction.

EQTEQT Corporation3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
EQT company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

is there potential for these contracts that is maybe structured whereby you all would think about participating

Capital AllocationCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Rice called data-center token-spread participation a jump from spark-spread exposure and saw no current market opportunity, but said EQT would keep an eye on it.

Calendar 2025 Q4

do you anticipate those being structured any differently than Homer City now any of your previous deals

Show response

Toby said structures will vary by site requirements, gas supply is universal, midstream opportunity is project-specific.

are you seeing anything different for this year when you look at those '26 expectations? Or is the guide more just kind of being conservative

Capex InvestmentMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Toby detailed conservatism with operational momentum baselined, opportunities from water logistics (80% piped frac water, 40% produced water), AI-assisted procurement, and aggressive service rebidding.

Show 8 more companies
CTRACoterra2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
CTRA company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

I'm just wondering maybe for Blake. Just, you know, like, are you seeing this maybe talk about potential further opportunities both in the Permian

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Blake Sirgo detailed three efficiency drivers: record drilling feet per day, dramatically improved frac efficiencies with 20-minute transition times, and rigorous well trouble management. ML-driven frac design optimization also highlighted.

I'm specifically wondering will the focus continue to be primarily on Lower Marcellus? Will you be able to co-develop several of the areas

Show response

Michael DeShazer confirmed returning to Dimock box in 2025 with Upper Marcellus overfill wells and co-development plans. Noted upper is lower productivity but longer laterals improve capital efficiency.

EOGEOG Resources2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
EOG company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

are you all actively speaking into some of these hyperscalers?

DemandInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Ezra outlined two benefit paths: existing marketing agreements capture regional pricing uplift from data center demand, and future model of data centers locating near gas fields could directly benefit Dorado.

I'm wondering how you think about the Western side of the black oil window

Capex InvestmentProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Ezra confirmed leasing focused on volatile oil window to core up ahead of drilling. Expansion to western black oil and eastern condensate windows requires more seismic data and development learnings.

EPDEnterprise Products Partners L.P.2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
EPD company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

I'd love to hear you guys always give a pretty good forecast on what you're thinking the commodity wise, both I'd say gas NGLs and oil

MacroeconomicPricingTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Jim outlined oil range-bound with OPEC balancing; Permian NGL forecast likely up again; constructive on natural gas long-term for LNG and power demand.

Looks like that the processing spread and others have stayed or I guess they were pretty stable for the remainder of last year. Are you expecting more of that this year

Show response

Randy explained processing spread stability is primarily a function of Waha gas price, with ethane relatively stable.

KMIKinder Morgan2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
KMI company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

would you all consider selling down some energy transition assets to fund these gas initiatives

Capital AllocationM&ATranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Kim said asset sales are not the best way to fund growth. CapEx fully funded from cash flow. Balance sheet capacity available. Could bring in partners on new projects at attractive cost of capital.

does that give you more do you think opportunities to, I don't know, necessarily buy distressed assets

Show response

Kim said early turbulence causes markets to pause, but prolonged distress could present longer-term acquisition opportunities.

OKEONEOK2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
OKE company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

do you still have sort of the same expectations for production in some of your key areas as you did last year?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Pierce confirmed at or above expectations driven by Bakken consolidation enabling longer laterals, Mid-Con activity picking up with gas prices.

are you all seeing additional opportunities to accelerate and maybe just how customer demand is looking there also

Show response

Pierce expressed strong excitement about EnLink integration, noting RFP opportunities in Permian and expanded Mid-Con presence, with the team 'jazzed up' to grow.

TRGPTarga Resources2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
TRGP company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

what's the timing and when would you all need new capital there, maybe along with, you know, how you all are using offloads to bridge that need

Capex InvestmentSupply ChainTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Pryor detailed Grand Prix capacity of 1.1M bpd vs 872K bpd actual, with third-party offloads providing flexibility on timing of next long-haul NGL pipeline.

how this fits into the overall integrated NGL strategy. And if, you know, again, of course, for the right price, would you all consider selling

Capital AllocationM&ATranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Meloy noted Badlands NGLs feed into fractionation and export. Owning 100% improves strategic flexibility for any future options.

COPConocoPhillips1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
COP company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

would you characterize every opportunity that fit your requirements as better or worse than, you know, you saw this time last year

M&ACompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Ryan Lance noted consolidation will continue but fewer quality targets remain, reiterated three key M&A tenets: financial framework fit, asset improvement, company improvement.

CVXChevron Corporation1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
CVX company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

I'm just wondering, was that more driven by -- I know you had more turnarounds that you talked about having about 25% less of those this year?

MarginMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Wirth acknowledged the weak quarter candidly, margins, turnarounds, inventory accounting, and impairments all went negative. Stressed nothing structurally deteriorating.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
FANG Diamondback Energy911%1 of 9 questions
DVN Devon Energy70%none of 7 questions
APA APA Corporation60%none of 6 questions
EXE Expand Energy40%none of 4 questions
OXY Occidental Petroleum40%none of 4 questions
EQT EQT Corporation30%none of 3 questions
CTRA Coterra2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
EOG EOG Resources2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
EPD Enterprise Products Partners L.P.2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
KMI Kinder Morgan2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • FANG
    Diamondback Energy · 9 questions
    11%1 of 9 questions
  • DVN
    Devon Energy · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • APA
    APA Corporation · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • EXE
    Expand Energy · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • OXY
    Occidental Petroleum · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • EQT
    EQT Corporation · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • CTRA
    Coterra · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • EOG
    EOG Resources · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • EPD
    Enterprise Products Partners L.P. · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • KMI
    Kinder Morgan · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
Show all 14 companies
CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
OKE ONEOK2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
TRGP Targa Resources2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
COP ConocoPhillips1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
CVX Chevron Corporation1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • OKE
    ONEOK · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • TRGP
    Targa Resources · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • COP
    ConocoPhillips · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • CVX
    Chevron Corporation · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q4180%none of 18 questions10
2025 Q120%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q2No questions recorded——
2025 Q360%none of 6 questions3
2025 Q490%none of 9 questions5
2026 Q1813%1 of 8 questions4
2026 Q240%none of 4 questions3
  1. 2024 Q418 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 18 questions) · 10 companies
  2. 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  3. 2025 Q2No questions recorded
  4. 2025 Q36 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 3 companies
  5. 2025 Q49 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 9 questions) · 5 companies
  6. 2026 Q18 questions · challenge rate 13% (1 of 8 questions) · 4 companies
  7. 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Capex Investment18
  • M&A9
  • Innovation & R&D8
  • Capital Allocation7
  • Competitive Dynamics7
  • Geographic Expansion6
  • Demand6
  • Cost Pressure6
  • Supply Chain5
  • Macroeconomic5
Show all 15 topics
  • Revenue Growth5
  • Margin5
  • Pricing3
  • Cloud & AI1
  • Product Launch1