Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Nehal Chokshi

Northland Capital Markets · covers Technology, Communication Services

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (8 quarters).

Questions
29on tracked calls
Challenge rate
24%7 of 29 questions
Companies
6questioned at least once
Reporting periods
8with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 29 of 29 questions from 6 companies

SMCISupermicro13 questions · 8 reporting periods · 3 of 13 challenging
SMCI company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

do you see the value add that Super Micro can add to NVIDIA ecosystem being different from the x86 ecosystem

Competitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Charles pointed to DCBBS total-solution differentiation and faster time-to-market across silicon platforms as the value-add.

Calendar 2026 Q1

would you bucket that more towards DCBBS ramp or more towards a reduction in your 10% customer going from 63% to 27%

Show response

Charles attributed margin improvement to both DCBBS (with 20%+ margins) and enterprise customer growth. Both factors expected to continue driving improvement.

you mentioned that over the next 2 years, targeting 20% to Data Center Building Block Solutions, 20%. Was that gross profit? Or was that revenue

Innovation & R&DMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Charles confirmed the 20% DCBBS target is profit contribution, not revenue. Indicates high-margin DCBBS business targeting meaningful share of total profitability.

Calendar 2025 Q4

your 10% customer, -- was that the primary driver of the upside that you saw in the quarter? Do you expect them to remain a 10-plus percent customer in the March quarter

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Charles deflected the specific customer question by pointing to overall growth trajectory. Noted more diversified large customer base and mentioned $50-60B revenue aspiration.

do you expect Super Micro to continue to bring to the market one generation faster the power efficiency advantages before NVIDIA makes it part of their reference architecture

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Charles confirmed SMCI's engineering advantage enables 3-6 month time-to-market lead on total solutions including DLC and dry cooling towers ahead of NVIDIA reference architecture.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Why is it necessary to basically do a routine repeat of this proof of Super Micro's engineering prowess

ChallengingMarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

David framed margin-dilutive mega-deals as validation of DCBBS capabilities that generate follow-on business. Charles noted xAI remains an important long-term partner.

Calendar 2025 Q2

what is going to be the driver of the projected Q2 uptick to the September quarter revenue

Revenue GrowthMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

David cited MI-355X and GB300 ramp as Q1 revenue drivers. Lack of operating leverage attributed to production learning curve during platform technology changeover.

is that being pushed more as a discrete service or the value of that discrete service is fractional to Gen AI factory or is it bundled

Innovation & R&DMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Charles confirmed DCBBS is bundled as comprehensive total solution including computing, cooling, power, battery backup. Expects DCBBS to reach over 20-30% of deal value over time.

Calendar 2025 Q1

is there any expectation that there will be inventory reserve in the June quarter and is that part of 10% gross margin guidance

Show response

Charles expects inventory reserve impact to decline from 200bp in Q3 to approximately 100bp in Q4 and near zero by September.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Can you tell us whether or not Backlog is up Q or Q for the December quarter

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

David declined to share backlog figures but noted backlog builds with new chip cycles and expects growth industry-wide.

is historical year-over-year growth really a good indicator of future demand? Have you looked at the actual pipeline of demand

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Charles claimed validation from both historical growth rates and customer pipeline, backlog, and commitments, but shared no specifics.

Calendar 2024 Q3

there's a strong feeling in the investment community that the Chairman and CEO roles, if separated, could be quite beneficial to Super Micro

ChallengingRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Charles said he is considering it with an open mind and acknowledged he will eventually retire, but gave no commitment or timeline.

any 10% customer exposures in the quarter and the upcoming quarter

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

David confirmed 10% customers exist but declined to disclose the percentage. Charles added they are gaining new customers in Europe and Asia.

NBISNebius Group N.V.6 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
NBIS company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

Your pipeline is up 3.5x quarter-over-quarter in 1Q '26

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Marc Boroditsky said the 3.5x AI cloud pipeline excludes hyperscaler deals and reflects qualified opportunities across AI natives, ISVs and enterprises.

Calendar 2025 Q4

how do you think about this?

Capital AllocationM&ATranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Arkady Volozh said capital is split between scale (data centers, GPUs) and product, which is built organically and supplemented by acquisitions like Tavily.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Incremental ARR in September was around $12 million, down from $180 million the prior quarter and $159 million in March. Why is incremental ARR down?

ChallengingRevenue GrowthSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Management attributed the drop to the capacity bottleneck and said Q4 incremental ARR will be significantly higher as new capacity comes online.

how are we focusing on debt and asset-backed financing for large deals?

Capital AllocationCreditTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Dado Alonso said Nebius is evaluating asset-backed financing, corporate debt and equity, expecting attractive terms backed by its largest customers.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Can you maybe elaborate a little more on the MLPerf?

Innovation & R&DCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Andrey Korolenko said cloud training speed scales linearly and matches bare-metal performance, a key selling point for customers.

So really, as we think about ARR for the year, what are the dynamics around ARR?

Show response

Dado Alonso gave concrete ARR progression and said a significant portion of the raised guidance is already under contract.

IONQIonQ, Inc.4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 2 of 4 challenging
IONQ company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

your implicit guidance for 2H is $135 million to $145 million.

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Singh pushed back on any implied decline, saying combined-company guidance and SkyWater eliminations will be provided next quarter.

the 256-qubit chip from SkyWater, that does not include integration of technology from Lightsynq, right?

Innovation & R&DProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

de Masi confirmed Lightsynq memory sits in the EPB networking work, while SkyWater builds ever-larger single-chip qubit counts.

Calendar 2026 Q1

can you talk to the driver of gross margin being down about 600 basis points Q-on-Q.

ChallengingMarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Singh deflected to EBITDA as the better metric given heavy R&D, citing product-mix effects and a low bill-of-materials advantage.

Is that contemplated in the long-term road map that you guys had laid out a year ago

Show response

de Masi confirmed the walking cat architecture and low physical-to-logical ratio were contemplated in the June roadmap.

NTAPNetApp4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
NTAP company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

But still do not have a good sense as far as, like, what percent of bookings or revenue that is.

ChallengingCloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Wissam declined to break out AI bookings or revenue, only quantifying the number of on-prem AI wins.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Have you seen your AI win rate go up, or is this just a reflection of the increase in deal flow AI deal flow?

Cloud & AIDemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

George clarified 5x growth is revenue-based not customer count. Win rates very strong; focus is expanding deal pipeline via refreshed portfolio, NVIDIA certifications, full-stack reference architectures, and expanded hyperscaler/application integrations.

what was the FX impact in the quarter? And was your expectations for fiscal year 2026?

Show response

Wissam confirmed Q4 FX impact de minimis (<1%). FY26 FX embedded in guidance at prevailing rates; declined to comment on analyst's 100bps tailwind estimate.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how long do you expect to before you can really introduce that and how heavy of a lift is this

Innovation & R&DCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

George confirmed scaled-out architecture solutions expected in customer deployments by end of next calendar year.

CRWVCoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
CRWV company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

what's kind of like the right way to think about how much incremental power you can bring in each quarter?

Capex InvestmentDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Management declined a per-quarter megawatt figure but cited a robust pipeline and 2 gigawatts added in 12 months; partial.

RGTIRigetti Computing, Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
RGTI company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

the 36 median cubic gate fidelity did improve from 99.5% in the first quarter to 99.6% in the second quarter

Show response

Management said the 36-qubit fidelity improvement to 99.6% came mainly from design optimization, with the 9-qubit at 99.8%.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
SMCI Supermicro1323%3 of 13 questions
NBIS Nebius Group N.V.617%1 of 6 questions
IONQ IonQ, Inc.450%2 of 4 questions
NTAP NetApp425%1 of 4 questions
CRWV CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
RGTI Rigetti Computing, Inc.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • SMCI
    Supermicro · 13 questions
    23%3 of 13 questions
  • NBIS
    Nebius Group N.V. · 6 questions
    17%1 of 6 questions
  • IONQ
    IonQ, Inc. · 4 questions
    50%2 of 4 questions
  • NTAP
    NetApp · 4 questions
    25%1 of 4 questions
  • CRWV
    CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • RGTI
    Rigetti Computing, Inc. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q3250%1 of 2 questions1
2024 Q4333%1 of 3 questions2
2025 Q110%none of 1 question1
2025 Q260%none of 6 questions3
2025 Q3367%2 of 3 questions2
2025 Q430%none of 3 questions2
2026 Q1617%1 of 6 questions4
2026 Q2540%2 of 5 questions4
  1. 2024 Q32 questions · challenge rate 50% (1 of 2 questions) · 1 company
  2. 2024 Q43 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  3. 2025 Q11 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  4. 2025 Q26 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 3 companies
  5. 2025 Q33 questions · challenge rate 67% (2 of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  6. 2025 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  7. 2026 Q16 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 4 companies
  8. 2026 Q25 questions · challenge rate 40% (2 of 5 questions) · 4 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Revenue Growth9
  • Innovation & R&D9
  • Demand8
  • Margin7
  • Cloud & AI4
  • Competitive Dynamics4
  • Guidance Reliability2
  • Capital Allocation2
  • Product Launch1
  • Capex Investment1
Show all 17 topics
  • Cost Pressure1
  • M&A1
  • Fx1
  • Supply Chain1
  • Credit1
  • Inventory1
  • Regulation Policy1