Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Nick Amicucci

Evercore ISI · covers Utilities, Industrials, Healthcare

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (4 quarters).

Questions
37on tracked calls
Challenge rate
3%1 of 37 questions
Companies
11questioned at least once
Reporting periods
4with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 37 of 37 questions from 11 companies

BEBloom Energy Corporation6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
BE company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

are you starting to have any conversations just along the lines of inference reasoning

Show response

Answered both, quantifying the revenue value of a month of earlier power for a 1 GW data center and framing distribution constraints as the inference opportunity.

Obviously impressive raise in guidance on a strong 2Q, but the free cash flow guide was pulled.

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Reframed the removal as aligning the deck to formally guided metrics and offered a $375+ million CFOA baseline, but did not restore a guide.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Are there any conversations that you guys are having with kind of your hyperscaler customers or the neo class

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Sridhar dismissed the bridge-power framing as no longer raised by customers, but gave no detail on how many deals remain grid tied.

Is it fair to say, too, that the vast majority, if not all, of the backlog currently is probably tethered

Show response

Sridhar accepted the premise with a correction and used the 2.45 gigawatt Rhode Island water and air comparison to argue clean siting will matter more at the edge.

Calendar 2025 Q3

How should we think about kind of the utilization on that capacity as we kind of enter into -- again, as we

Capex InvestmentRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Sridhar deferred utilization detail to next year's backlog discussion, confirming only that expansion beyond 2 gigawatts is being staffed for.

can you just kind of convey the additive value when we think of kind of the inference and when latency becomes an issue

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Sridhar argued the modular architecture serves both, and that inference sited near dense populations favors non-polluting, quiet generation.

NINiSource5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
NI company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

what is the governor's kind of ultimate objective? And how do those align with what you guys are seeing

Show response

Yates argued the governor and stakeholders are aligned that economic development and growth are the key to affordability, but did not detail specific objectives.

Calendar 2026 Q1

when we think about up to 2 gigawatts of developing opportunities that are later-dated, how quickly would those need to be brought into the fold to be COD by 2035?

DemandCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Lloyd noted developing opportunities timeline uncertain. Demand in Indiana significant from hyperscalers. Will work methodically as resources and equipment allow. Confirmed increased guidance includes only signed contracts, not pipeline.

Calendar 2025 Q3

is the pitch, I guess, to the government [indiscernible] incremental savings that as you kind of -- as you grow this, you could provide incremental savings

Regulation PolicyCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Lloyd confirmed incremental flowback is the explicit objective. Each new customer using existing transmission grid generates additional savings for retail customers.

if we were to look at kind of the gigawatt addition and then kind of the EPS accretion, is, I guess, roughly $0.08 per gigawatt, a good rule of thumb

Revenue GrowthCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Shawn declined to confirm per-GW economics, citing variability from technology choice and construction timelines. Maintained discipline on competitive information.

is that strictly for the first 3 gigs? Or is that -- does that kind of -- do you have the ability to kind of upsize that given the opportunity you have?

Supply ChainCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Michael confirmed EPC partnership designed for upsizing. Initial agreements cover 2 CCGTs and 400MW batteries. Lloyd added partnership enables faster subsequent execution without lengthy RFP processes.

NRGNRG Energy5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
NRG company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

where we get confidence on kind of the 2026 guidance and where we can kind of shake out

Guidance ReliabilityPricingTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Bruce said the first half puts NRG below the guidance midpoint, but a substantially hedged fleet and committed load give confidence in finishing within the range.

Calendar 2026 Q1

how you can leverage kind of both the residential as well as kind of segments and business lines to -- within that kind of offering

Subscriber GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Management highlighted quality customer selection in Texas paying off with record-low churn, continued smart home momentum, and plans to bundle electricity and home automation for affordability.

any kind of color you could provide just on the impact of kind of RTC plus B initiatives and just kind of the normalization

Regulation PolicyPricingTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Gaudette framed the market as impacted by solar and battery build slowing down, with no weather catalyst to set price markers. Expects curves to change radically with one hot summer.

Calendar 2025 Q4

now having kind of the RTC+B initiative in ERCOT in Texas kind of up and running now for about 2 to 3 months

Innovation & R&DRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Management called RTC+B an extraordinary opportunity that NRG is uniquely positioned to capture, though still early in quantifying.

Just anything that we could kind of pinpoint like really what's gone well? What kind of exceeded the expectations just over the past

MarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Bruce Chung credited the team's operational changes, cultural improvements, and ability to capitalize on weather-favorable conditions.

PEGPublic Service Enterprise Group5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
PEG company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

what would you need to see going forward to move to the upper half of the range or increase guidance altogether?

Guidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Cregg pointed to summer weather as the key variable, noted decoupling limits impact but extremes still matter. LaRossa added gas ops value generation as additional positive.

would we pretty much assume that you would be seeking the extension first and then any firm announcement on a potential upgrade?

Capex InvestmentInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Cregg clarified uprate targets 2027 or 2029 outage windows. LaRossa explicitly stated license extension is not a gating factor for the upgrade.

Calendar 2025 Q4

How are you guys kind of—are you guys kind of front-loading or kind of prebuying any type of nuclear fuel

Supply ChainCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Cregg explained the fuel supply chain is well-hedged: reactor fuel lasts years, contracts cover the next few years, and Russian fuel displacement will redirect global supply rather than create shortages. Modest price movements possible at the tail end of the five-year period.

is there any opportunity for you guys to partake in those allocations, the Brookfield Westinghouse selection

Innovation & R&DRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

LaRossa confirmed PSEG continues to educate and advocate for nuclear. Noted the DOE appears firmed up on AP1000 selection but i's and t's are still being crossed. PSEG is helping educate the incoming administration.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Kind of what undertakings were done? I mean, was that kind of an enhanced fuel offering

Innovation & R&DMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

LaRossa explained the 18-to-24-month cycle extension involved fuel design changes consistent with industry practice. Also highlighted cooling tower insulation improvements for summer efficiency gains. No further Hope Creek uprate opportunity, but Salem PWR could move from 18 to 24 months.

PWRQuanta Services5 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
PWR company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Was there any kind of pull forward of timing or weather implications within there, just given kind of more of a mild spring season?

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Duke said seasonality is leveling due to indoor fabrication and no revenue was pulled forward; growth reflects customers asking for more services immediately as Quanta performs on-site, including book-and-burn MEP work that never enters backlog.

Calendar 2026 Q1

should we kind of view that as more of a pull forward on that side of the house? Or is that -- was that somewhat contemplated

MarginRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Duke confirmed UI margins are the primary source of earnings improvement from mix and execution, and expects continued margin gains into double digits.

more of a bridge power type of approach. Is that something that is kind of an incremental opportunity

DemandCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Duke acknowledged bridge power exists but emphasized vast majority of customers will connect to the grid, where Quanta has core advantage.

Calendar 2025 Q4

just wanted to get a sense of kind of the ability to kind of push the button on executing on more renewables projects

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Duke confirmed renewables visibility through 2030 with double-digit growth continuing. Jayshree noted Tier 1 customers managing political dynamics with safe harboring.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Just kind of thinking about the available infrastructure currently within the United States and then the need -- the inevitable need for some more.

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Duke acknowledged daily pipeline conversations but capped guidance at $500M, citing lumpiness, weather risk, and state-level permitting challenges.

SOSouthern Company4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
SO company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

how are you thinking about cost, mitigating pricing increases on natural gas or something else, and getting that into rate base?

Supply ChainCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CEO emphasized scale, long-standing OEM relationships, and early positioning on turbine orders as key advantages in tight supply chain environment.

If you could comment on that and frame it. Is that part of the appetite and attraction for you to be able to expedite the process to time to power

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CFO emphasized vertical integration gives customers certainty on generation, transmission, and distribution sourcing and timing, enabling transparent cost communication.

Calendar 2025 Q4

any kind of insight into the typical time frame that you guys are seeing on the duration? Is there a minimum there that you guys are seeking

DemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Poroch confirmed minimum 15-year contract durations for data center agreements, with some going even longer to ensure durability.

should we be considering some potential upside just on the transmission side as we kind of think of these new generation assets

Capex InvestmentDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Poroch highlighted the flexibility of bilateral negotiations in all three electric territories. Womack added bridge solutions at Southern Power and PowerSecure are potential upsides to the plan.

Show 5 more companies
AEPAmerican Electric Power2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
AEP company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

the $3 billion of gross equity. Is that firm? Or is that kind of contingent upon the CapEx pace

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Mihalik confirmed the $3B growth equity is firm and tied to the $78B CapEx plan, noting equity needs are in the 2028-2030 period.

Is it fair to assume that, that breakdown kind of persists, so a little bit more heavily skewed towards transmission

Show response

Mihalik confirmed transmission will remain heavily weighted but noted generation is also very important given 63 GW of load growth.

CEGConstellation Energy2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
CEG company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

what would you guys need to see kind of going forward to get kind of more confidence in the upper half of the range

Guidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Management indicated they need at least another quarter to assess, noting they had good visibility into Q1 when setting guidance. Implies conservative positioning within the $11-$12 range.

Just wanted to get a sense just on the near-term kind of nuclear uprates, how near term are those? And when are we kind of -- what's kind of baked into the 2029 assumptions?

Capex InvestmentRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Byron and Braidwood uprates are in plan. Capital is deployed but none contribute to EPS accretion until 2030 at the earliest. These represent upside beyond the current 2029 guidance framework.

PPLPPL Corporation1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
PPL company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

are those going to require a separate ESSA? Or could they -- are they going to be typically riding on the CCGT contracts?

Show response

Management explained the ESSA covers generation to supply a data center and is not limited to CCGTs, spanning the full asset suite.

SYKStryker Corporation1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
SYK company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

Would you break down the drivers of that 10% sales growth for Medical for the year? What's driving that

Revenue GrowthProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jason Beach declined to break down product-level drivers but highlighted LP 35 European launch and Vocera acceleration. Kevin Lobo added Medical has delivered double-digit growth for years with a very strong order book.

XELXcel Energy1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
XEL company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

leveraging the Clean Energy Accelerator charge, is that also kind of applicable across all jurisdictions

PricingRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Frenzel gave the underlying principle rather than a jurisdiction list, saying the mechanism will take different names and shapes by state; Van Abel cited the Colorado filing as a parallel.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
BE Bloom Energy Corporation617%1 of 6 questions
NI NiSource50%none of 5 questions
NRG NRG Energy50%none of 5 questions
PEG Public Service Enterprise Group50%none of 5 questions
PWR Quanta Services50%none of 5 questions
SO Southern Company40%none of 4 questions
AEP American Electric Power2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
CEG Constellation Energy2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
PPL PPL Corporation1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
SYK Stryker Corporation1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • BE
    Bloom Energy Corporation · 6 questions
    17%1 of 6 questions
  • NI
    NiSource · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • NRG
    NRG Energy · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • PEG
    Public Service Enterprise Group · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • PWR
    Quanta Services · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • SO
    Southern Company · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • AEP
    American Electric Power · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • CEG
    Constellation Energy · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • PPL
    PPL Corporation · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • SYK
    Stryker Corporation · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
Show all 11 companies
CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
XEL Xcel Energy1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • XEL
    Xcel Energy · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2025 Q380%none of 8 questions5
2025 Q470%none of 7 questions4
2026 Q1150%none of 15 questions8
2026 Q2714%1 of 7 questions6
  1. 2025 Q38 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 5 companies
  2. 2025 Q47 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 4 companies
  3. 2026 Q115 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 15 questions) · 8 companies
  4. 2026 Q27 questions · challenge rate 14% (1 of 7 questions) · 6 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand11
  • Capex Investment10
  • Regulation Policy8
  • Revenue Growth7
  • Guidance Reliability5
  • Innovation & R&D5
  • Competitive Dynamics4
  • Cloud & AI3
  • Pricing3
  • Margin3
Show all 15 topics
  • Supply Chain3
  • Cost Pressure3
  • Capital Allocation2
  • Subscriber Growth1
  • Product Launch1