Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Patrick Wood
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).
- Questions
- 62on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 3%2 of 62 questions
- Companies
- 15questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 9with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right. See how we grade analysts on earnings-call questions.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 62 of 62 questions from 15 companies
STESteris12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
the $600 million deployment, that's obviously a big move for you guys. What was it that, you mentioned efficiencies and distribution outside, but that's a big move, so what was it that really tilte...
Show response
Dan explained the legacy Minnesota (Cantel) and St. Louis chemistry plants are not expandable and near capacity limits, forcing a greenfield build; North Carolina was chosen for distribution efficiencies and STEM talent access, with significant automation.
if we were to X out both the actual refund that you guys got, but then also the expense, so to truly treat it like it never existed. Were underlying margins, X all of that, up, and if so, why?
Show response
Karen confirmed gross margin was up on price and productivity absent tariffs, with the $4 million refund helping offset $14 million of true tariff costs that she said are not going anywhere.
Calendar 2025 Q4
CMS had two different proposals. That was obviously the PPE sort of onshoring, some of the API stuff on the drug side
Show response
Dan said ASC shift is a positive due to new capacity demand and higher clinical support needs that STERIS is uniquely positioned to provide. No material PPE manufacturing commitments or API relocation impact seen yet.
a bit more of a commercial push in EMEA across some of your product lines on the sterilization side
Show response
Dan confirmed commitment to EMEA expansion with structural go-to-market changes underway. Acknowledged it will take time to fully formulate and execute but expressed confidence in direction.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Healthcare on the service side also was very strong. What are you seeing there?
Show response
Dan explained Healthcare services includes IMS repair and instrument processing. Price gains tied to labor cost pass-throughs will moderate as labor normalizes, slowing top line but preserving margins.
on the modality side like X-ray, could you give us a sense of how that's contributed to growth
Show response
Dan declined to break out X-ray specifically, framing all radiation modalities as interchangeable tools. Said X-ray drives much of expansion capacity but would not quantify.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how the conversations with the customer has been around potentially like onshoring back to the U.S.
Show response
Dan candidly acknowledged onshoring is more aspirational than real so far, but noted opportunities for volume shifts within existing regulated manufacturing footprints.
Is there a situation where they end up having to force sell themselves essentially to you guys or your peers
Show response
Dan indicated some industry consolidation is likely but STERIS would prefer building new capacity over acquiring aging facilities.
Calendar 2024 Q4
do you think there's any opportunity for the intensity of the legislative change around EO to loosen up a little bit
Show response
Dan said the EO rules are already in place and unlikely to be retracted despite EPA changes. STERIS is well-positioned to comply within deadlines.
on the endoscopy side of the business. Just curious where you're seeing, you know, both in the demand for your scopes on the volume side
Show response
Dan noted strong reprocessing performance with good chemistry pull-through, but endoscopy products are growing at market, not above it.
Calendar 2024 Q3
the yield litigation side of things. Do we have any update on that on upcoming news flow
Show response
Dan declined to comment on EO litigation strategy, referring analysts to the 10-Q disclosures and declining to discuss ongoing litigation.
have you heard from any of your customers around supply chain changes, tariffs coming in
Show response
Dan noted no direct tariff concerns from customers but highlighted reshoring trends in AST with significant growth in Malaysia facilities.
BDXBecton Dickinson7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how much of this is that innovation pipe? Did you make any big changes to your commercial approach into the market
Show response
Polen credited both: a new CRO, changed sales comp, and a $35M targeted investment that grew APM/UCC/PI sales teams ~15%. Specific and thorough.
Calendar 2025 Q4
is there any structural change that happened recently or in the past that would preclude you from sort of hitting that normalized mid-single-digit growth rate
Show response
Tom confirmed no structural change. 90% of portfolio growing solid mid-single digits. 10% (Alaris, vaccines, China) has known transitory headwinds. Highlighted $30M incremental sales investments all 100% on track, double-digit growth in PureWick, biologics, tissue reconstruction.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is there not a temptation just to get off to the RMT even more aggressive in returning capital to shareholders, just given where the yield on the stock is
Show response
Chris highlighted discipline around net leverage (2.8x→2.5x target). Waters transaction creates over 200bps EPS growth uplift. Current Waters share price implies ~$50 per BD share, leaving remaining New BD trading at ~10x multiple.
Calendar 2025 Q2
is it the right framework? Is there any reason we would be wrong to think that RemainCo should be stable in that kind of mid-single-digit plus kind of a range
Show response
Tom confirmed 4% New BD organic as the expected full-year run rate. Highlighted continued momentum across Interventional, Connected Care, APM (13% growth), Pharm Systems recovery, and sequential improvement in Life Sciences.
Calendar 2025 Q1
my question is kind of to what extent you build muscle tissue in that skill set internally with the employees
Show response
Tom described Kaizens as highly energizing for employees, not draining. Mike Feld added that lean processes actually free up time for creativity and strategy.
Calendar 2024 Q4
if you end up going down the sale route and with a cash injection, are there any areas that you particularly feel you'd like to bulk up on
Show response
Tom highlighted Interventional as a priority for capital allocation with multiple high-growth opportunities, alongside continued organic R&D acceleration.
Calendar 2024 Q3
question around potential tariffs, supply chain impacts. Do you benefit from onshoring relative to any potential paths to go in
Show response
Tom emphasized strong local manufacturing strategy with minimal China exposure, only one product exported from China to the U.S.
SYKStryker Corporation7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
just the state of the union on the Smart Care business like the Vocera and care.ai
Show response
Direct and upbeat: record quarter, smooth integration, rising orders, though small relative to Medical.
What do you think it is that's distinct about, say, shoulder that is enabling it to sort of back off some of the
Show response
Credited better outcomes and Stryker's shoulder innovation, including Mako shoulder, for faster market growth.
Calendar 2026 Q2
It just looks some of the data that we see that ASC volume shift seems to have picked up this year a little bit more.
Show response
Quantified the ASC mix shift and named ASC construction as the limiting factor, calling the trend steady rather than inflecting.
curious about SmartCare and the Smart Hospital that you guys pushed out.
Show response
Detailed answer on the new business unit, tech stack modernization and an expected strong second half in SmartCare.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Is that still the case? Would you look at things like calcium management and other things that are sort of ancillary to that
Show response
Kevin Lobo confirmed vascular/PV is now part of the acquisition set. Also eyeing more health IT acquisitions following Vocera and Care AI. Every acquisition opens new adjacency windows.
what are the implications for that if any, with an endoscopy and everything else? Is your share in some of these categories high enough that it's like, hey, it's just a change of side of care
Show response
Kevin Lobo said high market share means ASC shift is just a new site of care. New ASC construction benefits Stryker's full portfolio offering. Sports business is a big beneficiary. CMS push to ASC only helps given breadth of portfolio.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I'd love if you could unpack a little bit more on the Endoscopy side of things. I know you talked about sports med and visualization
Show response
Kevin detailed 1788 camera success, sports med double-digit growth with AlphaVent Knotless, new Oculan light, and communications orders. Mako Shoulder getting very positive feedback but meaningful contribution starts 2026.
SOLVSolventum6 questions · 4 reporting periods · 2 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
was this one that was kind of kicking around that you guys had initiated pretty early on? Or was this a function of tariffs
Show response
CEO confirmed program was always contemplated but timing driven by separation progress and bandwidth availability; tariffs increased urgency. Savings reinvested in R&D and commercial infrastructure.
Calendar 2025 Q2
how are you feeling about that capital allocation? You mentioned bolt- on M&A, but like how much you feel you need to do that to buy into the kind of midterm growth range
Show response
CEO was clear that 4-5% LRP organic target is achievable without M&A; M&A would accelerate or overachieve that target, not fill a gap.
Calendar 2025 Q1
is it a fair assumption on our end to assume that the general price mix trends that you've seen in the previous quarter was consistent here
Show response
CFO confirmed pricing in normalized ±1% range; company is focused entirely on volume growth as the sustainable strategy.
How confident are you around that kind of 2.5% underlying? And I say this because, obviously, the remaining core growth like is at 4.6%
Show response
CFO expressed confidence in 2.5% normalized figure based on post-quarter analytics and distributor partnership data; acknowledged variability but called it a strong quarter.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how ready is the organization because there's a lot of work to do internally to bolt in new business without it being too disruptive
Show response
CEO confirmed M&A capacity being built; targeting early 2026 timeframe for first deals after debt paydown; smaller tuck-in transactions.
is it fair to assume that while you're going to have 100 points of organic growth headwind on that side, that we should see something on the operating margin
Show response
CFO confirmed small 10-20bps margin benefit from SKU rationalization; primary driver is supply chain simplification, not margin expansion.
ZBHZimmer Biomet6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
I'd love to hear the strategy around the go-to-market, how you're thinking about the initial rollout
Show response
Listed five product claims and three target surgeon segments, but gave no rollout pace because the system is not yet approved.
Calendar 2026 Q2
a bit of a sequential acceleration on that side. I know there's a lot going on between shoulder and sternal closure
Show response
Ivan detailed S.E.T. drivers: Paragon 28 near 15%, upper extremities upper single digit, CMFT in the teens on thoracic; flagged trauma and restorative therapies as the two headwinds and expects a better S.E.T. profile in H2.
Calendar 2025 Q4
moving to a negative 100 basis points erosion in the 26 guide, inflation is kind of at the same spot
Show response
Sukhi attributed pricing step-down to: EMEA price increase moderation, Japan biannual price decrease, China go-to-market reconfiguration, and Americas roughly in line with 2025. FY2025 ended at flat consolidated pricing with Q4 at -50bps. Consistent with Analyst Day framework.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Was that at like the rep level? Was that at the divisional head level? Just any more details on how you're structuring the incentive plan
Show response
Ivan said all senior P&L owners now paid on revenue growth, EPS, and FCF. Sales reps accountable for pricing dynamics. Compensation tied to growth and controllable margin at every level. Acknowledged incentive discipline was 'choppy over the last 3 or 5 years' but now fully implemented.
Calendar 2025 Q2
The numbers and the strength that you guys have seen there, do you know has that been predominantly on the coxa vara side? Or has that been more broad-based across Hip
Show response
Ivan confirmed Z1 is driving market share gains with ~50% competitive conversions. Zero supply shortages as of Q2 after late 2024 challenges. Growth amplified by OrthoGrid (acquisition exceeding expectations) and HAMMR. Two consecutive quarters of 5% U.S. Hip growth; expects similar or better run rate through year-end.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how are you thinking A about the opportunity to push it through your distribution sales network both in the U.S. and OUS
Show response
Ivan committed to preserving Paragon's dedicated channel, keeping the management team including CEO Albert Acosta, and running integration in isolation to minimize disruption.
BSXBoston Scientific4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
how much is that going to help things like seismic in the IVL side and TCAR building out that force in a larger way?
Show response
CEO cited combining PI and ICTx reporting structure. Penumbra adds PE and neurovascular with scaled sales force. ICT area receiving some of company's biggest investments. Did not directly address competitor vascular force buildout.
Calendar 2025 Q3
What was it that kind of made you feel like now is the time? I know you guys have been following them closely for a while
Show response
CEO cited Nalu reaching solid Medicare reimbursement, improving commercial payer coverage, and proven sales track record. Neuromod team proven with Relievant integration. Nalu creates widest pain portfolio versus SCS-only competitors.
Calendar 2025 Q1
in terms of Empower and the approval of that in the second half, how are you thinking of the outlook for that division
Show response
CEO expects Empower approval H2 2025 with larger 2026 impact. Denali S-ICD portfolio refresh launching 2026. Dr. Stein emphasized modular S-ICD communication as key differentiation.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I'm super curious how you think midterm, you know, how big that business could be
Show response
CEO described ESG as long-term endo growth driver with dedicated team, clinical trials, and CPT code momentum, but not reshaping BSX in 2025. Unique positioning with Apollo wrapped in broader endo portfolio.
Show 9 more companies
MDTMedtronic4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
how are we thinking about capital allocation, M&A? There's a lot of other companies doing very large deals in this space, and I'm just trying to work out, you know, directionally, do you guys feel ...
Show response
Martha confirmed focus on tuck-in deals (up to several billion dollars), close adjacencies to existing businesses. Strategy includes venture investments leading to M&A, multiple shots on goal in must-win markets (cited Affera PFA as template: organic program plus acquisition). Prioritizing higher-growth areas with meaningful capital across multiple segments.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how are those reflective relative to the NCD? Like, are there restrictions being put on? You know, what is the sort of tone of the conversation
Show response
Martha noted commercial payers coming online faster than anticipated. NCD described as broader than proposed. One noted difference: commercial payers emphasizing longer medication adherence period. Medicare NCD includes physician discretion avenue for medication intolerance.
Calendar 2025 Q1
would it be fair to assume that the base algorithm would call it mid-single-digit-ish growth and then high-singles in the bottom line, that that's a fair assumption moving into fiscal ‘26
Show response
Martha confirmed commitment to LRP algorithm of mid-single-digit revenue and high-single-digit EPS growth, noting reiterated FY25 guidance as proof point.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Given the focus on tuck-in M&A, I'm just curious, the kind of assets you're most interested on that side
Show response
Geoff described top-down M&A approach focused on high-growth markets and supporting established businesses. Emphasized portfolio management as ongoing process. Would not disclose specific targets or radical changes.
BAXBaxter International3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
Obviously, one of your peers is going to be capacity constrained. Is there a tailwind from that?
Show response
Hider talked about simplifying Round Lake and did not address whether a competitor's constraint is a tailwind.
You mentioned the contract manufacturer effect. Any rough sizing of that and whether that situation is going to resolve
Show response
Said progress was being made with the contract manufacturer but declined to size the impact.
Calendar 2026 Q2
as we contemplate ’27 and the TSA income that comes out, is that still EPS-neutral in that year?
Show response
Hider answered the Advanced Surgery part with qualitative colour and declined to characterise the 2027 TSA impact at all.
ISRGIntuitive Surgical3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
Is the solution here in your mind, like a lower-end form factor? Or do we stick with refurbished systems?
Show response
Dave emphasized current portfolio (DV5 for complex, XiR for ASC) can serve both ends of acuity spectrum today, with potential for optimization but no stated need for a new lower-cost platform.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how much do you guys think you need to continue to bend the cost curve down for INA to make it work in the ASC?
Show response
Jamie said capital cost is the greater constraint in ASCs, with XIR being a key opportunity. No significant INA price pushback in ASCs yet, and sterilization is not an impediment.
Calendar 2024 Q4
if you think of the efficiencies from your install-based entities, so over time, as you're placing more and more systems and in individual areas
Show response
Gary confirmed geographic density provides cost advantages in service, sales support, and training, while Jamie noted recurring I&A revenue carries higher margins than capital.
COOCooper Companies (The)2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
how do you guys know about the Clarity versus MyDay sort of dynamic? Was that feedback that came from, like, chatting to optometrists, or was that coming from the Salesforce?
Show response
How management diagnosed the Clarity-MyDay cannibalization dynamic. Management responded with context on this topic.
Calendar 2025 Q1
US, target penetration, I would love to like, can you remind us kind of where you think we are up to today in target penetration for those who are asthmatic.
Show response
US toric penetration rates and growth runway. Management responded with context on this topic.
EWEdwards Lifesciences2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
there's been a lot of sort of shuffle around with the FDA overall and people fired, rehired
Show response
Bernard noted situation is fluid but sees no impact on FDA approval timelines so far. People at FDA are professional and committed.
where are we at in terms of, you know, account sort of breadth versus depth
Show response
Daveen confirmed PASCAL is in fewer than 50% of U.S. TAVR centers. Seeing both depth increase (more usage at existing sites) and breadth expansion at new centers.
GEHCGE HealthCare2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
one of your peers has [ vice ] fund with the FDA. I think we all [indiscernible] through this before
Show response
Pete declined to comment on competitor's FDA issue, attributed AVS Q3 strength to go-to-market execution and new product performance (Vivid Pioneer, Venue, LOGIQ).
your MUSE platform has like a 50% market share, if I'm right, on the ECG side of things
Show response
Pete confirmed MUSE's significant position in EKG recording globally. AliveCor partnership enables post-EP remote monitoring. CareIntellect departmental solutions expanding to cardiology in 2026.
PODDInsulet Corporation2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
Is this a multiple visit kind of thing that competes them to switch over? Or is it happening pretty quickly
Show response
Eric described two-part conversion: first educate HCPs using SECURE-T2D data, then patient journey similar to type 1. Shared example of 80-year-old woman thriving on Omnipod 5 after initial uncertainty.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I'd love to sort of get a sense for midterm, your view of sustainability there. And how much is a function of Omnipod 5
Show response
Jim emphasized Omnipod 5 wins everywhere it goes. Growth sustainable because it opens the MDI population who previously rejected pumps. UK, Germany past anniversary still growing; France, Netherlands strong early adoption.
ABTAbbott Laboratories1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
how do you feel about the forward pipeline today compared to the forward pipeline in the past? How would you rate it?
Show response
Ford said investors see the pipeline clearly, cited R&D crossing $3 billion, and singled out AVEIR CSP and the mitral replacement valve.
DXCMDexCom1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2024 Q4
how are you thinking long term about what the average wet time will do
Show response
Kevin confirmed strong 15-day adoption in Stello users. Most patients prefer full 15-day wear. Service model being streamlined to maintain margins while supporting users.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| STE Steris | 12 | 0%none of 12 questions |
| BDX Becton Dickinson | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| SYK Stryker Corporation | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| SOLV Solventum | 6 | 33%2 of 6 questions |
| ZBH Zimmer Biomet | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| BSX Boston Scientific | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| MDT Medtronic | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| BAX Baxter International | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| ISRG Intuitive Surgical | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| COO Cooper Companies (The) | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- STESteris · 12 questions0%none of 12 questions
- BDXBecton Dickinson · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- SYKStryker Corporation · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- SOLVSolventum · 6 questions33%2 of 6 questions
- ZBHZimmer Biomet · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- BSXBoston Scientific · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- MDTMedtronic · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- BAXBaxter International · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- ISRGIntuitive Surgical · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- COOCooper Companies (The) · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Show all 15 companies
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| EW Edwards Lifesciences | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| GEHC GE HealthCare | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| PODD Insulet Corporation | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| ABT Abbott Laboratories | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| DXCM DexCom | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- EWEdwards Lifesciences · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- GEHCGE HealthCare · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- PODDInsulet Corporation · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- ABTAbbott Laboratories · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- DXCMDexCom · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2024 Q4 | 11 | 9%1 of 11 questions | 9 |
| 2025 Q1 | 12 | 8%1 of 12 questions | 9 |
| 2025 Q2 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q3 | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions | 8 |
| 2025 Q4 | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions | 7 |
| 2026 Q1 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2026 Q2 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q3 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 4 |
- 2024 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2024 Q411 questions · challenge rate 9% (1 of 11 questions) · 9 companies
- 2025 Q112 questions · challenge rate 8% (1 of 12 questions) · 9 companies
- 2025 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q310 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 8 companies
- 2025 Q49 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 9 questions) · 7 companies
- 2026 Q11 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2026 Q27 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q36 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Revenue Growth18
- Competitive Dynamics15
- Product Launch13
- Demand13
- M&A11
- Regulation Policy9
- Innovation & R&D7
- Capital Allocation6
- Supply Chain6
- Margin5
Show all 19 topics
- Trade Tariffs4
- Pricing4
- Geographic Expansion3
- Guidance Reliability2
- Cloud & AI2
- Cost Pressure2
- Capex Investment1
- Labor Market1
- Subscriber Growth1