Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Puneet Souda

Leerink Partners · covers Healthcare

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).

Questions
65on tracked calls
Challenge rate
11%7 of 65 questions
Companies
8questioned at least once
Reporting periods
9with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 65 of 65 questions from 8 companies

TECHBio-Techne14 questions · 7 reporting periods · 3 of 14 challenging
TECH company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

what gives you confidence that this is not any share loss in R&D Systems and Novus Biologicals?

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Kim attributed difference to tough comps (nearly 20% prior year) versus competitors comparing against negative numbers. Jim added that after backing out the one large OEM order, proteins and antibodies combined grew low single digits this quarter.

Can we still do mid-single-digit growth? Can Bio-Techne do mid-single-digit growth still in fiscal '27?

ChallengingRevenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Jim affirmed mid-single-digit FY2027 target, noting that excluding 3 customer-specific items they would have been low single digit growth even in the current tough environment. Cited academic uptick in proteomic analysis and spatial as leading indicators.

Calendar 2025 Q4

I appreciate the meaningful step up that needs to happen in the fourth fiscal quarter here. In organic growth

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Jim detailed underlying growth acceleration from 1% in Q1 to 3% in Q2 with slight step up in Q3, plus 3% comp tailwind in Q4. Kim cited accelerating core business, 30% ex-Fast Track cell therapy growth, and positive trends across growth verticals.

China, it's the third quarter. We are in a positive territory, and the growth is accelerating

MacroeconomicDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Kim cited China's fifteenth five-year plan prioritizing life sciences, exits from local biotech companies via M&A and licensing, and improving CDMO/CRO activity driving demand for reagents and proteomic tools.

Calendar 2025 Q3

there is multiyear funding number of grants that are lower in '26 versus '25, more concentration, fewer grad students, fewer bodies in the lab

ChallengingRegulation PolicyCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Kim cited favorable grant mix aligned with Bio-Techne's research areas and bipartisan support for flat NIH budget. Jim provided detailed competitive positioning: core reagents flat but in line or taking share, ProteinSimple at mid-single-digit growth above market, spatial turning positive.

are you continuing to see the momentum on new clinical trial adds?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Kim confirmed clinical trial starts remain flat and steady with normal turnover. Noted market maturation with new programs better aligned to viable, scalable, affordable cell therapies versus the more speculative earlier cycle.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Are you expecting low single digit for the full year fiscal '26? And if you could talk a little bit about the cadence of that over the next 4 quarters

Guidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Jim clarified that low-single-digit guidance is conditional on uncertainty duration, not necessarily full-year FY2026. Declined to give segment-level guidance but indicated no big material change in either segment's growth rates.

can you talk a little bit about what instruments are driving growth there? Lunaphore was obviously weak in academic setting

DemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Kim attributed instrument strength to QA/QC spec-ins at large pharma, the Leo high-throughput Simple Western launch, and biologics Maurice platform demand. Noted Lunaphore had three instrument placements delayed by Middle East political turbulence.

Calendar 2025 Q1

I'm wondering what you can provide there, just given a lot of -- I appreciate the uncertainty, but with China, NIH and with tariffs

MacroeconomicTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Kim deferred FY2026 guidance to the usual soft guide timing in three months. On China, noted tariffs are very negatable but acknowledged a step back to mid-single digits negative driven by tariffs and local economic weakness.

Could you provide more context into that, Jim, in terms of the impact you're expecting on academic, I mean, it's a meaningful reduction versus what you had before

Guidance ReliabilityDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jim explained Q4 step-down from non-repeating partner reagent orders, academic slowdown after February NIH announcements, and conservative pharma expectations given April 2 tariff escalation. Kim confirmed no Q3 pull-forward unlike Q2.

Calendar 2024 Q4

can you talk a little bit about the pull forward that you saw from Q3 to Q2 in cell and gene therapy GMP products?

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Kim explained GMP orders pulled from Q3 to Q2 at customers' request, adding several growth points. China stimulus seeing early traction with instrument sales. Jim noted broad-based pharma recovery beyond just cell therapy.

How does that shape your opportunity base when looking at

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Kim outlined M&A focus on analytical platforms for novel biological insights and cell therapy workflow adjacencies, noting strong balance sheet and time before Wilson Wolf close in 2027.

Calendar 2024 Q3

could you elaborate how sustainable is that momentum and speak to both the spatial versus the diagnostic side of the business

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Kim detailed sustainable momentum across ExoDx, Asuragen kits, and COMET spatial platform with strong R&D pipeline including ESR1 breast cancer test.

are these new trial starts or existing trials that are scaling up or moving into later phases?

DemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Kim confirmed 400 customers in funnel with 58 in clinical trial stages, growth from customer progression, increased order frequency from smaller accounts, and new customer additions.

WATWaters Corporation14 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 14 challenging
WAT company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

just wanted to see how much contribution you saw from GLP-1s in the quarter?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Batra said GLP-1 testing grew over 40%, broad-based (Americas over 30%, Europe over 36%, India nearly doubling); Chaubal noted ~30bps of the 200bps idiosyncratic drivers.

Which of the initiatives are more permanent run rate versus one-timers in the enterprise?

Show response

Batra deferred detailed 2027 outlook but said BD exits 2026 north of 6% (from -10% a year ago); framed the 180-day commercial, pricing and China initiatives as systemic.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Could you talk a bit about how much of the growth was driven by volume in the quarter

PricingRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Amol quantified ~200bps price on legacy Waters (consistent with prior years) vs only 0.5% on BD (in line with BD historical). Sees meaningful opportunity to bring BD pricing to Waters levels. Pricing upside not in guide.

Are you seeing sort of a pull forward of that replacement cycle peak

DemandCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Amol noted CROs, Chinese generics, and biotechs still not replacing despite overaged fleets, giving runway into 2027. 2021-22 placements come up for replacement in 2029-30. Reshoring dynamic expected to bridge any 2028 air pocket.

Calendar 2025 Q4

I would love to understand if you could, how much of a cushion there is in these numbers? How adjusted are they

ChallengingM&AGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Management clarified 2.5% BD growth guide does NOT include pricing improvements, deal desk benefits, or launch readiness gains. Only bakes in China DRG headwind and continued A&G softness.

was there any contribution from extra selling days in Q1 that you're contemplating

Guidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CFO confirmed Q1 guide includes benefit from 4 extra working days which derisks the remainder of the year.

Calendar 2025 Q3

With the subscription-based model, how should we think about the incremental upside here versus the prior Empower model

Innovation & R&DRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Management outlined 3-part Empower strategy: instrument compatibility, AI/ML features, and subscription transition with significant per-customer upside.

on 4Q, just wondering if you're expecting a budget flush in the fourth quarter. If there are any pull forwards in the third quarter

Guidance ReliabilityDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Management confirmed no pull-forward in Q3, with Q3-Q4 ramp of 16% prudently below the 18% last year and 22% historical average.

Calendar 2025 Q2

could you talk about the sequence of an order or a sequence of events that you want to focus on e-commerce service attachment, instrumentation replacement

Show response

Management outlined instrument replacement, service attach and e-commerce as immediate day-one actions post-close.

There was improvement in the NIH sentiment overall with the standard appropriations. But just wondering, instrumentation side, how do you expect that to

MacroeconomicDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

A&G decline of -3% was better than expected; management maintained conservative high single-digit decline assumption for H2.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Can you elaborate on what's already completed and what remains to be in terms of supply chain realignment in terms of Wilmslow, Singapore versus U.S.

Trade TariffsSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CFO broke down $45M gross tariff mitigation: $15M surcharges, $14M manufacturing actions, $6M discretionary spend cuts.

can you talk – take a minute and talk about how the pharma customers in the U.S. and Europe versus the pharma customers in India are thinking about in this macro environment

DemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Management emphasized no slowdown in replacement discussions, with large pharma, generics and CDMOs all growing double digits.

Calendar 2024 Q4

first quarter guide, 4% to 7%, a little bit wider than historical pattern. Just want to clarify I know you talked about the full year guide

Guidance ReliabilityMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

CFO explained the wider range reflects working day impacts and macro uncertainty, with Q1 being the smallest quarter.

India, Udit, I would love to get your thoughts on 70 bps to 100 bps contribution again strong throughout 2024

Geographic ExpansionDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Management outlined the large patent cliff opportunity with semaglutide genericization expected in 2026.

AAgilent Technologies13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 13 challenging
A company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

I just wanted to see if you could parse out a bit about the pharma versus SMID biotech versus small biotech.

Show response

Padraig cited an encouraging SMID biotech uptick as H1 biopharma financing doubled to $60B; Simon flagged mRNA oncology validation as future upside.

Calendar 2026 Q2

Can you elaborate how CAM improved throughout the quarter? Your confidence here, is this more semi driven or instrumentation

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Management confirmed steady and increasing CAM momentum with technology-driven share gains in advanced materials at low double digit growth. Noted prudence in H2 outlook decelerating from high to mid single digits.

Your diversification beyond health care seems to be helping you. But could you take a minute and provide a view into the pharma and the biotech business

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Management highlighted downstream QAQC and development positioning as sweet spot for reshoring and replacement cycle, with compounding Ignite benefits embedding structurally. Mid-sized biotech still challenged but deal activity improving.

Calendar 2026 Q1

where are you seeing that? Is that more on the LC/MS instrumentation side cell analysis?

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Adam clarified small/mid biotech spending not yet inflecting, framed as upside scenario. Padraig added January biopharma financing at $11B (2-year high), patent cliff driving M&A, but lag between funding and spending. Relatively small Agilent exposure.

Any update on -- to the full utilization of Train C, which I think is anticipated in 2027. The question is really around the margin impact

Capex InvestmentMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Adam confirmed CDMO business above corporate operating margin at steady state. Train C/D ramping through 2027 with negative margin impact offset by Ignite. Padraig added booked out for FY2026, now booking FY2027 with larger commercial batches.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Can you just elaborate a bit on what you're seeing in their quarter in China in third quarter?

MacroeconomicGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Padraig broke down China: small molecule grew 6%, biopharma mid-single digits, CAM low teens on petrochemicals and semis. New innovation policy from central government. Mike Zhang added strong customer relationships and high win rates on stimulus. Comprehensive.

just trying to get a sense of if there's an acceleration in the near term. And and, obviously, you're seeing a normal budget flush replacement cycle is working.

DemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Padraig confirmed pickup in quoting and replacement activity July-August. Market share gains across all platforms and geographies. Momentum similar in pharma and CAM with replacement cycles at different stages. Direct.

Calendar 2025 Q2

can you size how much of the China growth in the quarter was from the sort of the Lunar New Year timing perspective

MacroeconomicGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Padraig clearly separated consumable pull-forward (tariff-driven), Lunar New Year (~2pp), and stimulus (mostly Q1). China stable above $300M. Comprehensive breakdown.

Just trying to understand how should we think about the Infinity III replacement cycle? How is it doing in the environmental labs versus the pharma labs?

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Padraig detailed 6-9 month funnel-to-close cycle, higher attach rates, gradual build across 1100/1260/1290 bases. Bob added small molecule QA/QC double-digit growth proof point.

Calendar 2025 Q1

we were expecting more orders and maybe more continued orders. And so I'm just trying to understand, so why are you expecting it in the second and the rest

ChallengingMacroeconomicGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Padraig reiterated win rate and pull-forward dynamics. Simon added multi-year stimulus context and increased confidence for H2. Made-in-China advantage highlighted.

can you elaborate the margin contribution? You talked about pricing on one end, number of cost efforts and also reducing some of the management changes

Show response

Padraig cited 3-year Ignite framework. Bob confirmed on-track for 50-70bps this year despite FX headwinds, with pricing holding up.

Calendar 2024 Q4

given the launch timing, was there any pause that you saw in on the instrumentation? And what is the order book telling you?

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Padraig confirmed minimal order pause from Infinity III launch, expressed strong satisfaction with order book. Direct and reassuring.

could you elaborate on your manufacturing and final assembly positions just globally so we can understand sort of how much of the product is sort of China for China

Trade TariffsSupply ChainTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Padraig and Bob detailed manufacturing footprint: 60% US, small China-for-China exposure, manageable $4-5M quarterly tariff impact.

RVTYRevvity9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 9 challenging
RVTY company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

what gives you the confidence on recovery in the second half?

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Management pointed to second-half software contract renewals and its LLM/Signals AI and Anthropic connector pipeline, but did not quantify the high-content backlog it was asked about.

Calendar 2026 Q1

What are some of the steps there that you're taking that could yield sort of an immediate or near-term result?

Show response

Prahlad cited Gartner research paper highlighting RVTY's differentiated AI deployment. Benefits primarily in software development productivity. Rolling out multiple LLMs to entire global employee base at fraction of traditional cost.

Does this change your appetite for further M&A and capital deployment in the space?

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Prahlad framed divestiture as completing portfolio transformation journey. China now 8-9% of revenue with ~7% in LS. Will continue both acquisitive strategy and aggressive buybacks.

Calendar 2025 Q3

just on the academic and government side, I know the reagent exposure is there. So just trying to understand if the grants are fewer next year

Regulation PolicyRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Max confirmed 2-3% organic outlook assumes similar environment, not a huge ramp in market activity. Prahlad added all repro health and NBS manufacturing is local in China, and over half of IDx now local.

the improvement that you're seeing in this quarter, is it more of the, you know, China tariffs impacted situation from the last quarter?

DemandTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Prahlad confirmed improvement is genuine broader pharma/biotech activity, not China tariff-related normalization.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Can you talk a little bit about how much of that was installed in new contracts versus continuing licensing and service?

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Prahlad detailed strong metrics: 21% ARR uplift, 115% net retention, 13% APV growth, over one-third now SaaS.

Diagnostics was supposed to be the support or the ballast in these challenging time in tools, but it's turning out to be no different

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Prahlad defended portfolio citing LS reagents 5 consecutive quarters of growth, software 30%+, repro health strong, IDx ex-China very strong.

Calendar 2024 Q4

just indirect exposure that you have and just given the sort of funding challenge that might arise there

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Prahlad minimized NIH concern: 1% direct, under 5% indirect, mostly reagents/small ticket items that still flow regardless.

Wondering, if you can elaborate if there was any one-timers in the quarter. Any upside from Signals versus ChemDraw licenses?

Revenue GrowthCloud & AITranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Max confirmed low-double-digit software growth expected for full year and Q1. No one-timers flagged; predictable renewal pattern.

ILMNIllumina, Inc.6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
ILMN company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Why should we not contemplate something higher than a high single-digit revenue growth for 2027 that you outlined before?

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Jacob agreed clinical is a wave not a cliff and cited elevated placements, but stayed committed to high single-digit 2027 growth for now.

Calendar 2026 Q1

could you talk about within that mix, how much of this is coming from clinical versus research?

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Jacob said clinical placements are largely incremental (not conversions), driving immediate top-line growth; Ankur confirmed pricing transition assumptions are unchanged.

Calendar 2025 Q4

can you provide how the split was with research versus clinical?

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Jacob said clinical drove over 60% of the 100+ placements; mid-throughput remains macro-challenged, and Ankur saw little competitive impact in Q4.

Calendar 2025 Q3

I'm just trying to understand how should we think about China in sort of '26?

Geographic ExpansionRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jacob cited the OEM local-manufacturing approval as progress but declined a 2026 China view, taking it quarter by quarter.

Calendar 2025 Q2

did you see any pull-forward from the customers in the quarter?

Show response

Jacob reported no pull-forward and rising backlog as customers plan X in production mode; no cliff expected in the clinical transition.

Calendar 2024 Q4

could you elaborate a little bit just so we understand why you expect that to be reversed?

Regulation PolicyTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Jacob declined to comment on timelines or reversal, citing early-stage dialogue.

DHRDanaher Corporation4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
DHR company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

just wondering if you could provide any color on the order growth or book-to-bill in the quarter

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Book-to-bill around 1, consistent with the year. mAb growth remains the core driver at 75% of business, commercial volumes growing, new indications, biosimilars approaching launch. AAV is small and lapping.

There is a 20% pricing rebate for those manufacturing locally. This is beyond the VBP and the DRG headwinds

Geographic ExpansionPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Rainer noted the 20% local manufacturing preference has been informally in place. By year-end, much of diagnostic equipment and reagents will be localized. Views this as an advantage, not a headwind.

Calendar 2025 Q2

how broad is the exposure to gene therapies? And I totally recognize that, you know, innovation doesn't come without risk

Innovation & R&DDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Rainer framed Danaher as a protein-focused house (85% of business). Aldevron-Sarepta revenue expected at $30M for full year with minimal H2 contribution. AAV gene therapy in early innings.

Can you talk to us about the updated number there? And just given the inter-quarter changes with US-China trade

Trade TariffsMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Tariff exposure down to approximately $200M from $350M initial estimate. Company absorbed China tariff costs without passing to customers, making it a net neutral event.

Show 2 more companies
HOLXHologic4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
HOLX company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

can you elaborate a little bit about how do you see that conversion in the last quarter here and then '26?

DemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Steve sees steady improvement in gantry conversions. End-of-life units convert to existing 3Dimensions, while Envision targets thought leaders later in FY2026. Worst days in Breast Health are behind them.

the USPSTF members, as you saw, the committee has been purged and there's an expectation new members are going to come in. Just wanted to get your thoughts

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Steve dismissed USPSTF changes as short-term noise, noting their tests are fundamentally important for women's health and economically sensible. Doesn't see quarterly or annual impact.

Calendar 2025 Q1

why wouldn't you see more CapEx pressures from the hospital and the hospital systems in the current economic environment?

ChallengingSupply ChainTrade TariffsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Steve emphasized mammography and diagnostics are US-manufactured, Costa Rica footprint is established, and gantry purchases are modest enough that hospitals will carve out budget for meaningful product improvements.

Calendar 2024 Q4

can you elaborate a little bit on the incentive comp changes and the sales rep changes in the field?

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Steve expressed confidence mammography CapEx would remain protected even under hospital budget pressure given the importance of women's health screening. Acknowledged sales force attention drifted during chip shortage.

TMOThermo Fisher Scientific1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
TMO company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

could you elaborate what you're hearing from your larger biopharma large cap customers versus the early emerging biotechs

DemandGeographic ExpansionCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Casper noted large pharma has meaningfully improved confidence entering 2025 and emerging biotech funding outlook is also positive.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
TECH Bio-Techne1421%3 of 14 questions
WAT Waters Corporation147%1 of 14 questions
A Agilent Technologies138%1 of 13 questions
RVTY Revvity911%1 of 9 questions
ILMN Illumina, Inc.60%none of 6 questions
DHR Danaher Corporation40%none of 4 questions
HOLX Hologic425%1 of 4 questions
TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • TECH
    Bio-Techne · 14 questions
    21%3 of 14 questions
  • WAT
    Waters Corporation · 14 questions
    7%1 of 14 questions
  • A
    Agilent Technologies · 13 questions
    8%1 of 13 questions
  • RVTY
    Revvity · 9 questions
    11%1 of 9 questions
  • ILMN
    Illumina, Inc. · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • DHR
    Danaher Corporation · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • HOLX
    Hologic · 4 questions
    25%1 of 4 questions
  • TMO
    Thermo Fisher Scientific · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q320%none of 2 questions1
2024 Q4110%none of 11 questions7
2025 Q1729%2 of 7 questions4
2025 Q2138%1 of 13 questions7
2025 Q3119%1 of 11 questions6
2025 Q4520%1 of 5 questions3
2026 Q1922%2 of 9 questions5
2026 Q260%none of 6 questions4
2026 Q310%none of 1 question1
  1. 2024 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  2. 2024 Q411 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 11 questions) · 7 companies
  3. 2025 Q17 questions · challenge rate 29% (2 of 7 questions) · 4 companies
  4. 2025 Q213 questions · challenge rate 8% (1 of 13 questions) · 7 companies
  5. 2025 Q311 questions · challenge rate 9% (1 of 11 questions) · 6 companies
  6. 2025 Q45 questions · challenge rate 20% (1 of 5 questions) · 3 companies
  7. 2026 Q19 questions · challenge rate 22% (2 of 9 questions) · 5 companies
  8. 2026 Q26 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
  9. 2026 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand33
  • Revenue Growth16
  • Guidance Reliability10
  • Macroeconomic10
  • Product Launch8
  • Competitive Dynamics7
  • Regulation Policy7
  • Geographic Expansion7
  • Trade Tariffs7
  • M&A5
Show all 19 topics
  • Cloud & AI4
  • Margin3
  • Pricing3
  • Supply Chain3
  • Capex Investment2
  • Capital Allocation2
  • Innovation & R&D2
  • Credit1
  • Inventory1