Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Rayna Kumar

Oppenheimer · covers Financial Services, Technology, Industrials

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (8 quarters).

Questions
31on tracked calls
Challenge rate
3%1 of 31 questions
Companies
10questioned at least once
Reporting periods
8with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 31 of 31 questions from 10 companies

JKHYJack Henry & Associates10 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 10 challenging
JKHY company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

how are they thinking about IT spending for the next 6 to 12 months? And then separately, any read -- initial read on FY '27 revenue growth and margins

MacroeconomicGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Greg said macro environment not impacting tech spending. Benchmark survey at 88% vs 76% last year. AI now #1 priority. Pipelines very robust. Mimi said premature for FY27 specifics but thinking positive direction. Q4 not a launching pad for FY27. Budgeting process ongoing with operational leaders.

Calendar 2025 Q4

can you talk a little bit about what you're seeing out there in terms of pricing for core systems and ancillary services

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Greg said pricing environment unchanged by competitor announcement or broader competition. The 22 core wins demonstrate success since Jack Henry is never the lowest cost provider.

do you expect 3Q sales results to come in better? And are you starting to see the impact from the core consolidation news from one of your competitors

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Greg said Q2 wins had minimal impact from competitor consolidation announcement since deals were already in motion. Pipeline growing across core, complementary and payments. Larger opportunities emerging. Will report more definitively at quarter end.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Can you talk about how sustainable this type of margin expansion is going forward? And maybe how margin could look for the remainder of the year by quarter

MarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Mimi said R&D decline reflects disciplined budget planning with modest conservatism. Drivers of full-year margin expansion include spending control, limited headcount growth, and AI efficiencies. Some Q1 benefits are timing-related and expected to normalize.

Calendar 2025 Q1

you've spoken about 20 to 40 basis points of margin expansion as a medium-term target

MarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Mimi characterized 25-40bp as a floor not a ceiling, noting cost management is bread-and-butter for Jack Henry. Greg added new leaders have been trained to manage headcount rigorously. Headcount up only 1% this year.

in terms of the project delays that you experienced in the third quarter, what are you hearing on a time line

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Greg confirmed delays are slightly above normal with some pushing into next fiscal year, but all are contractual commitments not cancellations.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Could you just talk a little bit about what gives you confidence on the back half of revenue acceleration and what the key drivers will be

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Mimi outlined cloud growth, card ramp, new product installations, digital strength, and easing hardware headwinds as H2 drivers.

are you seeing any increased competition at the low end of the market from a large competitor that's been calling out these wins

Competitive DynamicsPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Greg noted some competitor pricing differences between retention and new wins, but no change in competitive environment. Some mergers of equals coming from that competitor.

Calendar 2024 Q3

one of your competitors recently called out a competitive win of less than $10 billion asset bank. I'm just wondering, if you're seeing any increased competition

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Greg acknowledged the competitor win but said competitive pressure is unchanged, citing the $7B win and successful renewals at $15-30B clients.

Do you think if this macro environment persists, there could be upside to your 25 to 40 basis point margin expansion target

MarginMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Mimi acknowledged potential upside from consumer spending but said too early to commit given Q1 just closed.

FICOFair Isaac4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
FICO company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

even with the DLP, the credit bureaus are likely to remain large customers of FICO

Competitive DynamicsRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Acknowledged the relationship is strong but openly competitive in mortgage scores, naming the Lender Choice program as the change.

Calendar 2025 Q4

on your last earnings call, you discussed some operational hurdles in having resellers move to the direct model. Can you just talk about how you're addressing some of those hurdles?

PricingProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Lansing walked back prior quarter's operational hurdle framing, saying the program is moving smoothly with high confidence in near-term go-live.

How much of the total resellers market would you say the 5 represent just to like establish some size on these wins?

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Lansing quantified the 5 signed DLP resellers as representing 70-80% of the total reseller market.

Calendar 2025 Q3

help us understand the usage of FICO scores in the downstream market. How material is it to total mortgage core volume

Show response

Lansing catalogued downstream score users (GSEs, rating agencies, MBS investors, mortgage insurers, regulators) and explained the per-closed-loan performance fee captures historically unmonetized IP value.

XYZBlock, Inc.4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
XYZ company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

Can you talk specifically about your expectations for Cash App Borrow growth in '26?

Show response

Amrita noted variable profit margins strong even with 223% YoY and 50% QoQ origination growth in Q4. Two key growth drivers for 2026: SFS now fully originating all Borrow loans enabling expansion to new states with improved unit economics, and deep integration with Cash App Green where Borrow access is a key incentive driving first-time actives to record levels.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Can you talk a little bit about some of the returns you're seeing on these investments and if it's scaling as you expected?

Competitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Amrita noted field sales LTV to CAC at strong rates with 5-6 quarter paybacks. Exceeded partnership expectations for leads and volume. Piloting first U.S. ISO partnership. Expects partner-driven GPV to grow 5 to 10 times in 2025.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Could you walk us through some of the products that will be the biggest driver behind Square's, gross profit acceleration this year?

Revenue GrowthGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Amrita highlighted share gains in food and beverage, retail, and with upmarket sellers >$500K GPV. Growth driven by Square Online enhancements, improved delivery integrations, and better banking/invoices with strong field sales and partnership ROIs.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Could you elaborate on any feedback that you're getting from vendors on your initial testing your enhanced Square for Restaurant point-of-sale experience?

Product LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Jack noted feedback loops between support, sales, and product teams are much stronger. Amrita cited Kiosks, Bar Tabs, Scan-to-Pay, House Accounts, item splitting, and instant payouts as launches in past six months.

MAMastercard3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
MA company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I noticed you had a nice acceleration in APMEA, in your payments volume, 11% from 9% in the last quarter.

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Mehra attributed the step-up to lapping prior-year Middle East moderation and higher fuel prices, with underlying regional growth continuing to perform well.

Calendar 2025 Q2

your progress in gaining market share in regions that have strong at [ A/A ] players like Pix in Brazil and UPI in India

Competitive DynamicsGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Michael described revamped debit platform in Brazil, competitive installment and recurring payment solutions. Business seeing healthy growth rates. Approach is to provide choice and compete on product quality.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Could you give us an update on your progress in gaining market share in Europe

Geographic ExpansionCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Michael highlighted U.K. market share leadership, UniCredit pan-European partnership across 13 markets, Italy as services opportunity, and 16% European volume growth.

CPAYCorpay2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
CPAY company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

Could you talk about just some of the drivers that'll get lodging back up to low single-digit growth this year?

Revenue GrowthMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Peter explained lodging as tale of two halves: negative H1, positive H2 as new sales and implementations come online. EBITDA margins increasing substantially quarter over quarter in 2026, slightly down full-year due to acquisitions, but expanding as synergies implemented and volume grows.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Are you seeing any different trends across SMBs versus your larger fleet clients? And can you talk about same-store sales trends for both segments?

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Ron noted reduced micro-account exposure from portfolio cleanup. Same-store sales steady at +1%, up 3pp from Q1 2024. No patchy trends across segments.

EFXEquifax2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
EFX company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

your appetite for more acquisitions here and if you do have an appetite, which areas do you expect your M&A efforts

M&ACapital AllocationGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Management laid out four bolt-on M&A swim lanes: international platforms, EWS, unique data, and identity/fraud.

Calendar 2025 Q3

I know you mentioned earlier that hiring, particularly white collar hiring continues to remain stressed.

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DLabor MarketTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.

Show 4 more companies
FISFidelity National Information Services2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
FIS company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

are you seeing more than usual RFPs? Secondarily, are you noticing any additional competition outside of the top three market share leaders?

Competitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Ferris characterized competition as steady, seeing no new entrants beyond the usual players and noting core remains sticky.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Can you talk a little bit about any potential dissynergies that may be tied to the sale of your Worldpay business

Show response

Stephanie stated clearly no dissynergies remain, all were absorbed during the initial 55% separation.

VVisa Inc.2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
V company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

I noticed in Latin America, there was a slight deceleration in volume versus last quarter

MacroeconomicGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Suh confirmed slight slowdown in Latin America but still grew strong, biggest single contributor was moderating inflation in Argentina. Overall Latin America remains a high-growth region with pleasing performance.

Calendar 2024 Q3

Can you talk about what opportunities this could present for Visa from Tink's perspective

Regulation PolicyProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Ryan said Visa will comply and sees the Visa brand as a differentiator in a more open-banking U.S., but is still assessing impacts.

AFRMAffirm Holdings, Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
AFRM company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

are you hearing anything about potential caps on BNPL rates? And know, if so, how would a firm react to that?

Regulation PolicyMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Max said no BNPL-cap chatter; Affirm tracks 51 regulators, has positive relationships, and applied for an ILC bank charter.

COINCoinbase Global1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
COIN company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

how should we think about incremental USDC on platform growth from x402 adoption? And over time, how meaningful could transaction fees on Base and from the x402 facilitator really become?

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Brian highlighted 90% of agentic stablecoin volumes on Base, and that x402 is now the most popular open standard for agentic commerce.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
JKHY Jack Henry & Associates1010%1 of 10 questions
FICO Fair Isaac40%none of 4 questions
XYZ Block, Inc.40%none of 4 questions
MA Mastercard30%none of 3 questions
CPAY Corpay2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
EFX Equifax2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
FIS Fidelity National Information Services2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
V Visa Inc.2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
AFRM Affirm Holdings, Inc.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
COIN Coinbase Global1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • JKHY
    Jack Henry & Associates · 10 questions
    10%1 of 10 questions
  • FICO
    Fair Isaac · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • XYZ
    Block, Inc. · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • MA
    Mastercard · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • CPAY
    Corpay · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • EFX
    Equifax · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • FIS
    Fidelity National Information Services · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • V
    Visa Inc. · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • AFRM
    Affirm Holdings, Inc. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • COIN
    Coinbase Global · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q3333%1 of 3 questions2
2024 Q440%none of 4 questions3
2025 Q150%none of 5 questions4
2025 Q220%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q340%none of 4 questions4
2025 Q470%none of 7 questions5
2026 Q130%none of 3 questions3
2026 Q230%none of 3 questions3
  1. 2024 Q33 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  2. 2024 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
  3. 2025 Q15 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 4 companies
  4. 2025 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  5. 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 4 companies
  6. 2025 Q47 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 5 companies
  7. 2026 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
  8. 2026 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Competitive Dynamics11
  • Geographic Expansion6
  • Revenue Growth6
  • Macroeconomic5
  • Pricing5
  • Demand5
  • Margin5
  • Guidance Reliability4
  • Regulation Policy3
  • Product Launch3
Show all 16 topics
  • M&A2
  • Cloud & AI2
  • Capital Allocation1
  • Credit1
  • Innovation & R&D1
  • Labor Market1