Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Richa Harnain
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2025 Q1 – 2026 Q2 (6 quarters).
- Questions
- 39on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 10%4 of 39 questions
- Companies
- 8questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 6with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 39 of 39 questions from 8 companies
ODFLOld Dominion Freight Line7 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
clarify the OR sequential change for the third quarter from the second quarter, that is based off GAAP OR, right?
Show response
Confirmed GAAP basis unambiguously and said adjustments like the real estate gain are disclosed rather than backed into a non-GAAP presentation.
the incremental margin we calculated in the quarter was really good, around 60%
Show response
Answered with a specific forward framework of 45% to 50% incremental margins on that revenue growth, above the longer-term trend, without endorsing 60%.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I wanted to give a stab at and try to get your impression. So earlier this month, we heard that team talk extensively about their differentiated dual-service offering
Show response
Adam dismissed FedEx dual-service as not new, noted FedEx will face change during separation, pointed to Mastio award wins and biggest market share gains over 10 years as evidence of ODFL's superior service.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Should we think that your incremental returns on growth can be higher than we've ever seen? I believe you eclipsed 40% post-COVID
Show response
Adam framed incremental margins: direct variable costs at 53% of revenue implies 47% incremental margin on pure leverage. Mid-40s expected in early recovery innings. Long-term goal is sub-70 OR. In strong years, 300+bp OR improvement possible. Weather disruption was last week's snowstorm, already baked into guidance. No material government shutdown impact.
Calendar 2025 Q3
where there's room for further optimization there? I know you're guiding to something that's worse than normal seasonality
Show response
Adam said cost focus is constant, not just in downturns. Overhead at 22% vs 17% in 2022 is the leverage opportunity. Direct variable costs already at record levels. Could see 300+bp OR improvement years when volume returns.
Calendar 2025 Q2
what are shippers telling you about their appetite to give you more business in the future
Show response
Industrial is 55-60% of revenue. ISM went positive briefly before tariff disruption. Tax bill with bonus depreciation finalized. Trade clarity and interest rate relief still needed to unlock investment.
Calendar 2025 Q1
How much of that down 6% plus or minus, compared to normal seasonality?
Show response
Adam pivoted to capacity discussion. Public carrier service centers down 23% over 10 years; ODFL up 15-20%. Yellow only repurposed ~60% of facilities. Capacity-constrained industry will benefit ODFL when volumes recover.
FDXFedEx6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I would love to understand and get more details on how much more expansion we would have seen
Show response
Russ named variable comp as the biggest factor and quantified fuel as roughly 20bps of margin, enough to flip the change positive, without full incrementals math.
Calendar 2026 Q1
on a year-over-year basis, the incremental margin in FEC sort of does come in. And as Raj, you just reminded us
Show response
Subramaniam explained Q3 peak profitability is a structural shift from improved forecasting, commercial discipline, and Network 2.0 efficiency, altering traditional Q3-Q4 seasonality. Q4 YoY headwinds: $275M variable comp, $135M LTL weakness, $50M MD-11s totaling ~$500M. Investor Day 4% revenue growth target remains for FY27.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how much do you estimate you're carrying today in terms of those additional costs? And what's worked into the outlook
Show response
Subramaniam said service quality reduces waste and is the right priority. Network 2.0 facilities typically reach efficiency within 3-6 months. AIC headwind reflects team performance above and beyond expectations.
Calendar 2025 Q3
maybe you can help us understand what's really driving the share gain what do we need to see to make it sustainable
Show response
Carere attributed gains to direct SMB selling (vs competitor's platform model), loyalty program growth, healthcare vertical stickiness, and 7-day coverage advantage. HD/ground economy bundle working with speed and rural coverage differentiation.
Calendar 2025 Q2
should we assume Q1 have a lower weight than usual, especially as, you know, these structural cost savings ramp up through the year
Show response
Dietrich confirmed Q1 will have lower-than-normal seasonal weight due to USPS headwind and transformation savings ramp. USPS headwind limited to first four months of FY26.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how much of FedEx shipment volumes is tied de minimis and how is the team preparing for this change
Show response
Carere emphasized operational readiness and customer support capabilities but did not quantify the specific volume exposure to de minimis shipments, pivoting to Q4 outlook framing instead.
CSXCSX Corporation5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how are customers feeling? What's driving them to CSX, they feel very company-specific.
Show response
Maryclare emphasized truck-to-rail conversion and rail's value proposition amid tighter trucking, and cited forest products supply improvement and infrastructure-tied demand in metals and minerals.
Calendar 2026 Q1
When do you expect to get to full ramp? And if you have a total of 100 projects expected for the year
Show response
Maryclare described diversity of pipeline but declined specific volume projections, noting projects vary in scale and ramp timing.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how should we think about you know, those growth projections? I mean, could they be stronger
Show response
Kevin said they are on track with Investor Day projections for Howard Street Tunnel benefits. Cited one key customer identifying a huge eastern conversion opportunity and strong weekly volume momentum.
Calendar 2025 Q2
as we think about the service improvement that you've garnered some momentum around into the back half of the year, could we expect some positive results
Show response
Kevin expressed confidence in pricing ability from strong service but no specific net pricing forecast. Noted one customer reported three straight years of declining trucking rates, which they see as unsustainable.
Calendar 2025 Q1
can you quantify that maybe further, like and how easy I appreciated the comments around, you know, the net promoter scores
Show response
Kevin quantified the lost revenue opportunity at $1M+ per day from unnormalized cycle times. Expressed confidence customers have stayed with CSX based on trust built through over-communication.
NSCNorfolk Southern Railway5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 2 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Your competitor -- primary competitor in the East has introduced some new product improvements
Show response
Mark George gave a high-level, non-specific answer complimenting both eastern competitors.
Calendar 2026 Q1
talk about initiatives that you're focused on to keep that cost trajectory going
Show response
Jason and John detailed $500M productivity over 2 years with $150M+ targeted for 2026. Key drivers: fuel efficiency records, T&E and cross-functional labor productivity, purchase service discipline, and safety-driven operational gains.
Calendar 2025 Q4
your cost target the cost target you laid out is ready to absorb a variety of different revenue scenarios, including higher ones. Back of the envelope math for us suggests you need to grow revenues...
Show response
CEO indicated low end of cost range implies 0.8-1.1% cost growth despite headwinds, with productivity offsetting inflation. Headcount expected flat to down through controlled attrition. CEO referenced 2025's 7% headcount productivity as template for 2026.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I wanted to confirm that this was ring-fenced to intermodal. And then I guess, what is really hindering your ability to compete?
Show response
CMO confirmed losses confined to domestic non-premium intermodal, competing vigorously on both price and service. Highlighted terminal capacity in Atlanta (2), Charlotte, Greensboro, and Jacksonville as ready for more freight. CEO clarified challenge is in interline arrangements where contracts may not flow through NSC directly.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I wanted to hone in, Mark, on your point around seeing meaningful share gains
Show response
CMO argued share gains are sticky because customers save money with rail and can trust NSC service, unwinding expensive alternatives built during prior service failures. CEO committed to growing operating profit even with flat or down revenue.
UNPUnion Pacific Corporation5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I'm curious how you're partnering with other IMCs? And you just said your private assets have capacity.
Show response
Rocker said UP is judicious in allocating containers to IMCs and addresses high-dwell partners directly.
Calendar 2026 Q1
is this the new normal? Or could it be better? I think Jim, you made a comment that you have line of sight to be better
Show response
Eric confirmed productivity gains are absolutely transferable. Emphasized perpetual dissatisfaction mindset driving continuous fundamental improvements, benchmarking terminals against each other.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Could you just clarify if that 4% to 5% increase includes your off offsetting efforts
Show response
Jennifer confirmed the 4-5% is net of offsets, driven by wage agreements, health/welfare, and payroll tax increases. Eric detailed offsets including RCL automation, switch operation automation, locomotive modernizations saving 5% fuel per unit, and energy management system expansion.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I think is this really the pricing lever starting to kick in Jennifer that you've talked about in earnest in the past
Show response
Jennifer acknowledged the impressive 12% EPS on flat volumes but noted macro indicators like housing starts and auto sales have worsened versus Investor Day assumptions, requiring macro improvement to reach the double-digit end of the range.
Calendar 2025 Q2
how you see your intermodal channel partners, the IMCs fitting into the equation of driving more domestic intermodal and enabling more conversions
Show response
Kenny highlighted the competitive rail box offering alongside IMC partners, and noted an uptick in industrial development project run rates versus prior year.
CHRWC.H. Robinson4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
They did step down sequentially to 13.1% from 14.6%. Michael, you said a lot of that was maybe fuel related.
Show response
Michael cited fuel pass-through and contractual repricing during the squeeze as drivers of the gross margin step-down, and expects revenue management to push margins back up.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Just wanted to better understand the flat volumes and down 3.5% TL volumes
Show response
NAST president said volume decline was deliberate choice plus storm impact reducing available freight. CFO framed vs competitors: one had high growth but negative GM, another had 20% volume drop. CHRW model delivered strong outgrowth while maintaining rates and AGP margins in 18-20% spot rate increase environment.
Calendar 2025 Q3
There's been a lot of talk around how very low-end capacity is exiting the market. Curious if you saw it in these results you put up, which are pretty remarkable, the strong gross margin expansion ...
Show response
Management acknowledged stacking regulatory changes (visa pause, English requirement, non-domiciled CDLs) causing localized capacity squeezes. AI-driven pricing engines helping manage volatile costing spikes. CFO said duration and severity of micro-squeezes much better than historically.
Calendar 2025 Q2
There remains this non skepticism about the ability for C.H. Robinson replicate or augment on such success in the event of an up cycle
Show response
CEO said company is structurally different from 2018. CFO emphasized automated processes don't require same headcount in recovery. Pointed to Global Forwarding as proof of concept.
Show 2 more companies
JBHTJ.B. Hunt4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
that's not just driven by mix, right? It's driven by some real same-store pricing growth
Show response
Darren confirmed +1% revenue per load ex-fuel is real positive pricing overcoming a negative mix from faster Eastern growth.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Is that still what you are targeting or, given the structural changes Spencer spoke about coupled with the efficiencies you are uncovering with all your technology and such, could it be higher
Show response
Shelley said margin targets unchanged but sees opportunities from transformation work, AI as force multiplier, and technology investments. Noted need for more demand normalization to fully restore margins. Prefers gradual one-to-two-year recovery over sharp inflection for long-term health. Acknowledged being inside margin targets is not a stopping point.
Calendar 2025 Q4
What are some initiatives you have in the hopper to really take that $100 million plus further
Show response
Brad Delco cited overhead/people efficiency, vendor renewals, and maintenance initiatives with longer tails as incremental opportunities. Declined to give Q1 guidance but noted market tightness in Q1 is unique. Shelley mentioned two strategic technology initiatives: reimagining intermodal order-to-completion and quote-to-cash processes.
Calendar 2025 Q1
is there a floor to margins we should be thinking about here as you go through the exercise on identifying cost-out opportunities
Show response
Shelley acknowledged multiple scenarios under review with varying duration assumptions. Darren was non-committal on whether consensus revenue per load expectations for H2 are achievable.
UPSUnited Parcel Service3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
how could your CPP trajectory look in light of maybe more cost efficiency from automation things to offset the step-up
Show response
Brian said CPP moves to low single digits in H2 as less productive older buildings are eliminated and automation investment drives efficiency. Carol noted far fewer employees than when restructuring started, helping manage contract step-ups.
Are you assuming U.S.-China business that wasn't structurally impaired from de minimis
Show response
Carol said path to mid-to-high teens international margins comes from both trade lane normalization and investing in premium European commercial volume, moving away from low-margin e-commerce domestically in Europe.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how should we think about the long-term CapEx outlook?
Show response
Carol noted closing old buildings eliminates maintenance expense. Brian confirmed aircraft financed through Burnham lease structures. Normalized CapEx expected at 3-3.5% of revenue going forward, down from higher levels due to fewer vehicles needed and reduced maintenance. Network flexibility reduces need for variable capacity CapEx.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| ODFL Old Dominion Freight Line | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| FDX FedEx | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions |
| CSX CSX Corporation | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| NSC Norfolk Southern Railway | 5 | 40%2 of 5 questions |
| UNP Union Pacific Corporation | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| CHRW C.H. Robinson | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| JBHT J.B. Hunt | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| UPS United Parcel Service | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
- ODFLOld Dominion Freight Line · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- FDXFedEx · 6 questions17%1 of 6 questions
- CSXCSX Corporation · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- NSCNorfolk Southern Railway · 5 questions40%2 of 5 questions
- UNPUnion Pacific Corporation · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- CHRWC.H. Robinson · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- JBHTJ.B. Hunt · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- UPSUnited Parcel Service · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q1 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q2 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q3 | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q4 | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions | 6 |
| 2026 Q1 | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions | 8 |
| 2026 Q2 | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions | 7 |
- 2025 Q15 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q25 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q36 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q46 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 6 companies
- 2026 Q19 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 8 companies
- 2026 Q28 questions · challenge rate 13% (1 of 8 questions) · 7 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Margin16
- Competitive Dynamics14
- Cost Pressure8
- Pricing6
- Demand6
- Guidance Reliability5
- Revenue Growth4
- Capex Investment4
- Innovation & R&D3
- Labor Market3
Show all 15 topics
- Trade Tariffs2
- Macroeconomic2
- Supply Chain1
- Regulation Policy1
- M&A1