Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Richard Shannon

Craig-Hallum · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (8 quarters).

Questions
27on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 27 questions
Companies
7questioned at least once
Reporting periods
8with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 27 of 27 questions from 7 companies

IONQIonQ, Inc.9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
IONQ company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

could you level set on how many satellites you have up in the space right now?

Show response

Tyler Perry Anderson asked this on for Richard Shannon (Craig-Hallum); attributed to the covering analyst per the on-for convention. de Masi said much is classified but confirmed a satellite constellation and ground/space PNT and QKD ambitions.

Calendar 2025 Q3

to what degree has the government shutdown impacted you for upcoming deals? Has this pushed anything out?

MacroeconomicRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Tyler Anderson (on for Richard Shannon) asked; de Masi said no material shutdown impact; Shapiro added funded projects continue to work, invoice, and get paid.

has there been any shift in customer demographic since you guys have been going out

Show response

Tyler Anderson (on for Richard Shannon) asked; Singh cited strong customer interest in the roadmap and low-cost, low-energy BOM; Ballance noted foundry-based scaling as a differentiator.

Calendar 2025 Q2

can Lightsynq be ran at room temperature for compute or sensing purposes? And if so, what is the plan for those?

Show response

Tyler Anderson (on for Richard Shannon) asked whether Lightsynq can run at room temperature for compute or sensing. Kassmann said the diamond quantum memory requires mild cryogenic temperatures, similar to enhanced-vacuum trapped-ion systems.

with the combined companies between Oxford Ionics and IonQ, is there a way to run all of these gates in parallel?

Show response

Tyler Anderson (on for Richard Shannon) asked whether combined Oxford Ionics and IonQ gates can run in parallel and the effect on gate speed. Kassmann said moving to 2D electronic gate control drives a step change in parallelism and throughput plus faster gate speeds.

Calendar 2025 Q1

The pulled-in acquisition of IDQ, does that benefit your guidance for the year?

Guidance ReliabilityM&ATranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Tyler Anderson asked this on for Richard Shannon (Craig-Hallum); attributed to the covering analyst per the on-for convention. Kramer said guidance already assumed both organic and inorganic sources, weighted to IDQ's expected contribution, and positions IonQ for 2026.

Could you highlight which modalities they're able to connect to

Show response

Tyler Anderson asked this on for Richard Shannon (Craig-Hallum); attributed to the covering analyst per the on-for convention. Kassmann said Lightsynq's diamond-based memory and matured frequency-conversion tech can integrate with multiple modalities across computing and networking.

Calendar 2024 Q4

could you guys give us any guidance on what you expect gross margins and OpEx to look like throughout the year?

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Asked by an associate (Tyler) on for Richard Shannon. Management declined formal margin guidance but said enterprise mix historically ran 75-77% gross margin and government contracts carry lower margin.

How should we think about the timing and market size of the networking market

Show response

Asked by an associate (Tyler) on for Richard Shannon. Management said acquisition benefits are already showing but declined to size the networking market or quantify near-term revenue.

RGTIRigetti Computing, Inc.6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
RGTI company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

For the HPE and PSC deployment, is this still fridge in control unit yours? Or is this going to be a third parties?

Show response

Tyler Anderson (on for Richard Shannon) asked whether the HPE/PSC deployment uses Rigetti's own fridge and control unit; management said the HPE/PSC system is Rigetti-built with outsourced components like fridges and Quanta control systems.

Calendar 2025 Q4

did they already have multiple [ dilution ] fridges installed? And are they just testing different components in the stack

Show response

Management inferred the Japanese buyer already has a fridge since it ordered the core Novera QPU rather than a full system. Question asked by Tyler Anderson (associate) on for Richard Shannon; attributed to the operator-introduced covering analyst per the on-for stand-in rule.

Calendar 2025 Q3

you may significantly increase your CapEx, including upgrading our chip fab facility or an entirely new one here.

Show response

Management said a new quantum fab would cost hundreds of millions, far below a CMOS fab, and is a possible need beyond the three-year horizon.

Calendar 2025 Q2

do you have any feedback or updates from QBI or NQCC to give?

Regulation PolicyInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Tyler Anderson (associate, on for Richard Shannon) asked for DARPA QBI / NQCC updates. Management said DARPA will narrow the field for Phase 2 by year-end and remains optimistic about advancing.

Calendar 2025 Q1

let me get a sense of when you think this enters the roadmap. Are we getting close to that time frame

Show response

Management said optical signaling is important long-term but roughly three to four years out; coax and flex cables come first.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Is this using kind of the tiling approach kind of extending on the 4-by-9 one that you said you're trying to hit midyear

Show response

Management confirmed the roadmap relies on chiplet tiling rather than scaling a larger monolithic chip.

QBTSD-Wave Quantum Inc.5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
QBTS company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

Have you gotten your hands on any of your multichip processors?

Show response

Tyler Anderson stood in for Richard Shannon. Baratz said early multichip and scalable-I/O prototype chips are back and about to begin testing.

Calendar 2025 Q4

is there a potential where we see multiple of those systems come online right away and have that capacity reserved for customers that you are talking to today?

Capex InvestmentDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Tyler Anderson stood in for Richard Shannon. Baratz clarified the 50% reference was the Italy Q-Alliance deal; cloud capacity is below 50% and systems upgrade quickly.

Calendar 2025 Q3

You mentioned SkyWater is using your QPU, is this for magnetic material simulation or for the simulation of quantum devices?

DemandInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Tyler Anderson stood in for Richard Shannon. Baratz said SkyWater is a new optimization customer; the large airline's applications were not disclosed.

Calendar 2025 Q2

could you elaborate on the developer tools that you released?

Innovation & R&DCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Tyler Anderson stood in for Richard Shannon. Baratz described the PyTorch-integrated discrete variational autoencoder toolkit that maps data into a discrete latent space suited to annealing.

Calendar 2024 Q4

should we expect the sales in the first quarter to be meaningfully above $10 million, or alternatively, what was the other contribution for the strong bookings in the fourth quarter?

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Markovich confirmed the system booking was the bulk of Q4 bookings but declined to break down the $18.3M or the Q1 revenue beyond the above-$10M figure.

COHRCoherent, Inc.2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
COHR company page →

Calendar 2024 Q3

is DCI relatively close to traditional telecom or a small portion, or just help us out a little bit there, please

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Jim confirmed DCI currently smaller than traditional telecom but growing faster, expected to become bigger component of overall telecom revenue.

how are you thinking about Coherent tying to market relative to your competitors? And do you also expect to ramp at a breadth of customer base

Competitive DynamicsProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Jim reiterated calendar 2025 ramp for 1.6T, expected similar customer breadth as early 800G ramp, declined to provide more specific timing.

CRDOCredo Technology Group Holding Ltd2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
CRDO company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

My first question is on your DSP win with a hyperscaler here. I think you said there's 800 gig

Product LaunchRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Brennan confirmed a full DSP implementation and, at 100 gig per lane, likely the largest revenue opportunity to date, but declined to size it in a competitive space.

Calendar 2025 Q1

some of your large customers to attempt to do dual sourcing. Have you seen any evidence of that

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Bill said Credo sees no significant competitive changes and treats dual-sourcing as a trailing-edge effort, citing its system-level ownership as an advantage.

LITELumentum Holdings Inc.2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
LITE company page →

Calendar 2024 Q3

Maybe you can just kind of delineate the timeframe for qualification and volume ramps here just to get a sense there

Innovation & R&DCloud & AIProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Alan noted some customers are more advanced, others need to rearchitect software. Product already transferred to Thailand operations for manufacturing. Deployment realistic in CY2025, meaningful growth in CY2026.

Is there anything going on here either in your kind of past markets or new markets here that's going to give us any signs of growth

DemandProduct LaunchInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Chris acknowledged 3D sensing is mature with no near-term catalyst. Metaverse/AR/VR and automotive applications helping modestly but slower to adopt than hoped. Keeping expectations muted.

Show 1 more company
ALABAstera Labs, Inc. Common Stock1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
ALAB company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

you have a really strong position in the retimers coming into the market and the P Series

Competitive DynamicsProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Management argued its ground-up AI switch architecture and first-mover PCIe Gen 6 position build a competitive barrier.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
IONQ IonQ, Inc.90%none of 9 questions
RGTI Rigetti Computing, Inc.60%none of 6 questions
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc.50%none of 5 questions
COHR Coherent, Inc.2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
LITE Lumentum Holdings Inc.2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
ALAB Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • IONQ
    IonQ, Inc. · 9 questions
    0%none of 9 questions
  • RGTI
    Rigetti Computing, Inc. · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • QBTS
    D-Wave Quantum Inc. · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • COHR
    Coherent, Inc. · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • CRDO
    Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • LITE
    Lumentum Holdings Inc. · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • ALAB
    Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q340%none of 4 questions2
2024 Q450%none of 5 questions4
2025 Q140%none of 4 questions3
2025 Q250%none of 5 questions4
2025 Q340%none of 4 questions3
2025 Q420%none of 2 questions2
2026 Q120%none of 2 questions2
2026 Q210%none of 1 question1
  1. 2024 Q34 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
  2. 2024 Q45 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 4 companies
  3. 2025 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
  4. 2025 Q25 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 4 companies
  5. 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
  6. 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  7. 2026 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  8. 2026 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Innovation & R&D13
  • Demand7
  • Product Launch5
  • Revenue Growth4
  • Competitive Dynamics3
  • Capex Investment2
  • Regulation Policy2
  • Cloud & AI2
  • Guidance Reliability2
  • M&A2
Show all 13 topics
  • Macroeconomic1
  • Margin1
  • Cost Pressure1