Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Ryan Levine

Citigroup · covers Utilities

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (8 quarters).

Questions
64on tracked calls
Challenge rate
2%1 of 64 questions
Companies
17questioned at least once
Reporting periods
8with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 64 of 64 questions from 17 companies

ATOAtmos Energy11 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 11 challenging
ATO company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

Are you going to break out what the earnings contribution was this quarter? And any early indications of what you were seeing last month?

Revenue GrowthPricingTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

CFO declined quarterly breakdown, preferring full-year view. Provided YoY figure of $16M/$0.08 and forward estimate of $0.08-$0.12 for H2 but no monthly detail.

given what we saw last month, would the monthly benefit be trending higher, given some of the commodity spread movements that we have seen?

PricingMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

CFO confirmed the H2 guidance of $0.08-$0.12 already incorporates April activity, effectively answering the trend question within the guidance range.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Given the recent Storm Fern and increasing gas demand in your service areas, do you see incremental opportunities to add gas storage?

Capex InvestmentDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CEO described the post-winter storage review process including third-party engineering overlays with customer growth projections. Noted 15 storage fields across 4 states plus third-party contract storage.

Calendar 2025 Q1

has that a refresh already occurred for this calendar year, so that we wouldn't expect any material changes until a review post winter 2026

Show response

CEO confirmed the NVQ review is ongoing and any adjustments would be finalized before the next heating season.

What are the underlying growth assumptions that embed the expansion projects that you have underway? And what conditions would merit further expansion

Capex InvestmentDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

CEO described multi-factor growth modeling process using city population forecasts, LDC demand requirements, and post-winter NVQ resets to drive expansion decisions.

Calendar 2024 Q4

in terms of federal announcements around Stargate and Seven. Potential developments in the Abilene, the extent there's consumption in that region. Would that have any impact

Show response

CEO confirmed any data center load would likely connect to APT system under the 75/25 sharing mechanism on interruptible basis.

can you remind us around the regulatory mechanisms across your service territory to allow for recovery on the capital side?

Regulation PolicyTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CEO confirmed annual rate mechanisms in most jurisdictions and traditional rate cases in Kentucky, Virginia, and Kansas for cost recovery.

wanted to hear your comments around the impact of Chinese and potentially Mexican tariffs around O and M and CapEx. I assume it's small, but any color

Trade TariffsCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CEO indicated tariff impacts would likely be minimal, noted tariffs were recently put on pause, and company is working with vendors to assess potential exposure.

Calendar 2024 Q3

In terms of the 4% O&M guidance, how lumpy is that throughout the forecast time period? Are there periods that are higher than that and others that are lower

Show response

CEO confirmed 4% O&M growth is expected to be fairly level year-over-year with potential quarterly variations.

what are you assuming for population growth or customer count growth in the Texas market in particular? And then, how sensitive is your outlook to that forecast?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

CFO stated growth assumptions are based on recent trends continuing but did not provide specific population or customer count figures.

What's your assumption for bad debt expense and how does that impact the outlook? It looked like that was excluded from the 4% O&M guide

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

CEO confirmed bad debt normalizing to pre-pandemic levels and expected to be fairly flat year-over-year in the five-year plan.

EIXEdison International11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 11 challenging
EIX company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

How does the ongoing undergrounding cost benefit analysis impact the decision around how much covered conductor

Capex InvestmentInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Powell laid out the benefit-cost methodology, the 1.0 threshold, feasibility and terrain constraints, and flagged that the RAMP base case may change before the GRC filing.

how have the education efforts ramped up in Sacramento compared to the last year on the wildfire bill?

Regulation PolicyMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Pizarro contrasted SB 901, AB 1054 and SB 254 cycles and identified the CEA report as the differentiating platform this session, while noting legislators start from varied baselines.

Calendar 2026 Q1

is there a way you could size how much cost-cutting initiatives AI could enable or unlock and how the AMI 2.0 and ERP systems could impact that opportunity?

Show response

SVP Powell noted AI spans entire business from customer ops to grid to procurement but still early to fully size. New CFO Moss highlighted AMI 2.0 benefits quantified in application with benefit/cost ratio well above 1 for incremental costs. CEO noted all supportive of 5-7% EPS growth.

How are you assessing wildfire risk going into the summer wildfire season compared to prior years given weather and all the company actions over the last few years?

Regulation PolicyCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

SVP Powell detailed layered approach: 7,100+ miles covered conductor, nearly 100 miles undergrounding as foundation, plus seasonal inspections, vegetation management, and PSPS improvements. Weather had early rain but drier recently; winds notoriously difficult to forecast.

Calendar 2025 Q4

would you look to continue to tweak the program to achieve your objectives? And any color you could share around the rationale for the recently announced changes?

Show response

CEO detailed two program changes: tenant compensation adjusted to higher of actual rent or fair market value for 3 months, and attorney fee support increased from 10% to 20% of net damages. Both applied retroactively. Advisors highlight importance of program stability, so further changes unlikely.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Does this action in your view, have an impact on who will ultimately get the proceeds from the funds?

Show response

CFO noted CEA monitoring subrogation claims carefully but doesn't believe fund administrator intends to put utilities at risk of accessing the fund.

What are the advantages of creating the new wildfire recovery compensation program to address the priorities of the community

Show response

CEO framed program as doing the right thing for impacted community given probable loss. Faster claims resolution also mitigates construction cost escalation, legal expenses, and is good stewardship of wildfire fund.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Have there been any changes to the wildfire mitigation plan preparation work or approach to forming the updated plan post the January events?

Capex InvestmentRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

SVP Powell noted core programs unchanged but more undergrounding in burn scar areas. Inspection and vegetation management programs continuously refined based on learnings.

Is there any early indication of when you may start to full capital from that front?

Regulation PolicyCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CFO noted very premature to estimate timing. Would first use $1B customer-funded self-insurance, then access fund through streamlined administrator process.

Calendar 2024 Q4

How do you expect the events from last month will change cost of CapEx items and O&M costs in the coming years?

Capex InvestmentCost PressureTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

SVP Powell noted 800 miles of covered conductor installed last year is an order of magnitude more than fire-related rebuild needs. Supply chain impact expected to be minimal.

is there an established venue to determine how the protocol will unfold in terms of investigating the equipment

Show response

CEO confirmed court-supervised process with a judge overseeing protocol discussions, next hearing in about a week.

PCGPG&E Corporation8 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
PCG company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Should we expect a meaningful update in the data center outlook as Rule 30 outcome becomes determined?

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Poppe said interim Rule 30 implementation is already reflected in the current pipeline and that AI is used extensively for wildfire meteorology.

Calendar 2026 Q1

how does the summer look for weather into wildfire season

Show response

CEO emphasized readiness over prediction. Continuous monitoring enabling shift from reactive to proactive grid operations. Confident heading into wildfire season.

is there any color you could share around whether special dividends or ratable dividends or buybacks

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CEO declined to prioritize alternatives. First priority is solid SB 254 outcome. CFO confirmed plan built on no equity, maintaining dividend, modest parent debt below 10%, IG metrics.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Are you looking to accelerate the prudency determination through the CEA process for future liabilities

Show response

CEO declined specifics, saying CEA process will produce a bundle of options and improvements. Key goal is making downside risk knowable and affordable for customers and investors.

Calendar 2025 Q2

any sense of what actually would be studied between now and presumably the end of the governor's term

Show response

CEO outlined study areas: insurance market viability, building codes, community hardening, forest clearing, claims limitations. Advocated for collective California approach like earthquake.

How do you view the proposed decision we get to SB 410 capital would be funded relative to plan

Capex InvestmentRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

CFO noted PD allows up to $2.4B for 2025-2026. New capital could make plan bigger, better for affordability, or extend 9% growth duration. Final decision expected end of August.

Calendar 2025 Q1

do you see any progress in the conversation to revisit or change the attachment rate for the wildfire fund

Show response

CEO declined to get ahead of policymakers on specifics but confirmed many ideas under discussion. Maintained confidence in constructive outcome this year.

where is the 90% number coming from and kinda one of the drivers

Show response

CEO clarified 90% refers to final engineering expected online by end of 2030 based on completed cluster study with agreed timing and signed customer agreements.

PNWPinnacle West7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
PNW company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

is there any timeline for when that study will conclude? Would that be concurrent with the subscription negotiations targeting the end of this year?

Show response

Ted tied Cholla analysis timeline to IRP filing (summer 2026). IRP will include wholesale generation mix review including potential gas conversion or new generation at the Cholla site.

what is the thought process around converting retired coal to gas generation, and the potential for federal permitting reform to impact the company?

Capex InvestmentRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Ted said Cholla conversion analysis is ongoing. New gas generation cost increases make conversion more attractive. IRP filing will include latest generation mix analysis including Cholla site evaluation.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Any color you could share around the pace of the large load commitments in the uncommitted bucket that you're considering to be ready for?

DemandCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Ted described repeatable process: identify infrastructure, offer 1+ GW tranches to queue, negotiate agreements, file with commission. First subscription offer made late 2025, actively in discussions to finalize in 2026.

Is the company looking to finance some of the transmission build out with some of the DOE energy dominance financing

Show response

Andrew confirmed evaluating all alternatives including federal grants and customer financing. Subscription model upfront capital helps balance sheet. Base plan uses traditional funding but open to off-balance-sheet options during construction.

Calendar 2025 Q2

are there contractual rights to be able to expand your capacity if needed and the growth materializes at prenegotiated tariff rates?

Show response

Ted confirmed contractual flex-up rights are secured, though did not specify whether at prenegotiated tariff rates.

what's the risk for shareholders and rate payers if the uncommitted growth projects don't materialize?

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Ted argued pipeline is prudent regardless of uncommitted growth materializing because it's needed for existing committed load and reliability.

Calendar 2025 Q1

On the coal plant closure, can you give us an update post the executive order and commissioner comments if there's any reassessment of the potential restart for that plant?

Regulation PolicyCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Ted confirmed Cholla retirement remains on track due to both federal law and economics. Exploring site repurposing for new nuclear or gas generation.

FEFirstEnergy4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
FE company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

sufficient internal engineering and project management capability to deliver on the

ChallengingSupply ChainCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Tierney cited deep contractor/supplier relationships since 2014. Supplier tightness easing vs COVID era; making advance equipment orders.

How are you assessing the potential impacts from the Maryland Lower Bills Act

Regulation PolicyMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Tierney focused affordability efforts on generation costs which drive 60% of bills; supportive of capacity auction caps and second auction for new generation.

Calendar 2025 Q3

what regions in PJM are you seeing the majority of the investment opportunity? And is there any cost inflation associated with the labor or equipment

Capex InvestmentSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Tierney emphasized the 30% is driven by incremental work not inflation, broadly distributed across all five states.

do you have a lot of confidence in the visibility of those forecasts in light of some of the FERC and other PUC recent commentary

Show response

Tierney outlined multi-factor criteria (land control, permits, plans, public announcements) giving confidence in pipeline quality.

EVRGEvergy3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
EVRG company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

Is Evergy seeking DOE energy-dominant financing capital for its transmission plan? Or any color you could share around maybe alternative subsidized forms of capital

Capex InvestmentRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Campbell said current plan uses traditional financing but is open to creative approaches for the next 10 GW tier, including customer-supplied capacity.

Calendar 2025 Q2

What's the labor ramp and EPC strategy for the new gas generation building? And any color you could share around compounds to achieve the COD target?

Show response

Campbell noted proximity to Black & Veatch and Burns & McDonnell, expressed confidence in COD dates but kept contractual terms confidential.

do the EPC companies have the ability to reprioritize resources if other generation if they get contracted for other projects?

Show response

Campbell expressed confidence in contractual protections but did not disclose specific terms, noting the EPC provider is experienced.

Show 11 more companies
NINiSource3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
NI company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

can you speak to some of the cost recovery attributes of the recent initiatives in the state that are in place now to ensure timely recovery

Regulation PolicyCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Lloyd corrected premise (HB 1007 unrelated to coal). Confirmed ongoing federal/state conversations about cost recovery for potential Schahfer extension. No resolution yet.

if the GenCo application is approved in September and at that point, is there a lot of the contract terms that have already been prenegotiated

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Confirmed parallel processes running simultaneously. GenCo approval would not trigger renegotiation. Multiple workstreams progressing concurrently including equipment, regulatory, and contractual.

Calendar 2025 Q1

can you remind us when those labor agreements expire and what the process of renegotiating labor rates is

Labor MarketCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Major contracts expiring in 2026: NIPSCO end of March, Pennsylvania end of August. All labor gets renegotiated in 2026.

PEGPublic Service Enterprise Group3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
PEG company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

other PJM state level discussions around virtual power plants, how are you thinking about the opportunity for PEG?

Show response

Ralph framed VPPs as a policy-alignment opportunity rather than a material financial one, noting some proposed pilot programs.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Is there any color around how many customers or individual projects represent that large megawatt increase

Show response

LaRossa provided directional color without specifics: New Jersey projects are smaller than other states, mostly edge computing and backup locations. Peak load just over 10,000 MW with 9,400 MW in inquiries.

Would you seek the customer bill deferral mechanism for an additional year as a result of the higher PJM capacity prices

Regulation PolicyCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

LaRossa deferred to the incoming administration. Cregg explained no spike like June is expected because the $329 auction is rolling on while higher-priced auctions roll off, resulting in near-flat bills.

AESAES Corporation2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
AES company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

do you see consolidation given the policy uncertainty at the U.S. federal level? And does that create opportunity for your stand-alone business to acquire some assets

Competitive DynamicsM&ATranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Andres confirmed consolidation opportunities for smaller developers, noting AES has been rolling up smaller developers over past 5 years. Bellefield cited as example of successful medium-stage acquisition.

How much cash flow is associated with Maximo and AS plan? And is there any color you can share on the financial metrics or commercial interest you're seeing

Innovation & R&DMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Andres disclosed 4 Maximo units operating now, scaling to a few dozen in 2026 for internal use only. Third-party commercialization likely 2027+. Advantages: 2-3x faster construction with same crew, critical for 2027 service deadlines.

ETREntergy2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
ETR company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

how GDP sensitive is your load

MacroeconomicDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CEO acknowledged not recession-proof but highlighted Gulf Coast structural advantages. Earnings sensitivity low at $0.01 per 1% change in industrial sales. Customers make 30-year decisions looking past near-term macro.

How does the Woodside FID decision impact the availability of power time to market for new potential data center customers

DemandCloud & AIMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CFO clarified traditional industrial and data center planning approaches differ. Binary planning for data centers means they are not mutually exclusive with traditional customer demand.

NRGNRG Energy2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
NRG company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

What are you assuming for '26 stand-alone business contribution for Smart Home growth?

Subscriber GrowthRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Management expects similar strong growth in 2026 with new good-better-best tiering and a more affordable entry-level offering.

in terms of duration of the contracts, are you seeing any change there around the tenor of contracts

Show response

Contract durations trending longer not shorter, especially with BYOP requiring longer terms to support generation economics.

WECWEC Energy Group2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
WEC company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

doesn't assume the higher very large load tariff ROE and to the extent that you were to be successful in that application

Regulation PolicyMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

VLC tariff IS assumed in plan. Working individually with customers on premium ROE within the 10.48-10.98% range.

any color you could share around maybe the engagement level or the time line that conversations are progressing through?

Show response

Focus on first 1.3 GW with expansion discussions expected next year. Talking to other potential customers beyond Microsoft and Oracle.

XELXcel Energy2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
XEL company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

What impact do you see from the potential new Texas legislation related to wildfires in terms of its impact to your mitigation plans

Show response

SRP under unanimous settlement; Texas legislation provides affirmative defense for compliant utilities. No material CapEx impact expected.

Have you discussed or previewed the credit implications for different transferability iterations with the rating agencies

Regulation PolicyCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Annual rating agency meetings in September; transferability loss seen as very low probability so not focus of prior discussions.

DTEDTE Energy1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
DTE company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

In terms of the potential tariff for data centers, would you look to file something soon?

Cloud & AIRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

COO indicated tariff filing timing depends on load ramp clarity, with current tariffs sufficient near-term but new structure needed once significant build is required.

ESEversource Energy1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
ES company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

can you maybe unpack that a little bit more in detail around the implications for your business and how that could impact whether it's an AMI decision

Regulation PolicyCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Moreira explained the court ruled prudency must be assessed at time of investment decision, preventing introduction of new facts years later. Nolan said this significantly improves confidence in making CT investments including AMI.

PPLPPL Corporation1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
PPL company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

Given the new PJM CEO's letter and related report, any thoughts around some of the ideas proposed and the future of the capacity auction?

Regulation PolicyCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Sorgi endorsed PJM's recognition that market reform is needed. Supported BYOG and interruptibility proposals, noted market moving toward bilateral contracting consistent with PPL's JV strategy.

SOSouthern Company1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
SO company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

Are you looking at any policy support to help attract data center growth in Alabama specifically? And are you looking at any changes to tariff design

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Womack said no legislative efforts in Alabama for data center incentives. Tucker added they have tremendous flexibility in contracting with large load customers without needing tariff changes.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
ATO Atmos Energy110%none of 11 questions
EIX Edison International110%none of 11 questions
PCG PG&E Corporation80%none of 8 questions
PNW Pinnacle West70%none of 7 questions
FE FirstEnergy425%1 of 4 questions
EVRG Evergy30%none of 3 questions
NI NiSource30%none of 3 questions
PEG Public Service Enterprise Group30%none of 3 questions
AES AES Corporation2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
ETR Entergy2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • ATO
    Atmos Energy · 11 questions
    0%none of 11 questions
  • EIX
    Edison International · 11 questions
    0%none of 11 questions
  • PCG
    PG&E Corporation · 8 questions
    0%none of 8 questions
  • PNW
    Pinnacle West · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • FE
    FirstEnergy · 4 questions
    25%1 of 4 questions
  • EVRG
    Evergy · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • NI
    NiSource · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • PEG
    Public Service Enterprise Group · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • AES
    AES Corporation · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • ETR
    Entergy · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
Show all 17 companies
CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
NRG NRG Energy2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
WEC WEC Energy Group2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
XEL Xcel Energy2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
DTE DTE Energy1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
ES Eversource Energy1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
PPL PPL Corporation1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
SO Southern Company1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • NRG
    NRG Energy · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • WEC
    WEC Energy Group · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • XEL
    Xcel Energy · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • DTE
    DTE Energy · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • ES
    Eversource Energy · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • PPL
    PPL Corporation · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • SO
    Southern Company · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q330%none of 3 questions1
2024 Q470%none of 7 questions4
2025 Q1120%none of 12 questions7
2025 Q2150%none of 15 questions8
2025 Q360%none of 6 questions3
2025 Q4813%1 of 8 questions6
2026 Q190%none of 9 questions5
2026 Q240%none of 4 questions3
  1. 2024 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 1 company
  2. 2024 Q47 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 4 companies
  3. 2025 Q112 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 12 questions) · 7 companies
  4. 2025 Q215 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 15 questions) · 8 companies
  5. 2025 Q36 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 3 companies
  6. 2025 Q48 questions · challenge rate 13% (1 of 8 questions) · 6 companies
  7. 2026 Q19 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 9 questions) · 5 companies
  8. 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Regulation Policy31
  • Capex Investment19
  • Demand17
  • Cost Pressure8
  • Cloud & AI7
  • Macroeconomic5
  • Revenue Growth3
  • Pricing3
  • Capital Allocation3
  • Margin3
Show all 17 topics
  • Innovation & R&D2
  • Competitive Dynamics2
  • Supply Chain2
  • Trade Tariffs2
  • Subscriber Growth1
  • M&A1
  • Labor Market1