Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Ryan Zimmerman
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 32on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 9%3 of 32 questions
- Companies
- 7questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 32 of 32 questions from 7 companies
SYKStryker Corporation12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
this year, Medicare took a pretty big swing as much as 20-plus percent on knees, hips, shoulders, etcetera.
Show response
Kevin downplayed the proposal based on 15 years of precedent and pointed to the ASC shift as a positive for Stryker.
can you spend a little bit on margins and the EPS guide for the second half of the year?
Show response
Reaffirmed the three-year margin commitment and walked through cyber idle costs, remediation spend and raw material pressure.
Calendar 2026 Q1
what is holding you back or what isn't holding you back, I guess, to reaccelerate M&A as a contributor to Stryker's top line growth
Show response
Kevin highlighted strong M&A pipeline with 2.1x gross debt/EBITDA providing firepower, referenced AVS deal, and said to expect active M&A through year-end and into next year.
I'm wondering if you kind of parse out between what is your ability to serve the market versus what may or may not be changes in demand
Show response
Kevin was emphatic that there was no pause in orders, only shipments. Hospital balance sheets remain healthy with a strong order book. Mako would have had an even higher record Q1.
Calendar 2025 Q4
there's actually a local coverage determination this morning around total joint arthroplasty and robotics. I think specifically with CGS
Show response
Kevin Lobo wasn't familiar with the specific case but cited international precedent for robotic reimbursement. Referenced Australian peer-reviewed data showing Mako outperforms other systems. Doesn't foresee any reduction in reimbursement.
how would you characterize that trajectory would you characterize your confidence to achieve that
Show response
Preston Wells confirmed same confidence in 150bps+ margin expansion through 2028. Cited operational excellence, lean, and shared services as key drivers, with 2026 guidance showing healthy margin trajectory.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how do you think about the health of the orthopedics market, how you're preparing to maybe capitalize on any disruption that may come of that and just kind of your outlook on orthopedic
Show response
Kevin Lobo highlighted multi-year momentum in knees from cementless leadership and Mako adoption. Preston Wells addressed pricing: still positive and above historic levels, now compounding year-over-year.
when you think you can kind of really take Inari to a bigger international presence maybe than prior -- when it was a stand-alone company
Show response
Kevin Lobo said international expansion has started but hasn't taken off yet. Expects meaningful impact in second half of 2026, leveraging Stryker's existing international infrastructure.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I'd love your thoughts on kind of what you see as greenfield opportunity within Mako at this point? And obviously, an installed base number is always appreciated
Show response
Kevin noted most U.S. sites have multiple Makos. 5,000 hospitals with many ORs remain targets. International is where U.S. was 5 years ago. May provide installed base number at year-end.
it's $175 milion now, most companies we've seen have come down maybe by about half. I'm just wondering if you could elaborate on why it's only coming down by about $25 million?
Show response
Preston explained China benefit offset by EU going to 15%. Kevin added that smaller China exposure and large European manufacturing footprint explain the differential vs peers.
Calendar 2025 Q1
the OUS hip number. It was pretty good, to say the least, and it stands out amongst the broader market
Show response
Kevin noted SERF acquisition benefit but strong underlying organic growth. Insignia hip stem not yet launched in Europe, suggesting more growth ahead.
is there anything in there, particularly in the extremities line, that we should think about in terms of the momentum you're seeing
Show response
Kevin highlighted Pangea as primary driver plus upper extremities delivering strong double-digit growth quarter after quarter since acquisition.
SOLVSolventum7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I wonder if you could kind of speak to the health of the market, what you're seeing, again, ex the advanced orders
Show response
Bryan said Solventum is not seeing procedure softness despite market noise; on proceeds, management biased to shareholder returns with some debt paydown and no large M&A.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Your comments suggest you are still holding the line on tariff assumptions for the year. Where is your head at on tariff refunds
Show response
CFO holding $100-120M tariff estimate; no refunds booked; Q1 at high end quarterly. Gross margin expected closer to 56% for remaining quarters after strong Q1 slightly above 56%.
what did you see in terms of impact when you did that cutover that informs the U.S. plan? And how much of that 70 basis points was reflective of preparation
Show response
CFO clarified 70bps was mostly SKU/separation timing (registration cutovers), not ERP-driven; Asia Pacific ERP successful and in rearview; U.S. ERP not until Q3.
Calendar 2025 Q4
embedding for expectations on Acera, if you can provide any high-level commentary around it
Show response
CEO confirmed Acera is in $1B market growing 10%, positioned in faster-growing synthetics subcategory; healthy double-digit grower with strong profitability; force multiplier with existing commercial infrastructure.
how should we think about maybe what's contractually obligated over a certain time period or any other additional details
Show response
CEO cited multi-year contracts, switching costs, compliance risk of errors, trust factor, and proprietary rules/algorithms as moats; views AI competitors as risking autonomous coding quality.
Calendar 2025 Q3
The program, the $500 million in cost weight, is that equal over the next 4 years? Is that upfront?
Show response
CFO declined to provide cadence detail; spend will be dictated by multiple projects across the program's timeline.
it does imply a little bit of a lower growth profile in the back -- in the fourth quarter, excuse me
Show response
CFO clarified Q4 at ~2.5% includes residual IPSS order timing reversal; normalized for that, it's in line with prior quarters.
GEHCGE HealthCare4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
I'm wondering how you think about the benefits of it? If there is increased business capture, does the growth profile of that business collectively change
Show response
Pete explained AIS builds on AVS model success. Primary goal is higher growth profile through better clinical/technical differentiation at street level and R&D allocation efficiency across cardiac/oncology pathways. Fewer organizational layers speeds decision-making. Near-term benefits expected in commercial execution; longer-term benefits from integrated product development.
Does your prioritization of capital deployment change in the face of some of these inflationary pressures
Show response
Jay confirmed priorities unchanged: organic R&D investment first, disciplined M&A (Intelerad as example of strong ROIC), then share repurchase at attractive valuations. $100M repurchased in Q1. Pricing and new product momentum supporting long-term conviction. Good progress on working capital in the quarter.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Just maybe you can kind of bridge us, I think, in terms of the twenty-sixth guide to those medium-term targets
Show response
Jay outlined: NPIs plus Flyrcado expected to add 1-2pp of additional sales growth medium-term. Heartbeat driving higher-margin NPIs and SG&A optimization for 17-20%+ margin. Pete emphasized tariffs moved timeline back 1-2 years but aggressive mitigation underway. All new products carry higher gross margins than predicates.
The RPO and the, you know, specifically, service RPO was up really well
Show response
Jay highlighted services grew 6% driven by price and volume. Enterprise agreements include multiyear service elements. AI remote fix improving capture rates. High equipment utilization driving service demand. Pete added new sophisticated products with higher-priced service contracts create flywheel effect.
ZBHZimmer Biomet4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 2 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Is it your assumption that pricing headwinds will increase in orthopedics because of these dynamics?
Show response
Ivan said 20 quarters of the same pricing question have not materialized worse, the implant is only ~14-15% of ASC cost so the conversation is about the care episode not implant price, and 85% of the book is contracted with visibility into H2 and 2027.
Calendar 2025 Q4
the contribution this quarter was lower than we expected. And if I look at the outlook, for '26, I I think it's about a 100 basis points which, again, is is a little lower
Show response
Ivan noted Paragon 28 came in ~20bps behind 270bps full-year target. Both quarters delivered upper single-digit organic growth. EPS dilution better than expected (~3% committed, came in slightly better). Committed to double-digit growth in 2026 with eight new product launches. Just held sales meeting in San Diego with high excitement.
Calendar 2025 Q2
talk to us about what specifically changed there from those past 2 quarters where it was maybe trailing behind some of your other peers
Show response
Ivan cited 150bps Q1-to-Q2 acceleration in U.S. Knees with July stronger still. Investments in DTP campaigns, leadership changes, territory restructuring, and evolved incentive plans. International knees impacted by EMEA tender shift to Q3. Expects strong international knee number in Q3. Additional upside from Oxford Partial Cementless and Persona Revision in 2026.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Can you just talk about it, Ivan, in terms of what's driving that, how durable
Show response
Ivan attributed growth to new products (organic and inorganic), specialized dedicated resources, and ASC investments. Upon Paragon closing, S.E.T. will be larger than Hips franchise.
HOLXHologic2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2024 Q4
The $25 million is that three quarters worth of sales or is there some disruption assumed there?
Show response
Karleen confirmed $25M is simply three quarters of Gynesonics sales, consistent with $28M trailing annual run rate.
are you suggesting or implied in that would be a decline in units just in terms of unit volume
Show response
Steve expects both unit improvement and mix-driven price increases in FY2026 with the new gantry. Not ready to guide '26 but has clear line of sight to acceleration.
ISRGIntuitive Surgical2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
maybe speak to the differences between the system placements versus what you saw with procedures this quarter
Show response
Jamie noted about half of US placements were trades, so installed base expansion moderated, while utilization grew a healthy 3%.
Calendar 2025 Q1
if you were to characterize the payer mix, particularly within the Medicaid population, what you could or could not be exposed to?
Show response
Gary acknowledged Medicaid is in the procedure mix but not dominant, saying it's too soon to speculate on impact. Jamie noted it's too early for specific comments.
Show 1 more company
MDTMedtronic1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
it would seem that there is opportunity potentially for a gross margin step-up, particularly in the second half of 2027
Show response
Pieton said roughly $65 million of tariff carryover hits Q1 and Q2 before lapping in H2; ex-tariffs, pricing lift and net cost-out continue. Mix drivers cut both ways: a MiniMed separation would lift gross margin, and CAS margin is improving. Overall gross margin is basically flattish, slightly up ex-tariffs, with better H2 performance, and growth drives operating-margin leverage via SG&A.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| SYK Stryker Corporation | 12 | 8%1 of 12 questions |
| SOLV Solventum | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| GEHC GE HealthCare | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| ZBH Zimmer Biomet | 4 | 50%2 of 4 questions |
| HOLX Hologic | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| ISRG Intuitive Surgical | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| MDT Medtronic | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- SYKStryker Corporation · 12 questions8%1 of 12 questions
- SOLVSolventum · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- GEHCGE HealthCare · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- ZBHZimmer Biomet · 4 questions50%2 of 4 questions
- HOLXHologic · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- ISRGIntuitive Surgical · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- MDTMedtronic · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q1 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q2 | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q3 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q4 | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q1 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q2 | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions | 5 |
- 2024 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q23 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q47 questions · challenge rate 14% (1 of 7 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q16 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q26 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 5 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Revenue Growth12
- Margin6
- Demand6
- M&A6
- Competitive Dynamics5
- Regulation Policy4
- Trade Tariffs3
- Capital Allocation3
- Guidance Reliability3
- Innovation & R&D3
Show all 17 topics
- Supply Chain3
- Product Launch3
- Capex Investment2
- Pricing2
- Geographic Expansion2
- Cloud & AI1
- Cost Pressure1