Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Ryan Zimmerman

BTIG · covers Healthcare

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Questions
32on tracked calls
Challenge rate
9%3 of 32 questions
Companies
7questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 32 of 32 questions from 7 companies

SYKStryker Corporation12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 12 challenging
SYK company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

this year, Medicare took a pretty big swing as much as 20-plus percent on knees, hips, shoulders, etcetera.

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Kevin downplayed the proposal based on 15 years of precedent and pointed to the ASC shift as a positive for Stryker.

can you spend a little bit on margins and the EPS guide for the second half of the year?

MarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Reaffirmed the three-year margin commitment and walked through cyber idle costs, remediation spend and raw material pressure.

Calendar 2026 Q1

what is holding you back or what isn't holding you back, I guess, to reaccelerate M&A as a contributor to Stryker's top line growth

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Kevin highlighted strong M&A pipeline with 2.1x gross debt/EBITDA providing firepower, referenced AVS deal, and said to expect active M&A through year-end and into next year.

I'm wondering if you kind of parse out between what is your ability to serve the market versus what may or may not be changes in demand

DemandCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Kevin was emphatic that there was no pause in orders, only shipments. Hospital balance sheets remain healthy with a strong order book. Mako would have had an even higher record Q1.

Calendar 2025 Q4

there's actually a local coverage determination this morning around total joint arthroplasty and robotics. I think specifically with CGS

Regulation PolicyInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Kevin Lobo wasn't familiar with the specific case but cited international precedent for robotic reimbursement. Referenced Australian peer-reviewed data showing Mako outperforms other systems. Doesn't foresee any reduction in reimbursement.

how would you characterize that trajectory would you characterize your confidence to achieve that

MarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Preston Wells confirmed same confidence in 150bps+ margin expansion through 2028. Cited operational excellence, lean, and shared services as key drivers, with 2026 guidance showing healthy margin trajectory.

Calendar 2025 Q3

how do you think about the health of the orthopedics market, how you're preparing to maybe capitalize on any disruption that may come of that and just kind of your outlook on orthopedic

Competitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Kevin Lobo highlighted multi-year momentum in knees from cementless leadership and Mako adoption. Preston Wells addressed pricing: still positive and above historic levels, now compounding year-over-year.

when you think you can kind of really take Inari to a bigger international presence maybe than prior -- when it was a stand-alone company

M&AGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Kevin Lobo said international expansion has started but hasn't taken off yet. Expects meaningful impact in second half of 2026, leveraging Stryker's existing international infrastructure.

Calendar 2025 Q2

I'd love your thoughts on kind of what you see as greenfield opportunity within Mako at this point? And obviously, an installed base number is always appreciated

Innovation & R&DDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Kevin noted most U.S. sites have multiple Makos. 5,000 hospitals with many ORs remain targets. International is where U.S. was 5 years ago. May provide installed base number at year-end.

it's $175 milion now, most companies we've seen have come down maybe by about half. I'm just wondering if you could elaborate on why it's only coming down by about $25 million?

ChallengingTrade TariffsSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Preston explained China benefit offset by EU going to 15%. Kevin added that smaller China exposure and large European manufacturing footprint explain the differential vs peers.

Calendar 2025 Q1

the OUS hip number. It was pretty good, to say the least, and it stands out amongst the broader market

Geographic ExpansionRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Kevin noted SERF acquisition benefit but strong underlying organic growth. Insignia hip stem not yet launched in Europe, suggesting more growth ahead.

is there anything in there, particularly in the extremities line, that we should think about in terms of the momentum you're seeing

Product LaunchRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Kevin highlighted Pangea as primary driver plus upper extremities delivering strong double-digit growth quarter after quarter since acquisition.

SOLVSolventum7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
SOLV company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I wonder if you could kind of speak to the health of the market, what you're seeing, again, ex the advanced orders

DemandCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Bryan said Solventum is not seeing procedure softness despite market noise; on proceeds, management biased to shareholder returns with some debt paydown and no large M&A.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Your comments suggest you are still holding the line on tariff assumptions for the year. Where is your head at on tariff refunds

Trade TariffsMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CFO holding $100-120M tariff estimate; no refunds booked; Q1 at high end quarterly. Gross margin expected closer to 56% for remaining quarters after strong Q1 slightly above 56%.

what did you see in terms of impact when you did that cutover that informs the U.S. plan? And how much of that 70 basis points was reflective of preparation

Supply ChainRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CFO clarified 70bps was mostly SKU/separation timing (registration cutovers), not ERP-driven; Asia Pacific ERP successful and in rearview; U.S. ERP not until Q3.

Calendar 2025 Q4

embedding for expectations on Acera, if you can provide any high-level commentary around it

Show response

CEO confirmed Acera is in $1B market growing 10%, positioned in faster-growing synthetics subcategory; healthy double-digit grower with strong profitability; force multiplier with existing commercial infrastructure.

how should we think about maybe what's contractually obligated over a certain time period or any other additional details

Competitive DynamicsCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CEO cited multi-year contracts, switching costs, compliance risk of errors, trust factor, and proprietary rules/algorithms as moats; views AI competitors as risking autonomous coding quality.

Calendar 2025 Q3

The program, the $500 million in cost weight, is that equal over the next 4 years? Is that upfront?

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CFO declined to provide cadence detail; spend will be dictated by multiple projects across the program's timeline.

it does imply a little bit of a lower growth profile in the back -- in the fourth quarter, excuse me

Revenue GrowthSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CFO clarified Q4 at ~2.5% includes residual IPSS order timing reversal; normalized for that, it's in line with prior quarters.

GEHCGE HealthCare4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
GEHC company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

I'm wondering how you think about the benefits of it? If there is increased business capture, does the growth profile of that business collectively change

Competitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Pete explained AIS builds on AVS model success. Primary goal is higher growth profile through better clinical/technical differentiation at street level and R&D allocation efficiency across cardiac/oncology pathways. Fewer organizational layers speeds decision-making. Near-term benefits expected in commercial execution; longer-term benefits from integrated product development.

Does your prioritization of capital deployment change in the face of some of these inflationary pressures

Capital AllocationM&ATranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Jay confirmed priorities unchanged: organic R&D investment first, disciplined M&A (Intelerad as example of strong ROIC), then share repurchase at attractive valuations. $100M repurchased in Q1. Pricing and new product momentum supporting long-term conviction. Good progress on working capital in the quarter.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Just maybe you can kind of bridge us, I think, in terms of the twenty-sixth guide to those medium-term targets

Guidance ReliabilityMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Jay outlined: NPIs plus Flyrcado expected to add 1-2pp of additional sales growth medium-term. Heartbeat driving higher-margin NPIs and SG&A optimization for 17-20%+ margin. Pete emphasized tariffs moved timeline back 1-2 years but aggressive mitigation underway. All new products carry higher gross margins than predicates.

The RPO and the, you know, specifically, service RPO was up really well

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Jay highlighted services grew 6% driven by price and volume. Enterprise agreements include multiyear service elements. AI remote fix improving capture rates. High equipment utilization driving service demand. Pete added new sophisticated products with higher-priced service contracts create flywheel effect.

ZBHZimmer Biomet4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 2 of 4 challenging
ZBH company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Is it your assumption that pricing headwinds will increase in orthopedics because of these dynamics?

ChallengingPricingRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Ivan said 20 quarters of the same pricing question have not materialized worse, the implant is only ~14-15% of ASC cost so the conversation is about the care episode not implant price, and 85% of the book is contracted with visibility into H2 and 2027.

Calendar 2025 Q4

the contribution this quarter was lower than we expected. And if I look at the outlook, for '26, I I think it's about a 100 basis points which, again, is is a little lower

ChallengingM&ARevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Ivan noted Paragon 28 came in ~20bps behind 270bps full-year target. Both quarters delivered upper single-digit organic growth. EPS dilution better than expected (~3% committed, came in slightly better). Committed to double-digit growth in 2026 with eight new product launches. Just held sales meeting in San Diego with high excitement.

Calendar 2025 Q2

talk to us about what specifically changed there from those past 2 quarters where it was maybe trailing behind some of your other peers

Competitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Ivan cited 150bps Q1-to-Q2 acceleration in U.S. Knees with July stronger still. Investments in DTP campaigns, leadership changes, territory restructuring, and evolved incentive plans. International knees impacted by EMEA tender shift to Q3. Expects strong international knee number in Q3. Additional upside from Oxford Partial Cementless and Persona Revision in 2026.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Can you just talk about it, Ivan, in terms of what's driving that, how durable

Revenue GrowthProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Ivan attributed growth to new products (organic and inorganic), specialized dedicated resources, and ASC investments. Upon Paragon closing, S.E.T. will be larger than Hips franchise.

HOLXHologic2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
HOLX company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

The $25 million is that three quarters worth of sales or is there some disruption assumed there?

Show response

Karleen confirmed $25M is simply three quarters of Gynesonics sales, consistent with $28M trailing annual run rate.

are you suggesting or implied in that would be a decline in units just in terms of unit volume

Revenue GrowthProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Steve expects both unit improvement and mix-driven price increases in FY2026 with the new gantry. Not ready to guide '26 but has clear line of sight to acceleration.

ISRGIntuitive Surgical2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
ISRG company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

maybe speak to the differences between the system placements versus what you saw with procedures this quarter

Capex InvestmentDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Jamie noted about half of US placements were trades, so installed base expansion moderated, while utilization grew a healthy 3%.

Calendar 2025 Q1

if you were to characterize the payer mix, particularly within the Medicaid population, what you could or could not be exposed to?

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Gary acknowledged Medicaid is in the procedure mix but not dominant, saying it's too soon to speculate on impact. Jamie noted it's too early for specific comments.

Show 1 more company
MDTMedtronic1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
MDT company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

it would seem that there is opportunity potentially for a gross margin step-up, particularly in the second half of 2027

MarginTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Pieton said roughly $65 million of tariff carryover hits Q1 and Q2 before lapping in H2; ex-tariffs, pricing lift and net cost-out continue. Mix drivers cut both ways: a MiniMed separation would lift gross margin, and CAS margin is improving. Overall gross margin is basically flattish, slightly up ex-tariffs, with better H2 performance, and growth drives operating-margin leverage via SG&A.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
SYK Stryker Corporation128%1 of 12 questions
SOLV Solventum70%none of 7 questions
GEHC GE HealthCare40%none of 4 questions
ZBH Zimmer Biomet450%2 of 4 questions
HOLX Hologic2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
ISRG Intuitive Surgical2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
MDT Medtronic1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • SYK
    Stryker Corporation · 12 questions
    8%1 of 12 questions
  • SOLV
    Solventum · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • GEHC
    GE HealthCare · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • ZBH
    Zimmer Biomet · 4 questions
    50%2 of 4 questions
  • HOLX
    Hologic · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • ISRG
    Intuitive Surgical · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • MDT
    Medtronic · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q430%none of 3 questions2
2025 Q130%none of 3 questions2
2025 Q2333%1 of 3 questions2
2025 Q340%none of 4 questions2
2025 Q4714%1 of 7 questions4
2026 Q160%none of 6 questions3
2026 Q2617%1 of 6 questions5
  1. 2024 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  2. 2025 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  3. 2025 Q23 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  4. 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
  5. 2025 Q47 questions · challenge rate 14% (1 of 7 questions) · 4 companies
  6. 2026 Q16 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 3 companies
  7. 2026 Q26 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 5 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Revenue Growth12
  • Margin6
  • Demand6
  • M&A6
  • Competitive Dynamics5
  • Regulation Policy4
  • Trade Tariffs3
  • Capital Allocation3
  • Guidance Reliability3
  • Innovation & R&D3
Show all 17 topics
  • Supply Chain3
  • Product Launch3
  • Capex Investment2
  • Pricing2
  • Geographic Expansion2
  • Cloud & AI1
  • Cost Pressure1