Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Sabahat Khan

RBC Capital Markets · covers Industrials

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).

Questions
38on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 38 questions
Companies
5questioned at least once
Reporting periods
9with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 38 of 38 questions from 5 companies

JJacobs Solutions12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 12 challenging
J company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

leverage is at about 2.1x, just above your sort of targeted year-end range

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Nathamuni confirmed plan to delever below 2x by fiscal year-end, reach 1.5x in FY2027. Second-half free cash flow expected at $600-700 million enabling both continued buybacks and debt paydown without balance sheet strain.

what is the line of sight to sort of projects? Is it 6 months, 12 months? Is it multiple years?

Show response

Pragada confirmed AI infrastructure pipeline up 400% YoY with visibility through FY2027-2028, driven by top hyperscalers and neo-cloud providers. NVIDIA relationship and Vera Rubin next-gen chip plan of record providing structural demand visibility.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Can you maybe just talk about is it a specific end market that's driving that?

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Pragada identified three recovery buckets: DoD programs for Navy and Army Corps now flowing through post-DOGE effects, FEMA disaster relief funding transfer settling at state level, and private sector environmental work picking up in industrial and life sciences applications.

walk us through kind of what's reflected in your guidance, what it would take to get to sort of closer to that higher end of the top line guide versus the lower end

Guidance ReliabilityRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Pragada identified backlog burn velocity in data centers and chip manufacturing as the primary driver for higher end of guidance, alongside international business growing 9%+ across Europe, Middle East, and APAC.

Calendar 2025 Q2

The top line is trending well. I think the operating profit, at least on a run rate basis, is trending quite a bit above

Revenue GrowthMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Pragada attributed PA momentum to U.K. government stabilization, defense/security transformation, 16% backlog growth, and double-digit U.S. growth in Life Sciences and Energy.

is there a view that some of this IIJA funding also accelerates in there? It sounds like it all needs to be more or less allocated by next year

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Pragada noted IIJA is only one-third spent with follow-on discussions underway, but growth confidence comes from backlog already in hand rather than speculative funding flows.

Calendar 2025 Q1

was that enough of a macro shock for some of your larger government customers that you deal with to start to think about maybe some level of stimulus spending

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Pragada confirmed federal DoD infrastructure pauses are reversing in the second half while state/local and global programs never stopped.

if across some of these end markets, you have seen some talk of reshoring related projects or initial discussions

Trade TariffsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Pragada confirmed active reshoring discussions in Life Sciences and semiconductors, with capital plans leaning toward the U.S., benefiting Jacobs' early-phase advisory positioning.

Calendar 2024 Q4

what you're hearing from your customers, what's reflected in your backlog in terms of the sentiment

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Pragada confirmed continued positive customer sentiment with double-digit pipeline growth across end markets despite political noise.

What are some of the initiatives that you've been able to execute on thus far from the time of the spin closing till now?

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Nathamuni cited cost controls, operating leverage, asset lifecycle mix improvement, and global delivery model as margin drivers, with Q2 dipping to low 13s before rebounding.

Calendar 2024 Q3

talk about kind of the -- kind of your focus on those regions? What drives you kind of to continue to be exposed there?

Geographic ExpansionDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Pragada emphasized local talent deployment for global delivery, with UK water never slowing and Middle East pipeline growing through Saudi Vision 2030.

would you say that range also builds in some buffer for maybe administration change or just kind of seeing how things evolve

Regulation PolicyGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Pragada stressed guidance reflects client-level activity tied to global secular trends, not political cycle assumptions. Nathamuni added guidance reflects most likely outcomes.

WMWaste Management12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 12 challenging
WM company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Could we maybe revisit your sort of medium-term outlook for that business?

M&ARevenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Fish reaffirmed medium and long-term optimism qualitatively; Morris added that cross-selling benefits will accrue outside the Healthcare segment. No numbers were given.

I guess what does the sort of the medium-term focus look like on the capital allocation front?

Capital AllocationM&ATranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Reed said the framework is unchanged, with a higher weighting to tuck-in M&A now that leverage is back inside the target range.

Calendar 2026 Q1

does this align more with a solid waste business where still made primarily a pricing driven? Just some comments on the long-term mix

Show response

Fish expects healthcare to become a balanced price-and-volume story by 2027 once front-half/back-half dynamics normalize. Volume improvement is the biggest opportunity.

would RINs and commodities maybe in a better position than we were a few months ago

PricingGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Hemmer confirmed $240-250M sustainability EBITDA target intact. Renewable energy pricing slightly better than anticipated but navigating utility interconnect delays. Reed confirmed second-half weighted EBITDA.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Can you maybe give us some perspective on the industrial activity has been weak for some time

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Jim noted industrial volumes bounced back to almost flat from -3-4% over prior 7-8 quarters. Residential shedding moderating to half by back-half 2026. Landfill and special waste remain strong. Economy on firm footing.

can you just talk about for '26, what you're sort of thinking on the pricing front, maybe some of the larger initiatives on the cost refinement

Show response

Jim detailed: customer service metrics now above Legacy Business. Credit memos peaked in Q4. 4.2% pricing but only 3% revenue due to lost account drag. Cross-selling at $50M EBITDA target, Jim would take the over based on area leader feedback.

Calendar 2025 Q2

What are you seeing into Q3 and maybe your expectations for the back half of the year

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jim confirmed industrial roll-off improving materially, C&D at positive 9.4%. Believes industrial recession has largely dissipated.

can you just give us some of the puts and takes to get the EBITDA margin still back into that midpoint

MarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Devina broke down 40bp margin raise: 30bp from C&D (mix + price/cost spread) and 10bp from recycling (lower commodity prices improving brokerage margin).

Can you just maybe update us on where you are on the resi improvement journey and maybe how much might be left there

Show response

John confirmed 70% of resi revenue at acceptable margins. Volume loss to moderate from 3.7% to ~2.7% by year-end. Residential optimization approaching final innings.

Calendar 2025 Q1

should we expect that to be the Q2 or Q3 to be the biggest quarter

M&AGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Devina confirmed second-half synergy ramp. HCM platform migration in Q3 unlocks SG&A value. SG&A improved 70bp sequentially in Q1, targeting 15% from 24%.

If you can just maybe talk about how those discussions are going, how -- if there's more volume to shed

Show response

John confirmed residential margin hit 20% milestone. Expects similar 3%+ negative volume through 2025 and into early 2026 as margin optimization continues.

Calendar 2024 Q4

what's the underlying view on the macro for the rest of the year and maybe more specifically on some of the more industrial or cyclical volumes

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Jim acknowledged industrial volume has been in recession, cautious on recovery but noted landfill MSW and special waste have been strong.

RSGRepublic Services9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
RSG company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

are you being pointed into direction of, look, these are customers that you previously weren’t pushing on price

Show response

CEO said AI now incorporates dozens of customer-specific variables to set an optimized long-term-value price, an order-of-magnitude step up from prior analytics.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Is it really just going to be on the environmental services side, kind of the magnitude of the event-driven volumes that really swing

DemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jon expects ES growth in 2026 even with conservative macro assumptions, noting the pipeline is building and the price-volume trade-off is being recalibrated.

How is the pipeline looking relative to kind of this year, obviously a big year this year

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jon described very full pipeline balanced across R&W and ES, tilted toward R&W, with exact timing of year-end vs Q1 closings TBD.

Calendar 2025 Q2

does that change the margin trajectory or the margin improvement journey you're on

Show response

Jon sees considerable multi-year margin runway from technical waste streams and post-collection infrastructure, cautioning against quarter-to-quarter measurement.

how are your discussions on pricing for next year going -- not looking for guidance, but just the acceptance of price

PricingTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jon confirmed tariff impact is de minimis, with a two-front strategy of pushing back on supplier surcharges and passing legitimate cost increases to customers.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Maybe if you could just start by commenting on maybe what you're seeing out there and maybe more cyclical parts of the overall business

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

John noted three years of negative cyclical demand led by construction and manufacturing, with March/April pickup after soft January/February.

comment on your outlook on 2025, the guidance metrics, any changes in the puts and takes on the top line or the margin guidance

Guidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

John explicitly reaffirmed guidance and noted seasonal demand in Q2/Q3 will determine full-year outlook, with update expected next quarter.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I think we're looking for four to come online. I think two came online. Is that just the timing thing

Capex InvestmentInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Jon confirmed the delay is a timing issue with a roughly 90-day rollover, with those projects expected online in Q1 2025.

how is the pricing sort of discussion with the clients going? Is there, you know, more pushback, less pushback at this point

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Jon noted pricing and cost inflation both moderating in tandem with spread maintained and retention rate very healthy.

URIUnited Rentals3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
URI company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Was this maybe a little bit of you waiting to see how the demand backdrop evolved? Or did something really inflect?

Guidance ReliabilityDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Matt said the project pipeline moved faster and deeper than even the raised April guide, giving confidence for the back half.

Calendar 2025 Q3

do you think the business or the industry needs some sort of a renewal to that IIJA program? Or is the industry just generally inflecting towards these larger mega projects

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Ted noted significant IIJA funding remains unspent. Country needs continued infrastructure investment regardless of funding source. Multiple tailwinds beyond infrastructure support outlook.

is there sort of an inflection point that you see in your business at which, look, larger projects are going to be stable at this space

Show response

Matt put repositioning costs in context at roughly 1% of operating costs. Large projects still offer comparable margins including extra transport burden. Planning and fleet positioning can improve efficiency.

DEDeere & Company2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
DE company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

what you are seeing in the EOPs, obviously the input costs are a big factor in the farmer decisions.

Cost PressureDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Management said input-price uncertainty persists globally but farmers remain resilient, are seeking alternatives, and stay focused on yield.

Calendar 2026 Q1

are you finding that this is more of a structural shift in the outlook that the farmers on the ground have maybe because of some of the trade issues easing

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Q1 beat largely from strong factory execution, not demand pull-forward. SA showing more caution from high rates, real appreciation, and election uncertainty. Positive offset: domestic consumption growth in both US (soybean crush, corn ethanol) and Brazil (domestic corn/ethanol use). Trade flow shifts creating puts and takes but strong underlying demand.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
J Jacobs Solutions120%none of 12 questions
WM Waste Management120%none of 12 questions
RSG Republic Services90%none of 9 questions
URI United Rentals30%none of 3 questions
DE Deere & Company2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • J
    Jacobs Solutions · 12 questions
    0%none of 12 questions
  • WM
    Waste Management · 12 questions
    0%none of 12 questions
  • RSG
    Republic Services · 9 questions
    0%none of 9 questions
  • URI
    United Rentals · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • DE
    Deere & Company · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q320%none of 2 questions1
2024 Q450%none of 5 questions3
2025 Q160%none of 6 questions3
2025 Q270%none of 7 questions3
2025 Q340%none of 4 questions2
2025 Q440%none of 4 questions2
2026 Q150%none of 5 questions3
2026 Q240%none of 4 questions3
2026 Q310%none of 1 question1
  1. 2024 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  2. 2024 Q45 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
  3. 2025 Q16 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 3 companies
  4. 2025 Q27 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 3 companies
  5. 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
  6. 2025 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
  7. 2026 Q15 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
  8. 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
  9. 2026 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand19
  • Pricing8
  • Guidance Reliability8
  • Regulation Policy7
  • Margin7
  • M&A6
  • Macroeconomic4
  • Capital Allocation3
  • Revenue Growth3
  • Cost Pressure2
Show all 16 topics
  • Cloud & AI2
  • Geographic Expansion2
  • Trade Tariffs2
  • Capex Investment1
  • Innovation & R&D1
  • Competitive Dynamics1