Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Scott Group
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 89on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 21%19 of 89 questions
- Companies
- 13questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 89 of 89 questions from 13 companies
PCARPaccar14 questions · 7 reporting periods · 3 of 14 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Is that change the way you think about what an upcycle could look like in terms of where orders and builds can go?
Show response
Feight pointed to freight tonnage levels, GDP growth and reshoring as the demand underpinning.
where do you think ultimately gross margins can get to relative to where they have been in prior cycles?
Show response
Feight spoke to product and footprint advantages but gave no quantified long-term margin target.
Calendar 2026 Q1
do you have a sense on the buy part of it—how much is fleet growth plans versus pent-up replacement
Show response
Management attributed demand to improving customer financials and fleet age normalization, with both replacement and growth elements
orders have doubled year to date versus a year ago, and you are still talking about a competitive pricing environment
Show response
Management pushed back that orders aren't the cleanest metric, pointing to 31.8% Q1 build share as better indicator of market position
Calendar 2025 Q4
do you have a sense is this more replacement, or is there any growth
Show response
Feight expects used truck values to rise further due to EPA 27 new truck price increases. Some temporary softness from CDL enforcement impact on used buyers.
If this is more of a supply-driven cycle with fewer drivers, how do you think about what that means for truck orders
Show response
Feight explained fewer non-compliant drivers improves rates for established carriers, boosting their profitability and truck purchasing ability.
Calendar 2025 Q3
the tariff surcharges effectively going to go away. But core pricing could should continue to move higher
Show response
Feight confirmed surcharges will be removed as stability returns. Normal pricing discussions resume, with cost favorability benefiting both parties.
Is that a good way to think about one? Q as we hit run rate as rebates, kind of offset some of the tariff costs
Show response
Feight confirmed margin improvement from December through Q1 2026 as tariff costs decline with 232 implementation.
Calendar 2025 Q2
can you just maybe try and quantify what the impact was in Q2
Show response
Feight confirmed Q2 tariff impact significantly less than $75M due to timing of implementation. Q4 depends heavily on Section 232 outcome.
where are we on the order book for '25? When do you Think you -- when do you open up '26
Show response
NA roughly 50% full for Q3, Europe mostly full. Big Beautiful Bill and regulatory clarity could drive closer-in order activity.
Calendar 2025 Q1
is this Q2 a timing issue was suggested earlier of full cost impact of tariffs, but timing and ability to price it
Show response
Feight confirmed Q2 margin pressure is primarily a timing issue of tariff costs hitting before pricing can fully catch up.
do you have any just directional color by region you can give
Show response
Feight confirmed US and Europe flat sequentially, with Mexico accounting for most of the delivery decline due to trade uncertainty.
Calendar 2024 Q4
this year, you think the market is flat to up, but the parts growth slows. So help me understand why we're not seeing a pickup
Show response
Feight explained parts growth is a tale of two halves like the overall business. Expects strengthening in second half tied to freight activity.
75% sold for the first quarter, half full for the second quarter. Just do you have any sort of context does that sort of about right
Show response
Feight confirmed normal backlog levels for this point in the cycle. No significant pre-buy order intake yet for 2H25/2026.
NSCNorfolk Southern Railway9 questions · 6 reporting periods · 3 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
do you feel like you need to add a lot of head count and other resources in order to get that service improvement.
Show response
Management addressed both headcount needs and gave a quantified Q3 margin seasonality outlook.
Calendar 2026 Q1
you've had months now to gather feedback. Anything that gives you more confidence in approval?
Show response
Mark expressed increased confidence in merger approval, citing stronger data and customer engagement. New application will strengthen the case for a single-line transcontinental railroad.
I see merchandise RPU ex fuel flat and so maybe you'll say it's mix, but just some thoughts
Show response
Ed attributed flat RPU ex fuel to mix from growth in lower-rated chemicals commodities like frac sand and NGLs, while core pricing remains strong and near-record levels.
Calendar 2025 Q4
anything from the STB process or rejection of the application, anything in there actually concern you as it relates to sort of ultimate merger approval odds?
Show response
CEO noted STB turn-back is typical for initial applications and they've been given a clear path to completeness. On pricing, 'fight for business' is a rallying cry not a pricing change, core pricing was very good in 2025 with strong merchandise yields. Seeking quality revenue, not discounting.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I think you said a 2-point drag in Q3 from some business losses related to the merger. And it sounds like it gets worse going forward. Is this just intermodal? Are you seeing it in any other places?
Show response
CMO confirmed merger-related volume losses concentrated in Southeast domestic non-premium intermodal, starting late Q3. Expects it to persist over next couple of bid cycles but confident NSC's superior route structure will win freight back. CEO emphasized impact was independent of merger itself.
I think that the $2 billion to $2.1 billion of cost, it's a relatively wide range on a quarterly basis. Any sort of more help in terms of where you think we could be in that range in Q4?
Show response
CFO pointed to 5-year seasonal average of ~1.5% Q3-to-Q4 expense increase. Headcount expected to step up slightly from below 19,500 toward Q4 2024 exit rate. Depreciation and purchase services to increase from capital work completion and IT managed services transition.
Calendar 2025 Q1
if we wake up and volumes are down 5% or something like do you think you can reduce head count and costs
Show response
CEO acknowledged NSC is not fully volume variable and declined to address specific 5% decline scenario, but emphasized extensive productivity runway, scenario planning, and ability to trim if pressures materialize.
The merchandise yields up 4% ex-fuel is that more about mix? Or is that sort of core price accelerating
Show response
CMO confirmed both favorable mix from chemical share gains and above-plan same-store pricing contributing to merchandise yield strength.
Calendar 2024 Q4
any color on how to think about the mix of volume versus yield
Show response
CMO confirmed growth across most markets with coal the main drag. Labor productivity has continued runway across all operating ranks beyond T&E, with 18.5% overtime reduction in Q4.
FDXFedEx7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 3 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Can you just give color on timing to sell the FedEx Freight stock?
Show response
Russ confirmed the 24-month tax-efficient monetization window and that Freight is excluded from guidance, but offered no further timing detail.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I don't think we're seeing this anywhere else in freight world. Like, I guess, I don't really understand why
Show response
Carere attributed growth to multi-year commercial retrench on B2B alongside world-class B2C proposition. 11 consecutive quarters of European share gains. Expects trends to continue in Q4 but will lap healthcare onboarding and international priority momentum. FY27 targeting 4% disciplined revenue growth.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Any way you can sort of break down that $600 million into the three buckets you laid out and maybe how much of that's in Q3
Show response
Dietrich broke down H2 $600M: ~$160M LTL softness, ~$175M MD-11 grounding, ~$265M variable compensation (majority in Q3). Q3 EPS sequentially lower than Q2 but Q4 expected to be strongest quarter of year.
Calendar 2025 Q3
now we've got 5% revenue growth and $1 billion of cost reduction and buyback, but earnings are flat. I guess, why aren't we seeing the better operating leverage
Show response
Dietrich explained $1B trade headwind across lost revenue opportunity, direct trade expenses ($300M), and base expense increases. Q2 expected to improve sequentially vs Q1 but not guiding to YoY direction.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Can you clarify how much of the $1 billion this year is Drive versus Network 2.0
Show response
Dietrich declined to split DRIVE vs Network 2.0 but committed to the $1B total. On earnings growth, framed it as demand-dependent: $3.40 at flat revenue, $3.70 at 1%, $4 at 2%. Subramaniam emphasized operating leverage from $4B cost reduction.
Calendar 2025 Q1
wondering if you want to share any thoughts on some of the puts and takes to think about for fiscal '26
Show response
Dietrich declined full FY26 guidance but shared helpful framing: ~$400M DRIVE annualization benefit, continued inflationary pressures, USPS headwind through Q2, and Network 2.0 savings ramping more in FY27. Confirmed LTL separation on track.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you just clarify what you're trying to communicate around Q3 expectations? And then on the LTL spend
Show response
CFO explained 18 months is consistent for this magnitude, confirmed USPS cost removal on track with 60% daytime flight hour reduction, and noted Q4 headwind will lessen.
ODFLOld Dominion Freight Line7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
clarify one thing on the 10% revenue growth for the third quarter. Does that assume sort of normal tonnage seasonality
Show response
Did not confirm the August and September seasonality assumption or give a timeline, instead framing 300 to 400 basis points of annual operating ratio improvement in a first big growth year.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Are you seeing that typical -- any of that typical spill from truckload back into LTL? And do you think a supply tightening in truckload means it's any different of a cycle
Show response
Adam confirmed truckload-to-LTL reversion is happening, cited specific large accounts that consolidated loads during weak TL market and are now reverting back to LTL.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you have a do you have a sense of of what's driving that? Is it are we starting to see some of the truckload stuff spill back?
Show response
Weight increase from both contract and mom-and-pop customers. TL-to-LTL spillover beginning to normalize. Revenue per hundredweight may face 50bp headwind from weight mix but revenue per shipment improves. January yield ex-fuel ~4%, normal seasonality would be 4-4.5%.
Calendar 2025 Q3
bigger picture, like how are you balancing like long-term pricing discipline versus what's going on with network density?
Show response
General discipline in industry. Yield ex-fuel up ~5% in October. EPS down less than half versus publicly traded peers. Cost control and yield discipline protecting OR better than competition.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Does that -- does the duration of this change your thoughts at all in any way?
Show response
Adam firmly defended strategy. Direct costs at 52-53% same as sub-70 OR in 2022. Overhead at 22% vs 17% is the gap. Industry down ~15% from 2022; ODFL performance aligned with industry. No fundamental strategy change needed.
Calendar 2025 Q1
the OR commentary you gave for Q2. I missed what the revenue assumption was. Were you saying that that's if revenue is basically flat from Q1 to Q2?
Show response
Q2 revenue range $1.4B (flat per day) to $1.5B (normal seasonality). Yield management consistent through downturn. Targets sub-70 OR long-term with overhead at 22% vs 17% in 2022.
Calendar 2024 Q4
last quarter, you sort of gave us a range of revenue outcomes. I don't know for the for Q4, right? I don't know if you have a similar thought around Q1
Show response
Adam framed Q1 revenue at $1.34B-$1.38B depending on seasonality performance. January yield up 4.5% partly driven by lower weight per shipment mix.
UALUnited Airlines Holdings7 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
The comment booked yields 14% higher for Q4. Like, any way to help us think, like, what that actually means
Show response
Nocella attributed the high booked-yield figure to a low leisure base; Leskinen tied 80 retirements to CASM tailwind.
Calendar 2026 Q1
why does the industry need a crisis to start pushing through such higher yields? Why can't we do it more sustainably?
Show response
Scott gave extensive answer: marketing teams better communicators than RM teams, internal pressure suppresses fare increases. Airfares in real terms down 27% vs pre-pandemic. Estimates keeping 20% of increase if normalized quickly, moving toward 80% the longer crisis lasts. Double-digit margins targeted for 2027.
Calendar 2025 Q4
help us think about price, costs this year given the momentum you've got right now
Show response
Mike acknowledged the math showing midpoint implies less than full point of margin. Guidance deliberately conservative after 2025's multiple asteroids. Explicitly signaled upside if trends continue.
Calendar 2025 Q3
what percentage of the EBITDA is it today? I just want to get a sense of the base
Show response
Mike declined specifics on loyalty EBITDA base or 2026 guidance but confirmed confidence in margin expansion and earnings growth in 2026. Kristina noted Investor Day will provide segment breakdown.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I didn't hear anything today about JetBlue and Blue Sky. Maybe just how you view that sort of driving your longer-term views
Show response
Scott emphasized strategic importance of JFK presence via JetBlue partnership, built-in frequent flyer base on both sides of Hudson, and return to JFK in 2027.
is there any way to quantify maybe how much of the 6-point improvement you're talking about is tied to Newark and how much is just broadly?
Show response
Andrew confirmed the 6-point swing is broad-based with Newark contributing more than the system average. Q4 RASM improvement expected primarily domestic.
Calendar 2024 Q4
what gives you the confidence in the duration part of the story? I guess what's the risk in your mind that as domestic pricing turns positive
Show response
Scott Kirby argued math of high airport costs makes ULCC profitability at major hubs structurally impossible.
UNPUnion Pacific Corporation7 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
Does the fact that we are taking this long. Does this give you any more or less confidence
Show response
Management gave an extensive, direct response expressing stronger conviction in the merger, citing customer benefits, employee job guarantees, and enhanced competition through seamless service.
Calendar 2025 Q4
your degree of confidence and approval here changed in in any way
Show response
Jim expressed unwavering confidence, arguing competitors only complain because they fear enhanced competition. He dismissed concerns about the walk-away red line disclosure, noting the STB wants it but he doesn't see its relevance to merger merits.
Calendar 2025 Q3
like do you think that rail opposition matters today, given all the other sort of puts and takes as it relates to this merger
Show response
Jim dismissed rail opposition as competitive anxiety, using the Starbucks analogy. Jennifer confirmed mix should be positive in Q4 but warned of tougher coal pricing comps ahead and continued weak truck market pressuring intermodal pricing.
Calendar 2025 Q2
any thoughts on second half operating ratio, second half price/mix as you sort of think about the business
Show response
Jennifer confirmed mix should improve in H2 as international intermodal declines, while Kenny attributed coal strength to natural gas pricing and LCRA wins.
Calendar 2025 Q1
it I would've thought it could've been, like, the perfect storm of, like, record kinda margin improvement when you just think about those three things
Show response
Jennifer confirmed mix and pricing together created a 250bp freight revenue drag, while Jim argued he'd prefer higher revenue with slightly worse OR over lower revenue with better OR.
Calendar 2024 Q4
consistent with attaining the long-term CAGR that seems carefully chosen language, just so we're all on the same page
Show response
Jim Vena directly confirmed the high single to low double-digit EPS growth target, emphasizing the team's commitment to delivering on Investor Day goals.
the pricing starting to become accretive to margin, is that -- does that start right away in Q1
Show response
Jennifer confirmed pricing was already accretive in Q4 2024, ahead of plan, and expects it to continue through 2025.
Show 7 more companies
WABWabtec7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
what's the timing for that multi-year backlog to start converting to revenue?
Show response
John quantified the growth split (acquisitions vs organic) and framed H1 organic at 5.5% as the cleaner read.
Calendar 2026 Q1
When you say similar to 1Q, what you're talking about the $270 million or more like the $250 million
Show response
John clarified Q2 will mirror Q1 in revenue growth, margin growth, and absolute EPS but without the non-operational benefits from currency and favorable tax timing.
how much, if any, is just assuming backlog of some of the acquisitions? Or is this all sort of net new orders?
Show response
John quantified Dellner's backlog contribution: ~3pp of 12.8% enterprise 12-month backlog growth, ~12pp of Transit 20.7% growth. Ex-Dellner ex-currency, 12-month backlog still in 8-8.5% range. Rafael highlighted continuing strong pipeline conversion across geographies.
Calendar 2025 Q4
can you just kind of go through that bit about the cash conversion and the guidance change and just the rationale there?
Show response
Rafael explained cash conversion averaged 99% over six years and 110% over last two years. Long-term target remains above 90% but pulling annual guide due to inherent variability especially with international deals.
this shift to more new, how do we think about the net impact to margins for that business and I guess bottom line?
Show response
Rafael confirmed global combined new and mods growing, but North America down driven by pronounced mod decline. EVO Advantage opens fleet of ~10,000 units with compelling payback. New locomotives making more headlines in investment decisions.
Calendar 2025 Q3
what quarter would you say is like the peak gross impact of tariff?
Show response
John acknowledged largest tariff impact still ahead, continuing to work cost-out plans, supplier mitigation, and pricing. Peak timing uncertain due to inventory flow-through complexity.
do you think those can go over the next couple of years?
Show response
Rafael framed transit margin expansion as continuous improvement journey from mid-teens target to high-teens, driven by better operations and portfolio evolution through exits and bolt-on acquisitions.
CSXCSX Corporation6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
do you think Merchandise price should be accelerating as well with Intermodal?
Show response
Maryclare reaffirmed same-store pricing better than last year and noted improvement in several markets, but declined to project 2027, calling it too early.
Calendar 2026 Q1
the $660 million, is this a good run rate? Or is there more opportunity to go on sort of fixing this PS&O line
Show response
Kevin confirmed more to come on PS&O but deflected specific Q2 margin, noting real estate gain won't recur and engine overhauls will be higher.
Calendar 2025 Q4
low single-digit revenue growth for the year any just sort of rough thoughts on volume versus yield in that
Show response
Mary Claire said modest volume growth with mixed market conditions. Steve acknowledged best-in-class margins are the goal but declined to give a specific long-term OR target, saying he wants a few quarters of execution evidence first.
Calendar 2025 Q3
is this cost opportunity Can we get back to a better pricing algorithm? Or are you just thinking more of a volume growth and operating leverage kind of story
Show response
Steve said all three levers matter, price yield, volume growth for operating leverage, and continuous improvement on operations. Acknowledged he hasn't put a specific number on margin improvement yet but targets some basis points per year.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Is there any way to like think about like the exit cost run rate relative to the average cost rate
Show response
Sean confirmed May/June better than April but said not to model significant sequential improvement. Kevin said domestic coal seeing more positive trends above plan with utilities at 40% utilization.
Calendar 2024 Q4
do you think we grow operating income this year or is that I get down a lot in the first quarter
Show response
Sean avoided a definitive yes/no, instead framing adjusted OI growth at lower end of mid-to-high single-digit Investor Day target, acknowledging coal and incentive comp as additional drags.
JBHTJ.B. Hunt6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
when intermodal pricing does start to turn, do you typically see it first in the East and transcon lags
Show response
Darren confirmed East moves faster than transcon as it competes more directly with highway. Brad Delco said he feels confident pricing will exceed core inflation (ECI, CPI) but uncertain when purchased transportation costs will settle, creating margin compression in JBT/ICS. Nick said March was very tight; April settled to typical levels; flatbed and temp still very tight; brokerage seeing double-digit contract rate increases.
Calendar 2025 Q4
why not? Like, it doesn't feel like you got a lot of price last year. Like, why wouldn't this be a year where you think you could be a little bit more aggressive
Show response
Darren explained early bid season is competitive westbound/backhaul business where they use lower cost-to-serve to grow volume. Brad Hicks recalled two years ago pushing price too aggressively when market didn't support it. Strategy is to sustain margin improvement through balanced growth while testing headhaul pricing opportunities.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how much of that do you think is the cost side of what you're talking about versus the yield side
Show response
Darren said peak surcharges were not the primary driver; Q3 peak demand off the West Coast was disappointing and program was adjusted mid-quarter. Network balance improvements and technology enhancements driving dray efficiency were sustainable contributors. Growing in imbalanced lanes is not inherently bad if pricing covers empty repositioning.
Calendar 2025 Q2
do you think are we at a point now where year over year intermodal margins can start improving or at least being flat
Show response
Darren framed margin repair as equal parts growth, cost takeout, and pricing. Brad Delco confirmed stabilization with modest improvement supportive language. Emphasized price is not the only margin lever.
Calendar 2025 Q1
do you have any, I know it'll be an estimate, but any sort of rough estimate of what percent of intermodal at some point originates overseas
Show response
Darren Field disclosed 20-30% of intermodal volume originates on West Coast but declined to estimate China-specific exposure. Said reducing capacity would not change pricing approach.
Calendar 2024 Q4
are we at least confident we are getting some degree of pricing increases
Show response
Darren Field expressed confidence in pricing improvement as truck rates rise but noted it remains a customer-by-customer conversation. Acknowledged bid season is too early to call.
UPSUnited Parcel Service6 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
So it seems like domestic margin improvement moderates a little bit in Q3, then reaccelerates again in Q4.
Show response
Dykes attributed the shape to normal seasonality; Tome answered the share question with capability differentiation rather than share data.
Calendar 2026 Q1
like should we assume that there is some sort of profit benefit from the higher fuel environment
Show response
Brian said fuel is not a profit windfall due to offsetting costs. Carol described H2 as the inflection point with meaningful margin expansion ahead driven by RPP/CPP spread and hub productivity at 20-year highs.
Help us think about where that can go over the next couple of years?
Show response
Carol said 2027 will be much better than 2026 based on underlying health. Hub productivity best in 20 years, automation at 67.5%, cost per piece 28% lower in automated buildings. SMB and health care driving stickiness.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is that number changing at all, bigger or smaller? And as we think about like the next wave of Amazon volume to come out, is it any different in terms of mix
Show response
Brian described physical building-by-building, lane-by-lane handover process working collaboratively with Amazon. Same cost buckets (variable, semi-variable, fixed) continue into 2026. Carol confirmed similar cost structure expected for next year, to be dimensionalized at Q4 earnings.
Calendar 2025 Q1
of the $3.5 billion, how much has been realized to date in Q1? And then, when I look at Q1, margins domestically improved 110 basis points
Show response
Brian attributed Q2 margin deceleration to tariff-driven SMB demand softness and chaos costs from closing 7% of U.S. buildings in the quarter.
Calendar 2024 Q4
would you characterize this as a mid-single digit margin, a low single digit, a no margin business
Show response
Carol declined to specify margin but called it 'extraordinarily dilutive.' Brian confirmed capacity will adjust one-for-one with volume drop, preserving pricing discipline.
LUVSouthwest Airlines5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 3 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
If I look at Q4 up 4% to 5% year over year, I think it is the biggest sequential Q3, Q4 increase maybe we have ever seen.
Show response
Justin says Q4 growth of 4.5% sits in points of strength expected to be profitable, but declines to discuss full-year 2027 capacity.
Calendar 2026 Q1
the industry -- this is the first sort of like big fuel spike where you guys aren't hedged and that's, sort of, helping the industry pass through fuel quicker
Show response
Bob acknowledged the pricing environment is stronger than expected and noted the $4 was a floor, not a range, the upper end was never disclosed. Structural cost discipline (CASM-X 2.3% with 1.2pt seat removal headwind) is also helping. On hedging, the industry being collectively unhedged drives more aggressive fare action.
Calendar 2025 Q4
usually when an ancillary goes up, fare goes down historically, what do you think is sort of different here
Show response
Bob explained seat ancillaries are a separate decision from fare purchase, occurring later in the customer journey. The approach is offering choice and buy-up opportunities rather than raising fares across the board. Tom confirmed extra legroom and seat assignments enhance unit revenues.
Calendar 2025 Q3
The guide has $300 million of incremental EBIT. So call it, $1.5 billion gap. Like do you think we should contemplate something similar next year
Show response
Bob explained the gap is entirely macro-driven: base business was down ~6pts at worst, has recovered materially but not fully. Tom added that as they move to EPS-guided range in 2026, initiatives net into the total rather than being separately quantified. Cost savings that seem 'initiative' become standard budgeting efficiencies.
Calendar 2025 Q2
am I looking at this right that you're implying closer to like 4% capacity growth in the fourth quarter?
Show response
Andrew explained Q4 year-over-year growth reflects an abnormally low Q4 2024 comp. Sequentially Q3-to-Q4 only up 1pt. Capacity is being placed in peak periods (October, November, December). November and December schedules not yet finalized with further reductions possible. Full year still targeting seats up 1%, trips down ~2%.
CHRWC.H. Robinson4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
You mentioned 3% gross profit growth in June. Is that you think a good run rate to use
Show response
Damon declined to extrapolate the monthly GP cadence, calling it just a data point; Michael attributed strong LTL to fuel benefit, share gains, and complex-shipment mix.
Calendar 2025 Q4
when you guys talk about demonstrable market share growth, is this sort of high single-digit spread versus CAS what you have in mind
Show response
CFO said demonstrable isn't limited to CAS outperformance, no cap on future market share. On personnel math, productivity defined as shipments per person per day differs from dollar savings due to benefits inflation, employee rewards, and cost avoidance from outgrowth. Committed to double-digit productivity and $6 EPS with high confidence.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I think I heard you say SG&A for the year is going to be above the midpoint. If I'm looking at this right, that's like a $20 million, over a $20 million increase from Q3 to Q4
Show response
CFO said $20M is high; SG&A has non-linear project spend. September down 9% driven by ocean rate normalization which will continue through Q4. Q4 and Q1 will be challenging for Global Forwarding on both volume and rates.
Calendar 2025 Q2
any color you can give us on NAST and forwarding trends and to start Q3 or any way how to think about just normal seasonality
Show response
NAST Q3 typically flat to Q2. No productivity floor expected; agentic AI to create further opportunities. Global Forwarding Q3 outlook uncertain due to tariff negotiations and consumer confidence.
DALDelta Air Lines4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 2 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
about a point of the revenue growth in Q3 was from MRO, maybe a little help from cargo. Is that sort of sustainable into Q4?
Show response
Dan said full-year MRO growth is 20-30% range with many years of double-digit growth ahead. Q4 MRO likely closer to flat year-over-year. Cargo growth of 19% won't sustain into Q4 but should still be positive. Some choppiness entering Q4.
we've never really seen that before. I guess, you exclude CrowdStrike last year. I guess I'm trying to understand, do you think this is just the new seasonality that makes Q4 a lot stronger?
Show response
Glen attributed Q4 strength to premium demand and corporate travel being in season, with favorable calendar effects. Acknowledged Q3 Transatlantic underperformance means some upside exists for next year's Q3.
Calendar 2025 Q1
as others expand their premium product and some mix changes like bag fees and things like that. How do you think about the risks
Show response
Glen argued competitors face greater capital constraints now, making premium investment harder, while Delta's 20 years of loyalty and service investment widens its lead.
if you look at historically in a downturn, International can be down more than domestic. And I know there's been some questions about this
Show response
Glen reported transatlantic cash sales up significantly year-over-year through summer. Ed noted core customer has household income $100K+ with $35T accumulated wealth since 2019.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| PCAR Paccar | 14 | 21%3 of 14 questions |
| NSC Norfolk Southern Railway | 9 | 33%3 of 9 questions |
| FDX FedEx | 7 | 43%3 of 7 questions |
| ODFL Old Dominion Freight Line | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| UAL United Airlines Holdings | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| UNP Union Pacific Corporation | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| WAB Wabtec | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| CSX CSX Corporation | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| JBHT J.B. Hunt | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions |
| UPS United Parcel Service | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions |
- PCARPaccar · 14 questions21%3 of 14 questions
- NSCNorfolk Southern Railway · 9 questions33%3 of 9 questions
- FDXFedEx · 7 questions43%3 of 7 questions
- ODFLOld Dominion Freight Line · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- UALUnited Airlines Holdings · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- UNPUnion Pacific Corporation · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- WABWabtec · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- CSXCSX Corporation · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- JBHTJ.B. Hunt · 6 questions17%1 of 6 questions
- UPSUnited Parcel Service · 6 questions17%1 of 6 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 11 | 27%3 of 11 questions | 9 |
| 2025 Q1 | 11 | 18%2 of 11 questions | 8 |
| 2025 Q2 | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions | 9 |
| 2025 Q3 | 17 | 35%6 of 17 questions | 13 |
| 2025 Q4 | 13 | 23%3 of 13 questions | 11 |
| 2026 Q1 | 15 | 27%4 of 15 questions | 11 |
| 2026 Q2 | 11 | 9%1 of 11 questions | 10 |
- 2024 Q411 questions · challenge rate 27% (3 of 11 questions) · 9 companies
- 2025 Q111 questions · challenge rate 18% (2 of 11 questions) · 8 companies
- 2025 Q211 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 11 questions) · 9 companies
- 2025 Q317 questions · challenge rate 35% (6 of 17 questions) · 13 companies
- 2025 Q413 questions · challenge rate 23% (3 of 13 questions) · 11 companies
- 2026 Q115 questions · challenge rate 27% (4 of 15 questions) · 11 companies
- 2026 Q211 questions · challenge rate 9% (1 of 11 questions) · 10 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Margin30
- Pricing28
- Demand25
- Revenue Growth18
- Competitive Dynamics15
- Cost Pressure15
- Guidance Reliability10
- M&A8
- Trade Tariffs6
- Capital Allocation4
Show all 16 topics
- Macroeconomic4
- Geographic Expansion3
- Labor Market3
- Supply Chain3
- Regulation Policy1
- Capex Investment1