Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Scott Gruber
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 59on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 8%5 of 59 questions
- Companies
- 10questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 59 of 59 questions from 10 companies
SLBSchlumberger13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 13 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
How are you thinking about the durability of the exploration cycle? Is this just a reaction to the higher crude prices?
Show response
Management framed exploration as a multi-year energy security and reserve replacement trend rather than a one-quarter crude price reaction.
You mentioned the Middle East getting back to, I think it was $2.1 billion to $2.2 billion in 4Q, 95% of last year.
Show response
CEO walked through Middle East recovery, year-end digital and product sales, and data center as the Q4 bridge; CFO added the Middle East scenario math.
Calendar 2026 Q1
In a world where code writing becomes easier and more commoditized, can you speak to the resilience of the value-add of your Digital portfolio?
Show response
Emphasized domain depth and AI integration as durable differentiators, noting use cases in drilling automation and autonomous ESP production workflows.
with an outlook for higher oil prices, at least over the medium term, how does that impact the Digital business?
Show response
Linked higher oil prices to increased discretionary tech spend, faster dataset purchases, and accelerated platform deployment decisions.
Calendar 2025 Q4
can you sustain similar growth rates for a couple of years into the future at a CapEx level that's still broadly around $2.5 billion
Show response
Stephane confirmed CapEx-to-revenue ratio staying at low end of 5-7% range. Production recovery and digital growth require less CapEx. Will increase if needed but expect it to come with increased cash flow.
does the billion-dollar target capture any of that international growth opportunity? Or would that be future upside?
Show response
Olivier confirmed international expansion beginning in Asia this year with modular manufacturing, plus Middle East in near future. US remains the hot market with the most exciting 2026-2027 pipeline.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you talk about the strategy for the business? Is the aim here to develop a skill set and take it global
Show response
Olivier confirmed plans to expand geographically (Asia pipeline agreed), diversify to more hyperscalers and collocators, broaden technology offering. Very low CapEx intensity.
Calendar 2025 Q2
How would you dimension both the underlying growth for the production market and then how you can enhance that growth with revenue synergies
Show response
Olivier described a growing OPEX-driven market that will outpace global CapEx, combining artificial lift, production chemicals, intervention, digital, and subsurface integration.
can you push that free cash conversion rate toward something like a 60% level on a sustained basis?
Show response
Stephane confirmed CapEx is at maintenance level (low end of 5-7% range), targeting >10% free cash flow margin. ChampionX will further reduce capital intensity.
Calendar 2025 Q1
do you think you can get the EBITDA margin back to the 25% level in the second half? You know, excluding the impact of ChampionX?
Show response
Olivier affirmed 25% full-year EBITDA margin ambition excluding ChampionX and tariff escalation, acknowledging tariffs are a headwind to H2 expansion.
How do you think about the resilience of digital growth in this environment? We continue to think about that
Show response
Olivier maintained mid-to-high-teens digital growth target, citing secular digital adoption trends decoupling from upstream CapEx.
Calendar 2024 Q4
do you expect a normal sequential improvement in 2Q, or the second half of the year is going to be a little bit higher weighted?
Show response
Olivier described typical seasonal pattern with low Q1, Q2 rebound, and H2 higher activity with potential deepwater upside.
Have you ever had a chance to digest the latest sanctions' language and I think you may provide an update of just to the kind of overall contribution
Show response
Olivier stated Russia revenue declined to 4% of global revenue, and SLB's voluntary measures align with new U.S. sanctions.
HALHalliburton12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
should we be thinking about a couple years of above normal incrementals? For Halliburton in 2027 and 2028?
Show response
Miller endorsed above-normal incremental expectations for 2027-2028 as consistent with his own view and possible given technology wins and Middle East recovery.
Are mobilization and start-up costs, you know, a significant weight on margins, today?
Show response
Carre acknowledged contract wins elevated mobilization costs creating some margin headwinds but could not quantify the exact impact; Miller added North America pricing is improving under the hood.
Calendar 2026 Q1
do you see international shale opportunities outside of Argentina utilizing more Zeus fleets given the efficiency advantage
Show response
Slocum explained Zeus deployment requires scale, runway, and recovery focus, conditions present in Argentina but not yet in most other international shale markets. Same capital discipline as U.S. deployment: first-contract cost recovery required.
Can you dimension that at all for us
Show response
Slocum confirmed fleets coming in now with more through year-end and into next year. Equipment moving from N.A. with good pricing and sustainable programs. Declined to quantify size or margins specifically.
Calendar 2025 Q4
How do the prospective returns on these power projects compare to your organic investments
Show response
Carre described power projects as long-term, low-risk contracts. Based on N.A. comparable, returns likely higher than current oilfield returns. Acknowledged it depends on country and competition.
walk through some of the items that will impact cash conversion this year
Show response
Carre acknowledged many moving parts. Collections been great through 2025. Mexico collections improving. Too early for detailed 2026 FCF projection.
Calendar 2025 Q3
do you think you can still deliver the share gains in D&E and T&P with the $1 billion budgets next year
Show response
Miller gave emphatic one-word confirmation. Prior context noted technology investment cycles matured, iCruise, Zeus rollout largely complete, so less capital needed to maintain growth trajectory.
kind of where do you stand in that process? Was it more weighted to kind of 3Q or would idling be more weighted to 4Q
Show response
Miller noted idling occurred late Q3 with some continuing into Q4. Idled fleets will stay idle until margins recover. N.A. expected to be first market to snap back, fleets kept available.
Calendar 2025 Q2
is there a plan to pause the ZEUS fleet expansion either in the second half or next year
Show response
Miller confirmed Zeus build is demand-driven and expects slowdown having achieved ~50% fleet target. CapEx expected at lower end going into 2026. Confirmed ~$40-45M per fleet ballpark.
is there any of the mobilization expense and contract start-up costs that weighed on 2Q? Is there an element of those costs still impacting 3Q
Show response
Carre detailed three Q3 D&E margin drivers: software improvement, directional drilling strength, and mobilization cost elimination. Also noted Saudi headwinds and drilling/completion cycle shifts.
Calendar 2025 Q1
What's the end game here with VoltaGrid, do you intend to just keep it as an equity investment or are you interested in ultimately becoming the majority owner
Show response
Miller positioned VoltaGrid as optionality without predetermined direction. Emphasized prudence and Halliburton's careful strategic approach. Declined to commit to specific path.
Can you just speak to the need for spending above DD&A, is that really helping to drive the share gains that you're targeting
Show response
Carre explained CapEx as self-regulating via revenue percentage. Noted 2025 CapEx reflects 2024 orders so limited near-term flexibility. Tariff impact on CapEx cost also flagged.
CTRACoterra8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you talk about your thoughts around running room to block up your positions in Lea and Eddy counties and the timing of doing so in a competitive market? And just how important is that in terms ...
Show response
Gruber probed Northern Delaware acreage blocking strategy. Sirgo explained acquisitions created foothold for trades and small deals focused on maximizing DSU size, wells per section, and lateral lengths.
does the well mix in the Delaware stay broadly the same in '26 kind of as you see it today?
Show response
Gruber asked about 2026 well cost trajectory and mix in Delaware. Deshazer confirmed continued cost compression from consistent rigs, frac fleets, longer laterals, and larger pad development.
Calendar 2025 Q2
would the preference be to maintain those 9 rigs in the Permian for that operational consistency.
Show response
Blake confirmed preference for operational consistency at $50 oil with lower service costs offsetting. Tom reframed discussion around completion crews not rigs, and Shane noted 50% reinvestment rate provides absorption headroom.
are you thinking about applying that well design -- the new enhanced well design across Culberson out of an abundance of caution?
Show response
Blake Sirgo explained it involves cement design changes, casing designs, and set points specific to field location. Focus is on ensuring mechanical isolation everywhere, not a blanket redesign.
Calendar 2025 Q1
what would happen to the '26 if oil follows the curve here in the high 50s. Do you end up maintaining 7 active rigs in the Permian?
Show response
Tom Jorden avoided specific rig count guidance for 2026, focusing instead on the distinction between structural weakness and temporary disruption. Described their stance as conservative but hopeful they are overreacting.
what's the reasonable expectation for when those volumes could come back if the remediation work is successful?
Show response
Tom Jorden acknowledged workovers will take months as a large campaign to work through all affected wells, with multiple remediation approaches being tested.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you talk about the path to close the cost gap? Yeah. You think about that three-year plan, can we see that cost gap closed materially?
Show response
Blake Sirgo outlined the plan to replicate Culberson economies of scale in Lee County, citing owned midstream assets, power optimization, and building a large contiguous block as foundations.
if gas does stay constructive, let's say it's $4 along the curve and oil's kinda flattish at $70. How would you allocate gross dollars between the Marcellus and then Anadarko
Show response
Tom Jorden emphasized pure returns-based allocation, noting Anadarko assets also have NGL optionality that can make returns competitive depending on pricing, so it remains a dynamic competition.
BKRBaker Hughes7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Can you unpack that opportunity set for us a bit more? What are some of the near term opportunities that you see?
Show response
Direct. Named data centers and gas infrastructure as the near term cross sell, then space, geothermal and mining as underappreciated Chart adjacencies.
Calendar 2026 Q1
can you unpack the 2Q guide for us a bit more? IET usually sees a nice step-up in revenues and margins in 2Q, but the guide is a bit more flattish
Show response
Ahmed broke down Q2 by segment. OFSE: Middle East down 20%+ sequentially, product sales hit harder by logistics. IET: modest conflict impact on GTE shipping, GTS overdue backlog benefit tempers usual 1Q-2Q step-up. Company EBITDA expected flat QoQ.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you walk through some of the moving pieces within that guide? Which segments are seeing some growth which may be down some?
Show response
Lorenzo identified 2026 order drivers: power systems growth from $2.5B foundation, data center intake rising toward $3B target, gas infrastructure expansion, new energy targeting $2.4-2.6B, and LNG consistent with recent years. Non-LNG orders at 20%+ CAGR.
Calendar 2025 Q3
can you provide some more color on what you can do now through the early close period to really accelerate the time to full synergy capture
Show response
Ahmed detailed 14 dedicated work streams focused on systems, supply chain, commercial, and operations integration. Led by Jim Apostolides with 25 years of M&A integration experience. $325M cost synergies targeted. Close expected mid-2026.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Can you just unpack the drivers of the margin performance a bit more? And as we start to think about '26, your confidence level in hitting the 20% mark in IET?
Show response
Ahmed detailed OFSE margin drivers (rightsizing, removing duplication, price discipline). IET margins expanded 190bps despite 40bps tariff headwind. Business system in third year driving structural improvement. Both confirmed 20% targets.
Calendar 2025 Q1
How much mitigation is embedded in the $100 million to $200 million impact? And is there an ability to squeeze that figure lower over time
Show response
Ahmed detailed limited U.S. import exposure (<5%), mitigation via centralized coordination hub, leveraging global supply chain, free trade agreements, duty drawback programs, and contractual pass-throughs.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Can you just update us on the puts and takes on the conversion rate? Your margins are getting better
Show response
Nancy cited three FCF conversion drivers: working capital efficiency (collections, inventory turns), tax rate optimization (cash and book rate declining), and structurally higher margins flowing through. Confident in 50% conversion path.
DVNDevon Energy6 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
can you discuss your AI strategy between in-house development versus third-party sourcing?
Show response
Trey Lowe said Devon has invested in data sets for a decade; Coterra's AI well-prediction models complement Devon's operational AI, with partnerships on specific applications but the core advantage being employee empowerment and speed of deployment (few wells to 1,000+ closed-loop gas lift).
Calendar 2026 Q1
I am thinking about where you could deploy some extra cash. I think about refracs in the Eagle Ford or even the Bakken in this environment
Show response
Clay explained refracs now compete with new wells due to improved D&C costs; highlighted early EOR/surfactant projects with impressive returns accruing to LOE rather than capital side.
Do you push harder on EUR or deploy more into AI and try to accelerate incorporation of those technologies into your operations?
Show response
Clay clarified surfactants and AI investments are relatively small; billions of FCF are for dividends, buybacks, and debt repayment, board-level capital allocation decisions with new combined entity.
Calendar 2025 Q3
How does that split? And we see your LOE rolling lower. How should we think about the LOE cost in '26?
Show response
John explained $150M production optimization is essentially all production uplift so far; LOE improved 6% YoY but lags; expect ongoing reductions in 2026.
should we think about the '25 TIL count kind of less 20 as a starting point for '26?
Show response
Clay declined specific TIL detail but pointed to 2025 current guide as starting point; no deflation assumed in 2026 preliminary.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Does the improvement in the output drive you to shift higher how you think about the maintenance level of production in '26
Show response
Clay confirmed mid-380K bpd remains target; production wins accrue to lower capital not higher volumes.
FANGDiamondback Energy5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
How do you think about Diamondback volumes, say, over the next 5 to 10 years on an organic basis
Show response
CEO confirmed in 70+ WTI world, couple percentage points organic growth adds to NAV and long-term FCF. Macro conditions now supporting hitting organic growth accelerator.
how would you describe the kind of underlying trend in capital efficiency especially as you lap the impact of the doctor
Show response
CEO separated DUC noise from fundamentals: drilling records across all lateral lengths, $300/ft achieved (from $360), Barnett already under $400/ft. Better subsurface results driving long-term gains.
Calendar 2025 Q2
you guys realized a good bit of savings this year following the one Big Beautiful Bill
Show response
Jere outlined 2025 cash tax rate of 15-18% (down from 19-22%) with ~$200M one-time benefit, normalizing to 18-20% in 2026.
How big will that be at the end of the year? And what's the strategy kind of going into '26 with the excess stocks
Show response
Kaes said they'd be comfortable down to high 100s-200 DUCs but prefer maintaining flexibility; drilling efficiency may prevent any net DUC drawdown by year-end.
Calendar 2025 Q1
do you see the technology and process efficiency gains slowing from here or are the geologic headwinds becoming more severe
Show response
Travis acknowledged geological headwinds are outpacing efficiency gains as the basin matures, with gains now measured in pennies vs dimes/quarters in prior years.
Show 4 more companies
EOGEOG Resources3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how do you think about the proper return hurdle for commerciality in the Middle East, especially relative to the U.S.?
Show response
Ezra said the operating environment and partner relationships are built into risk-adjusted returns, and the conflict stress-tested partnerships favorably.
Calendar 2025 Q1
What’s your view of additional oil opportunities around Trinidad?
Show response
Jeff said Beryl oil target was identified using advanced seismic tools before drilling. Geologic factors like depth and source rock position determine oil vs gas. More opportunities expected leveraging shallow water expertise.
Can you provide some color on what drove the beat in 1Q?
Show response
Jeff cited lower LOE from reduced workover expense and strong base production with less downtime from field technology and control room automation. G&A down on lower headcount needs from operational efficiency.
APAAPA Corporation2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
is that acreage surprising of the positive? Or are the drilling efficiencies making legacy acreage even more attractive
Show response
Christmann said NM assets were good rock but small, scattered, and non-op, didn't compete for capital vs. core Texas Delaware/Midland assets. Rodgers confirmed mid-to-high 5x EBITDA, proceeds for debt paydown.
some more color on those initiatives, whether there's CapEx associated and what kind of time line should we think about
Show response
Riney acknowledged LOE plan was ambitious with inflationary pressures in compression and water. Some savings may involve capital investment, some commercial renegotiation. Will be meaningful part of $350M target but takes longer.
OXYOccidental Petroleum2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
Is shale EOR economically viable now at current crude prices and with the 45Q enhancement
Show response
Hollub confirmed shale EOR is economical based on 4 pilots that outperformed models. Delaware Basin project planned within 1-2 years. Constraint is CO2 availability, not economics. Also testing CO2 EOR in North Oman.
does the potential JV and contribution from XRG tilt you towards sanctioning that project
Show response
Hollub confirmed FID intention for South Texas facility with DOE grant support. Will incorporate carbon engineering R&D innovations from STRATOS Phase 2. Pre-selling CDR credits before FID, similar to STRATOS.
EQTEQT Corporation1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
Are you hearing about an interest in fixed-price deals? Is that picking up? And obviously, it's all price-dependent
Show response
Jeremy cautioned that fixed-price deals risk undervaluing gas long-term as Haynesville depletes, preferring index-plus structures but remaining open to portfolio approaches.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| SLB Schlumberger | 13 | 15%2 of 13 questions |
| HAL Halliburton | 12 | 8%1 of 12 questions |
| CTRA Coterra | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions |
| BKR Baker Hughes | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| DVN Devon Energy | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| FANG Diamondback Energy | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions |
| EOG EOG Resources | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| APA APA Corporation | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| OXY Occidental Petroleum | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| EQT EQT Corporation | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- SLBSchlumberger · 13 questions15%2 of 13 questions
- HALHalliburton · 12 questions8%1 of 12 questions
- CTRACoterra · 8 questions13%1 of 8 questions
- BKRBaker Hughes · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- DVNDevon Energy · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- FANGDiamondback Energy · 5 questions20%1 of 5 questions
- EOGEOG Resources · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- APAAPA Corporation · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- OXYOccidental Petroleum · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- EQTEQT Corporation · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q1 | 13 | 23%3 of 13 questions | 8 |
| 2025 Q2 | 12 | 0%none of 12 questions | 7 |
| 2025 Q3 | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q4 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q1 | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q2 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 5 |
- 2024 Q45 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q113 questions · challenge rate 23% (3 of 13 questions) · 8 companies
- 2025 Q212 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 12 questions) · 7 companies
- 2025 Q38 questions · challenge rate 13% (1 of 8 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q45 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q19 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q27 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 5 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Capex Investment17
- Margin14
- Innovation & R&D12
- Capital Allocation12
- M&A8
- Geographic Expansion8
- Cost Pressure8
- Demand8
- Competitive Dynamics6
- Cloud & AI6
Show all 16 topics
- Revenue Growth6
- Pricing4
- Regulation Policy3
- Macroeconomic2
- Guidance Reliability2
- Trade Tariffs1