Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Scott Hanold
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 59on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 2%1 of 59 questions
- Companies
- 7questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 59 of 59 questions from 7 companies
EXEExpand Energy13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 13 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
compare and contrast the advantages of this more commercial strategy for integration versus owning midstream assets
Show response
Mike stressed Expand is not a midstream company and prefers the capital-light commercial route to premium markets.
Calendar 2026 Q1
How do you think about the ideal allocation reaching to those various end users?
Show response
Mike framed it as timing-driven: LNG first (facilities under construction, FIDs done), industrial second (big projects but FIDs not yet seen), power third (everywhere but generation equipment timing uncertain). International markets more optimistic about LNG demand than domestic consensus.
how competitive is it? Is it tough to be able to contract in this market given the heightened nature of it?
Show response
Dan differentiated supply-side (long-term SPAs at cost of liquefaction, available now) from sales-side (relationship-driven, long-term contracts). Short-term spot strip priced to perfection on Gulf Coast, but they are building for the long term with portfolio approach to contract types and tenures.
Calendar 2025 Q4
would that also contemplate looking at more of an integrated operation, such as going out and actually owning midstream to be more integrated?
Show response
Mike said partnerships preferred over outright midstream acquisition. LCM deal has a Momentum-type component. Need to get to end-use customers through partnerships rather than buying gathering systems.
Can you give us a sense of what drove that? Is that part of the OBDD from last year?
Show response
Brittany confirmed OBDD benefit driving low cash taxes. Expects stair-step increases in cash tax rate over the next few years to become full cash taxpayer closer to 2030.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Do you -- what other kind of facets are important for us to focus on? And then trying to figure out, like is there a greater position for you to build out there?
Show response
Josh said 75,000 net acres is about the right size given overall inventory depth. Some opportunity to build incrementally but nothing material. Selected area has much less structural complexity compared to steeply dipping beds further west in East Texas.
Could you give us a little bit of color on exactly what you're tweaking within that?
Show response
Josh declined to detail specific completion recipe but highlighted self-sourced sand as biggest differentiator, lower cost, controlled supply, enables higher proppant loading. Historically third-party sand suppliers struggled to keep up with increasing completion efficiency.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Can you talk about Expand's strategy? And what are your goals that you're looking for in a commercial agreement? And how do you think about the pricing mechanism for that?
Show response
Nick outlined multiple contract structures under consideration including direct sales, partnerships, and tolling. Dan Turco emphasized three pillars: accessing premium markets, structuring for lower cash flow volatility while retaining upside, and building portfolio-level integration and optionality.
Do you feel there's a need to be -- do you have some urgency in signing deals? And then with respect to, again, the commercial side of the agreement, if I look at, like, say, an LNG opportunity, wo...
Show response
Nick emphasized no urgency, looking at domestic and international sales in various forms. Key focus on risk-reward, protecting downside while participating in upside. Conversations ongoing across different areas and time frames.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Can you give me a sense of, with your discussion with investors, how do they view the variable dividend
Show response
Chris Ayres noted strong investor reception for both mechanisms. Variable dividends provide embedded TSR through cycle; buybacks drive per-share accretion. Expect combination going forward.
If the gas market does break down, would you go ahead and spend that and build to that productive capacity or would you defer the spending to next year
Show response
Nick separated capital decisions (based on mid-cycle) from production decisions (based on near-term market). In a weak near-term/strong long-term scenario, would continue spending but curtail production.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you talk about how -- what percentage of that is in the activity over the next couple of years? And just give us a sense of the relative economics
Show response
Josh detailed 60-65% Haynesville weighting, 45% lower/rest upper in NE. Both Bossier and Haynesville offer strong returns with similar productivity.
If you start building this productive capacity in these wells to bring on -- and let's say, the winter doesn't pan out. What happens in 2026
Show response
Nick emphasized flexibility to hold back TILs or curtail volumes, noting the company proved this capability in 2024 and would also adjust capital allocation if macro conditions change.
EOGEOG Resources11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how do you kind of compare and contrast opportunities up in Canada?
Show response
Ezra flagged egress as the key challenge in Canada while noting a robust Lower 48 opportunity set and renaissance in Alaska.
Calendar 2026 Q1
As you look ahead, is there further opportunity to build on that, or are these more countercyclical decisions
Show response
Jeff noted Cheniere deal terms hard to replicate but team continues looking for unique ways to price gas internationally. Emphasized scale and balance sheet as negotiating advantages.
could you give us a view of how you think about variable dividends
Show response
Ezra said special dividends remain in toolkit but shifted preference toward buybacks over past three years. On going above 70%, noted desire to build cash for countercyclical investment.
Calendar 2025 Q4
do you think some of the relative performance that people are being concerned about is because you all have been able to move faster to these secondary zones than peers
Show response
Ezra said primary target performance is relatively consistent. Acknowledged the development strategy shift heading into 2025 could have been better communicated externally. Additional zones unlocked by extreme cost reductions coming off 2023 industry highs.
Could you give a sense of other things that you all may be working on or considering, supply decrements, industrial users, or power data center users
Show response
Ezra said U.S. electricity demand grew ~2% in 2025 with prices up 6.5%, forecast 1-3% CAGR. South Texas (Dorado) offers open space, water, gas, fiber, and storm protection for data centers. Still early on multi-decade contract negotiations with construction timelines pushing right.
Calendar 2025 Q3
What's your temperature on at this valuation to potentially push to 100% or even more this year
Show response
Ezra said energy weighting at ~3% of S&P 500 represents large dislocation. Balance sheet supports higher return levels than 70% minimum. Building cash not a priority. Opportunities to return close to 100%.
You mentioned obviously better base production performance in the Utica. Can you give us a little color on that
Show response
Jeff credited magnitude of full integration: drilling efficiency enabling rig reduction from 5 to 4, high-intensity completion design implemented at scale, 1,100 wells moved to EOG proprietary applications, 80% on artificial lift optimizers delivering production uplift.
Calendar 2025 Q2
what does that translate into, right? So what is the cost to implement that versus maybe D&C savings and improved EURs?
Show response
Jeff said costs per well are low after acquiring and cheapening the IP. Enables geomechanical property calculation, fault/fracture identification, and equipment failure detection. Over 50 wells deployed so far with long runway for portfolio expansion.
Could there be some upside in performance and cost as you get in there? So what are the quick wins?
Show response
Jeff listed: shared infrastructure and consolidated facilities, EOG motors and mud cutters, in-basin sand sourcing, water recycling, longer laterals from expanded footprint, production optimizer deployment already underway.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how do you think about like capital allocation changing to more gassy areas like Dorado
Show response
Ezra maintained focus on investing at the right pace rather than chasing gas prices. LNG nameplate up 2.5 Bcf/d YoY. Dorado breakeven at $1.40 but won't outrun pace of learnings.
What do you think about 2026, and maybe any kind of thoughts on ‘27 in terms of like where do well cost trends go for EOG?
Show response
Jeff confirmed no 2025 tariff impact due to proactive inventory management. Confident in low-single-digit well cost reduction for 2025 from efficiency gains. Too early to guide beyond 2025 given tariff uncertainty.
FANGDiamondback Energy11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
You all are delivering more than -- oil barrels than I guess guided to, but nat gas is really outperforming
Show response
Danny credited improved local gas marketing and reduced flaring; Al added Barnett targeting as a forward driver.
Calendar 2026 Q1
is there how much desire is there to kind of continue to let that oil production grow versus curtail it?
Show response
CEO said situation is fluid, taking quarter-by-quarter. Still have things in back pocket to grow further. 520,000+ boe/d oil is new baseline.
Can you just walk through some of the specifics why performance was so strong? It sounds like there was a lot more well performance
Show response
CEO and COO jointly answered, better wells from completion optimization plus lower downtime from automation/ML. Perforating strategies, rate design, sand loadings driving uplift.
Calendar 2025 Q4
you did mention some performance-related revisions. Can you just give us a little bit of context behind that
Show response
Kaes said majority of revisions are price-driven; the rest are PUD reshuffling as acquired inventory (Double Eagle, Endeavor) gets reprioritized. 70% PDP, 30% PUD, averaging 3-year PUD booking.
what you're seeing in the landscape that sort of drives the shift from where Diamondback historically been
Show response
Kaes noted Permian consolidation has reduced the number of actionable deals; basin champions are emerging. FANG still monitors every deal but is pivoting toward organic resource expansion.
Calendar 2025 Q3
with 2026, is there any kind of a shift in activity allocation across both like acreage regionally within the Midland or even does the Delaware get attention
Show response
Kaes said Delaware gets less attention in 2026; Midland zone mix continues to evolve with Barnett and Woodford tests increasing, with a full asset update planned for next year.
how do you view the equity ownership of those various interests you have? And maybe specifically on Deep Blue, where there are future capital calls
Show response
Kaes said Deep Blue's third-party business is creating value; potential monetization or restructuring at some point, plus tangential opportunities in water-for-power.
Calendar 2025 Q2
how many more things can you do? I mean drilling days can't go to 0
Show response
Danny highlighted 4-5 day wells becoming more consistent vs 8-day average, completion speeds pushing 4,000 ft/day, with 15-20% further gains possible from continuous pumping.
you all had a bit stronger gas production this quarter. And it sounds like it came from more gas capture and processing
Show response
Kaes explained the NGL jump came from Energy Transfer-operated WTG plants resolving power issues in Martin County, with flaring down 75-100 bps.
Calendar 2025 Q1
what is it going to take for you guys to move into maintenance mode? And could you just give a little color on the setup for 2026
Show response
Kaes outlined plan to bring back a fifth crew and level at 485K bbl/d in Q4, with DUC backlog providing flexibility for 2026 production depending on prices.
your broad view of the oil macro. I thought it was pretty interesting in your investor letter how you thought the U.S. oil production was ready to roll over
Show response
Travis argued Permian base decline and reduced capital investment will lead to U.S. production declines, especially since efficiency gains are now incremental.
COPConocoPhillips7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how do you envision that happening with buybacks? Is it going be ratable? Or are you going to be opportunistic
Show response
O'Brien reaffirmed the 45% full-year payout (implying a second-half step-up), declined to guide buyback timing, and defended peer-leading distributions.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can you give us a sense of your view of what has happened in the market, if you have any view of physical versus the financial kind of position of oil
Show response
Andy provided detailed supply-demand framework, Ryan discussed floor price implications. Comprehensive response covering physical supply disruption, refinery impacts, and long-term equilibrium.
Calendar 2025 Q4
your shareholder return strategy at least in, you know, at that 45% rate does dip into it. Could you just give us your context on know, how you think about your cash balance
Show response
Andy O'Brien emphasized very strong starting cash position ($7.4B), $2B net debt reduction. 45% of CFO distribution works across price ranges. Balance sheet exists to bridge quarters if needed, and no real concerns about funding distributions.
Calendar 2025 Q3
there does appear to be a variance to oil your oil guide relative to consensus. And was hoping you could help us walk through,
Show response
Andy O'Brien guided 53% total company oil mix for 2026 (including Surmont higher royalties), 50% for Lower 48 driven by Delaware Basin growth with higher gas content.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I'd be interested in your thoughts on what you're seeing right now, and how that could shape your plans into '26
Show response
Ryan Lance described choppy near-term macro with OPEC+ 2.5M bbl unwinding offset by 5-year-low inventories, constructive long-term with 1M bbl/d demand growth continuing.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Should it be companies with higher cost of supply should be the first to cut and companies like Conoco show a little bit more resilience
Show response
Ryan Lance said $60 is close to mid-cycle planning price, would consider scope changes in sustained low 50s but not overreacting to short-term volatility.
Calendar 2024 Q4
there's been a number of initiatives coming out of the White House, and how do you all see that impact the way you all do business
Show response
Andy O'Brien detailed Surmont exposure with about half sold into US, noted Montney gas not sold into US, and diversified portfolio mitigates via Bakken/ANS differentials.
APAAPA Corporation6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
how much of that is going to run these various sets to look at the technical upside
Show response
Christmann said steady diet of delineation and appraisal testing is the nature of the basin and will continue indefinitely. Currently flowing back a 4-well Barnett test with more Barnett drilling later this year. Multiple spacing tests in both basins planned.
what is sort of the path? What are the next steps there
Show response
Christmann said data room open with significant industry interest. Looking to farm down with potential announcement forthcoming. Drilling likely in 2027, small chance it could be late 2026.
Calendar 2025 Q3
could you give us some sense of where you think gas production could go here over the next, say, year or 2
Show response
Christmann clarified 3 of 12 rigs (not 8) are on gas. Program exceeding all internal expectations. Longer-term growth dictated by exploration success. Have processing capacity that may need additional piping. Year-over-year gas growth continuing.
Can you give us a sense of like what are you thinking as well about some of the deeper potential
Show response
Christmann confirmed overlap with Barnett/Woodford plays. Planning Q1 2026 inventory update. Core development inventory extends well into early 2030s. Rodgers added that capital efficiency gains are forcing complete re-examination of all inventory including Callon acreage.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how do you balance your twelve rig activity this year between oil and gas drilling and what kind of infrastructure do you need
Show response
Christmann explained they started with one gas rig in November, plan to shift 2-3 rigs to gas this year. Good existing infrastructure backbone in the Western Desert but may need new infrastructure depending on exploration success.
your presentation deck, talked about delineating some zones there. Can you just give us a sense of exactly what you're looking at
Show response
Christmann described steady diet of zone testing. Riney provided detailed walkthrough of the rig drop from 11 to 8 rigs and the resulting production trajectory from 140K peak to 128K exit rate.
DVNDevon Energy6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
you kind of mentioned the windfall you all are going to get from the OBBVA. I think you said $1 billion over the next few years. What is the plan on allocating that cash?
Show response
Jeff confirmed no framework change; incremental FCF from tax savings and optimization accrues to balance sheet, accelerating debt reduction.
Anadarko stepped up pretty strongly this quarter as well. Can you tell us where you all are with the JV there
Show response
John attributed Anadarko growth to Dow JV well IDs plus Q1 weather recovery; consistent rig activity.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Does it make sense to maybe step up buybacks a little bit in the near term and utilize some of that free cash flow opportunistically?
Show response
Jeff confirmed no change to $200-300M/quarter buyback range; framework unchanged despite lower equity prices.
Can you give us a sense of like how you're looking and thinking about the macro? I mean there were no specifically defined cuts related to weaker oil prices
Show response
Clay said Devon is on 'high alert' but not yet at action threshold; forward curve at ~$60 still passes investment test.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Could you remind us of the inventory duration you see within the Grayson Mill asset and sort of, you know, how that compares with your sort of legacy, you know, box?
Show response
Clay confirmed nearly a decade of Williston inventory including Grayson, with costs coming down and productivity improving.
Could you give us a little bit of color on some of the background, you know, regarding that, you know, how did you all think about splitting the assets
Show response
Clay described it as a win-win with natural accretion, citing $2M+ per well savings already being demonstrated.
Show 1 more company
EQTEQT Corporation5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
can you talk about do you expect that EQT will be the supplier for those pull volumes
Show response
Jeremy expects at least majority if not all EQT volumes on MVP, creating the opportunity to grow with confidence; over 1 Bcf/d of greater takeaway plus 1.5 Bcf/d data center demand.
Can you talk a little bit about like industrial types of deals? Have you seen any interest in there? How much are you willing to allocate toward those initiatives
Show response
Jeremy confirmed broad interest across segments with reinvigorated commodities team and gas origination efforts turning up many opportunities, open to both midstream and supply deals.
Calendar 2025 Q2
When does that become a target that you look a little bit harder at? Do you see that as more of a longer-term option
Show response
Toby described deep Utica as longer-term with potential for science wells to prove operational execution; Jeremy added Utica at 2.5-2.6 Bcf/1,000 compares favorably to peers' Upper Marcellus and Bossier.
how does potential strategic shareholders selling, say, like some of the Olympus shareholder selling, does that play into it
Show response
Jeremy pivoted to the broader buyback thesis, growth projects provide valuation confidence beyond gas price, making buybacks more attractive if the market doesn't give credit early.
Calendar 2024 Q4
as you look at your core inventory duration, like what is your confidence level on how far that goes out comparatively to others
Show response
Management contrasted improving EQT well performance versus peer degradation, estimated 25+ years of high-quality inventory pre-Equitrans plus 10+ years added post-deal.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| EXE Expand Energy | 13 | 0%none of 13 questions |
| EOG EOG Resources | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions |
| FANG Diamondback Energy | 11 | 9%1 of 11 questions |
| COP ConocoPhillips | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| APA APA Corporation | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| DVN Devon Energy | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| EQT EQT Corporation | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
- EXEExpand Energy · 13 questions0%none of 13 questions
- EOGEOG Resources · 11 questions0%none of 11 questions
- FANGDiamondback Energy · 11 questions9%1 of 11 questions
- COPConocoPhillips · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- APAAPA Corporation · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- DVNDevon Energy · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- EQTEQT Corporation · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q1 | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q2 | 11 | 9%1 of 11 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q3 | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q4 | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q2 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 4 |
- 2024 Q48 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q19 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 9 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q211 questions · challenge rate 9% (1 of 11 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q311 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 11 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q49 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 9 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q17 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 4 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Capex Investment15
- Capital Allocation14
- Competitive Dynamics12
- Demand9
- Innovation & R&D9
- M&A8
- Macroeconomic7
- Revenue Growth6
- Geographic Expansion5
- Supply Chain5
Show all 16 topics
- Cost Pressure5
- Pricing4
- Regulation Policy3
- Guidance Reliability2
- Trade Tariffs2
- Margin1