Loading…
Loading…
Can you just help us bridge how much of that committed load is already embedded in the current plan versus what could represent incremental upside
remind us how you're using this kind of in your planning process
Can you just help us frame just maybe a little bit with more specitivity just what this means in terms of timing and scale of CapEx
Do you sort of expect any approval slowdowns or delays within service dates, especially with this accelerated load you're targeting
where do you stand around that, given how binary '26 could be?
in terms of Phase 2 process, what do you see as viable for limiting EIX's liability?
If you sort of get the Aquarion sale approval on March 25 and storm cost recoveries, that will obviously eliminate the hybrids, but could that also take out some of the straight equity
where do we stand on potential post-close liabilities to Ørsted? And at what point does that liability end
you have a proposal for recovery of roughly $160 million. Just walking through what you did and didn't get. Why did the Massachusetts, DPU deny that
on Yankee Gas, obviously, everyone is watching this one. You've got this motion to adopt the alternative resolution out there
What are you getting from Governor Shapiro to make withdrawing the case and weathering this environment worth it?
what should we think about for catalyst and timing? Could this happen before or after the election?
Are they still looking at Wisconsin, or are they more focused on Iowa
do we ever get to a point where we could see a more definable EPS guidance range, given that you are already at the higher end of that 7% and visibility is improving for you
are you kind of now implementing somewhat stricter safeguards so a situation like QTS does not happen again
can you just remind us what is the minimum take agreements? And is that minimum what is assumed in your current plan
With the market capacity you are making, how do you earn on those purchases? Can you give us some detail on how that flows through to earnings?
Can you talk about what you are seeing in discussions with potential customers that has allowed you to firm the 1 to 3 gigawatts in your strategic negotiations bucket to 3 gigawatts?
can you just maybe speak to the quality of the customer kind of behind the agreement? So is it a true hyperscaler, counterparty or colocator?
focusing a little bit more on sort of the downgrade thresholds, especially as you become more integrated, any kind of sense on how they could think about the thresholds
do you still anticipate all the capacity to be utilized front of the meter? Or is there a higher return option with PJM deals
do you guys see FERC, PJM colocation rules opening up opportunities to bring both new generation and upside in existing assets