Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Simon Leopold

Raymond James · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).

Questions
99on tracked calls
Challenge rate
8%8 of 99 questions
Companies
13questioned at least once
Reporting periods
9with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 99 of 99 questions from 13 companies

COHRCoherent, Inc.15 questions · 8 reporting periods · 3 of 15 challenging
COHR company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

given sort of the shifts in growth in the mix, how you are thinking about the gross margin trajectory?

Show response

Sherri reaffirmed the greater-than-42% gross margin target, noting the Q1 guide midpoint of 40.5% and that the bulk of 6-inch and new-product ramps are still ahead.

there is been press coverage on potential import restrictions for optical transceivers.

Regulation PolicyTrade TariffsCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Jim called the report speculative but said Coherent would benefit as the largest US transceiver supplier, citing 20+ US production facilities.

Calendar 2026 Q1

I'd like to see if you could confirm if the 1.6 terabit transceiver revenue exceeded, let's say, $100 million

Revenue GrowthProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Anderson declined to confirm the specific milestone but emphasized 1.6T ramp is faster than expected and is a good portion of sequential growth.

there's a perceived gap versus one of your primary competitors that stems from investors comparing their forecasts

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Anderson pushed back on the gap narrative, citing doubled OCS market forecast to over $4 billion, differentiated technology, resolved production bottleneck, and $15 billion CPO opportunity with NVIDIA partnership.

Calendar 2025 Q4

maybe if you could put some milestones around this to help us understand when does that cost $100 million per quarter?

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Jim confirmed both 800G and 1.6T growing with 1.6T accelerating from smaller base. Ramping with multiple customers. Initial ramp EML and silicon photonics, VCSEL-based 1.6T in second half of calendar 2026. Did not provide specific revenue milestones.

Are we in the time frame yet where you're engaging customers for scale-up architectures?

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Jim described very active scale-up engagements across multiple customers. Scale-up CPO opportunity expected to dwarf scale-out by orders of magnitude. Customer forecasts are very large. Timeline sooner than expected based on customer plans.

Calendar 2025 Q3

How do you think about your trajectory and your place in the OCS market?

Competitive DynamicsProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Jim confirmed strong OCS positioning with nonmechanical liquid crystal technology. Revenue and backlog grew sequentially. More meaningful revenue contribution expected calendar 2026, weighted toward second half.

there's been sort of this narrative that the indium phosphide is producing photodiodes and hasn't helped you with laser production

ChallengingSupply ChainInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Jim directly corrected the narrative, confirming 6-inch InP ramping production of EMLs, CW lasers, and photodiodes across both Sherman TX and Jarfalla Sweden facilities.

Calendar 2025 Q2

I wanted to see if I could get an understanding of what product categories or segments might be down sequentially at the midpoint of your guidance

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Jim clarified industrial down (partly $20M A&D exit, partly macro caution) while data center and comms up sequentially. OCS pipeline healthy with strong multi-customer engagement.

Calendar 2025 Q1

I feel like there's a perception that you're overly dependent on VCSELs for revenue and so you've got all the tools in the tool chest

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jim corrected VCSEL perception: majority of transceiver revenue is EML-based, with majority using internally manufactured EMLs. Silicon photonics also growing portion.

we've been getting a lot of questions or hearing about debate about excess inventory. So if you could help level set us

Show response

Jim reported strong and expected 800G demand with no signs of customer inventory buildup, noting customers deploy transceivers very quickly after shipment.

Calendar 2024 Q4

How does Coherent envision this technology affecting its business in both the intermediate term as well as the long term?

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jim provided thorough response: CPO expands TAM by converting electrical-to-optical connections, Coherent well-positioned through ingredient technologies applicable across form factors.

is just wondering if there's any customer concentration or vertical concentration, you could quantify in the quarter

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jim confirmed well-diversified datacom revenue across multiple hyperscalers, noted continued expansion of 800G customer count as a positive indicator.

Calendar 2024 Q3

was it really 800 gig and above or was there more strength from the more traditional products below

Revenue GrowthCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Jim confirmed growth from both 800G and sub-400G, with customer base for 800G significantly broadened from a couple to many customers year-over-year.

regarding priorities for the capital structure, really just sort of weighing the options of delivering, investing in OpEx

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Sherri outlined organic growth investment as top priority, deleveraging as close second. Paid down $118M in Q1 to reach 2.4x leverage.

CIENCiena Corporation12 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 12 challenging
CIEN company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

And what is your take on optical circuit switching? Is that a product that Ciena would explore?

Show response

Scott affirmed coherent moving inside the data center (intercept at 3.2 terabits) and enthusiasm for OCS, but declined to comment on whether Ciena will enter OCS.

It does not really appear like the web-scale RLS deployments are a driver here.

Competitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Question posed by Jeff Cocci (Raymond James associate) standing in for Simon Leopold ("Jeff Cocci in for Simon"); attributed to the covering analyst. Scott confirmed web-scale deals carry less off-box software but said the value extends well beyond hardware, on-box software, planning, deployment and global service.

Calendar 2026 Q2

are you able to raise price in the backlog? And how are you juggling your rising input costs

Show response

Marc framed pricing within 'value exchange', confirming pricing is on the table across products alongside supply security and working-capital terms.

Calendar 2025 Q4

if you could just break up the 10% disclosures, you said two cloud and an operator

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Mark disclosed AT&T as one 10% customer, declined to name the two cloud providers. Three collectively covered just under 44% of Q4 revenue. Full year: one cloud and AT&T at ~28% combined.

I want to see if you can give us maybe a timeline of when you would expect those two other hyperscalers to really kick into the numbers, how imminent that is

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Gary expects initial revenue from all three scale across hyperscalers in FY2026, with significant ramp in FY2027-2028. All currently US-centric. Infrastructure requires massive fiber buildouts which take time.

Calendar 2025 Q3

you're talking about hundreds of millions to to interconnect a pair of data centers. And so I what I'm trying to get a better sense of here is sort of the distinct differences

Cloud & AIProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Gary distinguished GPU cluster DCI as shorter distance, dedicated for AI training, requiring super high speed and low latency at scale. Uses RLS and 800G plugs.

I'd like to see if you could unpack is is this more about the service provider activity in routing

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Scott identified three routing drivers: service provider spending recovery, emerging coherent routing opportunities in aggregation networks, and DCOM inside data center applications.

Calendar 2025 Q2

folks are trying to look for what sort of the sustainability of this due to this you get a better sense that you'll see a broadening base of contributions from cloud

Show response

Gary pointed to both breadth (more cloud providers engaging) and depth (new applications like GPU clusters and in-DC management). Scott confirmed both wins have applicability to other customers.

what were the more specific percentage contributions from the two over ten percent and how much of overall revenue is coming from the top five customers

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jim provided exact percentages. Scott later added that top five customers were 45% of revenue. Named AT&T as the service provider 10% customer.

Calendar 2025 Q1

what exposure to Mexico and how you envision this changing because I believe you're moving more into Southeast Asia

Trade TariffsSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Jim listed manufacturing locations but declined to quantify Mexico exposure, citing fluidity. Scott added that Ciena owns all test assets, enabling production shifts across locations.

Calendar 2024 Q4

What I am wondering here is what drives an operator to choose one option over the other, and how do you see, if at all, a divergence between those two buying patterns?

DemandCloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Jim and Gary explained cloud prefers direct but speed constraints push them to service providers for Mofen. Clear and comprehensive.

What's your thinking on customer concentration in the forecast for fiscal 2025? What are you assuming? Do you expect a similar top two

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Jim stated concentration pattern will remain similar with rotating 10% customers from the same set of two service providers and two cloud providers.

LITELumentum Holdings Inc.12 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 12 challenging
LITE company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

to what extent we're able to reprice backlog with your customers? And how did that affect this quarter's gross margin

Show response

Michael said repricing was modest and LTAs are forward-looking; mix was the larger driver, with room left on gross margin from both.

Calendar 2025 Q4

I just wanted to see if you could maybe double click on the OCS market, which sounds quite a bit better than what you discussed last quarter

Cloud & AIProduct LaunchRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Michael confirmed OCS backlog well past $400M with most shipping in calendar H2 2026 into 2027. Calendar Q4 expected quite a bit above previously targeted $100M. Broad-based across three customers with increasing demands. Price increases having modest impact on revenue and more meaningful impact on margin.

Calendar 2025 Q3

I've heard second or third hand that you've suggested that this could be $100 million by your December '26 quarter. Now I don't know that, that's true. So I wanted to hear directly from you how you...

Cloud & AIProduct LaunchRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Michael confirmed $100M quarterly OCS target by December 2026 with increasing confidence. Growing number of use cases from customers and potential customers. Engagement level described as super high.

I would like to see if you could rank order, what does the biggest dollar increase come from sequentially in December versus September

Revenue GrowthCloud & AIDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Michael ranked transceivers as the biggest sequential driver but emphasized the surprisingly broad-based demand across pump lasers, narrow linewidth, coherent components. Every segment contributing. Width of demand was more surprising than any single driver.

Calendar 2025 Q2

I'd love to get an update on how to think about the trajectory in that should we be envisioning a very gradual ramp

Cloud & AIProduct LaunchRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Michael outlined OCS ramp: current through December quarters still ramping, first inflection in early 2026, more meaningful inflection in H2 2026. Currently limited by manufacturing capacity being built out.

Wondering how you're thinking about your position in that market in terms of quantifying as well as your ability to remain a sole source supplier

Innovation & R&DCloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Michael cited two competitive moats: unique power level and reliability leveraged from undersea laser and Raman pump heritage. Currently sole-sourced with early shipments underway.

Calendar 2025 Q1

trying to get a sense of how much business or manufacturing do you still have in China and that assumption

Trade TariffsSupply ChainMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Wajid explained tariff impact from component costs (sub-mounts, capacitors). Moving DCI production from China to Thailand and eventually Dongguan cloud module production as well. Impact expected to diminish in FY Q1/Q2.

I'd like to get your latest thinking on what contributions and what role you can play in CPO

Innovation & R&DCloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Wupen positioned CPO ramp volume for H2 CY2026. In addition to lasers, exploring other optical chips for CPO ecosystem. Near-term focus remains on cloud module and laser component ramp.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I interpreted your comment on your outlook to be more about inventory normalizing, whereas some of the others in the supply chain have sounded a little bit more upbeat

ChallengingDemandInventoryTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Alan declared inventory discussion over, now shipping what customers are shipping out. DCI and transport demand very strong. Not returning to pandemic peak levels but seeing genuine demand.

I wanted to see if you could speak a little bit to your thoughts and comments on the prospects for Co-Package Optics or CPO

Innovation & R&DCloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Wajid explained CPO solves electrical scaling beyond 200G per lane. Lumentum sees it as additive since optical content doesn't decrease and their modest transceiver share means no cannibalization risk.

Calendar 2024 Q3

I'd like to get your perspective on how you see the market for 1.6 terabit devices evolving and what you would anticipate your role would be

Innovation & R&DCloud & AIProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Alan outlined component-level participation via 200G EMLs ramping summer 2025, plus transceiver-level with positive customer feedback on samples. Timing depends on customers.

what I'm trying to get an assessment of is sort of what's changed in that December outlook versus what you thought several quarters ago

DemandCloud & AIGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Alan confirmed Cloud Light business tracking as expected with no surprises, consistent with prior two earnings calls.

CSCOCisco Systems, Inc.10 questions · 5 reporting periods · 2 of 10 challenging
CSCO company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

the embedded base is relatively young. So help me understand sort of the motivation or why you're succeeding here

ChallengingDemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Robbins argued 2023 flush was overstated in perception. Billions in pre-Cat 9K installed base was never upgraded. Cat 4K and 6K end-of-support is driving real replacement demand.

Could you unpack what you're seeing particularly on the international governments

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Patterson noted EMEA and APJC public sector grew mid-to-upper teens. Robbins cited European defense spending, sovereignty initiatives, and geopolitical drivers as ongoing catalysts.

Calendar 2025 Q3

the two-thirds, one-third split between systems and optics. And I'm wondering how you expect that to trend

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Robbins expects the two-thirds systems, one-third optics mix to remain relatively stable based on current customer conversations.

I'm concerned that particularly in the federal vertical with potential budget cuts and enterprises worried about the implications from tariffs may have accelerated some of the orders

ChallengingTrade TariffsDemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Robbins denied any pervasive pull-forward. Patterson provided data: channel partner feedback, linearity normal, activation timing unchanged, no future-dated ship requests spike.

Calendar 2025 Q2

when you've had these refreshes how to think about that? Because when I reflect on the last one, 2017, 2018

DemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Robbins acknowledged 2017 comparison is difficult due to subscription transition. Emphasized the campus refresh will be driven by embedding security into the network for agentic AI.

after July 9, what would be the effect of tariffs based on the July 9 end of the pause

Trade TariffsCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Herren confirmed Q4 guide assumes reciprocal tariffs resume on July 9 with USMCA and semiconductor exemptions intact. Acknowledged difficulty predicting final outcome.

Calendar 2025 Q1

there's been increasing noise around a technology known as co-packaged optics

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Robbins explained Cisco's flexible go-to-market approach with webscalers, selling systems, standalone optics, or silicon depending on customer preference.

drill down on your federal exposure, and the scenarios you're envisioning if there are major layoffs

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Robbins directly addressed federal exposure size and DoD concentration, noted civilian-side impact and no material change expected in outlook.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Splunk opportunities of new potential customers being introduced to Splunk. If you could update us on the progress

Show response

Chuck noted 1,500 more customers added to Splunk prospect list. Hundreds of Cisco partners trained and building Splunk practices. Scott added Splunk tracking ahead on profitability.

I'd love to get maybe an update or double-click on the partnership you announced with Nvidia

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Chuck described partnership as early stage. Hyperfabric shipping early calendar 2025. New Nvidia-based AI compute platform and AI PODs announced this quarter.

NTAPNetApp10 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 10 challenging
NTAP company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

this implies relatively little sequential growth through the year, and I get the extra week adds some complication.

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Wissam said seasonality is typical once the extra Q1 week (~$65M) is removed, with mid-single-digit growth across Q2-Q4.

Calendar 2026 Q1

is every participant, every vendor raising price by the same amount at the same time?

Competitive DynamicsPricingTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

George described rational industry where vendors take different approaches (some raise list/maintain discount, others restrict discounting) but all face similar cost structures. Competition comes down to software value, portfolio breadth, and operational discipline. HFAs seeing significant interest from customers.

Calendar 2025 Q4

I wanted to see how you thought about your opportunities to win business with some of the sovereign or neo clouds

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

George confirmed long-standing sovereign cloud relationships expanding into AI with AFX enabling broader participation. Advantages in security, multi-tenancy, data protection, and hybrid capabilities play well in enterprise AI workloads. More innovation coming.

how do you think about the competitive landscape in that application and broadly the AI opportunities?

Competitive DynamicsCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

George cited differentiated capabilities (security, multi-tenancy, data protection, hybrid) as competitive advantages in sovereign AI. AFX introduction driving strong interest from AI cloud providers pursuing new use cases.

Calendar 2025 Q3

I'm trying to get a better sense of is the readiness of your portfolio to support enterprise initiatives and whether you've got more products in the pipeline to perhaps move up the value chain

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

George outlined four AI technology pillars: high-performance/scale storage (strong today), cloud-equivalent storage for hyperscaler tools (more work with hyperscalers coming at Insight), data management tools (search, organize, vectorization, RAG readiness, guardrails, coming at Insight), and ecosystem expansion (reference architectures with NVIDIA and hyperscaler tools).

Calendar 2025 Q2

did the behaviors that are creating your concerns actually moderate when tariffs were delayed in May versus what you saw when they were first announced in April?

DemandTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

George described normal Q4 linearity in Europe despite Easter in final week (planfully managed). Caution manifesting as deal downsizing and extra procurement approval cycles rather than deal slippage.

how are you thinking about the section 232 reviews on semiconductors? What are your expectations for the impact of that?

Trade TariffsRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

George confirmed NetApp currently under semiconductor exemption but declined to speculate on Section 232 outcomes.

Calendar 2025 Q1

I wanted to see if you could talk about your expectations for tariffs and the risk

Trade TariffsSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

George confirmed minimal China dependency, Mexico flexibility, no tariffs in Q4 guide, and industry-wide impact if broad tariffs applied.

Calendar 2024 Q4

if there's anything in particular going on in terms of the mix between your software and hardware business that might be affecting our product gross margins either in the recent quarter or in the o...

MarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Mike focused on flash mix as the driver of gross margins rather than hardware/software split.

I'm just wondering if there are any specific characteristics of the customers you see experimenting with AI applications in the enterprise

Show response

George noted broad-based AI wins with more concentration in public sector, manufacturing, financial services, and healthcare.

FFIVF5, Inc.9 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
FFIV company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I guess I'm trying to understand why systems are continuing to outgrow software.

Revenue GrowthDemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Locoh-Donou rejected both premises, said software is tracking the plan set at the start of the year, and enumerated sovereignty, displacement and consolidation as hardware drivers.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Could you update us on any progress around the engagement and discussions you've had with NVIDIA?

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Francois confirmed F5 is now in NVIDIA's reference architecture. Third-party tests validated 30-40% more token generation per GPU. Multiple POCs and trials underway. Customer sophistication still evolving, first priority is getting AI factories running, then optimizing efficiency. Inference shift will accelerate adoption.

some customers may be showing a preference for your hardware solutions based on the performance, the relative performance that perhaps the total cost of ownership of implementing software is actual...

Show response

Francois confirmed $60 million in H1 from customers recommitting to hardware after previously stopping. Drivers include data center modernization, performance needs, and AI data delivery. But broader trend is hybrid multi-cloud driving both hardware and software demand with customer flexibility.

Calendar 2025 Q4

what rough percentage of revenue is coming from AI projects today?

Show response

Francois declined to break out AI revenue formally but indicated it moved from single-digit millions quarterly in FY25 to double-digit millions quarterly. Runtime security seen as multi-billion-dollar market in early innings. Cooper noted mid-single-digit systems price increase from January 2025 still flowing through.

Calendar 2025 Q3

what are you seeing in terms of U.S. federal in light of the government shutdown?

Regulation PolicyDemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Francois confirmed Q1 guidance assumes Federal disruption from government shutdown with hope for normalization over the year. Cooper declined to guide FY26 software/hardware mix given only 12 days since incident disclosure. Follow-up clarified breach affects BIG-IP equally across both hardware and software (virtual edition) deployment models; NGINX and DCS were not impacted.

Calendar 2025 Q2

how should we think about services trending?

Show response

Cooper explained services deceleration to 1% was due to last laggard customers retiring prior-family units from maintenance base. Now behind them. Short-term deferred revenue up 5% and total deferred up 10% indicate services growth should improve in FY26.

Should we take this as more of a one-off? Or is there some new trending that we should think about?

Show response

Francois cautioned against reading too much into single-quarter service provider trends. 5G promise hasn't fully materialized. Carriers had been sweating assets but relaxed somewhat recently. Dynamics not fundamentally changing in the segment.

Calendar 2024 Q3

how did your verticals perform relative to expectations that you guided?

Show response

Frank confirmed enterprise was the upside driver, exceeding expectations. U.S. Federal met expectations on a dollar basis. Service provider segment remains weak with broad demand constraints.

you've essentially guided up from the prior quarter's flat first half rather than implying that Q2 should be down a lot to compensate

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Cooper confirmed the first-half outlook improved from flat to low-single-digit growth, driven by better software expansion from renewals and mid-single-digit systems growth expectations.

Show 7 more companies
PEverpure, Inc.8 questions · 8 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
P company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

So what's different about this deal versus the original hyperscale deal?

Competitive DynamicsProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2027 Q2 →
Show response

Charlie said the second deal took longer because the hyperscaler wanted its own supply contract first; Rob said the design is substantially similar to the first.

Calendar 2026 Q2

how you're thinking about the longer-term trends of input costs, particularly NAND chips

Cost PressureSupply ChainTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

CEO expects continued price increases at least through the summer; fab capacity (NAND, memory, CPUs, even low-end chips) is largely sold out and shifted toward higher-margin components, so prices rise until supply and demand rebalance.

Calendar 2026 Q1

what I didn't hear you update was the prior commentary about expecting double-digit exabytes this fiscal year.

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

CEO confirmed the prior 'low double-digit exabytes' hyperscaler expectation for the year, now expecting more than originally guided.

Calendar 2025 Q4

scaling the hyperscale business, you know, you could could change the gross margin dynamics. Can you expand on this a bit?

MarginRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

CFO said hyperscaler revenue is currently ~90%+ margin software licensing that lifts blended margins, but Pure is exploring different FY2027 revenue models that could change the hyperscaler gross-margin economics; details at Q4.

Calendar 2025 Q3

How are you thinking about the Meta contribution to the financial model in October?

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

CEO said Pure expects 1-2 exabytes for Meta this year and can reach double-digit exabytes next year at 90%+ royalty margin; CFO said hyperscaler revenue won't be material to FY26.

Calendar 2025 Q2

I'm trying to understand why it takes so long. Is it a matter of customization on your part

Competitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CEO said the timeline is driven by the hyperscaler's 18-month-to-2-year next-gen data-center design cycle (compute, software, networking), not Pure's product testing; same for any hyperscaler.

Calendar 2025 Q1

I was hoping you could update us on your thinking of how enterprise adoption of AI initiatives could affect your business.

Show response

CEO framed AI as multifaceted: large-scale training (GTC), a still-early inference opportunity building momentum, and the biggest opportunity being data-silo-to-data-cloud reorganization via Fusion.

Calendar 2024 Q4

describing the nature of that particular win and some of the color behind the use case and that opportunity.

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CTO clarified CoreWeave (not the top-4 hyperscaler) is a GPU-cloud partnership plus strategic investment making Pure available to CoreWeave customers.

ANETArista Networks7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
ANET company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I’d like to try to get a better understanding of the composition or the source of the incremental revenue

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Jayshree said the incremental $1.1 billion spans all product sectors, including core data center front end and routing, not only AI and campus.

Calendar 2026 Q1

I wanted to explore your commentary around the scale-across opportunity in particular

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Jayshree confirmed scale across was small last year but will contribute at least a third of AI revenue in 2026. Scale up is virtually zero until 2027-2028.

Calendar 2025 Q4

I am wondering how much of a tool has been price hikes, you raising your prices to customers, and or whether or not within the substantial amount of purchase commitments you have whether there is a...

Cost PressureSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Jayshree admitted existing purchase commitments insufficient for memory needs, planning first price increase on memory-intensive SKUs after absorbing costs in 2025.

Calendar 2025 Q3

it sounds like there's a broader base of customers that may be employing it and that this is a factor that's in your 2026 margin guidance

Competitive DynamicsMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jayshree estimated blue box limited to single-digit to ~20 customers requiring operational skill, with lower margin impact factored into 2026 guidance.

Calendar 2025 Q2

understanding how that might be shifting given that it does seem like there should be some broadening with the Neoclouds

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jayshree described balanced approach: titans contributing ~50% of revenue while aggregate enterprise/Neocloud customers form the other meaningful half under Todd's leadership.

Calendar 2025 Q1

looking for the update on white box. I know, you've talked about this quite a bit in the past

Competitive DynamicsCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Jayshree emphasized white box operates at ~10% gross margins and is hardware-centric. Arista dominates complex use cases like AI spine with mission-critical EOS features.

Calendar 2024 Q4

If you could offer a little bit more color about how the elements of that are trending and your expectations for how that part of the business is growing

Revenue GrowthProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Jayshree expects campus and routing adjacencies to exceed $1B in FY25 out of $8.2B total, driven by SD-WAN evolution and campus innovation.

DELLDell Technologies6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
DELL company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

what other elements or factors are limiting any upside beyond the memory constraint.

Supply ChainCost PressureTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Clarke rank-ordered constraints as DRAM, NAND, CPUs, then hard drives, noting trailing and leading semiconductor nodes are filling up.

Calendar 2025 Q4

I'm trying to get at is how much is this about your ability to get key components new orders, or existing orders occurring earlier?

Cloud & AISupply ChainDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Jeff attributed the raise to the combination of $12.3B new orders, growing backlog, supply chain execution, and customer readiness (buildings, power, DLC) converging in Q4.

Calendar 2025 Q3

I'd like to see if you could double click on that vertical and offer us some quantification

Show response

Jeff cited 50/50 mix of new vs returning enterprise customers across tech, manufacturing, financial services, healthcare. Linked Hopper sequential growth to enterprise air-cooled adoption.

Calendar 2025 Q2

if maybe you could help us bridge the trends in your ISG operating margin. In that I I know there's some seasonal aspects to it

Show response

Yvonne attributed sequential margin decline to normal Q4-to-Q1 seasonality plus lower North America mix in traditional servers and more large competitive deals.

Calendar 2025 Q1

give us your thoughts on your exposure to the U.S. federal government. Basically, how big is it typically as a percent of your revenue?

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Yvonne declined to quantify federal exposure specifically. Jeff added broader context about navigating demand cycles historically.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I just wanted to see whether you were referencing year-over-year or sequentials on that guidance

Cost PressureTrade TariffsSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Yvonne clarified OpEx guidance is year-over-year. Jeff addressed tariffs confidently, citing 40 years of navigating geopolitical cycles with a global supply chain built on resiliency.

HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
HPE company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

what is giving you the confidence that the strength this quarter does not reflect any of that?

DemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Antonio said there is no evidence of pull-ins or double-booking and no cancellations, supporting confidence in demand durability.

Calendar 2026 Q1

I wanted to see if you could talk about the topic around demand elasticity

DemandPricingCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Neri separated demand (very strong, no slowdown) from fulfillment capability (supply constrained). Myers clarified some unit impact expected in second half from pricing but traditional server revenue still expected to grow on net basis.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Rami had indicated that Juniper had landed some deals in the back end. I'm wondering if you could unpack and give us a little bit more detail

Cloud & AIM&ACompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Neri explained Juniper becoming de facto standard above NVIDIA Spectrum in large AI deployments. Active conversations with NeoCloud and service providers. Deferred architecture details and sales approach to October SAM.

Calendar 2025 Q1

I'm wondering are you targeting more of the the cloud builders right now and is that affecting some of the the assumptions

DemandMarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Neri emphasized the balanced three-segment approach with particular enthusiasm for enterprise AI's 40% order growth. Highlighted sovereign supercomputer win rate and Gen 12 refresh opportunity.

Calendar 2024 Q4

you indicated that traditional servers would be flattish to even slightly up sequentially in the January quarter, which I think defies seasonality

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Myers confirmed guidance and attributed it to continued Gen11 momentum. Neri added context on Blackwell transition timing and backlog composition.

ARMArm Holdings2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
ARM company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

wondering what your thoughts on are whether or not SoftBank will potentially need to sell some of the Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares stock that it holds to finance some of the investment

Competitive DynamicsCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Rene relayed direct conversations with Masa Son stating unequivocally no interest in selling any Arm shares. Called Masa very long on the company and very bullish about long-term prospects.

you've provided a forecast for some deceleration in the royalty revenue growth. I'm just wondering if you could elaborate on the trend

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Jason explained Q4 royalty growth deceleration is driven by lapping a stronger comp from Q3 overperformance and an unusual MediaTek chip release timing a year ago. Absolute royalty dollars for the full year expected to remain in line with earlier expectations.

SMCISupermicro2 questions · 1 reporting period · 1 of 2 challenging
SMCI company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

So I would have thought that availability of Blackwells, GB200 could have given you maybe some more upside to September and a more linear outlook for the year, but this would suggest more of a back...

ChallengingRevenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Charles attributed back-end loading to resolving 10-K constraints and improving chip availability from NVIDIA. Cited DCBBS as an accelerator but did not provide specific quarterly cadence.

And is any of this related to customers perhaps waiting for GB300? Or is that not a factor

DemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Charles confirmed some customers are waiting for GB300. Positioned SMCI as ready once NVIDIA supports shipment.

ALABAstera Labs, Inc. Common Stock1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
ALAB company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Maybe you could just talk qualitatively about your end market concentration. How has it trended the quarter?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Des described broad-based first-half strength, with Aries the largest line, Scorpio becoming largest in Q3, and Taurus, Leo CXL, optical, and custom adding into 2027.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
COHR Coherent, Inc.1520%3 of 15 questions
CIEN Ciena Corporation120%none of 12 questions
LITE Lumentum Holdings Inc.128%1 of 12 questions
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc.1020%2 of 10 questions
NTAP NetApp1010%1 of 10 questions
FFIV F5, Inc.90%none of 9 questions
P Everpure, Inc.80%none of 8 questions
ANET Arista Networks70%none of 7 questions
DELL Dell Technologies60%none of 6 questions
HPE Hewlett Packard Enterprise50%none of 5 questions
  • COHR
    Coherent, Inc. · 15 questions
    20%3 of 15 questions
  • CIEN
    Ciena Corporation · 12 questions
    0%none of 12 questions
  • LITE
    Lumentum Holdings Inc. · 12 questions
    8%1 of 12 questions
  • CSCO
    Cisco Systems, Inc. · 10 questions
    20%2 of 10 questions
  • NTAP
    NetApp · 10 questions
    10%1 of 10 questions
  • FFIV
    F5, Inc. · 9 questions
    0%none of 9 questions
  • P
    Everpure, Inc. · 8 questions
    0%none of 8 questions
  • ANET
    Arista Networks · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • DELL
    Dell Technologies · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • HPE
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
Show all 13 companies
CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
ARM Arm Holdings2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
SMCI Supermicro2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
ALAB Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • ARM
    Arm Holdings · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • SMCI
    Supermicro · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • ALAB
    Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q360%none of 6 questions3
2024 Q4147%1 of 14 questions9
2025 Q1128%1 of 12 questions9
2025 Q2166%1 of 16 questions10
2025 Q31414%2 of 14 questions10
2025 Q4157%1 of 15 questions10
2026 Q1813%1 of 8 questions6
2026 Q2119%1 of 11 questions10
2026 Q330%none of 3 questions2
  1. 2024 Q36 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 3 companies
  2. 2024 Q414 questions · challenge rate 7% (1 of 14 questions) · 9 companies
  3. 2025 Q112 questions · challenge rate 8% (1 of 12 questions) · 9 companies
  4. 2025 Q216 questions · challenge rate 6% (1 of 16 questions) · 10 companies
  5. 2025 Q314 questions · challenge rate 14% (2 of 14 questions) · 10 companies
  6. 2025 Q415 questions · challenge rate 7% (1 of 15 questions) · 10 companies
  7. 2026 Q18 questions · challenge rate 13% (1 of 8 questions) · 6 companies
  8. 2026 Q211 questions · challenge rate 9% (1 of 11 questions) · 10 companies
  9. 2026 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand35
  • Competitive Dynamics32
  • Revenue Growth30
  • Cloud & AI30
  • Innovation & R&D13
  • Product Launch12
  • Supply Chain9
  • Margin9
  • Trade Tariffs9
  • Cost Pressure6
Show all 18 topics
  • Pricing6
  • Regulation Policy6
  • Guidance Reliability6
  • Inventory3
  • M&A2
  • Capex Investment1
  • Geographic Expansion1
  • Capital Allocation1