Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Tal Liani

Bank of America · covers Technology, Communication Services

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).

Questions
64on tracked calls
Challenge rate
41%26 of 64 questions
Companies
12questioned at least once
Reporting periods
9with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 64 of 64 questions from 12 companies

CSCOCisco Systems, Inc.12 questions · 8 reporting periods · 5 of 12 challenging
CSCO company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

which means that there was some slowdown of the hyper scaler orders this quarter

Show response

Robbins attributed the optics to comparison and telco acceleration, insisting hyperscaler demand is unchanged; asked by Thomas Zilberman on for Tal Liani.

Calendar 2026 Q2

are you concerned that enterprises -- non-AI customers are buying ahead of time because of supply constraints

DemandSupply ChainTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Mark acknowledged modest pull-ahead, cited 3 supporting data points: 4-5pp of acceleration from price increases, no incremental pipeline pull-forward from Q4, and healthy Q4 pipeline with no degradation.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Can you drill down and tell us -- you spoke about orders in the prepared remarks. Can you speak about revenue growth

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Patterson highlighted strength across entire networking portfolio with data center switching double-digit 6 of last 8 quarters and campus platforms ramping faster than historical launches.

when I look at the sequential growth from Q3 to Q4, it's only 1.4%. So normally, it's 5%, 6%

ChallengingRevenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Patterson noted Q3 is tracking normal seasonality despite huge Q2. Robbins added hyperscaler order lumpiness creates uncertainty in historical seasonal patterns.

Calendar 2025 Q4

The rest of the business, which is the majority, $55 billion base for last year, is only growing 3.6%

ChallengingRevenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Robbins shared that ex-hyperscale, rest of business grew 9% on orders. Patterson noted second-half comps are much tougher (Q3/Q4 FY25 were +11% and +8%).

Calendar 2025 Q3

What are the trends in service revenues, and what should we expect going forward

Show response

Patterson explained services revenue decline reflects lapping of post-backlog professional services. Services typically trails product growth, expects improvement as networking revenue ramps.

How much risk is there that this year is a phenomenal year for spending and trends would slow down next year

Capex InvestmentCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Robbins acknowledged visible CapEx growth of ~50% aggregate but sees continued demand signals from customers, believes AI spending is durable.

Calendar 2025 Q2

whether 2025, you think is a peak year. CapEx will likely slow down materially slow down. What happens to Cisco

ChallengingCapex InvestmentCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Robbins cited global sovereign cloud strategies and said he does not believe 2025 is peak. Herren added that enterprise AI inference is a significantly larger opportunity than training.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Splunk was down 11% this quarter year-over-year, maybe my numbers are totally wrong. So if you can clarify what's happening with Splunk

ChallengingM&ARevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Herren explained calendar mismatch (Splunk's Q4 week 13 fell outside Cisco's Q2), confirmed Splunk still growing double digits and profitable ahead of plan.

security and observability. It's supposed to accelerate - it accelerated last quarter. Can you talk about the trends this quarter

ChallengingProduct LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Robbins noted four consecutive quarters of organic security demand growth, highlighted 1,000+ customers for Secure Access and XDR with ~1M users each, Hypershield Fortune 100 wins.

Calendar 2024 Q4

what is driving this massive growth in orders? And can you elaborate on the areas where you participate in cloud

Show response

Chuck gave detailed breakdown: 4 of 6 largest webscale customers above triple-digit growth, AI orders >$300M, participation spans silicon, systems, and optics across back-end and front-end.

Very strong gross margin, very strong operating margin this quarter. Talk about the drivers and sustainability of these margins

Show response

Scott attributed to Splunk mix, productivity improvements, and one-time duty drawback catch-up. Guided 68%-69% for full year, indicating sustainability ex the one-time benefit.

CIENCiena Corporation10 questions · 5 reporting periods · 4 of 10 challenging
CIEN company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

I just want to understand kind of get understanding of how backlog could behave in 2027.

Show response

Gary attributed the backlog build to lead times, not double-ordering; said revenue would be higher with more supply and the constraint persists into 2028.

any color on customer composition, meaning hyperscalers, I understand. What about smaller hyperscalers?

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Gary said about 50% of business is now direct hyperscalers, with growing 'neo scaler' demand expected to become increasingly important through 2027-2028.

Calendar 2026 Q1

What we are seeing in every cycle is that when there are constraints, customers start ordering much, much earlier, and that creates big increases in backlog and then declines. How can you manage it?

ChallengingDemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Gary emphasized installation services growth (+42%) as proof of real deployment, not phantom orders. Deep collaborative relationships provide visibility into actual deployment timelines. Mark added value exchange includes non-cancelable terms to protect against backlog cancellation.

are there any forward pricing or forward purchase commitments, etc., you can take in order to mitigate the future increase in component pricing?

Supply ChainMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Mark confirmed locking in current component pricing through purchase commitments. Acknowledged future repricing risk and actively having conversations on both supplier and customer sides to avoid margin squeeze. Results and guidance raise reflect confidence in balance.

Calendar 2025 Q4

you didn't have good visibility before for the growth. And the question I'm asking myself is do you have now good visibility going forward?

ChallengingDemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Mark pointed to $7.8B in FY2025 orders and sold-out Q1 as evidence of visibility. Gary attributed the acceleration to cloud providers' realization that networks became the gating item for AI infrastructure.

is there a chance that the margin will also have a gross margin will also have a cycle with revenues? Or what needs to happen for the gross margin to have a similar cycle to revenues?

Show response

Mark expects more sustainable margin improvement than past cycles due to space/power value proposition. Mid-40s gross margin now viewed as waypoint, not endgame. Expects multiyear gross margin expansion with sequential improvement through FY2026.

Calendar 2025 Q1

What's a good assumption for us for kind of steady state growth ignoring all the mountains and valleys? What's a good assumption for services growth, annual growth?

Show response

Jim recommended using optical business growth as proxy for services growth, noting quarterly variations are noise around that trend.

What are the applications for WaveLogic? Why is it growing? And where do you see it in the network?

Innovation & R&DProduct LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Scott provided detailed roadmap: long-haul/subsea core today, metro DCI pluggables growing, campus 2-20km coherent in 2026, inside data center beyond 3-year guide.

Calendar 2024 Q4

if the contribution of pluggables is going to go up over the next few years, what needs to happen to offset the margin pressure?

ChallengingMarginProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Jim acknowledged plug margins are below average today but will improve with WL6 Nano and volume ramp. Gary added line systems carry the biggest weight in margin mix, not plugs.

They're under such pressure of spending, and they talk about much lower spending cycle in the next few years. What drives their deployments?

ChallengingDemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Gary conceded service provider spend won't return to peak levels but expects recovery from two years of under-investment. Mofen and multi-cloud builds provide incremental growth on top.

FTNTFortinet9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 5 of 9 challenging
FTNT company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

What are the firewall trends? What drives this 32% growth in secure networking billings, and how sustainable is it?

ChallengingRevenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Ken attributed growth to 30 years of in-house innovation, integration of 30 functions in FortiOS 8.0, and ASIC improvements. Competitors rely on acquisitions and remain fragmented.

How sustainable is 32% growth? Is there an easy comp situation this year that boosts growth, or is there something more fundamental

ChallengingRevenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Ken pointed to comparable growth rates during COVID (low 40s). Christiane cited consolidation, simplicity, and security posture as drivers beyond AI, but no explicit sustainability timeline.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Product revenues went up 18%, materially below the street. The street expected about 12%. What are the drivers?

ChallengingRevenue GrowthProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Ken downplayed end-of-service as a growth driver, comparing it to not waiting for an old car to die before buying a new one. Cited SASE, SecOps, and OT as real drivers. John Whittle added the challenge is prioritizing among too many growth opportunities.

why is the guidance for next quarter kind of uninspiring. Revenue growth is slightly below the street

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Ken attributed Q4 guidance conservatism to service revenue drag from prior-year negative product billings, noting the 29-month average service term creates a lag. Product revenue strength should drive service recovery toward end of 2026.

Calendar 2025 Q2

are these displacements of existing vendors, let's say, a customer has Zscaler or Palo Alto and you're displacing them?

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Ken described SASE as both expansion from existing base (90%+) and competitive displacement. Three differentiators: single OS integration, sovereign SASE for service providers, and proprietary global infrastructure.

What is the margin outlook? And where is the balance between investments and margin upside?

MarginCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Ken described the long-term target of routing 70% of SASE traffic through owned infrastructure for cost advantage, acknowledging near-term investment pressure but framing it as long-term beneficial for margins.

Calendar 2025 Q1

why is -- why are we seeing some lightness in the guidance for the next quarter? Why don't we see the demand coming forward to the next quarter?

ChallengingRevenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Christiane explained sales teams are hesitant to increase commitments amid macro uncertainty, leading to conservative guidance despite strong April close rates and linearity. Ken added tariff-related caution but no price increases planned.

Calendar 2024 Q4

billing for the fourth quarter was better, but billing for the first quarter is weaker. So why is the weakness in bidding?

Revenue GrowthMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Keith explained Q4 upside came from $5-10M deals exceeding expectations by $40-50M, while Q1 caution reflects tariff exposure in Latin America, Canada, and US federal.

Product revenues outperformed so much this quarter And that might be a cycle, a reverse cycle, but the guidance for next quarter, I don't see outperformance

Revenue GrowthProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Keith attributed Q1 caution to tariff uncertainty and multinational exposure rather than fundamental weakness, while Ken noted the shift toward ARR/RPO may defer some billings.

FFIVF5, Inc.8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 7 of 8 challenging
FFIV company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

why do we see a lag between software? And at the time of refresh, don't companies upgrade their software package as well

ChallengingRevenue GrowthSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Cooper explained 90% of software is subscription with majority through renewal motion. Software attach at refresh is healthy but a small component of total software. FY26 slower growth reflects FY23's flat base in the 3-year renewal cycle, not weak expansion. FY27 expected to inflect with larger renewal base.

why are we seeing the growth only outside of the U.S. or less in the U.S.?

ChallengingGeographic ExpansionCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Francois cautioned against over-reading single-quarter regional mix, noting timing of shipments. All three secular trends (hybrid multi-cloud, threat landscape, AI) are global including U.S. EMEA has additional sovereignty catalyst driving outsized growth but U.S. AI trends remain strong.

Calendar 2025 Q3

even before that you only guided growth to 5%. So if that's the case, why don't we see a faster growth rate?

ChallengingRevenue GrowthSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Cooper reiterated FY23's flat software creates a math headwind in FY26's renewal base. FY27 will see reacceleration as FY24's stronger base comes up. SaaS transition headwind also ending. Term license business grew 18% in FY25, underlining healthy fundamentals beneath the cycle.

do you think you can further grow from this level? Or is the growth rate going to decline substantially because this level reflects kind of the level of the refresh going forward

Show response

Cooper confirmed still early in refresh with over 50% on legacy platforms. Additionally, data center capacity expansion for AI readiness is an emerging non-cyclical growth vector with multi-year potential. Near-term growth clouded by security incident impact.

Calendar 2025 Q1

When do you think AI starts to be a meaningful driver or a notable driver to growth?

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Francois noted AI revenue exists today across three vectors. Additionally, some hardware refresh is indirectly driven by AI readiness. AI gateway GA provides new purpose-built AI security solution with early traction.

why don't we see growth from new products, new markets, new drivers that you have in the quarter that renewal is weak?

ChallengingRevenue GrowthSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Cooper explained renewals drive growth because the base compounds annually with expansion. New business adds to the renewal base but isn't the primary revenue growth driver. ASC 606 upfront recognition creates lumpiness.

Calendar 2024 Q4

is there something special in Q1, Q2 that bring things forward, or is it just conservatism that they're not willing now to make a call on second half?

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Cooper acknowledged some hardware pull-in from pricing increases. For H2 software, same renewal base exists but too early to assume Q1's exceptional expansion rates will persist. Taking prudent approach given it's early in the year.

can you separate how much of it is, because of accounting and renewals, and how much of it is because, or because of real growth

ChallengingRevenue GrowthSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Cooper acknowledged ASC 606 creates lumpiness but emphasized the underlying driver is customers converging multiple solutions onto F5's platform. Expansion rates exceeding historical norms on large subscription renewals.

ANETArista Networks6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 2 of 6 challenging
ANET company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

what are the conditions—for deferred revenues to be recognized over the next few quarters

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Jayshree explained qualification cycles have extended from 2-4 quarters to 6-8 quarters due to new product complexity, customer readiness, and manual cable installation timelines.

Calendar 2025 Q4

The rest of the business, which is 60% of the business, you guide it to grow zero

ChallengingRevenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Jayshree pushed back on flat core business conclusion, noting it is too early in the year to specify segment growth precisely. Denied memory allocation prioritizing cloud over enterprise.

Calendar 2025 Q3

you started with 10% growth in 2Q, and it goes to 5% and now only 1.6%. So there is deceleration

ChallengingRevenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jayshree attributed quarterly variability to supply-driven shipment timing rather than demand weakness, reiterating strong commitment to 20% growth.

Calendar 2025 Q2

whether there is any correlation between the delays in Tomahawk 6 and your growth

Competitive DynamicsMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jayshree defended margins as efficiency-driven, not just pricing. Tomahawk 6 is in Arista's labs with new products expected next year. White box coexistence acknowledged.

Calendar 2025 Q1

whether the entire market behaves this way now, meaning -- we know tariffs are coming later in the year

Trade TariffsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Jayshree noted even if customers tried to pull in orders before July, Arista couldn't supply it all. No material inventory buildup at customer sites observed.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Enterprise grew 16% this year. What drives it? Is it just regular growth of data centers? Or do you start to see entries investing because of AI

DemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Chantelle cited coverage expansion, preferred partner programs, and new logo focus. Jayshree highlighted routing now includes dedicated hardware SKUs with 7280 platform.

QCOMQualcomm6 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
QCOM company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

when you launch a product into China and it's into the New Year's -- the Chinese New Year, et cetera, is first fiscal quarter the strongest quarter?

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Akash confirmed typical seasonality: Dec and Mar quarters strongest, June quarter lowest. Pattern consistent with historical handset business trends.

Where do you think you can perform better than you initially thought last quarter, et cetera? Can you give us a little bit of a color on how next quarter is behaving

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Akash broke down Q1: auto flat to slightly up from $1.1B record, IoT positioned for growth, handsets low teens sequential growth driven by Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 launches.

Calendar 2025 Q2

How do you see the China growth trends when it comes to the domestic market and international markets? What's the outlook from your perspective?

Geographic ExpansionCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Akash cited Xiaomi multi-year deal as evidence of strong China positioning. Cristiano added 30 years of China experience and expanding beyond phones into auto, industrial, robotics.

What are the implications of the decline in Apple? What are the implications on margins? Are they positive or negative?

MarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Akash confirmed ~30% margin target maintained. Growth in auto/IoT far exceeds Apple revenue scale, enabling continued margin management despite Apple decline.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I want to focus on a 20% growth of smartphones and QCT this quarter. And the question is how long will this continue?

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Akash broke down 13% handset growth into content increase (sustainable multi-year trend) and premium tier volume growth (21% to 30% of market), both seen as durable.

Calendar 2024 Q3

are you concerned that maybe the strength is more inventory build-out or build-out by customers

ChallengingInventoryDemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Amon countered peer weakness with data points on China OEM growth and content increase, and said Qualcomm no longer sees the old inventory dynamics.

Show 6 more companies
CRWDCrowdStrike5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 2 of 5 challenging
CRWD company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

can you discuss verticals like contribution of SMB and trends in SMB, kind of new market opportunities

DemandSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Podbere declined to provide segment breakdowns but noted success is agnostic across all customer sizes. Retention data will be provided at year end. All segments performing well.

Calendar 2025 Q3

now you're giving this guidance of of 40% growth in the second half. And the question is, what drives it and how sustainable is it

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Kurtz and Podbere cited platform consolidation, AI demand, Flex momentum, and competitive displacement wins as durable growth drivers beyond just the CCP anniversary tailwind.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Why is it causing a divergence? Why isn't it impacting the same way ARR? And just to follow-up on this is why you said that you expect ARR growth to accelerate

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Podbere explained CCP partner program amortization under ASC 606 causes temporary ARR/revenue divergence. Back-half conviction driven by Flex momentum and platform consolidation.

Calendar 2025 Q1

the growth from existing customers had gone down, which means there is a decline in the growth in upselling to existing customers

ChallengingSubscriber GrowthRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Podbere deflected somewhat by noting DBNR is noisy and that larger/longer Flex deals pressure the metric, but positioned it as positive for long-term economics.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I want to understand how 4Q changes and why wouldn't 4Q be actually better than 3Q?

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Burt detailed five specific Q4 headwinds: delayed pipeline generation, extended sales cycles, continued CCP deployment, uncertain CCP mix, and maintained $30M ARR/subscription impact estimate.

ZSZscaler3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
ZS company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

the stock is down, but the trends beneath the surface seem very strong. And I'm trying to understand what is driving it

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Jay attributed strength to all three growth pillars accelerating. Kevin confirmed organic growth consistent with Q4, beating internal expectations. Competitive landscape hasn't changed, new firewall entrants rarely seen in deals.

Calendar 2025 Q2

how much of the growth is because of scheduled billing? And how much of the growth is because of new products that are beyond ZIA, ZPA

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Remo broke down: unscheduled billings grew 28% YoY, scheduled as expected below 20%. Q4 guide implies 25% unscheduled growth. Emerging products expected mid-20s to high-20s%. Jay said NRR of 114% is strong but bigger platform deals naturally reduce NRR.

Calendar 2025 Q1

when you talk about Zero Trust Branch, when you talk about Zero Trust Cloud, practically, what does it mean? What are you selling

Product LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jay explained Zero Trust Branch eliminates SD-WAN, firewalls, NAC, and switches. Zero Trust Cloud does workload-to-workload via exchange. Competition is legacy firewall vendors.

PANWPalo Alto Networks2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
PANW company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

What's the impact on dilution on margins or free cash flow margins? And then how long does it take to see the synergies

Show response

Dipak set 37% FCF floor inclusive of both acquisitions before returning to 40%+ by FY28. Nikesh explained Chronosphere will run independently under Martin Mao while integration focus is on CyberArk. CyberArk synergies expected by end of FY26.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Can you go over kind of what happened to margins this quarter that I saw a little bit of pressure and then what's the outlook for the year

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Dipak attributed pressure to newer SaaS offerings not yet at scale. Nikesh added a one-time 40 basis point hardware inventory write-off that won't repeat.

CRWVCoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
CRWV company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

your backlog of revenues, what determines the recognition of revenues from it?

Revenue GrowthMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Management explained revenue recognition begins when tested capacity is handed to the customer, then straight-lined; answered directly.

NBISNebius Group N.V.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
NBIS company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

How do you plan to finance this additional CapEx? And are you considering disposing some of your noncore holdings?

Capital AllocationCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Dado Alonso said over 90% of the February CapEx range is secured, with incremental spend funded via asset-backed and corporate debt and possible equity.

NOWServiceNow1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
NOW company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Your pricing is token-based, assist based and competitors like Salesforce offer outcome-based

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Amit defended the hybrid license-plus-usage model and data/context moat; Gina added Pro Plus uplift above 30% and AI-native SKU uplift of 20-30%.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc.1242%5 of 12 questions
CIEN Ciena Corporation1040%4 of 10 questions
FTNT Fortinet956%5 of 9 questions
FFIV F5, Inc.888%7 of 8 questions
ANET Arista Networks633%2 of 6 questions
QCOM Qualcomm617%1 of 6 questions
CRWD CrowdStrike540%2 of 5 questions
ZS Zscaler30%none of 3 questions
PANW Palo Alto Networks2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
CRWV CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • CSCO
    Cisco Systems, Inc. · 12 questions
    42%5 of 12 questions
  • CIEN
    Ciena Corporation · 10 questions
    40%4 of 10 questions
  • FTNT
    Fortinet · 9 questions
    56%5 of 9 questions
  • FFIV
    F5, Inc. · 8 questions
    88%7 of 8 questions
  • ANET
    Arista Networks · 6 questions
    33%2 of 6 questions
  • QCOM
    Qualcomm · 6 questions
    17%1 of 6 questions
  • CRWD
    CrowdStrike · 5 questions
    40%2 of 5 questions
  • ZS
    Zscaler · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • PANW
    Palo Alto Networks · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • CRWV
    CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
Show all 12 companies
CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
NBIS Nebius Group N.V.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
NOW ServiceNow1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • NBIS
    Nebius Group N.V. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • NOW
    ServiceNow · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q31100%1 of 1 question1
2024 Q41145%5 of 11 questions7
2025 Q11145%5 of 11 questions8
2025 Q2813%1 of 8 questions6
2025 Q31050%5 of 10 questions6
2025 Q4743%3 of 7 questions6
2026 Q11155%6 of 11 questions7
2026 Q220%none of 2 questions2
2026 Q330%none of 3 questions2
  1. 2024 Q31 question · challenge rate 100% (1 of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2024 Q411 questions · challenge rate 45% (5 of 11 questions) · 7 companies
  3. 2025 Q111 questions · challenge rate 45% (5 of 11 questions) · 8 companies
  4. 2025 Q28 questions · challenge rate 13% (1 of 8 questions) · 6 companies
  5. 2025 Q310 questions · challenge rate 50% (5 of 10 questions) · 6 companies
  6. 2025 Q47 questions · challenge rate 43% (3 of 7 questions) · 6 companies
  7. 2026 Q111 questions · challenge rate 55% (6 of 11 questions) · 7 companies
  8. 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  9. 2026 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Revenue Growth30
  • Demand22
  • Competitive Dynamics13
  • Guidance Reliability10
  • Margin10
  • Cloud & AI7
  • Product Launch7
  • Subscriber Growth6
  • Capex Investment4
  • Geographic Expansion3
Show all 19 topics
  • Supply Chain2
  • M&A2
  • Macroeconomic2
  • Pricing1
  • Capital Allocation1
  • Cost Pressure1
  • Trade Tariffs1
  • Innovation & R&D1
  • Inventory1