Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Tami Zakaria
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q3 (8 quarters).
- Questions
- 86on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 6%5 of 86 questions
- Companies
- 12questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 8with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 86 of 86 questions from 12 companies
PCARPaccar14 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 14 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
So what underpins that margin guide? Why would not margin be better sequentially?
Show response
Feight gave two specific drivers: truck-to-parts revenue mix and a shift toward fleet from vocational trucks.
but with the NCPs that have been announced, it seems like the fine could be lower than the cost of a compliant engine.
Show response
Feight confirmed the economics and flagged the proposal is still in a comment period.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Does this outlook include the year-to-date strength in orders—meaning do you expect orders to moderate
Show response
Management explained outlook shaped by Q1 running at or below 200K annualized, requiring rapid acceleration to reach 250K midpoint
Does that change your view on what would be the tariff impact, especially for aftermarket parts
Show response
Management directly addressed tariff impact as limited due to truck-specific Section 232 offsets with moderate but not significant effect
Calendar 2025 Q4
are you rolling back some of those price increases or surcharges given that Section 232 eases some of the tariff cost burdens
Show response
Feight confirmed surcharges eliminated for 2026. Some price slide in Q1 expected but more than offset by cost reductions for net positive price-cost.
Did you see at any point in the fourth quarter the gross margin rate being in that, you know, 12.5% to 13% range
Show response
Feight confirmed sequential margin improvement even within quarters, suggesting Q4 exited at improving levels heading into Q1 guide.
Calendar 2025 Q3
is there any plan to give back any of this pricing as some of these headwinds are offset
Show response
Feight indicated some cost benefit will flow to customers, potentially supporting market share gains, but framed as fair value exchange.
the 3.75% value of the truck to offset tariffs extends through 2030, which gives, you know, some time to plan ahead
Show response
Feight noted conversations with suppliers beginning but too early to commit to sourcing changes. Five-year runway provides planning time.
Calendar 2025 Q2
When do you expect that to be fully operational? And when at run rate, how many engines do you expect
Show response
Baney confirmed Columbus MS plant operational Q1 2026 with 5,000 remanufactured engines per year at full run rate.
just any color you can provide on what drove that revision in the outlook versus the beginning of the year
Show response
Feight attributed South American weakness to 400bps Brazilian interest rate increases since start of year, dampening consumer confidence.
Calendar 2025 Q1
any color on what mix of parts come into the U.S. from the outside
Show response
Schippers noted parts can reprice immediately unlike trucks. Less than half of parts purchases from non-US origins. PACCAR makes some proprietary parts.
it seems like there aren't any potential Section 232 tariffs embedded in the second quarter gross margin guide
Show response
Feight confirmed Q2 guide reflects current tariffs only. Section 232 adjustments could be favorable but outcome unclear.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Can you help us understand how to think about deliveries by geography in the first quarter versus the fourth quarter
Show response
Feight gave clear regional breakdown: US Class 8 flat to up, medium-duty normalizing, Mexico pre-buy fading, fewer production days in South America.
the whole idea could be rethought at this point given the current administration shift away from BEVs
Show response
Feight strongly defended the Amplify JV as long-term strategic, offering full powertrain portfolio for customers regardless of regulatory shifts.
ITWIllinois Tool Works13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 13 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
are you seeing any improvements quarter-to-date in some categories or largely trends have remained stable
Show response
Gave intra-quarter cadence (April good, May sustained, June better) and confirmed Q3 is tracking to the raised guide.
I think you're targeting 30% operating margin by 2030 and 3 of your 7 segments are already at or above that.
Show response
Walked through Automotive, Test & Measurement, Food Equipment and Construction runway rather than ranking them, but answered the substance.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how do you view the proliferation of GLP-1 drugs and its impact on demand from restaurants and the hospitality industry
Show response
CEO dismissed GLP-1 as a near-term concern, noting QSR is a smaller portion of Food Equipment and it is too early to assess impact. CFO added innovation will offset pressures.
Calendar 2025 Q4
the auto segment growth in China was, I think, about 5% I think granted bills were also slower in the fourth quarter in China. But anything else to call out there?
Show response
Chris cited EV penetration with Chinese OEMs (now 70% of market) as primary driver. China auto OEM up 12% for full year. Michael added China overall up 9% for year with welding mid-teens, T&M high single digits. China now $1.2B or 8% of revenue, expected mid-to-high single digit growth in 2026.
How are you thinking about growth in the U.S. or Americas versus Europe as it relates to the 1% to 3% organic growth outlook for the year?
Show response
Michael said North America up ~2%+ based on run rates, Europe flat with no improvement expected, Asia Pacific up mid-single digits driven by China mid-to-high single digits. More CBI contribution and less PLS headwind bridges to 1-3% organic.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Should we expect this to continue at that 1% range for the next few years?
Show response
Chris said 2026 PLS not yet determined, it's bottom-up from divisions. Whether 50bps or 100bps, it's an ongoing value-creating activity tied to 80/20 front-to-back with <1 year payback.
do you perceive this to be an opportunity down the line given your market share with the big 3?
Show response
Chris said produce-where-we-sell means factories are already in place. More US production would mean more for US factories, but no huge net benefit since capacity already exists.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I just wanted to ask about the new operating margin outlook. I think you reduced it at the midpoint
Show response
Michael explained tariff pricing is EPS positive but modestly margin dilutive. This is a timing issue, margin will be recovered as in prior cycles.
should we expect sequential improvement versus 2Q?
Show response
Michael confirmed Auto margins will be solidly above 20% in H2 and full year, on track for low-to-mid-20s target by next year. Enterprise initiatives and CBI margins driving improvement.
Calendar 2025 Q1
the organic growth guide 0% to 2%, I think I heard you say it includes some pricing action
Show response
Michael confirmed organic growth guide includes tariff-related incremental pricing as potential offset to volume weakness in H2. Updated auto build projections also factored in.
have you already taken pricing in response to tariffs, or you're waiting to take the pricing when tariffs become effective
Show response
Michael confirmed all impacted divisions have acted on March announcements, some already on April announcements. 2017-2018 and post-COVID experience gives confidence in pricing power.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you remind us of your exposure to direct imports from countries like Mexico and also the EU and Canada?
Show response
Michael disclosed China at 5-6%, Canada 2%, Mexico 2% of US spend. $250M China imports means 10% tariff = $25M price action needed. Manageable for a $16B company.
Minus any tariff-related noise, what is the expectation for price cost for this year that's embedded in the guide?
Show response
Michael said normal price-cost environment: price offsets costs on dollar basis and is slightly favorable on margin. Differentiated products support pricing power.
TRMBTrimble Inc.10 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I think I heard you say you are going to reach the EBITDA target of 30% a year early. So what's next?
Show response
Rob pointed to an Investor Day next year for new targets and reiterated confidence in continued operating leverage without giving 2027 numbers.
what is the duration of a typical data center project where you can stay involved?
Show response
Rob walked through Trimble's involvement from capital program management through survey, civil, layout, fit-out and handover, noting the revenue flows in over months to quarters.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how do you have confidence that Claude users would eventually migrate to using SketchUp instead of just staying on Claude
Show response
Rob explained Claude creates initial models but SketchUp needed for iteration, multi-user collaboration, professional-grade analysis (rendering, energy modeling, daylight analysis). Professional users require authoring tool. Claude lowers barrier to entry.
to get to your full year guide, we need to see a lot of slowdown versus the first quarter number
Show response
Phil cited tough H2 2024 comps, Middle East uncertainty, tariff policy, and less hardware visibility. Started well but incorporating risk alongside opportunities. Will update in a few months.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I wanted to get an update on TC1. Could you remind us if it's available globally everywhere now
Show response
Rob confirmed majority of AECO ARR under TC1 framework. Rolled out in Europe, still in motion in Asia Pacific. TC1 eliminates friction for cross-sell by establishing unified terms and conditions.
Calendar 2025 Q3
should we expect similar year-over-year improvement in operating margins
Show response
Phil declined to guide on 2026 margins, saying only revenue preview of mid- to high single-digit was being provided at this time. More detail coming at Q4 earnings call.
would you consider levering up to buy back stock? Or are you waiting for any opportunistic acquisitions
Show response
Phil prioritized business investment, then tuck-in M&A in construction software, then committed to over one-third of free cash flow returning to shareholders via buybacks. Leverage well below 2.5x target.
Calendar 2025 Q2
was there any front-loading by customers ahead of tariffs that will drive a weaker back half
Show response
Phil confirmed no prebuying or inventory buildup. Survey channel actually saw some destocking. Back-half caution driven by macro prudence and tougher year-over-year comps as Field Systems inflected in H2 2024, not demand concerns.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Is that $10 million coming from mainly China? I'm basically trying to understand what the $10 million impact per quarter could look like
Show response
Phil clarified tariff impact is mainly Canada/Mexico USMCA non-compliant products entering U.S., not China. China imports are low-dollar items like cables and batteries with minimal impact.
can you remind us what revenue exposure you have to federal sources and whether we should expect any impact from any dose-related cost cuts
Show response
Phil stated federal exposure is in single-digit millions for rest of year. They were conservative entering 2025 and have removed additional amounts. Further cuts would not be material.
CMICummins9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
So I think 2Q builds, you're expecting to be better than 1Q. And so sequentially, are we talking about maybe 20%, 30% growth
Show response
Mark confirmed Q2 step-up, Q3 remaining strong, Q4 seasonally weaker. Rest of year expected as good or better than Q1. Adding production shifts to meet rising medium-duty demand.
could you share what was the price realization in the quarter
Show response
Mark confirmed price/cost was modestly positive but not a significant driver. Straightforward and transparent on the limited pricing contribution.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is there a scenario where we would see the first wave of aftermarket services picking up for those units that you've sold
Show response
Rumsey clarified limited aftermarket from backup power gen sets. Distribution earns on installation. Broader installed base in other applications does drive aftermarket growth.
if NOx 2027 is not delayed after review, how are you thinking about the cadence of any product launches in 2026
Show response
Rumsey confirmed products ready to launch in 2027 if regulations stay. Unprecedented uncertainty around regulation has been challenging. Engaging with EPA on cost reduction levers.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Should we expect better cost absorption and improved incremental margin versus what we are seeing now when the remaining capacity goes live
Show response
Smith confirmed aspirations for higher margins after capacity absorption but noted complexity across products and regions. No dramatic changes expected for remainder of 2025.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Are you able to share what price cost was in the first quarter?
Show response
Smith provided clear breakdown: ~3% price-cost improvement offset by ~1% negative volume impact for net ~2% gross margin expansion.
for the distribution and component segments, are those primarily made in the U.S. as well or what's the mix of imports
Show response
Smith noted Distribution is a reseller; Components has U.S. manufacturing but supplier base brings tariff exposure. Complexity comes from sub-tier suppliers, not Cummins plants.
Calendar 2024 Q4
what pre-buy lift is embedded in the current heavy-duty and medium-duty outlook for North America?
Show response
Smith confirmed stronger second half built into forecast driven partly by regulatory prebuy. Q1 expected to be low point. Deflected on quantifying exact prebuy lift.
if power generation demand holds at these levels, it seems like distribution could see another double-digit growth year in 2025
Show response
Smith confirmed power gen as main Distribution swing factor but noted mining and oil/gas could add growth beyond 2025 if economy strengthens.
WABWabtec8 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
What are some of the factors you believe drove that? Was it driven by any specific industry, or was it broad-based?
Show response
Rafael credited truck-market dynamics, higher fuel prices, driver shortages and better rail service; no shift in mods/new demand yet.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can you remind us whether you have any LNG or natural gas variations of your marine engines or even locomotive could be used for non-rail power generation
Show response
Rafael confirmed marine engine (Tier 4 compliant, niche market) and power generation capability exist but opportunities are very specific and limited. A locomotive is essentially a generator on wheels.
Could you provide some color how to think about the rest of the year?
Show response
John explained equipment/services lumpiness driven by locomotive run scheduling. First half favors equipment growth with more new locomotives. Combined worldwide mods and locos expected up for full year, but down slightly in North America. Mods down significantly, double digits, driven by North America.
Calendar 2025 Q4
is it mostly according to the transit segment or freight or pretty much split between the two?
Show response
John confirmed Integration 3.0 savings approximately fifty-fifty between freight and transit, noting transit is slightly overshared relative to its revenue contribution.
if you could provide some color on how to think about seasonality for that segment as it relates to last year?
Show response
Rafael confirmed transit margins on track to expand to high teens over planning horizon. John noted 2025 had level-loading that front-loaded organic growth to Q2-Q3. Expects more balanced delivery in 2026.
Calendar 2025 Q3
the 300 locomotives under that contract, is that also over the next fifteen years or could the delivery of those could be more front-end loaded?
Show response
John clarified 300 locomotives over ten years as a baseload, noting previous contract was exhausted early due to strong demand growth from new lines, volume growth, and fleet aging.
Should we expect this growth to accelerate in the fourth quarter and maybe build momentum in 2026?
Show response
Rafael noted businesses tracking to plan except for worse-than-expected railcar builds (~$100M impact). Industrial products positive especially heat exchangers for mining and AI-driven power generation.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Are you able to reprice the backlog if needed, or would pricing actions be primarily focused on new orders going forward
Show response
Rafael declined specifics but described managing a basket of business across new locos, mods, multiyear agreements, and transactional parts. Confident in delivering guidance and constructing profitable growth.
CATCaterpillar Inc.7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
What do you expect for the full year in terms of STUs? I know you’re guiding to mid to high teens revenue growth
Show response
Zakaria asked about full-year sales-to-users and channel restocking; Creed pointed to continued STU momentum and a more normal Q4 dealer-inventory drawdown.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Wondering what keeps your view on the margin opportunity unchanged versus the Analyst Day
Show response
Andrew explained progressive margin targets require 31% pull-through to maintain position. Accelerated depreciation from capacity additions creates margin drag in Power and Energy. Current tariff headwinds also factor in.
Calendar 2025 Q4
the AIP announcement last night
Show response
Creed said AIP order mostly natural gas generators similar to Joule as a complete system. Battery component is small portion of overall total. Capacity for prime power growth included in existing expansion plans. Prime power creates significant services opportunity three to five years after delivery as gensets hit overhaul cycles.
Calendar 2025 Q3
what drove the acceleration in sales to end users in the quarter
Show response
Creed attributed E&T growth to getting more product through factory as capacity expansion progresses. RI had timing benefits on commissioning from quarter to quarter. CI continuing to see great pickup from merchandising programs in North America with performance above industry trends. Backlog growth across all segments provides momentum into Q4 and next year.
Calendar 2025 Q2
how you're thinking about mitigating some of these tariff headwinds as you look in the medium to long term
Show response
Creed emphasized Caterpillar's global manufacturing complexity with over 50000 US employees across 65 locations in 25 states and a net exporter position with exports up 75% since 2016. All mitigation options on table including sourcing changes and pricing but longer-term levers require investment and time. Taking no-regrets short-term actions and pursuing USMCA certification. Not characterizing anything as permanent given continued fluidity.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how should we think about this for the remainder of the year
Show response
Bonfield clarified Q2 tariff estimate is not full quarter impact as some tariffs took effect mid-quarter. Company has not implemented all mitigating actions available. Over 50% of tariff impact from China which has highest rate. If China tariffs moderated through deals would significantly reduce cost base. Will keep investors updated through the year.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how did construction and resources orders do sequentially in the quarter versus the third quarter?
Show response
Bonfield said E&T was major driver of Q4 order growth. Some improvement in resource industries orders particularly related to large contracts previously announced. CI orders broadly flat for the quarter year over year.
Show 6 more companies
RSGRepublic Services7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
New York is proposing that landfills treat leachate for PFAS before discharging to waterways.
Show response
CEO said Republic is engaged at state and federal levels, favors sensible regulation, and views landfills as the right point to capture and treat PFAS leachate.
Calendar 2026 Q1
do you expect residential volumes to turn positive at some point next year?
Show response
CEO was candid that residential volumes likely still decline in 2027 due to rollover from midyear contract losses. Will continue prioritizing returns-focused pricing over volume.
Just wondering if you could remind us how much of your portfolio is indexed to the CPI? Should it continue to go higher?
Show response
CFO detailed restricted pricing mix: ~20% headline CPI, 35% alternative indices (water/sewer/trash), 45% fixed rate or rate review. 12-month look-back with 12-month implementation lag.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Should we expect volumes to get sequentially better or pretty much ratable in 3Q, 4Q
Show response
Brian guided to flattish Q3 volumes from remaining event-driven work, turning negative in Q4 as projects complete.
any color on what to expect for 3Q versus 4Q
Show response
Brian maintained 5% full-year yield target on related revenue, implying just under 5% in H2 after 5%+ in H1.
Calendar 2025 Q1
did that range of volume outcomes embed any recessionary scenario or any incremental slowdown in the broader economy
Show response
John confirmed no recession scenario in guidance, instead assuming slow and steady cyclical recovery with more detail coming after Q2.
are you expecting that segment's EBITDA margin to eventually be up year over year in 2025
Show response
John confirmed full-year ES margin expansion expected, cautioning that quarter-to-quarter mix variation makes quarterly comparisons noisy.
WMWaste Management6 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
How should we think about C&D volume growth or volume decline in 3Q versus 4Q?
Show response
Fish gave a specific full-year figure of about negative 0.8% against original guidance of positive 0.4%, attributing the gap to unrecovered winter volume.
how much tonnage do you expect this to run rate at and over what time frame?
Show response
Morris said he did not know the tonnage off the top of his head and redirected to remaining Medley airspace and the South Florida disposal position.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I was wondering if you could quantify the price versus volume you saw in health care this quarter?
Show response
Fish could not quantify healthcare price vs volume split on the call and deferred to IR team for offline follow-up.
Your sustainability EBITDA dollars was robust, but margins sequentially ticked down to, I think, 45% from 50% in 4Q
Show response
Hemmer confirmed 300bp recycling margin expansion target on track and 200bp renewable energy margin expansion expected. Higher RNG pricing may push margins above guidance.
Calendar 2025 Q4
can you help us with the cadence of this as we think about 1Q versus the rest of the year
Show response
Tara outlined second-half weighted cadence due to carryover of late-2025 plants plus 3 new projects coming online in first half of 2026. Deferred specific modeling splits to IR follow-up.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Could you comment on where these customers that are churning are going to
Show response
Rafa noted losses are often partial, not full customer departures, because no competitor can match Stericycle's full network. Exit interviews confirm customers will gravitate back to single-provider solution once ERP stabilizes.
URIUnited Rentals5 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
is there a reason to expect rental revenue growth to slow down from the year-to-date double-digit rate?
Show response
Ted declined a specific back-half growth number, pointing to the guidance range and noting ancillary/re-rent as the main swing factor.
Calendar 2026 Q1
the $100 million increased gross CapEx, is that driven by general rental or specialty?
Show response
Matt said increase is spread across the portfolio with specialty slightly overweight due to faster growth and cold starts. Also spending on gen rent products that are tight for major project support.
I'm curious about the World Cup that you mentioned, should we model a sizable maybe onetime tailwind from that in the second quarter?
Show response
Matt said World Cup is already embedded in guidance. No single project or event is material enough to move the needle for the full company. Known well in advance.
Calendar 2025 Q3
is it fair to assume your raised equipment purchase plans would be across Gen Rent and Specialty equipment? Or is there -- are there any specific categories
Show response
Matt said incremental CapEx is broadly distributed across the portfolio, not specialty-heavy like typical growth CapEx. Large projects consume the full equipment range.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Is there a structural barrier or reason why specialty maybe could not become a bigger part in local markets
Show response
Matt confirmed no structural barrier. Specialty prioritizes large/complex projects for cross-sell but local penetration opportunity exists as platforms mature.
DEDeere & Company4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
I think you expect now $1.1 billion of impact which I think is probably a $100 million lower
Show response
Management said the FY26 direct-tariff run rate fell from 1.2 billion to 1.1 billion, driven mainly by Section 32 tariff changes.
Calendar 2026 Q1
My question is on the new excavator, which is quite exciting. Curious whether you can comment on any marketing plans around the launch of this?
Show response
CONEXPO main launch event with 24 product launches including world premieres. Extensive customer testing before launch. 20-ton class excavators first fully Deere-designed and Kernersville-built. Excavators represent ~40% of NA construction industry. Differentiated technology and productivity features versus prior Hitachi partnership models.
Calendar 2025 Q3
in a scenario where, let's say, retail sales are up 5% or up 10%, are you expecting to be up -- the production to be up similarly?
Show response
Large ag production tracks retail 1:1 in FY2026. Small ag/turf and C&F get ~10% production lift from building in line with retail after FY2025 underproduction.
Calendar 2025 Q1
the farmer aid package from December, how long would it take for farmers to receive the bulk of the money
Show response
Based on 2019 precedent, payments likely used to pay down debt, buy inputs, shore up balance sheets rather than triggering new equipment orders near-term.
BGBunge Global2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2024 Q4
do you see any potential benefits of any of this for any of your segments benefiting from this as the year progresses?
Show response
CEO said direct impact is small but positive for farmer investment in seed and inputs for the next planting season.
if, let's say, China promises to buy more from the U.S. maybe at the expense of South America?
Show response
CEO emphasized balanced global footprint allows regional trade-offs: US export benefit but potentially more challenging crush, with adjustments elsewhere in the global system.
ADMArcher Daniels Midland1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
Could you comment what volume growth was for S&S in the quarter? And more importantly, what volume growth you expect for the full year
Show response
Management noted pockets of weakness in European starch volumes from higher corn costs and softer March exports to Mexico from tariff uncertainty.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| PCAR Paccar | 14 | 14%2 of 14 questions |
| ITW Illinois Tool Works | 13 | 8%1 of 13 questions |
| TRMB Trimble Inc. | 10 | 10%1 of 10 questions |
| CMI Cummins | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions |
| WAB Wabtec | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| CAT Caterpillar Inc. | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| RSG Republic Services | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| WM Waste Management | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| URI United Rentals | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| DE Deere & Company | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
- PCARPaccar · 14 questions14%2 of 14 questions
- ITWIllinois Tool Works · 13 questions8%1 of 13 questions
- TRMBTrimble Inc. · 10 questions10%1 of 10 questions
- CMICummins · 9 questions0%none of 9 questions
- WABWabtec · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- CATCaterpillar Inc. · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- RSGRepublic Services · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- WMWaste Management · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- URIUnited Rentals · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- DEDeere & Company · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
Show all 12 companies
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q1 | 15 | 0%none of 15 questions | 10 |
| 2025 Q2 | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q3 | 14 | 0%none of 14 questions | 9 |
| 2025 Q4 | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions | 6 |
| 2026 Q1 | 17 | 12%2 of 17 questions | 10 |
| 2026 Q2 | 12 | 8%1 of 12 questions | 8 |
| 2026 Q3 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
- 2024 Q49 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q115 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 15 questions) · 10 companies
- 2025 Q29 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q314 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 14 questions) · 9 companies
- 2025 Q49 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 9 questions) · 6 companies
- 2026 Q117 questions · challenge rate 12% (2 of 17 questions) · 10 companies
- 2026 Q212 questions · challenge rate 8% (1 of 12 questions) · 8 companies
- 2026 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand32
- Margin18
- Revenue Growth17
- Trade Tariffs16
- Pricing12
- Guidance Reliability9
- Competitive Dynamics9
- Capex Investment8
- Geographic Expansion8
- Cost Pressure7
Show all 19 topics
- Macroeconomic7
- Regulation Policy5
- Supply Chain5
- M&A4
- Product Launch4
- Cloud & AI3
- Innovation & R&D3
- Inventory1
- Capital Allocation1