Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Terry Tillman
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q3 (8 quarters).
- Questions
- 29on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 0%none of 29 questions
- Companies
- 4questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 8with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 29 of 29 questions from 4 companies
ROPRoper Technologies13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 13 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I think you all said continued ARR growth. I mean how is the growth compared to the overall software organic
Show response
Jason confirmed Vertafore ARR growth is above the segment; Neil added the agentic TAM could roughly double the market over time.
Calendar 2026 Q1
are you seeing with some of the businesses, you actually have to hire -- put in forward deployed engineers or kind of change how you go to market
Show response
Neil said yes, some businesses will need forward deployed engineers for change management. But likely a reallocation from customer support/service rather than huge cost increase. Some businesses see natural uptake while others face 'do I lose my job' trepidation requiring change management.
How much more sustainability is there in terms of just the momentum in terms of getting folks to move to SaaS?
Show response
Neil traced Aderant's multi-era growth: competitive market share gains (35% to 65% in large law), bolt-on product expansion for cross-sell, cloud enablement post-COVID, and now AI tailwind. Still early innings (3rd-4th) on cloud migration. Multiple growth drivers with long runway.
Calendar 2025 Q4
did you actually see any improvement in order volumes for perpetual in December or January?
Show response
Jason said December naturally stronger but two large GovCon deals slipped at year-end. Expect both to land in H1 2026 but hedged guidance in case. Neil added commercial pipeline build has been encouraging throughout, no competitive issue, just signature timing pushed right by shutdown uncertainty.
Do you see ARPU lift continuing to play out through the year? And are you on track for that autonomous kind of load matching technology innovation to play out in '27?
Show response
Neil confirmed ARPU expansion continuing from like-for-like pricing plus more value to sell on both network sides (automation, data beyond load board). Automated matching technology works, brokers tendering, carriers matching, payments overlaid. Focus on native TMS integrations with cascade of announcements expected in 2026.
Calendar 2025 Q3
what are you assuming in 4Q? And the second part of that first question is, and maybe this is wildly optimistic, but assuming at some point, the government shutdown thesis, could you actually get t...
Show response
Jason said not assuming Deltek shutdown recovery hits in Q4 but acknowledged customers can decide quickly. Very strong pipelines across businesses despite tough Q4 2024 comps. Feels good about Deltek for 2026 with cloud AI features driving conversion of largest maintenance base at Roper.
is there any way you can frame like how much you can garner now per successful load or transaction going forward with some of this newer technology versus the past
Show response
Neil sized opportunity at 1.2M daily loads x $100-200 labor savings per automated load. Declined to specify capture rate but signaled strong conviction. Requires TMS integration with every broker and carrier onboarding. Early broker integration results described as 'sold out.' Emphasized Switzerland positioning.
Calendar 2025 Q2
do these just create opportunities for solid for longer? Or potentially some reacceleration of growth from some of these newer dynamics
Show response
Neil said Neptune's meter-to-cash strategy is unique in the market, compelling for smaller municipalities wanting single-vendor solutions. Growth pickup expected but will take time.
how is ProCare performing, particularly as it's becoming more of an organic calculation?
Show response
Neil acknowledged ProCare underdelivered at 10% vs 15% target. Complete leadership change (CEO, CFO, CRO, CTO). Go-to-market massively improved. Expects mid-teens growth in H2. Payments attach at 75%.
Calendar 2025 Q1
is the AI-driven revenue meaningful at all at this point for CentralReach? And are you seeing some of that kind of AI attach rate yet
Show response
Neil said CentralReach AI revenue not yet material but is a meaningful growth driver. Broader portfolio pivoting to Agentic AI with digital employees monetized on work-completed basis.
I think it was up 50 bps in the first quarter. How do we think about core EBITDA margins for the year
Show response
Jason expects segment-level core margins up nicely with corporate G&A making total flattish. Acquisition margins improve through year with Transact seasonal ramp and CentralReach at low-40s.
Calendar 2024 Q4
could you stack rank a little bit from -- as you talk to the leaders of the businesses, what's kind of -- is there any macro that's actually starting to help
Show response
Neil cited leadership talent upgrades as primary driver, followed by more stable macro outlook and ongoing SaaS conversion tailwind with $900M+ of on-premise maintenance still to convert.
as it relates to DAT, I don't know if this is -- maybe this is a hard question, but pricing and packaging and value kind of monetization
Show response
Jason outlined phased pricing actions: half the network in Q4, another action in H1 2025, and more at year-end, all tied to fraud prevention and network reliability improvements.
TYLTyler Technologies9 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
building on that last question on the transaction deal that’s a $10 million ARR deal, I’m curious
Show response
Miller confirmed the deal was transaction-funded from the outset and explained where that model does and does not fit.
what seems more impactful? Document automation, priority-based budgeting, or the resident AI assist?
Show response
Moore declined to rank the products but said document automation and resident AI are getting the most traction today.
Calendar 2026 Q1
In terms of just confidence level, 90 days since your last update on SaaS flips, the volume and velocity as we look through the year.
Show response
Lynn said confidence very high with clients now receptive and hesitation in the past. Public safety now 100% going to cloud. AI a tailwind but not yet a big tailwind. 2030 plan unchanged.
Did something happen or inflect in terms of maybe just go-to-market and kind of the sales playbook?
Show response
Lynn said no specific inflection, just timing of 2 big deals (Miami-Dade ~$800K and Harris County ~$1M). ROI selling point resonating. Expects document automation to expand beyond courts into broader Tyler portfolio.
Calendar 2025 Q4
maybe if we could, double click into that And the second part of the question, somewhat unrelated is, when we look at the SaaS revenue, you gave the guide for '26.
Show response
Lynn said state sales team still early innings but really good Q4 sales success including several deals over $1M ARR. New Mexico corrections deal wouldn't have happened without them. Brian said SaaS growth expected fairly consistent across year at 20%+ range.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Could you maybe double-click on kind of approaches you have been taking to be much more programmatic to drive those add-on sales and expansions?
Show response
Lynn said inside sales outperforming quotas but still early in 2-3 to 10-12 products per client journey. Also noted ERP RFPs in Q2-Q3 were highest in 2 years, confirming demand recovery from post-ARPA blip.
Calendar 2025 Q2
if I just look at the SaaS bookings of [ $148 million to $218 million ], that is a substantial uplift sequentially and is higher than any bookings last year
Show response
Brian attributed SaaS bookings strength to inside sales expansions, strong renewals of multiyear deals signed last year, plus sequential improvement in new logo deals.
Calendar 2025 Q1
as you look to the rest of the year, in terms of visibility and just kind of execution risk and what seems kind of easier to plan for, how does it feel on the flip side versus new SaaS bookings?
Show response
Brian confirmed flips are on track with internal plans. Average contract duration at 2.7 years bounces around the standard 3-year term based on client preference mix.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Are you hearing about anecdotally some increased conversations because of maybe this trickling down?
Show response
Lynn said no DOGE impact from clients yet. Announced new dedicated state sales team for 2025 representing full Tyler portfolio, expects gradual ramp.
PATHUiPath Inc.5 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
Anything at all you could share early on, on some excitement in areas you see where you could have a quick impact?
Show response
Asked where Gupta as COO sees quick-impact opportunities; he cited faster post-sale starts and tighter coordination among partners, services and delivery teams.
is it pretty similar in terms of that initial landing or impact? And was outcome-based monetization involved in any of
Show response
Asked whether AI-attached deals land similarly and whether outcome-based monetization featured; Ramani said AI/platform deals are naturally larger but did not detail outcome-based pricing.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Are you all seeing situations where it's involved in managing agents from system of record companies
Show response
Daniel said Maestro is agent-agnostic, with tight integration for its own agents and support for open-source frameworks like LangGraph.
Calendar 2025 Q2
thinking about maybe we consolidate with vendors that are further along in Agentic
Show response
Daniel confirmed customers are consolidating away from legacy RPA vendors that cannot keep pace, favoring combined AI-agent and robot platforms.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I'm curious about SolEx. First, in terms of the timing on how this could kind of go through their ecosystem
Show response
Daniel called SAP SolEx early innings but expanding reach and pipeline; Ashim said SolEx follows normal 606 revenue recognition.
SHOPShopify2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how often is this actually now being a primary driver of demand gen and actually getting the new merchant?
Show response
Harley said Catalog converts 2x vs general search and AI search converts nearly 80% higher than traditional organic search; likened the AI builder moment to the COVID entrepreneurship surge via Sidekick.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Will this be generally available in time for the holiday season? And how do you think about that as we go into the back half of the year?
Show response
Harley confirmed Catalog and Checkout Kit are already live with Microsoft Copilot using Checkout Kit. Universal Cart launched in early access. The three products enable discovery, cart management, and embedded checkout for AI agents.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| ROP Roper Technologies | 13 | 0%none of 13 questions |
| TYL Tyler Technologies | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions |
| PATH UiPath Inc. | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| SHOP Shopify | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q1 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q2 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q3 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q4 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q1 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q2 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
- 2024 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q25 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q15 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Cloud & AI13
- Competitive Dynamics9
- Revenue Growth9
- Demand9
- Product Launch4
- Subscriber Growth4
- Regulation Policy3
- Pricing2
- Innovation & R&D2
- M&A2
Show all 12 topics
- Cost Pressure1
- Margin1