Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Tim Arcuri
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).
- Questions
- 156on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 22%34 of 156 questions
- Companies
- 18questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 9with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 156 of 156 questions from 18 companies
KLACKLA Corporation15 questions · 8 reporting periods · 7 of 15 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I am a Little confused as to why you cannot raise prices to at least offset memory prices. I know that you are coming
Show response
Gave a concrete structural reason (orders already booked) and explained pricing resets happen at new product introduction.
gross margin is being guided flat on up 10% revenue. I know you went through why that Is and you are basically giving
Show response
Declined to give a December gross margin figure, pointing to mix and the 63.5% plus or minus 500 basis point long-term view.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I just wanted to come back to this idea that you're outgrowing WFE this year. You're guiding up sort of high teens
Show response
CFO explained the 2025 WFE baseline is about $120B, with $140B+ for 2026 translating to mid-to-high-teens growth. Semi PC systems expected to grow over 20%, outperforming the overall market.
I wanted to ask you about the pushout of High-NA. And just like what the puts and takes are for you?
Show response
CEO said High-NA is exactly as modeled with no change to expectations. CFO added that process control intensity is rising independent of litho scaling, driven by architecture changes and high-mix design.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I think you meant the back half of the year. Is that a half on half comment?
Show response
Bren confirmed the high single to low double digit growth is a half-on-half statement for second half 2026 but declined to guide the full year with more precision.
Did the market downtick, or did stuff pull in?
Show response
Bren attributed the range shift to market size volatility rather than a fundamental change, noting KLA's share went from roughly 10% of the packaging market in 2021 to close to half in 2025 with continued positive momentum.
Calendar 2025 Q3
can you give us RPO? I know it was $7.9 billion last quarter. Where did it end this quarter?
Show response
Bren confirmed the RPO disclosure change effective fiscal 2026, citing cross-industry inconsistency, with lead times now normalized to 7-9 months and annual backlog to be disclosed in the 10-K.
But even to get down 10%, I have to have China down like $250 million Q-on-Q in December. Is that the right number
Show response
Bren confirmed China in the high 20s percent for December, translating to about 30-31% for the full year, with 2026 expected to settle in the mid-20s from both export restrictions and general normalization.
Calendar 2025 Q2
can you give us RPO?
Show response
Bren disclosed RPO at approximately $7.9 billion, down about $1 billion as lead times normalize from 18 months to 7-9 months with long-backlog customers worked through.
you were thinking up 10% for the year, but you seem to be running ahead of that?
Show response
Bren confirmed service growth in the 10% plus range with sequential growth expected to continue through the year on the 52nd consecutive quarter of YoY growth.
Calendar 2025 Q1
why stop reporting RPO midyear? Was it like causing the problem?
Show response
Bren explained the RPO change starting fiscal 2026 aligns with peer practices, shifting to transaction price for unrecognized contracts to address cross-company comparison confusion.
it implies back half systems is down like 15% half-on-half. That's a lot. So do you take issue with that math?
Show response
Bren pushed back on the math, indicating semi-PC systems expected roughly flat half-on-half, implying WFE outgrowth significantly exceeds mid-single-digit.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Bren, can you give us RPO? It was supposed to be up. Can you give us the number?
Show response
Bren disclosed RPO was down $900 million, half from debooked orders due to export controls and half from higher shipment levels, a notable departure from expectations.
what about EPC? It was up a lot this quarter. It grew a lot in, well, it didn't grow that much, but it grew a lot in Q4
Show response
Bren guided EPC to mid-single-digit growth, with flat panel exit offsetting semiconductor packaging growth from SPTS and ICOS, but improving margin mix by 20-30 bps.
Calendar 2024 Q3
They have a base assumption as to what it's going to look like, and that's and that's handicapping our guidance.
Show response
Higgins said KLA contemplated all export-control scenarios and is comfortable with the December guidance range regardless of what happens.
TERTeradyne14 questions · 7 reporting periods · 4 of 14 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
So I guess the question is, like, is 8%, like, in your mind, when you think about it, is 8% the right number?
Show response
Gregory traced test from near 4% of total CapEx in 2023 to 8% in the first five months of 2026 and gave a 7% to 9% settling range.
So the question is, when do all these new calls start to add to share gains?
Show response
Gregory said share effects appear in 2027 and will be gradual and socket by socket, without committing to the aspirational share number the analyst asked for.
Calendar 2026 Q1
It sounds like the demand signals has anything gotten better over the past 3 months, but you're not raising guidance for the back half of the year
Show response
Michelle provided detailed breakdown of low-end (timing/lumpiness risk) vs high-end (continued AI strength) of range. Greg added segment-by-segment color on first-half vs second-half weighting.
So is that total [ 11 5 ] for the year, is that like a reasonable TAM number for the year?
Show response
Greg declined to confirm or deny the TAM figure, citing uncertainty and noting how far off 2025 TAM estimates were in April 2025. Said Advantest's numbers are not absurd but not confident enough to share their own.
Calendar 2025 Q4
can you break down the SoC TAM in 2025, the $7.2 billion
Show response
2025 SoC TAM breakdown: compute ~$5B, mobility ~$1B, auto/industrial just under $1B, service ~$700M. Memory TAM just under $1.4B ($1.2B DRAM, rest flash). VIP compute TAM was just over $600M.
it seems to me like the Semi Test share only gets back to the like high 30s, which is really only where it was from 2022 to 2025. So it doesn't really seem to imply that much share gain
Show response
Greg sees share in low 40s in the target model. Proportion stays roughly 80-10-10 across Semi Test, Product Test and Robotics. IST revenue is in company totals but not in ATE TAM denominator.
Calendar 2025 Q3
can you just maybe give us a little bit of a sense on Q1? I mean, is it -- should we expect it to be down a little bit?
Show response
Historical mobile-driven seasonality no longer applies. Compute projects are lumpy and tied to customer launches. Different shaping expected going forward. Will update in January.
can you give us a sense like it seems like it's maybe evenly split between memory and SSD. Is that a fair just general number to kind of think about in terms of the composition of the growth in cal...
Show response
Q4 Semi Test growth skewed 2/3 compute+networking, 1/3 memory. Consistent with Greg's earlier breakdown.
Calendar 2025 Q2
does it make you optimistic about your mobile market and your large customer in particular next year?
Show response
2nm gate-all-around plus wider memory buses increase tester resources per device. Mobile will be larger but smaller as share of mix due to compute strength.
So can you just help us like size how big that can be and sort of when it starts to impact your business?
Show response
2025 impact minimal (NPI work). 2026 will be a needle mover. US manufacturing for supply chain resilience, not just this customer.
Calendar 2025 Q1
this is such a big order, when does it help the business? Does it ship in the back half of the year?
Show response
Shipments spread across Q1-Q2; short lead times on robotics products. Order was from a global automotive manufacturer for both MiR AMRs and UR cobots.
can you give us some TAM updates from what you provided during the Analyst Day?
Show response
Declined to update TAM breakdowns given trade policy uncertainty. Prior estimates were $4.9B SOC and $1.4B Memory for 2025.
Calendar 2024 Q4
PBT has been negative for the past 6 years. Cumulatively, it's -- you lost $150 million
Show response
Framed IA losses as market-driven not execution-driven. Sanjay corrected cumulative loss to $23 million since 2019 at operating level.
these numbers would imply that the test intensity is like less than 1% for that stuff
Show response
Acknowledged disconnect with chip company forecasts, noted model is bottoms-up by unit quantities and device complexity rather than TAM-linked.
INTCIntel Corporation13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 13 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
So I guess that implies a pretty big step up in revenue for Q4.
Show response
Zinsner noted Intel only guides one quarter out and cautioned that while Q4 should see lift, supply will still not catch up to demand.
Calendar 2026 Q1
it seems like Terafab is a little bit of a different deal and maybe even like a process licensing agreement
Show response
Lip-Bu stayed high-level on the Terafab partnership, describing a broad relationship and shared vision without clarifying the commercial structure or whether it is a standard foundry deal.
is there a way to sort of quantify like how much demand you're sort of missing out on?
Show response
Dave declined to provide a specific number but indicated the missed revenue opportunity starts with a 'B', meaning billions of dollars.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I'm wondering if you can kind of pro forma that for us like if you could meet all the demand, what would the kind of unconstrained guidance be for March?
Show response
Dave said $12.2B midpoint is low-end seasonal relative to $13.7B Q4. Unconstrained would be well above seasonal. Declined to quantify the gap precisely.
what do you define as like success in that business? I think prior to you arriving, the mantra was sort of to be #2 -- the #2 foundry player by 2030
Show response
Lip Bu focused on execution milestones rather than revenue targets. 14A on track, customer decisions expected H2 2026. Dave highlighted advanced packaging as early success indicator, opportunities well north of $1B each, larger than previously expected. Customers prepaying for EMIB-T substrate capacity.
Calendar 2025 Q3
you didn't give an update last call on Diamond Rapids launch date. I know the whole road map is under review, but you did sound -- the company sounds fairly optimistic about Coral Rapids
Show response
Lip Bu said Diamond Rapids getting stronger hyperscaler feedback. Coral Rapids in definition stage with SMT multithreading for higher performance. No specific launch date given for either product.
I'm wondering -- and this is probably a hard question to ask -- to answer, but I wonder if you could maybe just kind of fast forward a bit and say like what would gross margin be if you were off of...
Show response
Dave identified two dynamics: foundry cost structure improvement from newer nodes (moving from negative to positive GM) and product quality/competitiveness improvements needed especially in data center. Startup costs from stacked process launches are billions of dollars and will roll off beyond a few years.
Calendar 2025 Q2
if I'm an outside customer and I'm looking at your road map and I see this hedging on 14A, why would I engage?
Show response
Lip Bu said 14A is being designed as a foundry node from inception with early customer engagement. Will only deploy CapEx after seeing volume commitments and yield milestones.
Could you take like $5 billion out of gross CapEx next year? If you can give some sense on that
Show response
Dave said maintenance CapEx is roughly $9B (half of $18B) but 2026 will be meaningfully higher than $9B yet below $18B. Still digesting $50B in assets under construction.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Can you help us with sort of what a clean number is for March? You guided 36%, but that was supposed to have some COGS headwinds
Show response
Dave said top-line beat and favorable Raptor Lake mix were the two biggest margin drivers. Stripping those out, margins would have been much closer to the guide.
How do you think about that? And how can you update us on sort of what you're tracking?
Show response
Lip Bu prioritized internal ramp first, then building trust with external customers on PDK and schedule. Declined to announce specific external customer wins.
Calendar 2024 Q4
you took the CapEx to the low end, but there's $1.2 billion outflow that's in the financing section
Show response
Dave transparently acknowledged working supplier payment terms to lower CapEx timing, noting over $50B in assets under construction being digested rather than new external purchases.
can you just sort of level set us for kind of how to think of the incrementals from here?
Show response
Dave said 40-60% incremental fall-through is the right framework for 2025, pulled down from the usual 60% due to Lunar Lake cost pressure. 60%+ expected in 2026 with Panther Lake volumes.
MUMicron Technology, Inc.12 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
You said that 14 of the 16 SCAs have $100 billion in cumulative revenue.
Show response
Sanjay confirmed the $100B floor-price revenue figure and stressed actual revenue is expected to be much higher, with ~25% of revenue under SCAs.
how much of the August quarter revenue, for example, will be flowing under an SCA?
Show response
Mark walked through the RPO and next-12-month disclosure mechanics under ASC 606, noting RPO is a conservative minimum figure.
Calendar 2026 Q1
You are going to generate, I do not know, $35,000,000,000 to $40,000,000,000 in free cash flow
Show response
Mark framed priorities as balance sheet (delever, now solid BBB), organic investment (CapEx, R&D) with ROIC over 30% headed towards 50%, the 30% dividend increase, and significant future repurchase capacity for offsetting dilution and opportunistic buybacks.
is it fair to say that there is a mechanism in these SCAs that would limit your gross margin on the downside
Show response
Sanjay declined to comment on downside margin protection mechanics in SCAs, reiterating the agreements are multiyear with specific commitments designed to give visibility and stability to the business model.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I wanted to ask you about customer LTAs
Show response
Sanjay confirmed Micron is in multiyear LTA discussions with several key customers spanning DRAM and NAND, with 'specific commitments' and 'much stronger contract structure' than prior LTAs, while declining to share specifics.
So you took it up to $20 billion net
Show response
Mark said a substantial part of fiscal 2026 CapEx supports DRAM, HBM, and 1-gamma, with brick-and-mortar construction spend roughly doubling from fiscal 2025, and fiscal 2027 CapEx also expected to be up while maintaining discipline aligned with supply-demand.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you help us how that splits out between DRAM and NAND
Show response
Mark declined to break out bits vs ASP but said the 580bp sequential margin expansion comes from mix, pricing, and cost execution, with DRAM carrying the heavier growth mix.
I guess you had previously guided us to, like, a $100 billion HPN TAM by 2028
Show response
Sanjay reiterated the $100B HBM TAM by 2030 framework (vs. Arcuri's 2028 reference), reaffirmed that HBM bit CAGR outgrows DRAM, and emphasized the strengthening value proposition of HBM without updating the headline number.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I wanted to ask sort of how you see the HBM TAM scaling with the accelerator TAM
Show response
Sanjay framed HBM as growing from $18B to ~$35B in calendar 2025 and said HBM bit demand growth in 2026 will significantly exceed overall DRAM industry demand growth.
Calendar 2025 Q1
You're guiding revenue up about $750 million. How much of that is coming from DRAM versus NAND
Show response
Mark declined to give a DRAM/NAND split but confirmed bit growth in both and said DRAM/HBM would carry the bias of growth.
Calendar 2024 Q4
in terms of your DRAM bit shipments, you're sort of saying that they're going to be in line with the mid-teens for calendar '25. Is that right?
Show response
Murphy confirmed Micron expects to ship in line with industry DRAM bit demand of mid-teens for the full calendar year.
NAND demand is up low doubles, but I would guess you're going to under-ship that for the year. Is that fair?
Show response
Sadana directly stated Micron expects relatively stable bit share in both DRAM and NAND across calendar 2024 and 2025, meaning NAND shipments will grow roughly in line with demand.
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.11 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
of the growth between Q2 and Q3, which will grow more on a dollar basis, CPU or GPU?
Show response
Su declined a precise CPU/GPU dollar split but affirmed sequential double-digit data center growth in Q3 and more in Q4, so partial.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how much of that growth either in June or for the year, is like units versus pricing?
Show response
Lisa explained growth is primarily unit-driven, with ASP increases mainly to cover inflationary pressures. Jean added that mix shift to higher core counts is also lifting ASP.
your competitor has talked about the low latency part of the market being 20% plus
Show response
Lisa positioned AMD's full compute portfolio including CPUs, GPUs, and semi-custom capabilities as well-prepared to address low-latency and other inference optimization variants.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you give us a sense maybe of the other pieces? And then also, can you give us a sense of how, you know, data center GPU is gonna ramp through the year?
Show response
Jean Hu said Q1 data center grows sequentially with both CPU and GPU up (GPU including China); Lisa Su added MI355 ramps 1H and MI450 inflection hits 3Q-4Q 2026 into 2027.
Calendar 2025 Q3
can you give us maybe some anecdotes of how this has influenced your position in the market with other customers?
Show response
Lisa Su said the OpenAI deal plus the Helios OCP showcase accelerated customer interest with broader engagement at higher scale; supply chain is dimensioned to have multiple customers at similar scale in 2027/2028.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Is that going to be a material portion of the revenue you're going to recognize for MI355 in the back half of the year?
Show response
Lisa Su said the developer cloud is a developer-experience tool not a revenue driver, while large hyperscaler deployments remain the primary revenue opportunity for MI355.
Can you get to, say, $7 billion for the year? And can you give us some -- maybe a milepost on what you're assuming for Q3?
Show response
Lisa Su declined to confirm the $7B full-year number but said MI355 is ramping strongly from Q2 into Q3 with further Q4 growth expected, contrasting the MI355 ramp favorably to the slower MI300 ramp.
Calendar 2025 Q1
you said that data center GPU grew significant double digit, but it was like $600 million last March.
Show response
Lisa Su confirmed GPU performed in line with expectations but declined to give a specific dollar figure; said the $1.5B MI308 impact is front-loaded to Q2 and Q3 with very little in Q4.
Is that just due to ZT or is there something else happening there
Show response
Jean Hu attributed inventory build to lead-time-driven pre-build for the Q3/Q4 data center GPU ramp plus client and server support, not ZT-related.
Calendar 2024 Q4
wondering if you still think that the server CPU business can grow in line with that core kind of mid-to-high teens.
Show response
Jean Hu emphasized AMD's full portfolio strength (Turin, Genoa, Milan) delivering best TCO, supporting continued unit, ASP, and share growth in competitive server market.
Jean can you just give us a sense of where data center GPU came in for December?
Show response
Jean Hu declined to give a specific GPU dollar number but confirmed server grew faster than data center GPU in Q4; Lisa Su added first half 2025 roughly flattish vs second half 2024.
MCHPMicrochip Technology11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 5 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I wanted to ask you just your perspective on how long that this upturn can last
Show response
Steve gave concrete factors (data center, aerospace/defense, later-cycle industrial and automotive) for why the upturn could run longer.
Are there any inventory sale of previously written down inventory that is inflating margins?
Show response
CFO acknowledged reserve sell-through is a net benefit to margins but said it is not going away near-term.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Do you have any update on that? What do you think the pro forma growth rate is for Microchip Technology Incorporated?
Show response
Steve declined to quantify a pro forma growth rate, saying FY2027 growth would be substantially higher and deferring a longer-term figure.
Calendar 2025 Q3
what are these LTSAs? I mean, it's coming down very slowly. Why is it taking so long to bring these down
Show response
Steve clarified PSP program was dismantled. Eric noted LTSAs still exist in filings but customers are being given flexibility to push requirements out by 1-2 years without being forced to buy. LTSAs now serve mainly as design-in engagement tools rather than providing backlog visibility.
what's the point of even having them if they don't provide you any coverage in a quarter like December
Show response
Steve explained LTSAs serve as competitive moats, breaking the tie when customers choose between Microchip and competitors like TI or NXP. They no longer provide extra visibility and customers are not forced to take unneeded product.
Calendar 2025 Q2
you said bookings are the highest since July 2022. But in reference to another question, you're guiding up 5%
Show response
Steve declined to quantify December expectations but confirmed above-seasonal growth expected through March. Some strong July bookings are turns orders while others fill December quarter backlog.
a lot of us see what happened last cycle hand worry that when we hear that, that it could scare customers off a little bit because of the potential to get back into like a PSP sort of a dynamic
Show response
Steve firmly distinguished current approach from PSP: orders are cancelable, no forced early shipments, simply asking for 4-month backlog visibility. Eric and Rich added that better backlog visibility helps service customers and plan capacity.
Calendar 2025 Q1
do you have a way to determine what consumption is in June relative to your guidance
Show response
Steve confirmed sell-through exceeds sell-in guidance but the gap is narrowing from $103M to well below $100M. Production running well below consumption to drive inventory down.
should we expect margins to be higher this time around than they were at the same revenue level last time
Show response
Eric wouldn't commit to specific margin levels at comparable revenue, citing slope dependency and FIFO-based higher-cost inventory still to work through.
Calendar 2024 Q3
how long you think it could take the distribution channel to sort of get back to normal
Show response
Ganesh explained multi-level destocking dynamics but couldn't give a specific timeline for channel normalization.
does revenue have to get all the way back to 1.8 before you're no longer burdened by underutilization
Show response
Eric acknowledged significant underutilization but wouldn't pin a revenue level, citing mix and ramp slope dependencies.
Show 12 more companies
QCOMQualcomm11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 4 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
It seems a little fast to get something to market that includes your IP by the end of this year, given cycle time
Show response
Cristiano noted customer engagement predated the Alphawave acquisition, with Alphawave increasing execution capabilities and IP portfolio for a multi-generation relationship.
is the assumption still the same that like around your share in Apple
Show response
Akash confirmed 20% share assumption for fall phones with no product relationship beyond that, noting sell-side models of approximately $2 billion in QCT Apple revenue for FY27.
Calendar 2025 Q4
do you have any update on the Huawei license? I know we're still waiting for it. And maybe what's the sticking point?
Show response
Alex Rogers confirmed no Huawei update. Views Huawei and the other large customer renewals as significantly distinct paths. Early renewal discussions with large customer already underway.
The drop through is more than 100%. I mean, it's not surprising that margins would come down. They seem to be coming down pretty quickly
Show response
Akash denied any factor beyond revenue scale and higher OpEx. Cristiano added market-wide adjustment consistent with peers. Normal seasonality also a factor for Chinese premium launches.
Calendar 2025 Q3
before you were saying to take like 30% of units out, and that was like $500 million roughly. But it seems like nowhere near that much came out
Show response
Akash confirmed Apple share played out as expected (3 of 4 models). September upside was not from Apple but from Android premium tier with new Snapdragon chip launch.
is there any update on the negotiation with Huawei for a license? It seems like it's kind of dragging on a little bit
Show response
Alex Rogers confirmed no update on Huawei license. Discussions underway but nothing substantive to report.
Calendar 2025 Q1
is that a segment that you've seen any evidence of pull forward of demand
Show response
Cristiano cited Shanghai Auto Show partnerships and no signs of China customer defection. Product relevance for global ambitions of Chinese customers sustains positioning.
is there anything besides just the macro that you would sort of, point us away from thinking of that as like a normal, Q3?
Show response
Akash confirmed normal seasonality for Android/Auto/IoT but Apple share declining to ~70% for fall 2025 launches. Macro remains the primary uncertainty.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you give us an idea of how big the PC business was within IoT? You said you were 10%, I think, of the $800 or sorry, the above $800 laptop market
Show response
Akash declined to give quarterly PC revenue breakdown, redirecting to annual update cadence and 10% retail share metric as progress toward 12% long-term target.
is there any evolution in the way you're thinking about the modem situation that your large customer?
Show response
Cristiano clearly stated modeling assumptions: 20% share for 2026 launch, no renewal assumed for 2027. For 2025, share expected between 100% and 20%.
Calendar 2024 Q3
for China Android to be up more than 40%, it implies that your 2 other big customers are both down
Show response
Palkhiwala explicitly denied tariff-driven pull-forward, attributing the customer-level swings to launch cadence and timing of chipset purchases, not share shifts.
AMATApplied Materials10 questions · 7 reporting periods · 3 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
even if you go 40%, that implies a pretty big decel into December.
Show response
Brice committed to outgrowing the market and confirmed the raise path (>20% to >30% to higher) but declined to name a number, citing no out-quarter guide.
Calendar 2026 Q2
it sort of implies that you barely grow off of the July levels, which doesn't seem possible
Show response
Brice guided investors to assume linear dollar growth from Q3 through fiscal Q1. Gary clarified supply chain is the pacing factor, not demand.
is there a risk that this spreads and maybe it sort of then captures more in the net
Show response
Gary declined to comment specifically on Huawei restrictions but confirmed all impacts are factored into the quarterly guide and calendar year growth outlook.
Calendar 2026 Q1
is the message that you could do like $10 billion in system sales
Show response
Brice acknowledged the thought is fair but declined to give a specific capacity number, noting prepositioned space available and focus on working with 2,000 suppliers to scale.
on a pro forma basis, that actually is growing because you're taking the 200-millimeter equipment business
Show response
Brice pointed to recast tables in the press release and confirmed AGS should grow low double digits or better, supported by 55,000-tool installed base growing 5%+ annually.
Calendar 2025 Q4
is the add-back not going to be more than 600? And in fiscal Q1, like are you taking slots away from the other customers
Show response
Brice noted $110M ships in Q1 from pre-built tools but the remaining $600M requires cycle time to plan and build. The add-back will spread through the year as supply chain catches up. On PVD concerns, Gary expressed strong confidence with deep 4-generation visibility.
Calendar 2025 Q2
what you think the total business will grow for this year? And then my question is, most of the other companies expect WFE to be pretty first half-weighted
Show response
Brice declined to give a full-year AGS number but noted core AGS growing low double digits with 200mm equipment dragging headline growth. For WFE timing, noted 7% year-to-date growth with durable trends but did not commit to H1/H2 weighting.
Calendar 2025 Q1
do you think you gained WFE share? That's the first question. And then how do you kind of assess, Gary, headwind from these
Show response
Brice acknowledged Chinese vendors have advantages from trade rules but noted Applied gained share in all markets outside China. Gary pointed to strong positions in leading-edge logic, DRAM, HBM, and packaging.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how much WFE spending do you think has to be spent to support that much revenue
Show response
Brice expects WFE intensity to decrease slightly from elevated levels but remain in the mid-teens, with Gary noting increasing materials engineering intensity at advanced nodes.
you said that advanced node revenue is going to double. You said it was $2.5 billion I think this year
Show response
Brice quantified GAA increment at approximately one-sixth of the $7B total per 100K WSPM, noting most leading-edge logic shipments now target GAA nodes.
LRCXLam Research10 questions · 8 reporting periods · 0 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Can you give us some sense of sort of what to expect in service within the guidance for September?
Show response
Bettinger gave directional colour on upgrades, spares and advanced services but explicitly declined to quantify segment guidance.
How long will it take for you to move that up? Is it like a revenue thing or is it a time thing?
Show response
Answered both drivers and gave a timeframe of several years, though without an annual cadence figure.
Calendar 2026 Q1
can you like deconstruct how you got here so fast? And maybe also, I think people want to hear how much capacity you have
Show response
Doug detailed factory proximity efficiencies, lower logistics costs, and value-based pricing; Tim added tool reliability improvements reducing warranty costs.
are you seeing these signs of these huge new fab projects, sort of the customer base expanding
Show response
Tim confirmed strong demand but declined to comment on specific customers, noting more companies likely entering the semiconductor space as a future opportunity.
Calendar 2025 Q4
you're guiding, you know, WFE to a 135 this year. I mean, if we use semiconductor revenue and you assume sort of a normal WFE in number, seems like could get to, like, a 150. So maybe the constrain...
Show response
Doug declined to quantify the constraint gap but said plans are fluid as customers try to bring facilities online faster, and noted it sets up 2027 as another good year.
Calendar 2025 Q3
the incremental 4 to 500,000,000, where did that come from? It sounds like maybe a little bit of it pulled in from the first half of next year.
Show response
Doug acknowledged some pull-in from 2026 H1, which he now sees as flat to slightly up from 2025 H2, with HBM and broader demand slightly better.
Calendar 2025 Q2
do you think that December revenue is down as well just like gross margin? Or do you think it's pretty flat?
Show response
Doug confirmed December revenue will be down to roughly the March level, consistent with flat half-on-half WFE, which also partly explains the gross margin step down.
Calendar 2025 Q1
you made a comment on the call that you're, I think you said, quote, taking steps to limit the impact of tariffs. Can you talk about that?
Show response
Tim declined specifics but cited a flexible global supply chain built over recent years, including US and Asia operations, that enables agile optimization.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Doug, can you speak about the gross margin? The guidance is pretty good. And you talked about
Show response
Doug reiterated gross margin staying in a tight range, with customer concentration headwinds offset by Asia operations tailwind.
Calendar 2024 Q3
can you just talk about the puts and takes? I guess, particularly around China.
Show response
Management confirmed overall WFE up in 2025 but China lower and a smaller share of revenue, deferring specifics to the January call.
TXNTexas Instruments9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
it looks like at the lower end of the $2 billion to $3 billion gross CapEx guidance for the year.
Show response
Rafael reaffirmed the $2-3B CapEx range, leaning to the higher end given demand, and cautioned the ITC can be choppy as assembly/test capex is outside the US.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I know typically you don't break the guidance down by segment, but just given how different it was in March
Show response
Haviv declined to split guidance between industrial and data center but confirmed both strong. Automotive Q1 China was down, rest of world up, holding near peak levels.
I wonder if you can comment just on the behavior of customers. I know you're guiding up a little better than seasonal off of a number in March that was very strong
Show response
Haviv confirmed Q1 was continuation of Q4 trends, led by industrial and data center. Industrial signal was broader across all sectors and geographies, accelerating through the quarter.
Calendar 2025 Q4
are you thinking about loadings that you wanna keep inventory sort of in this four eight range? And you just wanna match loadings with demand from here
Show response
Rafael said TI is pleased with inventory and capacity positioning and will adjust loadings as needed based on demand visibility through the year.
can it go lower than that? Because I seem to recall a comment at our conference in December that it could go, like, lower than 5% of revenue next year
Show response
Haviv clarified the mid-single-digit revenue comment was about maintenance CapEx only (no-growth baseline). Rafael explained beyond 2026, CapEx intensity is ~1.2x long-term revenue growth gross, which nets to ~1x after ITC benefits.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I'm wondering if you can talk about the linearity of bookings through the quarter. I know, in the June quarter, things had softened throughout the quarter
Show response
Haviv said Q3 was more consistent than Q2 without the late-quarter moderation. Mike confirmed turns business followed expected cyclical recovery patterns without Q2's early-quarter spike.
if I exclude the depreciation, so on a cash basis, it's down, like, to sub 67. So hasn't been that low in, like, ten years
Show response
Rafael explained loadings are being adjusted down in Q4 to maintain $4.8B inventory levels given lower revenue, with higher depreciation adding further gross margin pressure.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Is there a way to handicap sort of what your exposure is in China to these retaliatory tariffs
Show response
Haviv confirmed China at ~20% of revenue aligned with GDP share, highlighted consignment inventory and geopolitically dependable capacity as key tools for navigating tariffs.
is there any way for you to know how much of this is pull-ins ahead of the tariffs? I mean, is there any way your discussions with customers
Show response
Haviv attributed Q1 strength to cyclical recovery rather than tariffs, citing broad industrial recovery and low customer inventories, but acknowledged possible inventory build desire in Q2.
NVDANVIDIA Corporation8 questions · 8 reporting periods · 1 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
Do you see the rise of open models as being good for NVIDIA or ultimately negative?
Show response
Jensen argued nearly all open models run on NVIDIA and that both closed and open models drive its sales, dismissing the trade-off framing.
Calendar 2026 Q2
the traction you are getting with some of these custom merchant things you are doing, stuff like, you know, CPX and LPX
Show response
Jensen framed LPX as a niche product for high-token-rate premium services with limited throughput and context processing, estimating the addressable market at 10-20% depending on AI maturity.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I know that you really jacked up the purchase commits
Show response
Colette defended ecosystem and supply investments as the priority while reiterating ongoing buybacks and dividends, without committing to an accelerated repurchase.
Calendar 2025 Q4
what's the single biggest bottleneck that worries you that could constrain your growth
Show response
Jensen acknowledged all factors as constraints but stressed NVIDIA's multi-decade supply-chain relationships, partnerships on land, power and financing, and confidence in routes to market.
Calendar 2025 Q3
You said 50% CAGR for the AI market
Show response
Jensen cited $180B in AI-native startup funding YTD (vs $100B all of last year), AI-native startup revenue going from $2B to $20B with 10x next year not inconceivable, and widespread H100/H200 sell-outs as evidence of sustained demand.
Calendar 2025 Q2
July guidance assumes there's no SKU replacement for the H20
Show response
Jensen said the new export limits make it impossible to reduce Hopper further and that NVIDIA has no product to announce for China today but is considering limited options.
Calendar 2025 Q1
we hear a lot about custom ASICs
Show response
Jensen laid out four reasons NVIDIA wins vs ASICs: architectural generality across model types, end-to-end stack coverage, perf-per-watt leadership directly driving revenue for power-capped AI factories, and the complexity of delivering and scaling a software ecosystem that is 10x more complex than two years ago.
Calendar 2024 Q4
is that still the right way to think about it that Blackwell will crossover Hopper in April?
Show response
Colette addressed the margin trajectory (low-70s during ramp, recovering to mid-70s), but Jensen did not commit to a specific crossover quarter, saying Hopper demand will continue through several quarters.
STXSeagate Technology Holdings7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
how does that fit with the idea that you're not growing units? Or are you, in fact, beginning to grow units
Show response
Mosley clarified units are not increasing but average heads per drive is rising. Romano added HAMR cycle time is longer than PMR so some PMR heads used to keep unit levels stable.
Calendar 2025 Q4
is it right to assume that pricing is also locked in for all of '26?
Show response
Romano confirmed volume and pricing are locked for all of calendar 2026 via POs. For 2027, volume indications and agreements are in place but pricing is not yet fixed.
Calendar 2025 Q3
why would it take another year to go from 15% to 20% of exabytes to more than half of exabytes?
Show response
Mosley explained the HAMR transition involves long wafer lead times and factory retooling that can't be switched quickly. Qualification doesn't immediately translate to full volume.
Calendar 2025 Q2
So sort of by definition, you have a year worth of visibility. Are you changing how you book that capacity?
Show response
Mosley confirmed demand exceeds supply capacity. Customers are working with Seagate on qualification timelines which provides long-term visibility into exabyte needs.
Calendar 2025 Q1
How much of that's related to the $200 million that you lost in March, I know it's probably a little hard to tell
Show response
Romano pushed back on double ordering, noting demand is genuinely strong. Mosley added BTO contracts provide enforcement and data center investments are not temporal.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you clarify exactly what you meant by, the entirety of the impact is being felt in March?
Show response
Mosley and Romano clarified the $200M is material not started in time and not recoverable, but June returns to the right supply level to match demand.
Calendar 2024 Q3
I had a question about the capacity outlook now given that you're just kind of bumping up against your max today
Show response
Asked whether growth flattens with Seagate at max capacity; Dave said exabyte capacity expands through technology transitions to higher-capacity drives without major capital additions.
MRVLMarvell Technology6 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
there is some speculation that you actually might be moving into the compute TAM, and that is by far the biggest custom compute wallet out there
Show response
Murphy acknowledged broad engagements across all US hyperscalers but did not confirm or deny compute TAM entry directly; emphasized current targets are based on designs already won.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Since you're guiding optics up double digits, can you give us a sense of sort of what the baseline is for the optics business
Show response
Murphy reiterated Q4 FY2025 data center mix (optics ~50%, custom ~25%, other ~25%) but declined to update quarterly. Acknowledged AI trending toward majority of total company but couldn't pinpoint exact quarter.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I think last quarter, you said that AI was about 55% of data center. I wonder if it was in the same range
Show response
Murphy declined to give exact quarterly AI mix but indicated trajectory toward AI becoming majority of total company revenue, not just data center. Deferred specific AI revenue target to future update.
did the customer think does this grow a little faster than that? That's why the gross margin was a little lower
Show response
Murphy confirmed custom business runs below company average gross margin. Meintjes added second-half gross margin expected in similar range as Q2 guide, with custom demand growing strongly.
Calendar 2025 Q1
you had guided AI to $2.5 billion this year. I think you said you used the word very significantly
Show response
Murphy declined to put a specific number on FY2026 AI revenue, saying the company is 'leaving this year open-ended' and will find the right time to update the target.
Did you mean half of AI's optics so that the AI breakdown is basically roughly half is optics and then half is custom ASIC
Show response
Arcuri clarified the mix percentages were for total data center, not just AI. Murphy confirmed.
SWKSSkyworks Solutions6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 3 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
are there any puts and takes where you would call out for the third calendar quarter that it would be any different than the usual up like 12%, 13%, 14% sequentially?
Show response
Phil only guides one quarter but sees nothing suggesting abnormal seasonality for back half. Book-to-bill above 1, lean inventories, strong demand signals across customer base.
can you talk a little bit about your content trajectory at your largest customer?
Show response
Phil expressed confidence in content position at largest customer with no unusual signals. Android win validates technology play and value proposition. Not seeing anything unusual on seasonality despite industry chatter.
Calendar 2025 Q4
you have about a $1 billion left on your repo authorization. The stock has obviously come in
Show response
Philip Carter confirmed $1.6B cash, $1B debt, with ample flexibility. Some requirements exist during pendency period. Announced 71-cent dividend. Must maintain financial prudence ahead of debt market access for deal closing.
it seems like maybe it's a risk that they push back on you on pricing
Show response
Phil acknowledged competitive pricing dynamics are always present at largest customer but noted Skyworks is supply-constrained and not seeing pricing pressure. Acknowledged dynamic could change going forward.
Calendar 2024 Q3
can you talk about what's included for the largest customer for December? It seems like you did see some pull-ins in the September
Show response
Kris pushed back on pull-in suggestion, confirmed demand tracking expectations. Largest customer expected up 5-10% sequentially in December.
I noticed that the repo was quite low despite the strong free cash flow, I might have thought it would have been a little stronger
Show response
Kris cited M&A optionality and $1.6B cash/$1B debt balance sheet but declined to share specific buyback considerations as a matter of policy.
ADIAnalog Devices4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
You have been thinking that you're shipping about 10% to 12% below consumption. Where do you see that in the guidance for April?
Show response
Rich confirmed customers are essentially ordering to consumption now, broadly true across end markets, with no evidence of restocking activity.
Calendar 2025 Q4
you talked about Maxim revenue synergies. Can you update us on that? I know you said you're on track, but maybe you can give us a sense of where that stands
Show response
Vince confirmed Maxim synergies in the hundreds of millions against $1B target by 2027, possibly achievable earlier. Rich confirmed Q2 normal seasonality is up mid-single digits.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you just talk do you think you're now shipping above consumption in these markets? How do you view sort of where we are?
Show response
Rich confirmed channel inventories remain lean with end demand still double digits below consumption, but expects some catch-up to end demand in Q4. Industrial guided up low to mid-teens sequentially.
Calendar 2024 Q4
you just mentioned that fiscal Q2 is gonna be up. I'm wondering what you consider normal seasonal to be in fiscal Q2
Show response
Mike provided clear seasonal framework of mid-single-digit Q2 growth at company level. Rich noted total bookings returned to growth with book-to-bill below one reflecting seasonal Q1 outlook.
AVGOBroadcom Inc.4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
are you beginning to consider maybe using other foundries to add more optionality to your supply?
Show response
Hock said supply for 2026-2027 is secured with 2028-29 in progress, and that customers coming for incremental supply can largely be accommodated.
Calendar 2026 Q1
should we think about that pulling gross margin down like 500 basis points roughly as these racks begin to ship? And I guess part of that, Hock, is there some like floor to the gross margin
Show response
Hock pushed back directly, said yields are dialed in and AI-mix margin impact will be minimal. Kirsten agreed, said impact 'not going to be substantial at all.'
Calendar 2025 Q2
UALink, which, of course, you left. And now there's the big GPU company opening up NVLink, and they're both trying to build ecosystems, and there's an argument that you're an ecosystem of one
Show response
Hock dismissed UA Link and NVLink as proprietary despite marketing, said Ethernet will continue to prevail for scale-up.
Calendar 2025 Q1
do these four new customers, do they add to that seven million unit number?
Show response
Hock confirmed the 7 million unit / $60-90B FY27 SAM framework includes only the three current customers; the four new engagement partners would be incremental to that number.
WDCWestern Digital3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 2 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
So is 13.5 million is that kind of like should we think about that as the high watermark for the number of drives you could produce in a quarter
Show response
Irving said production varies by mix and capacity; not a fixed ceiling. Don added client/consumer seasonal volumes could return in seasonal periods.
why would they not if they need two drives, why would they not tell you that they need three? And if they didn't take the drive
Show response
Irving noted healthy customer relationships with POs backing LTAs. Not a fan of take-or-pay clauses; prefers working with customers on demand smoothing.
Calendar 2024 Q3
So why would they not just place shadow orders to make sure they get what they need a year from now?
Show response
Challenged whether customers could place shadow orders; management clarified the agreements are visibility-driven, not take-or-pay, direct.
ONON Semiconductor2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
is the right rubric still to think like 30 bps per point of utilization
Show response
Thad confirmed 25-30 bps of gross margin per point of utilization and reaffirmed further margin expansion into Q4 on a consistent mix.
Can you just talk about, do you still see $300 million for the full year?
Show response
Thad said the exits are done, the $35 million was the Q2 impact, and annualizing Q1-Q2 gets to roughly $300 million for the year, about $900 million exited over recent years.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| KLAC KLA Corporation | 15 | 47%7 of 15 questions |
| TER Teradyne | 14 | 29%4 of 14 questions |
| INTC Intel Corporation | 13 | 8%1 of 13 questions |
| MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 12 | 0%none of 12 questions |
| AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 11 | 9%1 of 11 questions |
| MCHP Microchip Technology | 11 | 45%5 of 11 questions |
| QCOM Qualcomm | 11 | 36%4 of 11 questions |
| AMAT Applied Materials | 10 | 30%3 of 10 questions |
| LRCX Lam Research | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions |
| TXN Texas Instruments | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions |
- KLACKLA Corporation · 15 questions47%7 of 15 questions
- TERTeradyne · 14 questions29%4 of 14 questions
- INTCIntel Corporation · 13 questions8%1 of 13 questions
- MUMicron Technology, Inc. · 12 questions0%none of 12 questions
- AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc. · 11 questions9%1 of 11 questions
- MCHPMicrochip Technology · 11 questions45%5 of 11 questions
- QCOMQualcomm · 11 questions36%4 of 11 questions
- AMATApplied Materials · 10 questions30%3 of 10 questions
- LRCXLam Research · 10 questions0%none of 10 questions
- TXNTexas Instruments · 9 questions11%1 of 9 questions
Show all 18 companies
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions |
| STX Seagate Technology Holdings | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| MRVL Marvell Technology | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| SWKS Skyworks Solutions | 6 | 50%3 of 6 questions |
| ADI Analog Devices | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions |
| WDC Western Digital | 3 | 67%2 of 3 questions |
| ON ON Semiconductor | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- NVDANVIDIA Corporation · 8 questions13%1 of 8 questions
- STXSeagate Technology Holdings · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- MRVLMarvell Technology · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- SWKSSkyworks Solutions · 6 questions50%3 of 6 questions
- ADIAnalog Devices · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- AVGOBroadcom Inc. · 4 questions25%1 of 4 questions
- WDCWestern Digital · 3 questions67%2 of 3 questions
- ONON Semiconductor · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 9 | 56%5 of 9 questions | 7 |
| 2024 Q4 | 18 | 11%2 of 18 questions | 11 |
| 2025 Q1 | 24 | 17%4 of 24 questions | 15 |
| 2025 Q2 | 18 | 17%3 of 18 questions | 12 |
| 2025 Q3 | 20 | 30%6 of 20 questions | 13 |
| 2025 Q4 | 20 | 25%5 of 20 questions | 13 |
| 2026 Q1 | 25 | 16%4 of 25 questions | 15 |
| 2026 Q2 | 20 | 20%4 of 20 questions | 13 |
| 2026 Q3 | 2 | 50%1 of 2 questions | 2 |
- 2024 Q39 questions · challenge rate 56% (5 of 9 questions) · 7 companies
- 2024 Q418 questions · challenge rate 11% (2 of 18 questions) · 11 companies
- 2025 Q124 questions · challenge rate 17% (4 of 24 questions) · 15 companies
- 2025 Q218 questions · challenge rate 17% (3 of 18 questions) · 12 companies
- 2025 Q320 questions · challenge rate 30% (6 of 20 questions) · 13 companies
- 2025 Q420 questions · challenge rate 25% (5 of 20 questions) · 13 companies
- 2026 Q125 questions · challenge rate 16% (4 of 25 questions) · 15 companies
- 2026 Q220 questions · challenge rate 20% (4 of 20 questions) · 13 companies
- 2026 Q32 questions · challenge rate 50% (1 of 2 questions) · 2 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Revenue Growth61
- Demand52
- Competitive Dynamics32
- Guidance Reliability23
- Margin22
- Capex Investment19
- Supply Chain19
- Cloud & AI18
- Innovation & R&D13
- Trade Tariffs10
Show all 19 topics
- Inventory9
- Pricing9
- Capital Allocation9
- Cost Pressure6
- Regulation Policy6
- Product Launch6
- Macroeconomic3
- M&A3
- Geographic Expansion1