Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Anthony Petrone
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).
- Questions
- 37on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 3%1 of 37 questions
- Companies
- 7questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 9with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 37 of 37 questions from 7 companies
COOCooper Companies (The)8 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Is there any major difference in the margin profile of office surgical and fertility
Show response
Al declined to give segment margin or standalone CVI tax detail but reiterated the process is proceeding for the entire CooperSurgical business given strong interest.
Calendar 2026 Q1
what was the percent of private label exiting last fiscal year? And with the addition of these new private label contracts, where can that increase to?
Show response
Private label revenue share trend and margin impact. Management responded with context on this topic.
maybe can you size that in terms of the number of target practices you're going after? Like how many sites are you looking to penetrate?
Show response
MiSight Japan target practice count and market sizing. Management responded with context on this topic.
Calendar 2025 Q4
On CVI, maybe a little bit on the private label business. How that trended in the fiscal year?
Show response
Private label trends and CVI/CSI synergy assessment for strategic review. Management responded with context on this topic.
Could you talk about your expectations for '26?
Show response
MiSight FY2026 growth expectations with Stellest competition. Management responded with context on this topic.
Calendar 2025 Q1
do you think there is any risk just on a destock or a tighter inventory situation in contact lenses
Show response
Channel inventory risks from tariffs and IVF executive order impact. Management responded with context on this topic.
Calendar 2024 Q4
You mentioned a little bit on an inventory contraction. So you had strong back-to-school fits. But then in October, you had inventory contraction
Show response
MiSight inventory contraction seasonal pattern going forward. Management responded with context on this topic.
SiHy daily torics in particular, silicone hydrogel daily torics are margin accretive to the business
Show response
SiHy daily toric margin accretion and toric penetration trends. Management responded with context on this topic.
GEHCGE HealthCare8 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
when you think about AI-enabled platforms, you have Intelerad in there
Show response
Pete outlined dual AI model: (1) embedded AI in products (e.g. Vivid Pioneer's 4-5 algorithms drive higher price and margin expansion), and (2) SaaS-based features sold as customizable cloud applications per scanner or fleet. CT and ultrasound leading SaaS approach. Intelerad platform serves as reading interface for deploying AI tools across inpatient and outpatient settings.
what do you actually have baked in there from a tariff impact for 2026?
Show response
Jay confirmed 2026 tariffs below $250M (2025 level). Q1 is largest impact quarter, trailing down through year. No windfall from IEPA Supreme Court ruling. Tariffs assumed to remain in effect for rest of year. Refund submissions for 2025 tariffs planned but not included in guidance and accounting treatment TBD.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Maybe one will be on just, you know, how much price is actually in there just considering you have a fair amount of new product introductions
Show response
Pete confirmed no major like-for-like price step-ups entering 2026 but new products carry meaningful price premiums (e.g. Vivid Pioneer). Tariff-related pricing possible later in year. Jay confirmed IntelliRed expected to close in H1 2026, slightly dilutive in year one but offset by cost efficiency. Revenue approximately $270M growing low double digits with EBITDA north of 30%.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I saw you guys signed a distribution agreement with CDL on your pharma diagnostics side for [ Flyrcado ]. Is -- my understanding was CDL represents maybe
Show response
Pete clarified: 25% PET MPI market conversion = $1B Flyrcado without new scanners. PET system growth driven by both cardiology and oncology. Jay confirmed 2026 tariff impact will be below $265M current year level, structural supply chain changes, USMCA, selective pricing.
Calendar 2025 Q1
what is -- I'm assuming semiconductor impacts are reflected in your net $0.85 impact
Show response
Jay confirmed semiconductor tariffs reflected but not most significant. On 2026 pathway, confirmed below $0.85 but wouldn't quantify further, will update quarterly.
when you think about potential upside to that, is that more contingent on just rate of adoption at the nuclear medicine level
Show response
Pete confirmed adoption/conversion is primary driver, not capital equipment availability. Growing business in geographical pods due to radiopharmaceutical half-life. Potential for significantly faster ramp once critical mass reached.
Calendar 2024 Q4
if we have normalization in China, is it fair to say that this could be an upside case to the mid-20s on the margin side over time
Show response
Jay deflected specific mid-20s question, referencing 120bps expansion despite low growth. Pete added new product launches in 2026 at higher margins will help.
walk us through a little bit on the 18.7%, about 120 basis points above our model
Show response
Jay provided thorough margin bridge: 150bps from volume/mix/price, productivity offset inflation, ~100bps from one-time items. Noted not to extrapolate Q4 seasonality.
HOLXHologic6 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
should we expect to see working capital uptick here in the second half of the year as the company prepares more for that full launch next year?
Show response
Karleen said no meaningful inventory build needed since many Envision components are similar to the legacy 3D gantry.
how does pricing on a Fusion platform stack up to non-fusion assays?
Show response
Karleen clarified the goal is Fusion capability in every lab (not one-for-one with Panther). Over 1/3 have Fusion now. Fusion menu will carry a pricing premium over legacy Panther assays.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Maybe just an update on where we are in those cycles? And your latest views perhaps heading into one or more of those contracting cycles
Show response
Karleen declined to share contract details but pointed to molecular growth ex-HIV at low double digits as evidence of strong customer relationships.
How is your inventory of semis and does that present a headwind or lack, thereof, when you look at the next gantry cycle?
Show response
Essex dismissed semiconductor supply concerns, noting they expanded their supplier network during the prior chip shortage and see no headwinds.
Calendar 2024 Q4
What sort of gets you back to 5% to 7%, how long do you think that will take
Show response
Steve framed current softness as cyclical within a multi-year LRP window. Each franchise has growth drivers. H5N1 compared to Zika, not assumed in guide but would be upside.
Calendar 2024 Q3
should we be thinking that sort of the 2014 to 2017 sort of installs from the 3D Tomosynthesis on initial product cycle
Show response
Steve expects a rolling replacement cycle rather than a large bolus. Essex noted Gynesonics complements MyoSure by targeting different fibroid types.
RMDResMed6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
how often does that turn into a new prescriber? How often are these primary care physicians actually new to the CPAP world
Show response
Management explained targeting already-engaged PCPs and tracking referral volume increases. Noted VirtualOx shows double-digit increase in home sleep tests but did not provide a specific conversion rate number.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Maybe just an update on the impact to the front end of the funnel more specifically
Show response
Mick shared new 3-year resupply data showing 6.2% higher rate at 3 years. Patient motivation appears to last and accelerate over time. GLP-1 patients more adherent to CPAP even longer than to GLP-1 therapy itself.
Calendar 2025 Q2
competitive bidding, the proposal is calling for maybe just a consolidation of the number of contract suppliers out there
Show response
Mick drew on 15+ years of competitive bidding experience. Current Medicare rates now in sync with private payers. Rules look similar to last round. Also discussed Apnimed Phase III, noting GLP-1s may have taken wind out of oral drug sails.
Calendar 2025 Q1
just an update on the state of the state as it relates to where GLP ones are at the moment
Show response
Mick said Lilly hasn't started DTC campaigns for sleep apnea yet, expects 6-12 months post-approval. ResMed proactively targeting high-volume GLP-1 PCPs with CME education, seeing measurable prescription increases.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Do you think eventually as commercial payers come in, that you'll have to actually step through CPAP to get to a GLP-1?
Show response
Mick noted Lilly's own SURMOUNT-OSA data showed CPAP+GLP-1 combo patients did better than GLP-1 alone. AASM guidelines emphasize PAP as frontline. Expects DTC advertising within 6-12 months.
Calendar 2024 Q3
Last year, you put in some price increases, both devices and ReSupply
Show response
Mick indicated a largely benign pricing environment ahead with targeted increases only where costs remain elevated. No major change in U.S. HME purchasing patterns.
DXCMDexCom4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
So what do you think coverage could potentially look like? Will it have you know, certain verification requirements
Show response
Pushed back on the A1C-threshold premise using CMS precedent and existing commercial policy, and gave a real-world utilization figure above 80%.
Calendar 2026 Q1
How do you level set expectations on what we should be looking for for a statistically meaningful A1c reduction out of the RCT
Show response
Jake pointed to registry data as reasonable estimate for RCT results. Population comes in with spectrum of A1c including some quite high. CGM targets behavior modification and medication adherence. Expects statistically significant improvement meeting reimbursement threshold. Full readout at ADA next month.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how long do you think it will take to fully roll over the 10-day to 15-day? And what does that do to gross margin
Show response
Jereme noted historical generational transitions take couple years. 15-day requires different prescription. Basal penetration target around 60% over time. Non-insulin T2 currently under 5%, significant room to grow. 15-day margin impact significant and also opens lower-reimbursement markets.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Do you have any data on that? Are you noticing more utilization intensity with prediabetics
Show response
Jereme provided utilization hierarchy: T2 highest, prediabetes middle, non-diabetic lowest. Distribution still predominantly stelo.com; Amazon live for ~1 month with great uptake.
MDTMedtronic3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
how the capital allocation will change post diabetes being completely separated?
Show response
Geoff said the shift to high-growth tuck-ins is already underway; Thierry noted R&D+investments roughly doubled and no specific buyback plans, only tactical.
Calendar 2025 Q3
frame for us what you would view as the best case outcome in terms of the targeted population in uncontrolled hypertension
Show response
Martha described all puzzle pieces falling into place: breakthrough designation, CMS reimbursement, physician society guidelines, hospital demand. 18 million uncontrolled hypertension patients. Ardian could be even bigger than CAS given patient population.
Calendar 2024 Q4
with the NTAP and TPT in place now, how much of that population can you go after and how much is still out there that you would need an NCD to sort of address that patient population?
Show response
Sean detailed 18M uncontrolled hypertension patients on drugs, addressable market about half of Medicare with current coverage. Emphasized demand is not the issue, coverage and center establishment are.
Show 1 more company
EWEdwards Lifesciences2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
a little bit on the U.S. TAVR backlog. It typically sits at around somewhere in the 3- to 6-month range and with asymptomatic not being in there in this quarter
Show response
Larry Wood clarified the 3-6 month timeframe is normal process not backlog. Not seeing marked reduction in processing time but seeing renewed focus and likely uptick in referrals. Will take a couple quarters to quantify.
where do you see severe asymptomatic for mitral from minimally invasive in terms of penetration? And what do you think can happen when we get more data potentially from competition here early next ...
Show response
Daveen explained mitral is much earlier than TAVR in penetration. Multiple modalities (repair + replacement) needed for different anatomies. M3 in Europe adding treatment for patients who previously had no option. U.S. launch expected first half next year.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| COO Cooper Companies (The) | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| GEHC GE HealthCare | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| HOLX Hologic | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| RMD ResMed | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| DXCM DexCom | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions |
| MDT Medtronic | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| EW Edwards Lifesciences | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- COOCooper Companies (The) · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- GEHCGE HealthCare · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- HOLXHologic · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- RMDResMed · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- DXCMDexCom · 4 questions25%1 of 4 questions
- MDTMedtronic · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- EWEdwards Lifesciences · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2024 Q4 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q1 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q2 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q3 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q4 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q1 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q2 | 2 | 50%1 of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q3 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
- 2024 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2024 Q47 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q17 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q25 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q16 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 50% (1 of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Product Launch12
- Demand10
- Margin8
- Competitive Dynamics8
- Regulation Policy6
- M&A4
- Innovation & R&D4
- Trade Tariffs4
- Capital Allocation3
- Revenue Growth3
Show all 18 topics
- Pricing3
- Subscriber Growth2
- Geographic Expansion2
- Supply Chain2
- Inventory2
- Cloud & AI1
- Capex Investment1
- Guidance Reliability1