Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Vijay Rakesh
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).
- Questions
- 101on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 0%none of 101 questions
- Companies
- 20questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 9with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 101 of 101 questions from 20 companies
CRDOCredo Technology Group Holding Ltd11 questions · 8 reporting periods · 0 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
As you have all these 4 segments ramping, can you give us some perspective on how to look at fiscal 28?
Show response
Bill discussed ALC and OmniConnect multibillion-dollar TAMs and guided to outsized growth again in FY28 and beyond, without specific numbers.
Calendar 2026 Q2
ASP increase for you with the 200 gig per lane. When you see that ramping, is that more like into next year?
Show response
CEO said FY27 200-gig-per-lane revenue is relatively light as the industry hasn't fully transitioned, but Credo is ready for production across copper and optical.
Calendar 2026 Q1
So is your assumption that as 1.6T ramps into calendar '27, '28 that it will be predominantly copper?
Show response
Bill sees the 200 gig per lane market addressed by AECs plus laser-based modules and ALCs, with ASP uplift from 800 gig to 1.6T across the portfolio; CPO stays further out.
Calendar 2025 Q4
How should we look at the gross margin profile as optical DSPs are starting to ramp as well?
Show response
Dan reiterated the long-term 63% to 65% gross-margin model, said Credo is currently above it, and expects normalization toward roughly 65% over the medium term.
Do you see those revenues start to ramp in second half calendar '26?
Show response
Bill said scale-up entry is via PCIe Gen 6 (Gen 5 interim), bringing retimers and AECs simultaneously, with products protocol-agnostic at the 200-gig-per-lane generation.
Calendar 2025 Q3
the ramps with the fourth customer seems to be I pretty nice accelerated ramp
Show response
Asked what drove the fourth customer's accelerated ramp; Brennan attributed it to conservative guidance and a fast qualification of the first ramping program.
is it is the read through that the impact is potentially more from tenant side
Show response
Asked what drives the Q2 gross-margin guide; Fleming said at current scale any fluctuations are largely product-mix driven, with no change to the long-term gross-margin model.
Calendar 2025 Q2
can you just talk to what are the -- what is the traction you're seeing in optical DSP?
Show response
Brennan described a cost-effective 12nm family and a power-efficient 5nm family, staying agnostic between full DSP and LRO as sub-10-watt 800 gig modules gain priority.
Calendar 2025 Q1
as you look out 12 to 18 months, you see that ramping pretty nicely to significant volumes
Show response
Bill said both new hyperscaler customers have committed design engagements ramping in fiscal '26 (conservatively the second half), with high confidence but timing still firming up.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I was wondering what percent of revenues was going to the AI side, AI - into AI servers.
Show response
Bill said the large majority of AEC shipments are AI-related, and essentially all 100-gig-per-lane deployments are for AI applications.
just wondering, obviously, a nice ramp there. But how many customers do you have on the Optical DSP side now?
Show response
Bill declined to give an exact optical DSP customer count but cited much broader module-level design activity and increasing end-customer qualifications.
MCHPMicrochip Technology11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
In terms of the current design wins, any of them on the scale-up side, on the rack, where do you see those wins
Show response
Steve said the 14 design wins span scale-up and scale-out with a mix of hyperscaler and enterprise customers, but declined to give dollar content per rack.
Calendar 2026 Q1
would you not expect that business to start to accelerate into fiscal 2027 and 2028 here?
Show response
Steve said A&D is strong and will grow steadily, but acceleration is gated by primes' production capacity and very long (up to nine-month) cycle times.
how does that data center portfolio grow? Obviously, there is a lot of focus on data center and spend there.
Show response
Brian declined to size growth but said agentic AI and inference workloads drive PCIe-based component demand across hyperscalers, OEMs, and enterprise.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Any thoughts on how we should look at, you know, how that segment does in 2026, 2027
Show response
Steve cited multiple tailwinds: largest US defense budget, Boeing MAX production ramp, NATO countries doubling/tripling defense budgets, and space exploration acceleration with SpaceX and others all driving strong A&D demand.
Where are fab utilizations now blended? And how should we look at OpEx to the rest of the year
Show response
Steve declined to quantify utilization but said it is quite low with ~$50M+ gross margin upside as factories return to full production. Eric explained OpEx growing in dollars from bonuses returning to target levels and pent-up demand for raises after last year's pay cuts, but declining as percent of revenue.
Calendar 2025 Q2
is your understanding that it puts you at a much better position versus like this STMicro and Infineon
Show response
Steve believes Microchip's higher U.S. manufacturing percentage should be advantageous but acknowledged the rules are not yet clear enough to definitively say.
Do you guys think most of the inventory write-downs get done by the September quarter
Show response
Eric said write-downs will continue beyond September but decline each quarter from $90M to $77M and lower. Underutilization charges will decline modestly in September with a bigger step-down in December when wafer starts increase.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Just wondering if you're expecting any Section 232 rulings coming down in terms of trying to bring product back to the U.S.
Show response
Steve bluntly stated current rules incentivize production outside both U.S. and China. Will evolve strategy as rules continue changing.
how you're looking at utilization, I guess, across the fabs as you go to the back half
Show response
Steve projected inventory below 200 days by September. Production must start growing before hitting 130-150 day target to avoid capacity ramp issues.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I think you're looking at the different segments, autos, industrial, consumer. Is there a way to let's work this playlist
Show response
Eric declined to provide mid-year end market breakout, noting it will come with fiscal year-end results in May. All end markets remain weak.
is there any risk for inventory obsolescence or write-down given, you know, you're seeing some disintermediation
Show response
Eric confirmed significant reserve charges are already reflected in gross margin. Steve's plan to reduce inventory by ~$250M through FY26 end should reduce future charges.
ONON Semiconductor11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how your content breaks out between site power, the power in the rack and the compute rack
Show response
Hassane split content roughly 50/50 high vs medium/low voltage at $115,000 per rack, with high voltage content up ~10x driving an outsized increase.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Any thoughts on how we should think about utilization improving? And are there any exits that are still left in the core business?
Show response
Trent confirmed no further exits beyond 2026. Utilization at 77%, ramped up quickly to meet strong demand. Will match utilization to demand signals for remainder of year.
Can you talk about how you see that progressing in June and into the back half?
Show response
Trent said auto roughly flat in Q2 shipping to natural demand, no replenishment yet. Industrial up mid-single-digit. Other (including AI DC) up mid-teens QoQ.
Calendar 2025 Q4
do you expect gross margins to get back to the low forties looking at the margin accretion from EFK and FabRite?
Show response
Trent said 40%+ gross margin is within sight. Lean inventory and right distribution levels mean utilization can be matched quickly to recovery. No need to burn through excess first.
do you expect that to get to, like, a 10, 15% of revenue run rate given some of peers seem to be targeting somewhere like that?
Show response
El-Khoury said reaching 10-15% of revenue is a matter of when, not if. Products are available, market opportunity exists. Question is speed of design cycle and proliferation.
Calendar 2025 Q2
How are you guys preparing for that? What are you expecting in terms of when this happens?
Show response
El-Khoury said no crystal ball on tariff outcome. Manufacturing footprint flexibility is the preparation strategy. Recognized by customers as advantage.
One of your peers declared bankruptcy. Just wondering how that's playing out from a business risk perspective
Show response
El-Khoury said peer's struggles preceded bankruptcy. Customer sourcing decisions already baked into baseline. ON wins on its own product merit, not competitor weakness.
Calendar 2025 Q1
so are you seeing some headwinds from the auto tariffs or auto parts?
Show response
El-Khoury said no direct tariff impact but too soon to assess indirect effects. No material pull-ins or pushouts observed from tariff activity.
Is that commentary on pricing specific to ON? Or is that what you're seeing in the industry?
Show response
El-Khoury said pricing pressure is industry-wide, not ON-specific or product-specific. Cost improvements expected to offset low single-digit pricing declines.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how that should play out over the next couple of quarters, I guess, after Q1, like, do you see that flat or maybe second half picking up
Show response
Trent said utilization will remain in mid-50% range until demand recovery. Will increase utilization only when demand signals improve.
I think you said it might be up year on year. Just wondering if any color around that and the backlog, how that's trending
Show response
El-Khoury declined specific SiC guidance, saying share is gained and designs are won but 2025 is purely demand-dependent on EV vehicle sales.
ARMArm Holdings10 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
are they mostly in the 128 cores? I know core count is important.
Show response
Rene confirmed 128 cores today and said more cores is the direction of travel, but declined road map specifics. Jason said silicon breaks out once it is at least 10% of revenue.
Calendar 2026 Q1
should we still think of it as a high single-digit percent growth fiscal '27, '28? Or is that trending higher too
Show response
Jason guided license revenue growth in the 20% range for FY2027, above the long-term high single-digit to low double-digit floor. Attributed strength to the ongoing AI investment cycle.
How is your data center royalty revenues growing, I guess, as you look at fiscal '27 over last year?
Show response
Rene confirmed data center royalties doubled YoY and expects them to double again in FY2027. Emphasized IP and AGI CPU businesses are additive, not cannibalizing each other.
Calendar 2025 Q4
will we be expecting, like, an Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares custom ASIC down the road given the substantial partnership that you have with them
Show response
Jason declined to provide any specifics about potential products from the SoftBank partnership. No timeline or product confirmation despite Vijay framing the question around the significant $200M quarterly revenue.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Do you expect Arm to be in the market with the merchant CPU? Or will it all be kind of licensed platforms
Show response
Rene declined to confirm or deny a merchant CPU product. Said market share gains are somewhat independent of that strategy and expressed confidence in the technology roadmap.
With the SoftBank expanding the license deal there, can you give us some more color on how that looks?
Show response
Rene described Stargate's 10GW vision with huge compute potential. All Stargate opportunities currently use Arm as core CPU. Declined specifics on products or timelines.
Calendar 2025 Q1
On the 13 customers, what's the split of data center versus mobile?
Show response
Jason confirmed 13 CSS customers split roughly 6 client, 6 infrastructure, 1 auto after adding first automotive CSS license this quarter.
can you talk to what the opportunity is on the license side or the royalty side?
Show response
Rene emphasized Arm's energy efficiency advantage as the sole CPU provider in Stargate. Confirmed Grace Blackwell as initial chips but declined further technology details.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Can you talk to how the Cobalt 100 is progressing, how that's ramping?
Show response
Rene deferred Cobalt specifics to Microsoft but highlighted strong partner deployment momentum and the Grace Blackwell tailwind for data center Arm adoption.
on the related party side, it looks like very nice traction sequentially. I saw it up 48%
Show response
Jason expects Arm China to remain consistent at ~25% of revenue near-term but to decline to mid-teens over time.
LRCXLam Research8 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
When do you start to kind of scale and bridge into that, I guess? What would be the timeframe?
Show response
Gave a specific current SAM percentage and corrected the analyst's back-of-envelope share math over CSBG inclusion.
Any way of kind of sizing the opportunity there for every 100 wafers, whether it's HBM4E with TSVs or in HBM4?
Show response
Declined to quantify and said he was not prepared to do so, offering only the qualitative taller-stack argument.
Calendar 2026 Q1
are you seeing investments or CapEx picking up there? Is that something you're seeing into '27
Show response
Tim deferred to customers on high bandwidth flash timing but emphasized early engagement on next-gen technologies and growing NAND importance in the AI memory stack.
Is there a way to look at what your content uplift is per 100,000 wafers or something HBM3E goes to HBM4or 4E
Show response
Doug confirmed content per wafer increases with HBM4 higher stack counts but declined to provide specific dollar-per-wafer-start numbers.
Calendar 2025 Q4
your Foundry is growing almost 100% plus. Year on year. Just wondering as you look at 2627 with some of leading edge found this accelerating, how you see that road map?
Show response
Tim said future nodes bring backside power, more advanced packaging, and CFET, all expanding Lam's SAM and share opportunity. Expects robust investment across all segments continuing into 2027.
Calendar 2025 Q3
As you look at the strength that you mentioned into next year, is that being driven by memory or foundry, logic, logic foundry as well?
Show response
Doug said 2026 growth will likely come from both memory and foundry/logic, with more granularity coming on the December call.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I think you have ITC, the investment tax rate going to 35%. Do you see that driving a tailwind to WFE as you look at next year?
Show response
Doug said he hasn't yet tried to correlate the ITC increase with potential WFE tailwinds for 2026.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Just a quick question on the NAND side. Sorry, if I -- somebody asked this question already, I joined late
Show response
Doug declined to give a specific NAND WFE growth number but confirmed it would be up year-over-year.
STXSeagate Technology Holdings8 questions · 8 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
should we expect margins to kind of, you know, get to the 60% plus
Show response
Gianluca said incremental gross margin is well above 60% but declined to set a target; Dave declined to model an attach rate, calling it application-specific.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Just wondering if there's a way to look at it on what's the impact from HAMR mix versus utilization or price
Show response
Mosley pointed to aerial density driving more exabyte output with minimal incremental cost as the key margin driver. Customers lean heavily into space and power efficiency per terabyte.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Should that drive a much better gross margin profile, I guess? And any thoughts on how we should see the margins improve
Show response
Romano confirmed March guidance includes HAMR ramp and margin improvement continues through calendar 2026. OpEx approaching 10% of revenue target and could improve further with revenue growth.
Calendar 2025 Q3
would you expect to hit the mid-45%, 45% margins exiting fiscal '26? Or how should we look at that margin progression?
Show response
Romano confirmed they achieved the first milestone earlier than expected. Every quarter will differ but the Analyst Day model could be exceeded. Mosley noted they are studying AI content generation uptake.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Is that pickup coming from pricing, utilization and the HAMR mix? Or can you give us some attribution like what percent goes to -- from the pricing improvement versus utilization versus the HAMR mix?
Show response
Romano confirmed all factors (HAMR mix, pricing, cost per TB decline) contributing to continued sequential margin improvement. Mosley noted HAMR qualification progress going well with more customers ramping beyond the initial three.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Just wondering how -- on the mix of HAMR be, let's say, exiting fiscal '26
Show response
Mosley declined specific HAMR mix guidance but confirmed acceleration. Romano said wait for Analyst Day for future profitability model details.
Calendar 2024 Q4
do you expect HAMR to get to like 10% to 20% of that mix by like first half calendar let's say 2026?
Show response
Mosley and Romano declined specific HAMR mix targets but confirmed they expect the majority of the ramp in second half of calendar 2025 after multiple qualifications complete.
Calendar 2024 Q3
trying to bring on some of the idle capacity and headcount as you start to bring some capacity back on
Show response
Asked for a 2025 unit-shipment outlook and the idle-capacity ramp plan; management declined to size units, saying factories are full and additional exabytes will come from technology transitions to HAMR.
Show 14 more companies
WDCWestern Digital7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
Are you expecting to pull in the HAMR road map time line given how tight supply is
Show response
Irving confirmed qualification pulled in by half year. Started with one customer, second imminent. Also started next-gen ePMR qualification. Planning to deliver close to 4M drives this quarter vs 3.5M last quarter.
when you look at HAMR ramps, any thoughts on how we should look at those margins
Show response
Irving reiterated HAMR at scale will be neutral to accretive to gross margins versus current ePMR portfolio.
Calendar 2025 Q1
are you still looking at ramping those like in calendar '26, like second half twenty six, I think, as you mentioned on the Analyst Day event
Show response
Irving reiterated HAMR roadmap: qualifications H2 2026, high-volume production H1 2027, developed in partnership with customers.
When you look at shipping into China, is that going from your Malaysia facilities or do you ship hard drives into China
Show response
Irving clarified all production in Southeast Asia, no US-bound products from China, and as of April 11 no tariffs on US-bound products. China shipments not subject to tariffs.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Do you see the need to kind of push on the areal density side too as your fear is moving on the hammer side
Show response
David confirmed continuous focus on areal density with Ultra SMR as competitive advantage, extensible to future technology transitions.
Any thoughts on how you see the pricing margin kind of trend to the year?
Show response
David indicated ASP headwinds moderating next quarter but declined to give full-year pricing trajectory, citing supply actions to support rebalancing.
Calendar 2024 Q3
with the 11 disks, are we able to still make it accretive on the margin side to your current portfolio?
Show response
Asked whether the new 11-disk UltraSMR drive stays margin-accretive; management said it lowers customer TCO and lifts profitability, direct.
AVGOBroadcom Inc.5 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
can you talk to how your dollar per gigawatt should improve into the subsequent XPU generations?
Show response
Hock said per-gigawatt content stays roughly $20-30 billion as higher chip ASPs are offset by higher per-chip power reducing chips per gigawatt; Charlie confirmed tripling laser/substrate factory capacity.
Calendar 2025 Q2
If you look at fiscal '26, you have many new customers ramping [ Meta ] and probably you have the 4 of the 6 hyperscalers that you have talked in the past. Would you expect that growth to accelerat...
Show response
Hock reaffirmed FY25 growth rate sustaining into FY26, declined to quantify above that.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Just a question on the networking side. Just wondering how much does up sequentially on the AI side? And any thoughts around M&A going forward?
Show response
Hock said AI mix will normalize to 70% XPU / 30% networking. On M&A, said 'we're too busy doing AI and VMware at this point', no near-term M&A appetite.
Calendar 2024 Q4
do we have a good line of sight into fiscal '26, showing a pretty nice ramp to hit those numbers
Show response
Hock declined to provide fiscal 2026 visibility, citing Broadcom's one-quarter-at-a-time guidance policy. Warned of quarter-to-quarter variability given only three customers and lumpy deployment patterns.
Got it. And the other 2 CSPs, when do you see them ramping?
Show response
Hock confirmed deep engagement with tape-out chips for two new hyperscale prospects but declined to commit to a timeline, saying production readiness and customer software stacks must come first.
LITELumentum Holdings Inc.5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Is it fair to assume both the 200 gig EML and CW laser should be accretive to your margins?
Show response
Michael confirmed both are corporate-accretive with the CW-EML margin gap closed considerably, and 200 gig EMLs reaching majority volume by mid-2027.
Calendar 2026 Q1
you continue to see this supply-demand imbalance of 30% as you go through into next year as well?
Show response
CEO revealed pump laser constraints are even greater than the 30% EML imbalance. Described it as somewhat unanticipated, with a 4-quarter ramp plan from the Rose Orchard facility.
should drive a pretty nice uptick there back to like the 300-radix or the 500-radix OCS racks into next year
Show response
CEO confirmed Google as one of their largest customers driving significant demand but declined to comment on specific customer architectures or v7-to-v8 OCS pull differences.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you size what the CPO quarterly run rate would be with the new multi-million dollar, multi-$100 million order
Show response
Michael pegged CPO at ~$50M in calendar Q4 2025 with the new multi-$100M order ramping in H1 2027. Multiple customers contributing. Power laser fab completely sold out. Ramp hitting faster than forecast.
would you expect pricing to be a tailwind most of this year and into next year too
Show response
Michael confirmed demand-supply imbalance persists at ~25-30% even after 20% capacity addition. 200G EML targeting 25% of mix by year-end with roughly 2x pricing versus 100G. Differential 200G EMLs provide yet another ASP tailwind. Wupen emphasized continuous yield improvement and die size reduction efforts.
SNDKSandisk Corporation4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
wondering if you're seeing any price premium on that, and how should you look at the price premium versus conventional NAND
Show response
Goeckeler declined to detail BiCS10/HBF pricing but emphasized Sandisk grows through highly productive nodal transitions that can exceed market growth rates.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Are the $11 billion in guarantees and the $42 billion RPO mostly in data center?
Show response
Visoso declined to disclose segment mix of RPO. Noted the $42B is from three Q3 contracts only; the two Q4 contracts would add more.
you have a pretty disruptive technology coming in terms of high bandwidth flash. Any thoughts on how that is progressing?
Show response
Goeckeler confirmed on track: NAND die and controller in development, NAND late this year, full system with controller early to mid next year.
Calendar 2025 Q4
what you're looking at in terms of bit growth and obviously, ASP pricing has been on a tear
Show response
CFO confirmed mid-to-high-teens annual bit growth plan unchanged through 2028, with prices rising broadly across all end markets as NAND flows to most attractive segments.
AMATApplied Materials3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
when do you see that start to get more material, if you can give us some more color there
Show response
Brice deferred specific timing but confirmed leading-edge logic and DRAM as the two fastest-growing end markets with double exposure through both market growth and share gains.
Calendar 2025 Q1
if there's a way to look at what the mix of, you know, just packaging was of total WFE
Show response
Brice pointed to $1.7B in 2024 packaging revenue without sharing WFE percentage, noting Applied has advantage share. Gary reiterated plan to double packaging revenue over next few years.
Calendar 2024 Q4
when you look at the China revenues, do you expect it to kind of hold at these levels going through calendar 2025
Show response
Brice confirmed Q1 also approximately 30% China and called it historically normal, noting it depends on ICAPS market evolution since DRAM/NAND and leading-edge are restricted.
IONQIonQ, Inc.3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
as you look at that mix of hardware and platform services, should that mix be about the same going forward?
Show response
Singh said the mix depends on where each customer starts and pointed to rising multiproduct sales as the network effect to watch.
Calendar 2025 Q4
any way to think about -- and the forward quarter, I guess, any way to think about the hardware, software split?
Show response
Singh reframed the question around integrated solutions rather than a hardware/software split, deferring standard breakouts to reporting.
Any thoughts on when this national quantum initiative, the NQI funding starts to open up?
Show response
Singh said IonQ is not waiting on government funding given $3B-plus cash; de Masi noted 60% commercial revenue and a bullish DoW budget.
MUMicron Technology, Inc.3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
Just wondering how the qualification is progressing and if you continue to see that similar power performance leadership
Show response
Sanjay confirmed HBM4 early units are sampled with multiple customers, reaffirmed leadership in power/performance, and pointed to 1-beta node cost benefits plus internal advanced CMOS logic die.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you talk to what's the split between HBM and conventional DRAM and NAND?
Show response
Bhatia and Murphy confirmed HBM is the largest CapEx share for fiscal 2025 covering front-end, assembly/test, and clean rooms, while NAND CapEx has been cut to below its revenue share.
as your SPM capacity, maybe goes up next year, how much is your conventional DRAM capacity coming down?
Show response
Bhatia confirmed the 3:1 trade ratio at mature yields and said Micron aims to maintain overall DRAM bit share through the transition, with bit growth in line with industry demand numbers.
SMCISupermicro3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
Just wondering what would be the split of a full NVL72 rac versus HDX that you're shipping now
Show response
Charles did not provide NVL72 vs HGX split. Instead described DCBBS component shipping status across multiple product lines with gradual ramp.
wondering what is contemplated in terms of revenues from the data award win that you announced
Show response
Charles declined to comment on specific customer revenue contribution but expressed excitement about European and Middle Eastern growth.
Calendar 2024 Q3
how many liquid cool racks we are shipping in September and if you have some idea in December
Show response
David noted shipments were slightly below last quarter. Charles emphasized they shipped the most liquid cooling racks to market recently.
INTCIntel Corporation2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
Any thoughts on how you would look at CapEx through that time frame, 25-26? Are you looking at rationalizing that given the footprint
Show response
Dave said $18B CapEx for 2025 driven by better utilization of existing construction-in-progress. Long-term capital intensity target of roughly 25% of revenue.
Just wondering how the data center side would play out to the end of the year. As you look at the second half, especially
Show response
Michelle said Q1 driven by a few strong hyperscalers. Optimistic on Granite Rapids ramp and AI head node opportunity but acknowledged macro concerns and strong demand for older-gen parts in server.
NXPINXP Semiconductors2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
how you are looking at that $9.5 billion by '27 number for autos
Show response
Jeff confirmed $9.5B 2027 auto target adjusted only by backing out ~$300M MEMS sensor baseline from 2024, then applying the 8-12% growth rate.
should it grow like high single digit above LVP? Or how should we look at it
Show response
Jeff confirmed the 8-12% auto long-term model assumes low single-digit SAAR growth. With flat SAAR, back that out but content per vehicle remains the real accelerator. S&P projects 2026 at ~92.6M units, roughly flat.
SWKSSkyworks Solutions2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2024 Q3
in China there is a trend towards entry level and some of RFs side moving to discrete. Are you seeing any of that?
Show response
Liam confirmed Skyworks has minimal China low-end exposure. Strategically positioned with Google and Samsung rather than commodity China players.
if you were to take a look at how do you see adds in growth year-on-year within that 5G?
Show response
Liam declined to provide 2025 outlook, citing single-quarter guidance policy. Did not address 5G content growth trajectory.
DELLDell Technologies1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
Just wondering what the mix of sovereign orders was. And then I know you talked about improving AI margins in the back half
Show response
Jeff noted pipeline has over 6,700 unique customers, predominantly Blackwell, with growing RTX 6000 and PCIe options indicating enterprise traction.
QBTSD-Wave Quantum Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
How should we think about QCaaS and sales mix going forward?
Show response
David Liu stood in for Vijay Rakesh. Markovich said OpEx grows ~15% sequentially and the QCaaS-versus-systems mix will be lumpy quarter to quarter given revenue-recognition timing.
RGTIRigetti Computing, Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
any thoughts on how -- what are you getting on the price uplift versus the 36 qubit one?
Show response
Management said it is too early to quantify pricing uplift; usage is short research jobs, not commercial workloads.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions |
| MCHP Microchip Technology | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions |
| ON ON Semiconductor | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions |
| ARM Arm Holdings | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions |
| LRCX Lam Research | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| STX Seagate Technology Holdings | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| WDC Western Digital | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| LITE Lumentum Holdings Inc. | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| SNDK Sandisk Corporation | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
- CRDOCredo Technology Group Holding Ltd · 11 questions0%none of 11 questions
- MCHPMicrochip Technology · 11 questions0%none of 11 questions
- ONON Semiconductor · 11 questions0%none of 11 questions
- ARMArm Holdings · 10 questions0%none of 10 questions
- LRCXLam Research · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- STXSeagate Technology Holdings · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- WDCWestern Digital · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- AVGOBroadcom Inc. · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- LITELumentum Holdings Inc. · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- SNDKSandisk Corporation · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
Show all 20 companies
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| AMAT Applied Materials | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| IONQ IonQ, Inc. | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| SMCI Supermicro | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| INTC Intel Corporation | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| SWKS Skyworks Solutions | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| DELL Dell Technologies | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc. | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| RGTI Rigetti Computing, Inc. | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- AMATApplied Materials · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- IONQIonQ, Inc. · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- MUMicron Technology, Inc. · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- SMCISupermicro · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- INTCIntel Corporation · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- NXPINXP Semiconductors · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- SWKSSkyworks Solutions · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- DELLDell Technologies · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- QBTSD-Wave Quantum Inc. · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- RGTIRigetti Computing, Inc. · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 4 |
| 2024 Q4 | 17 | 0%none of 17 questions | 10 |
| 2025 Q1 | 14 | 0%none of 14 questions | 9 |
| 2025 Q2 | 13 | 0%none of 13 questions | 9 |
| 2025 Q3 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q4 | 19 | 0%none of 19 questions | 12 |
| 2026 Q1 | 16 | 0%none of 16 questions | 10 |
| 2026 Q2 | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions | 8 |
| 2026 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
- 2024 Q35 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 4 companies
- 2024 Q417 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 17 questions) · 10 companies
- 2025 Q114 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 14 questions) · 9 companies
- 2025 Q213 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 13 questions) · 9 companies
- 2025 Q36 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q419 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 19 questions) · 12 companies
- 2026 Q116 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 16 questions) · 10 companies
- 2026 Q29 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 9 questions) · 8 companies
- 2026 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand33
- Revenue Growth24
- Cloud & AI24
- Product Launch20
- Margin18
- Capex Investment16
- Innovation & R&D15
- Competitive Dynamics13
- Pricing11
- Supply Chain6
Show all 18 topics
- Geographic Expansion5
- Regulation Policy4
- Trade Tariffs4
- Inventory3
- Cost Pressure2
- Capital Allocation2
- M&A2
- Guidance Reliability2