Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Alec Brondolo
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 24on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 25%6 of 24 questions
- Companies
- 6questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 24 of 24 questions from 6 companies
APPApplovin Corp10 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how do you guys feel about the category? How are your conversations with customers progressing?
Show response
Adam countered category-softness concerns: MAX marketplace grew double digits QoQ, the ad-supported market is growing quickly, and off-platform IAP understates true category revenue. Direct.
Calendar 2026 Q1
does the way that you distribute the mediation solution need to change in order to kind of reach this new long tail
Show response
Adam said no mediation changes needed; integration is trivial. On social media, explained vibe-coding products as talent attraction and low-cost experimentation, not a core revenue initiative.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Where are you finding the most success? Which platforms are you finding the most success in leveraging to acquire customers today?
Show response
Adam described measurement company partnerships driving awareness; Google search ads effective but no SEO history yet. Combining brand advertising with direct response to build platform recognition.
the concern in the market is that Meta could find a way to bid deterministically and opt out ATC traffic with their audience graph
Show response
Adam said deterministic bidding would violate Apple's terms. Meta has been IDFA-only since privacy changes; AXON 2 model did not exist five years ago when Meta dominated, making a return to prior share unrealistic.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Do you think that might be manifesting sooner than expected? And did it contribute to third quarter results?
Show response
Adam said no App Store fee impact yet; if 30% drops to 15%, roughly 20% LTV lift for games with some flowing to marketing platforms over quarters.
Would you be interested in those assets if they were available?
Show response
Adam pivoted away from M&A speculation, focusing on organic supply expansion opportunities across open web, other app publishers, and CTV.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Is that live on October 1? Or is October 1 a version of the product that has credit card, that has measurement, but then we add kind of the AI stuff later
Show response
Adam described three tiers: Q&A onboarding widget available early, complex campaign analysis agent coming later, and generative AI ad creative tools in development.
Can you maybe help us understand how big that list of advertisers is?
Show response
Adam didn't quantify but said referral-based onboarding will be multiples bigger than manual process, combined with Q4 holiday season and international opening.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how do you think about the potential impact on the business from an ad spend perspective?
Show response
Adam modeled a fee reduction to 15% creating 20% revenue uplift for developers, which flows into competitive auction bidding benefiting APP.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how do you think about kind of the amount of spend growth the current supply base that kind of the mobile game environment or ecosystem has today could absorb?
Show response
Adam dismissed supply as a constraint, noting 80-90% growth on flat supply. Demand density improvement through more advertiser categories is the primary growth driver.
UUnity Software Inc.5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 2 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
How do you think about finding that balance, delivering enough value to the customer while protecting the bottom line?
Show response
Management framed Unity AI as early-stage but effective and efficient; answered directly.
Calendar 2026 Q1
is there a specific expectation for Vector sequential growth in the second quarter?
Show response
Management declined a precise Vector figure but framed runtime data as an unmodeled catalyst.
Calendar 2025 Q4
could you help us understand what you've seen in the market from Meta so far in the first quarter?
Show response
Management dismissed a Meta-competition scare and cautioned against overreacting to LinkedIn posts; direct.
Calendar 2025 Q3
could you call out some specific points of improvement, maybe ways that you were able to leverage the learning from Vector into other areas
Show response
Management said Vector tech is being applied across the ad portfolio but gave few specifics.
Calendar 2025 Q2
the extent to which the better Unity Ad Network growth in the second quarter was cannibalizing ironSource spend as opposed to incremental
Show response
Management quantified cannibalization at under 10%, framing growth as largely incremental; direct.
TTWOTake-Two Interactive4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
kind of hype around the game is pulling forward sales that you otherwise would have earned post release
Show response
Strauss conceded demand could be pulled forward, saying that is partly why guidance is unchanged - no units are sold yet and preorders can be cancelled.
Calendar 2026 Q1
what is the level of confidence that the newer cohort of gamers will graduate into more premium triple a experiences over time
Show response
Strauss argued children naturally age out of kids-oriented entertainment by 10-11, and that the premium gaming market is a fundamentally different business targeting 17+ consumers. Expressed confidence in the appeal of M-rated titles.
Calendar 2025 Q4
could you maybe refresh our understanding of what makes a studio appealing to Take-Two?
Show response
Strauss outlined M&A criteria: talent, technology, and IP, with financial accretiveness as a secondary requirement. Cautioned that most corporate M&A fails due to empire-building mentality, emphasizing TTWO's selective and culture-fit approach.
Calendar 2025 Q3
is it possible or are you maybe starting to feel like we're entering a more positive cycle for industry growth?
Show response
Strauss acknowledged consumer tailwinds reminiscent of early pandemic momentum, though not quite as strong. Emphasized that growth pockets are defined by quality and TTWO must remain an outlier to deliver exceptional results.
GDDYGoDaddy3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
As Airo Plus grows, how do you think about what products get, I guess, are in the bundle or in kind of the direct monetization bundle Airo Plus versus what products are given away
Show response
Aman clearly explained Airo as free basic functionality across jobs-to-be-done, with Airo Plus offering premium versions triggered by engagement levels.
The repurchase, $700 million. I think that was the largest repurchase in the last several quarters. Was that a function of the pressure on the stock
Show response
Mark confirmed opportunistic approach consistent with ongoing strategy, committing to at minimum covering dilution. Direct.
Calendar 2024 Q4
How do you think about, you know, potentially adding a third-party AI products to that subscription tier over time?
Show response
Aman confirmed openness to third-party products in Aero Plus, currently testing with partners. Also identified site optimizer and digital marketing suite as tent pole features.
DUOLDuolingo, Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
Are there learnings we can take from how successful those brand tie-ins have been in China
Show response
Von Ahn said learnings transfer within Asia but some is China-specific, driven by Duolingo's strong local brand and English-learning demand; direct.
TTDThe Trade Desk, Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 1 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
Do you think you have the product -- the right product market fit with this initiative? Or are you open to making changes to make it a little more appealing to advertisers?
Show response
Green defended OpenPath as intentionally competitive, designed to expose supply chain inefficiency. Charges 4.5% meant to be near breakeven. Criticism comes from players who don't want efficient supply chains. Not surprised it ruffles feathers. Any assertion about complex fee structure is 'just not true.'
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| APP Applovin Corp | 10 | 20%2 of 10 questions |
| U Unity Software Inc. | 5 | 40%2 of 5 questions |
| TTWO Take-Two Interactive | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions |
| GDDY GoDaddy | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| DUOL Duolingo, Inc. | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| TTD The Trade Desk, Inc. | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- APPApplovin Corp · 10 questions20%2 of 10 questions
- UUnity Software Inc. · 5 questions40%2 of 5 questions
- TTWOTake-Two Interactive · 4 questions25%1 of 4 questions
- GDDYGoDaddy · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- DUOLDuolingo, Inc. · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- TTDThe Trade Desk, Inc. · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q1 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q2 | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q3 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q4 | 5 | 60%3 of 5 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q1 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q2 | 3 | 67%2 of 3 questions | 3 |
- 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q23 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q45 questions · challenge rate 60% (3 of 5 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q23 questions · challenge rate 67% (2 of 3 questions) · 3 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand10
- Competitive Dynamics7
- Cloud & AI5
- Revenue Growth5
- Product Launch4
- Innovation & R&D4
- Capital Allocation3
- Regulation Policy3
- M&A2
- Macroeconomic1
Show all 13 topics
- Margin1
- Geographic Expansion1
- Pricing1