Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Alec Brondolo

Wells Fargo · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Questions
24on tracked calls
Challenge rate
25%6 of 24 questions
Companies
6questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 24 of 24 questions from 6 companies

APPApplovin Corp10 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 10 challenging
APP company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

how do you guys feel about the category? How are your conversations with customers progressing?

ChallengingDemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Adam countered category-softness concerns: MAX marketplace grew double digits QoQ, the ad-supported market is growing quickly, and off-platform IAP understates true category revenue. Direct.

Calendar 2026 Q1

does the way that you distribute the mediation solution need to change in order to kind of reach this new long tail

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Adam said no mediation changes needed; integration is trivial. On social media, explained vibe-coding products as talent attraction and low-cost experimentation, not a core revenue initiative.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Where are you finding the most success? Which platforms are you finding the most success in leveraging to acquire customers today?

DemandCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Adam described measurement company partnerships driving awareness; Google search ads effective but no SEO history yet. Combining brand advertising with direct response to build platform recognition.

the concern in the market is that Meta could find a way to bid deterministically and opt out ATC traffic with their audience graph

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Adam said deterministic bidding would violate Apple's terms. Meta has been IDFA-only since privacy changes; AXON 2 model did not exist five years ago when Meta dominated, making a return to prior share unrealistic.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Do you think that might be manifesting sooner than expected? And did it contribute to third quarter results?

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Adam said no App Store fee impact yet; if 30% drops to 15%, roughly 20% LTV lift for games with some flowing to marketing platforms over quarters.

Would you be interested in those assets if they were available?

M&ACompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Adam pivoted away from M&A speculation, focusing on organic supply expansion opportunities across open web, other app publishers, and CTV.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Is that live on October 1? Or is October 1 a version of the product that has credit card, that has measurement, but then we add kind of the AI stuff later

Innovation & R&DCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Adam described three tiers: Q&A onboarding widget available early, complex campaign analysis agent coming later, and generative AI ad creative tools in development.

Can you maybe help us understand how big that list of advertisers is?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Adam didn't quantify but said referral-based onboarding will be multiples bigger than manual process, combined with Q4 holiday season and international opening.

Calendar 2025 Q1

how do you think about the potential impact on the business from an ad spend perspective?

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Adam modeled a fee reduction to 15% creating 20% revenue uplift for developers, which flows into competitive auction bidding benefiting APP.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how do you think about kind of the amount of spend growth the current supply base that kind of the mobile game environment or ecosystem has today could absorb?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Adam dismissed supply as a constraint, noting 80-90% growth on flat supply. Demand density improvement through more advertiser categories is the primary growth driver.

UUnity Software Inc.5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 2 of 5 challenging
U company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

How do you think about finding that balance, delivering enough value to the customer while protecting the bottom line?

Show response

Management framed Unity AI as early-stage but effective and efficient; answered directly.

Calendar 2026 Q1

is there a specific expectation for Vector sequential growth in the second quarter?

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Management declined a precise Vector figure but framed runtime data as an unmodeled catalyst.

Calendar 2025 Q4

could you help us understand what you've seen in the market from Meta so far in the first quarter?

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Management dismissed a Meta-competition scare and cautioned against overreacting to LinkedIn posts; direct.

Calendar 2025 Q3

could you call out some specific points of improvement, maybe ways that you were able to leverage the learning from Vector into other areas

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Management said Vector tech is being applied across the ad portfolio but gave few specifics.

Calendar 2025 Q2

the extent to which the better Unity Ad Network growth in the second quarter was cannibalizing ironSource spend as opposed to incremental

ChallengingRevenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Management quantified cannibalization at under 10%, framing growth as largely incremental; direct.

TTWOTake-Two Interactive4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
TTWO company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

kind of hype around the game is pulling forward sales that you otherwise would have earned post release

ChallengingDemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Strauss conceded demand could be pulled forward, saying that is partly why guidance is unchanged - no units are sold yet and preorders can be cancelled.

Calendar 2026 Q1

what is the level of confidence that the newer cohort of gamers will graduate into more premium triple a experiences over time

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Strauss argued children naturally age out of kids-oriented entertainment by 10-11, and that the premium gaming market is a fundamentally different business targeting 17+ consumers. Expressed confidence in the appeal of M-rated titles.

Calendar 2025 Q4

could you maybe refresh our understanding of what makes a studio appealing to Take-Two?

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Strauss outlined M&A criteria: talent, technology, and IP, with financial accretiveness as a secondary requirement. Cautioned that most corporate M&A fails due to empire-building mentality, emphasizing TTWO's selective and culture-fit approach.

Calendar 2025 Q3

is it possible or are you maybe starting to feel like we're entering a more positive cycle for industry growth?

MacroeconomicDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Strauss acknowledged consumer tailwinds reminiscent of early pandemic momentum, though not quite as strong. Emphasized that growth pockets are defined by quality and TTWO must remain an outlier to deliver exceptional results.

GDDYGoDaddy3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
GDDY company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

As Airo Plus grows, how do you think about what products get, I guess, are in the bundle or in kind of the direct monetization bundle Airo Plus versus what products are given away

Product LaunchPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Aman clearly explained Airo as free basic functionality across jobs-to-be-done, with Airo Plus offering premium versions triggered by engagement levels.

The repurchase, $700 million. I think that was the largest repurchase in the last several quarters. Was that a function of the pressure on the stock

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Mark confirmed opportunistic approach consistent with ongoing strategy, committing to at minimum covering dilution. Direct.

Calendar 2024 Q4

How do you think about, you know, potentially adding a third-party AI products to that subscription tier over time?

Product LaunchInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Aman confirmed openness to third-party products in Aero Plus, currently testing with partners. Also identified site optimizer and digital marketing suite as tent pole features.

DUOLDuolingo, Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
DUOL company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

Are there learnings we can take from how successful those brand tie-ins have been in China

Geographic ExpansionCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Von Ahn said learnings transfer within Asia but some is China-specific, driven by Duolingo's strong local brand and English-learning demand; direct.

TTDThe Trade Desk, Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 1 of 1 challenging
TTD company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

Do you think you have the product -- the right product market fit with this initiative? Or are you open to making changes to make it a little more appealing to advertisers?

ChallengingInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Green defended OpenPath as intentionally competitive, designed to expose supply chain inefficiency. Charges 4.5% meant to be near breakeven. Criticism comes from players who don't want efficient supply chains. Not surprised it ruffles feathers. Any assertion about complex fee structure is 'just not true.'

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
APP Applovin Corp1020%2 of 10 questions
U Unity Software Inc.540%2 of 5 questions
TTWO Take-Two Interactive425%1 of 4 questions
GDDY GoDaddy30%none of 3 questions
DUOL Duolingo, Inc.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
TTD The Trade Desk, Inc.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • APP
    Applovin Corp · 10 questions
    20%2 of 10 questions
  • U
    Unity Software Inc. · 5 questions
    40%2 of 5 questions
  • TTWO
    Take-Two Interactive · 4 questions
    25%1 of 4 questions
  • GDDY
    GoDaddy · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • DUOL
    Duolingo, Inc. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • TTD
    The Trade Desk, Inc. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q420%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q130%none of 3 questions2
2025 Q2333%1 of 3 questions2
2025 Q340%none of 4 questions3
2025 Q4560%3 of 5 questions4
2026 Q140%none of 4 questions4
2026 Q2367%2 of 3 questions3
  1. 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  2. 2025 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  3. 2025 Q23 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  4. 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
  5. 2025 Q45 questions · challenge rate 60% (3 of 5 questions) · 4 companies
  6. 2026 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 4 companies
  7. 2026 Q23 questions · challenge rate 67% (2 of 3 questions) · 3 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand10
  • Competitive Dynamics7
  • Cloud & AI5
  • Revenue Growth5
  • Product Launch4
  • Innovation & R&D4
  • Capital Allocation3
  • Regulation Policy3
  • M&A2
  • Macroeconomic1
Show all 13 topics
  • Margin1
  • Geographic Expansion1
  • Pricing1