Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Andrew Strelzik
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).
- Questions
- 51on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 0%none of 51 questions
- Companies
- 6questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 9with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 51 of 51 questions from 6 companies
TSNTyson Foods17 questions · 8 reporting periods · 0 of 17 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I guess as we look forward, what gives you confidence in the sustainability of that performance in
Show response
King argued Tyson is not a commodity chicken company; about three-quarters of chicken operating income runs on a committed-demand pooled model like prepared foods.
I think you made a, a comment in the prepared remarks about ’27 looking a lot like fiscal ’26
Show response
King said the 2027 comparison implies continued momentum and growth in volume and profitability across all businesses, but gave no quantitative outlook.
Calendar 2026 Q1
what do you think it reflects in terms of how far along you are on this internal improvement journey?
Show response
King pointed to six straight quarters of Chicken volume and sales growth and consecutive Prepared Foods share gains as evidence of structural, durable improvement.
Do you mean that there's more room for earnings upside or can you just clarify exactly what you meant by that?
Show response
King affirmed upside across the business via continuous improvement and footprint right-sizing, framing the changes as structural but without quantifying.
Calendar 2025 Q4
what you're seeing in terms of screwworm in Mexico and maybe some of the signposts or milestones to watch for the border to potentially reopen
Show response
Devin noted incidents continue near the border but thankfully not across it; unseasonably cold temperatures in Texas may help prevent insect movement; no insight on when the government would reopen the border; will watch as spring approaches.
when you look at where you are today, where are you versus where you want to be in terms of your operations broadly
Show response
Donnie emphasized improvement opportunities across every facet of every business and function including corporate; cited greater technology utilization, capacity utilization improvement, more targeted MAP spending, and ROIC mentality being applied enterprise-wide.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I was trying to kind of decipher exactly or more precisely what drove that. You talked about live ops, but you've been talking about that all year
Show response
Donnie attributed outperformance to cumulative 3-year transformation: better yield, improved live performance (old genetics performing at historical top-end, new big bird genetics flowing through), capacity utilization improvements from difficult decisions 18 months ago, and aggressive cost and non-value-added activity reduction.
How have you factored potential beef imports into the U.S. into your outlook
Show response
Donnie noted imports are primarily boneless lean beef from Australia ending up in grinds complex; consumer trading from muscle cuts into grinds with grind demand remaining very strong.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Can you talk about your expectations for the magnitude of the herd recovery or maybe compare what your expectations are for this herd recovery versus prior cycles
Show response
Brady acknowledged prolonged drought created an elongated cycle bottom unlike previous decades; noted drought tailwind now supports rebuild momentum but declined to forecast specific magnitude or timing. Donnie added beef team removed over $100 million of controllable costs this year.
is there anything that you're seeing that would lead you to believe your normalized or mid-cycle or what have you, beef profits are different in this cycle than in prior cycles
Show response
Brady noted differences in this cycle versus the last 6: prolonged drought, elongated bottom, and unusually resilient demand. Did not provide specific mid-cycle profit expectations.
I was hoping you could maybe give us an update there. And then maybe if we could think about the size or you could help us think about the size of some of the incremental efficiencies
Show response
Brady confirmed sustained audit process for manufacturing efficiency but did not provide updated dollar figures. Donnie broadened to enterprise-wide operational excellence, data and digital delivery, and disciplined capital allocation across all segments.
Calendar 2025 Q1
can you maybe compare or quantify the investments in chicken in the back half of the year versus the front half of the year and has that expectation changed at all over the last several months
Show response
Devin detailed investments: new product launches, strategic customer work, quality improvements in retail branded products, packaging upgrades for delivery/pickup, and digital consumer platform spend. Curt added context that even at high end $1.3B, back half of $620M vs $680M front half.
Have you seen any changes in export trade flows related to that or any impacts on your business so far, either pull forward on demand, shifts away from the U.S. to other countries
Show response
Donnie stated there could be temporary short-term disruptions as trade flows adjust; emphasized 90 years of navigating tariffs and non-tariff barriers; confirmed all tariff and consumer pressure impacts factored into guidance.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I'm just kind of curious, if you could dig in a little bit more on the pieces or the levers to deliver the guidance
Show response
Kyle detailed three initiatives: distribution growth (+40bps share), innovation success (Griddle Cakes $100M+, chicken biscuit outpacing), and operational discipline.
can you just kind of walk through some of the factors that kept you from lifting the lower end of the range
Show response
Wes expressed confidence in midpoint and noted Q1 was on plan with solid demand; low end reserved for major extraneous events like weather or bird health.
Calendar 2024 Q3
I was just curious if you could quantify how much you think that can move the needle, similar to what you said in chicken
Show response
Brady acknowledged 85% of beef economics are market-driven but highlighted yield improvement opportunities at $3+ cutouts without quantifying the savings potential.
Are we getting closer maybe next year to a time when maybe you can start to loosen the purse strings a little bit on that front
Show response
Curt reaffirmed commitment to below 2x leverage target before loosening; Donnie added focus on improving returns on existing invested capital.
BGBunge Global14 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 14 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Do you think underlying fundamentals support the current margin structure, excluding the higher energy prices?
Show response
Answered affirmatively and grounded it in RVO clarity plus strong global meal and corn demand; Neppl separated the energy effect.
Can you elaborate on how the Viterra assets are benefiting Bunge in this environment
Show response
Heckman gave concrete examples across soy, softseed, ocean freight and Argentina; Neppl added tighter credit spreads as a second benefit.
Calendar 2026 Q1
between Brazil and Argentina, kind of where do things stand today in terms of the curves?
Show response
Heckman noted both Brazil and Argentina curves inverted with less visibility than US. Farmers sold into Q1 flat price rally but slowed in Q2. Good bean crops expected again, setting up well overall.
how should we think relative to kind of what you guys outlined at the Investor Day, the pace of the share repurchase opportunity ramping from here
Show response
Neppl confirmed $250M remaining Viterra buyback will be completed this year. New framework targets ~50% of discretionary cash flow to shareholder returns. Noted 2026 CapEx commitments and leverage ratio monitoring may limit additional buyback this year.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I'm just curious if you see similar opportunities to kind of transform the earnings power of the Viterra piece separate of the synergies through internal operations
Show response
Heckman drew direct parallel to 2019 Bunge turnaround playbook: portfolio rationalization, centralized capital allocation, aligned rewards, risk culture implementation. Emphasized teams hit ground running on day one with unified position views.
can you share what you're assuming in '26 in the guidance for synergies on the cost and commercial side
Show response
Neppl provided specific numbers: $190M cost synergies in 2026, $220M run rate by year-end, $70M+ already realized by end of 2025, ahead of proxy-stated $175M target. Commercial synergies modest and still developing.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I was just hoping maybe you could provide some color on where that strong execution was.
Show response
Heckman gave detailed examples: connecting origination with crushing, executing open crush positions, transportation/logistics efficiencies from pairing origins and destinations, added internal liquidity for faster execution.
is there anything from the back half of the year that we should keep in mind relative to your guidance for the back half of the year in terms of seasonality or abnormal type things as we start to b...
Show response
Neppl confirmed no unusual seasonality in H2 results. Heckman added key variables for 2026 comparison will be biofuel policy timing, trade policy timing, and China sourcing program changes.
Calendar 2025 Q2
if you're able to help us kind of think about what a clean Viterra earnings base for 2024 would have looked like
Show response
CEO acknowledged Viterra had a challenging pre-close period with regulatory delays. CFO noted pro forma lacks synergies, includes deal costs, and Viterra team could have executed better. Both fixable.
How are you thinking about the implications kind of on a more global basis with the U.S. potentially out of the global market for bean oil
Show response
CEO cited prior experience with strong US oil share from biofuels and now-expanded global system. B15 in Brazil helps balance demand. Combined platform well suited for complex macro.
Calendar 2025 Q1
have you changed that approach at all? I'm just curious how that compares maybe to normal. Any color on that would be great?
Show response
CEO noted farmers and consumers both shifted to more spot activity due to uncertainty, reducing forward books. BG evaluating hedges based on S&D signals across global system.
Is there any way to frame kind of how much you think that, that is impacted relative to your $7.75 kind of outlook?
Show response
CFO cited challenging merchandising, Russia exit, Ukraine impact, inflation, and projects still under construction as headwinds vs mid-cycle. Hard to quantify exact disruption impact.
Calendar 2024 Q4
what's your degree of confidence, or how do you weigh the risk that maybe some of these uncertainties kind of linger beyond the first quarter?
Show response
CEO acknowledged risk scenarios exist, guided Q1 at only 16% of full-year (40% of 40%), expects improvement from South America in Q2 and North America in H2.
Do you see 2025 as an earnings base maybe on a pro forma basis that you should grow from over the next several years or kind of like a troughish type of number
Show response
CEO indicated 2025 should be a base to grow from, driven by commercial synergies from Viterra combination and continued investment.
ADMArcher Daniels Midland9 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
How should we think about the durable growth rate of that subsegment?
Show response
Luciano guided medium-term Flavors growth to at least mid-single digits with operating profit growing faster, citing 20% Flavors growth in Asia Pacific.
The first one is on the 45Z outlook, which continues to move higher. Can you talk about kind of what's underpinning that?
Show response
Luciano explained the 45Z increase reflects growing line of sight on carbon-intensity verification, prevailing wages, sequestration and ethanol volumes plant by plant.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how are you thinking about capital allocation incrementally? Are there more CapEx projects on the radar
Show response
Management confirmed balanced framework: priority to cost/growth projects and five growth platforms, continued dividend growth (377th consecutive quarter), prudent bolt-on M&A, and buybacks plausible as cash flows improve.
I was hoping that maybe you could help us think about the kind of earnings cadence through the year
Show response
Luciano guided to roughly 49-51 first/second half split. Q3 crush is approximately 30% sold for meal, 50-60% for oil. Q4 only about 10% booked. Patolawala added Q2 will be stronger than Q1 due to mark-to-market reversals and ethanol strength.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I wanted to go back to the guidance and, in particular, your assumptions on the higher end of the range. And appreciate some of the uncertainties around timing and magnitude related to RPO. But can...
Show response
CFO outlined high-end assumptions: faster RVO adoption lifting crush margins, stronger consumer demand across S&S and nutrition, and RINs moving higher. Declined to give specific crush margin numbers, citing too many variables. Q1 crush margins expected similar to Q4.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I wanted to start by asking about your outlook for Ag Services. And the third quarter was stronger than we anticipated
Show response
Management attributed Q3 strength to strong export volumes and absence of prior-year take-or-pay headwinds, but flagged Q4 margin opportunities as more difficult.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I was hoping you could maybe a little bit more explicitly give us kind of the earnings split between 3Q and 4Q or at least a little bit more guide
Show response
Management indicated a 1/3-2/3 Q3/Q4 split, with Q4 benefits from improved crush margins, Decatur East restart, and better Ag Services export season.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Is there a specific RVO kind of number or range that you're assuming to get to those types of outcomes or how do you maybe think about that
Show response
Management quantified the industry RVO ask and CFO stated a $0.50 EPS headwind if replacement margins don't move up in the second half.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I wanted to ask about your view on vegetable oil demand, soybean oil demand in particular. Now that we have the 45Z guidance kind of behind us
Show response
Management provided specific projections for soybean oil share gains and expected policy clarity to support second-half margin improvement.
DRIDarden Restaurants8 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
if you're seeing anything notable in terms of supply rationalization that could create an opportunity for share gains
Show response
Rick said no dramatic supply change but weaker brands closing units likely creates opportunity given Darden's cost of capital and credit. Direct.
Calendar 2026 Q2
The other business segment had its best comp performance in a couple of years and built some momentum through the year.
Show response
Rick credited Yard House and Cheddar's menu work; expects more growth from those brands ahead, Chuy's on back end of integration.
Calendar 2026 Q1
you lowered the commodity inflation guidance from 4% to 5% down to 4%
Show response
Raj confirmed beef favorability vs prior estimate (Q4 high single-digit instead of double-digit) and favorable dairy. Change is tens of basis points.
should we assume that most of those are Olive Garden and LongHorn
Show response
Raj confirmed 50-55 from OG/LongHorn, mid-single digits each from Yard House and Cheddar's, rest from fine dining. Over long term, smaller brands expected to grow faster as percentage.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Does that surprise you at all
Show response
Rick explained delivery guests are more similar to off-premise than on-premise. Same to-go/delivery ratio expected at other brands. Off-premise guests already higher frequency than dine-in.
Is that all the new units and with the updated new unit guide
Show response
Raj confirmed CapEx reflects accelerated openings and pipeline building for FY2027. Framework calls for 3-4% unit growth contribution; expects to be in range.
Calendar 2025 Q2
How are you thinking about marketing over the next several years
Show response
Rick confirmed marketing growing faster than sales by 10-20bp. Speed of service still early innings, 100,000+ servers need to change habits. All brands getting faster.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I wanted to talk about total inflation for 2025 and perhaps if you could walk us through some of the drivers
Show response
Raj walked through first-half 2%+ inflation (flat food, high-3s labor) expecting step-up in Q4 from beef, chicken, and seafood turning inflationary.
DPZDomino's2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
are you thinking about innovation opportunities differently moving forward? And how are you thinking about the brand refresh, amplifying the impact of innovation
Show response
Russell explained shift from retail-oriented show-and-tell of menu items to focus on food deliciousness. New website helps exploration; marketing now emphasizes craveable product alongside value. Brand refresh enables future innovation to lead with deliciousness rather than just price points.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Where is that reinvestment going? What are you prioritizing in terms of the reinvestment
Show response
Sandeep pointed to same three buckets from Investor Day but declined to quantify savings amount. Noted all is incorporated in the unchanged 8% profit growth guide for 2025 and 2026.
STZConstellation Brands1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
where do you think there's the biggest risks to your assumptions and the biggest -- maybe where we might look back and say, hey, that turned out to be a little bit conservative
Show response
Bill identified consumer sentiment recovery timing as the single biggest variable, noting it would benefit the entire industry, not just STZ.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| TSN Tyson Foods | 17 | 0%none of 17 questions |
| BG Bunge Global | 14 | 0%none of 14 questions |
| ADM Archer Daniels Midland | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions |
| DRI Darden Restaurants | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| DPZ Domino's | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| STZ Constellation Brands | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- TSNTyson Foods · 17 questions0%none of 17 questions
- BGBunge Global · 14 questions0%none of 14 questions
- ADMArcher Daniels Midland · 9 questions0%none of 9 questions
- DRIDarden Restaurants · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- DPZDomino's · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- STZConstellation Brands · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2024 Q4 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q1 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q2 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q3 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q4 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q1 | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q2 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q3 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
- 2024 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2024 Q46 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q17 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q27 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q36 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q47 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q18 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q27 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Margin21
- Guidance Reliability12
- Cost Pressure9
- Revenue Growth8
- Competitive Dynamics7
- Demand6
- Geographic Expansion5
- Regulation Policy5
- M&A5
- Macroeconomic5
Show all 17 topics
- Capex Investment4
- Capital Allocation3
- Supply Chain3
- Trade Tariffs3
- Product Launch2
- Innovation & R&D2
- Pricing1