Angie Storozynski

Could you maybe tell us what percentage of your CapEx currently qualifies for recovery under this rider?

is there any chance that you could actually stay out of rate cases longer once you become a larger company?

it's not going to have diminished profitability because of the goodwill that is being paid and then just a different treatment of privately-owned asset acquisitions

Anything you guys can provide as a basis for the earnings power of this asset and how it compares to municipal M&A

looking at ways to, if I understand correctly, basically, retain the previous full decoupling

is this just more simply because you have so many growth opportunities that, again, you can smooth out the earnings trajectory

you guys consider, you know, maybe using hybrids instead of traditional equity

we've had a lot of announcements -- semi-announcements about new build in PJM. How do you see those potential capacity additions?

what kind of assumptions you're making about cash taxes in that $8.4 billion free cash flow assumption for '26 and '27?

do you think those are comparable deals like quality-wise, firmness wise, to the ones that you guys are working on?

how many of these units you will be able to sign and granted that solar power curves are rising

looking at forward power curves, especially in Northern Illinois, there's been quite a dramatic pullback in those curves

at least listening to the hyperscalers, there's been a shift away from training facilities more to inference

how do they compare versus the load that you currently serve? Yes, like a percentage-wise, how big of an impact is it?

if the commission doesn't approve the current transaction, you're just going to keep the asset and just address the funding needs with more equity

this SB4 is going to apply here. So all of the commissioners need to apply on the rate case? So this is more like a test case

given that this transaction needs to be approved by PURA, if you are anticipating any roadblocks there

we've all read about the Manhattan sized data center in your Louisiana service territory from Meta. So how much of that is currently covered by ESAs

how it should have impacted your dilution math in your growth rate

about residential sales being weak, weather-normalized residential sales being weak this quarter and basically flattish year-to-date

does it incorporate a site lease? Or is there an incremental payment, for example, for the land itself on top of that?

I see the slide showing the sensitivity of your gross margin to changes in forward power curves. I mean we've had finally the move in curves

it is surprising that they could be ahead of you in the pecking order. It's not for the fact that you guys actually have sites

does it preclude you from actually potentially bidding for other assets in PJM?

the Big Beautiful Bill and its impact on -- and the tax shield it basically brings with it

what is the difference between the contract that you just signed and the other C&I contracts?

are you seeing some sort of a reaction, for example, from existing large loads, be it in the Permian or anywhere else?

How would you structure these contracts? Are these gonna be spark spread driven contracts?

are you hoping to maybe rely more on the DSIC mechanism, any ways to maybe reduce costs

is it a onetime issue because of the rate case that you just filed, meaning that some of those earnings deficiencies get remediated in this rate case?

you talked about potential contracting with generation assets of IPPs in Pennsylvania—at least that is what it sounded like to me. And I am wondering if you are referring to existing assets or to n...

do you think that this would be, for example, deducted against the capacity deficiency that would be procured in the backstop PJM capacity auction?

you mentioned that as the data center pipeline grows, the rule of thumb about how much transmission spending is needed for every gigawatt of load added no longer holds

Is it possible that you could develop contract-based generation assets and that the offtaker of those contracts would be your Pennsylvania utility?

I have basically like about $500 million of CapEx, right, that I need to replenish in order to beat the current CapEx plan unchanged

you're not waiting for that model tariff to be established before basically finalizing these data center deals?

do you still have this material benefit on the time to power benefit? And is that in a sense disproportionately benefiting your zone as far as attracting the load growth in Pennsylvania?

on the 2024 results, so the hold call drag was probably the biggest surprise here

building a brand new combined cycles for a hyperscaler or whoever under a long-term contract by Southern Power meeting your return expectations

the Southeast seems to come up quite a bit. I mean I'm looking at the map. There are a few options here. So I'm just wondering, is it just, as I said, preliminary discussions

you clearly have this unique cost of capital advantage in the entire industry. That usually comes with well, with more pressure

how you see that requirement or that push vis-a-vis your large and growing generation portfolio?

how you think you see the demand for long-term contracts for gas-fired new build ahead of this RBA

your '26 guidance, you're very heavily hedged. You have a capacity auction that comes with a pricing floor

are we waiting both in Texas and at FERC for the final rules to be passed? Before any deals can be announced

why haven't we heard of any gas deals? Is it that, you know, you mentioned in the past some sort of a portfolio deals