Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Brett Knoblauch

Cantor Fitzgerald · covers Technology, Financial Services, Communication Services

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (8 quarters).

Questions
45on tracked calls
Challenge rate
4%2 of 45 questions
Companies
9questioned at least once
Reporting periods
8with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 45 of 45 questions from 9 companies

IRENIREN Limited11 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 11 challenging
IREN company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Now it's kind of somewhere around $25 million. Is that -- over what duration could you clarify?

Show response

Kent Draper said pricing is consistent across live conversations and trending up; Dan clarified 3- to 5-year deals.

Are you seeing any design changes that might allow for lower PUEs at other sites that you guys have coming online

Capex InvestmentInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Kent Draper said PUEs are ambient-driven with incremental improvements; Dan noted spare-power headroom from conservative PUEs.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Could you maybe just elaborate how that fits into your go-to-market motion

Show response

Kent Draper said Mirantis brings faster deployment, the ability to service software-heavy enterprise customers, strong internal engineering, and a well-built customer-support function; also asked about the 730MW 2027 ramp split (450MW Childress, 280MW Sweetwater), which management confirmed.

Calendar 2025 Q4

what you are seeing from a pricing environment, I think we have a lot of data points on the colo pricing

Show response

Kent pointed to longer tenures, air-cooled interest and prepayments rather than a specific pricing figure.

Calendar 2025 Q3

can you maybe parse out how much of that is allocated to GPUs and the ancillary equipment?

Capex InvestmentInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Kent said GPUs are the vast majority of the $5.8B order, with substantial InfiniBand networking; reusability for future GPU generations remains to be seen.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Is the strategy to go out and order or purchase GPUs with a customer already in mind?

Show response

Daniel Roberts said customers want on-demand compute now, so ordering hardware ahead is warranted while each incremental order is a small share of overall risk; Kent added color on power-per-GPU rising.

Calendar 2024 Q4

is one way you think of Horizon as it's almost like a model home showcasing who would be the big tenant at Sweetwater

Competitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Kent agreed it demonstrates internal capability, pointing to building 50 MW of data centers a month as proof supporting customer conversations trending toward IREN retaining ownership.

Does that factor into maybe why you guys are announcing Horizon 1 after maybe just only recently

Show response

Kent confirmed the post-DeepSeek uptick factored in, citing a large demand uptick for liquid-cooled capacity across cloud and colocation and a delivery-timeline advantage.

Calendar 2024 Q3

are you guys concerned that those shipments could potentially not be delivered or held up at customs

ChallengingSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Management dismissed Bitmain delivery concerns, citing six years without material issues and the last 31 exahash miners arriving within about seven days.

how do you view that or CapEx on GPUs relative to maybe some of the Bitcoin mining CapEx

Capex InvestmentCapital AllocationCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Management said it is less inclined to invest in GPUs near term given cost of capital and softer demand ahead of the Blackwell transition, favoring Bitcoin CapEx.

Have you seen like a material increase in demand post that announcement given it kind of used Texas assets

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Management acknowledged more perceived demand after the FERC decision but cautioned nothing is real until a deal is signed.

CLSKCleanSpark, Inc.9 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
CLSK company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

walk us through how mining potentially could be incorporated into future site acquisitions and development?

Capex InvestmentCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Nathan Frankovitz, on for Brett Knoblauch, asked how mining could be incorporated into future site acquisitions and development; Matt described using modular immersion-cooled mining to monetize interruptible or early-energized power within 90 days, then converting sites to data centers.

Calendar 2026 Q1

does this portfolio approach potential maybe push back when the first lease signing could be?

Show response

Matt Schultz said the portfolio approach does not change lease timing and that assets have independent value, framing it as upside rather than a delay; a direct answer.

Calendar 2025 Q4

go into detail on the 2 new sites in Texas. When are you guys expecting to have power available on those sites

Geographic ExpansionCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Asked by colleague Gareth on behalf of Brent Noble (operator-introduced). Management gave specifics on Sealy (285MW, first tranche 1H27) and Brazoria energization (Q4 27-Q1 28).

Calendar 2025 Q3

Could you comment on what you had to pay for the new site in Texas that you guys just announced?

Capex InvestmentM&ATranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Matt declined to disclose the exact price but said it was a mix of equity and cash at the low end of the market range.

Calendar 2025 Q2

with greater scale, would you be able to sell less Bitcoin to cover the same cash cost?

MarginCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Knoblauch asked whether scale lets CleanSpark sell less Bitcoin to cover costs; Vecchiarelli cited operating leverage dropping to the bottom line.

Calendar 2024 Q4

what type of power capacity do you have in your pipeline? And maybe in which states would you look spend?

Capex InvestmentGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Zach said expansion is possible across all operating regions but expects the majority of growth in Tennessee and Wyoming, citing utility willingness to adopt interruptible-load energy tariffs.

Can you just maybe talk about the you guys deploy in managing OpEx while delivering such strong growth?

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Gary attributed OpEx discipline to a strict budgeting process and low incremental corporate overhead, expecting indirect expenses to stay relatively flat with professional fees the only M&A-driven wildcard.

Calendar 2024 Q3

I guess post having FOB, there will be a lot more deals than we saw, and I know you guys have been aggressive

M&ACompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Zach expects a second wave of private-miner sales as held-back fleets age, but sees little public-to-public consolidation given premiums.

on the infrastructure side, the build-out in Wyoming and likely other locations

Capex InvestmentCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Zach declined to commit to one capital source, citing open capital markets, and quantified roughly $200 million of infrastructure spend to reach beyond 50 exahash.

RIOTRiot Platforms, Inc.8 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 8 challenging
RIOT company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

how would you describe the gating items on your end or what you and your prospective tenant need to do to convert it

ChallengingCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Les declined to list specific gating items, describing the scale of the multi-year, 756 MW development and the design, legal, and commercial work required from both sides.

Calendar 2026 Q1

I'm curious if that is still the case. Do you have a preference if it's a single tenant or multi-tenant

Cloud & AICapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Management confirmed full-site interest persists but noted 756 MW is unprecedented scale for a single lease. Core and shell procurement is well-advanced with the same AMD general contractor secured, and Tier 3 long-lead items (generators, chillers) already being procured.

Calendar 2025 Q3

the, call it, 400 megawatts being used for Bitcoin mining at Corsicana, is that maybe like the last source of power that you would draw as you kind of build up more on the AI side

Cloud & AICapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Management confirmed Phase 1 builds on unused land preserving mining cash flows, with Phase 2 eventually supplanting mining buildings for the final 168 MW, paced by customer demand.

where else on the maybe the hiring front, you guys have made hires and to what extent there's more hires that you need to go out and make

Show response

Management described hiring as following a pendulum from engineering to sales to operations, with key development hires in place and recent SVP of AI and Hyperscale Sales addition shifting focus toward leasing.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Are you guys getting kind of like similar feedback when you guys are looking at potential customers or kind of what to do with maybe the remaining 600 or full gigawatt there

Show response

Management described phased approach to Corsicana development, noting large-scale capacity is attractive for growth-oriented tenants seeking expansion pipeline beyond initial lease.

where do you see network hash going? Is there a level where you think maybe it kind of plateaus a bit

Competitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Management noted 4% network share is not a mandate, expects miners face power constraints similar to data centers, and outlined ~26% YoY growth for 2025 followed by ~10% for 2026.

Calendar 2024 Q4

is all of Corsicana on the table if a hyperscaler wanted the full gigawatt there

Show response

Management confirmed openness to leasing the full 1 GW if the economics are accretive to shareholders.

on the power agreements place at these sites, do they need to be authored to support AI/HPC

Show response

Management clarified power supply agreements do not require demand response participation; all curtailment is voluntary and specific to Bitcoin mining.

MARAMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc.7 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
MARA company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

what's giving you the confidence that this could be executed as quickly as you're expecting?

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Fred cited competition among multiple prospective tenants across 90% of MARA's capacity and surging demand for compute as model providers cap usage and raise prices.

you outlined like a path to get that to maybe like a 600-megawatt AI campus.

Capex InvestmentCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Fred said the first 200-megawatt facility would take roughly 18 to 24 months, with behind-the-meter capacity coming online soonest and grid interconnection following.

Calendar 2024 Q4

How should we be thinking about hash rate growth this year? I know your hash

Guidance ReliabilityCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Management declined to give a specific 2025 hash rate target, citing dependence on mining profitability and a focus on capital efficiency over scale.

why you chose to issue the converts to buy Bitcoin maybe rather than go out and buy energy generation assets

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Management defended using convertible debt to buy an appreciating asset (Bitcoin) rather than depreciating miners, framing it as opportunistic capital allocation.

Bitcoin has certainly proven to be cyclical, what part of the cycle do you think we're in?

MacroeconomicDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Management said Bitcoin is now highly correlated to equities and is in a near-term risk-off phase, but maintained the long-term adoption trend is intact.

should we expect you to go out and acquire as much power in 2025 as you did in 2024?

Capex InvestmentGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Management outlined a plan for roughly 50% international capacity by 2028, partnering with energy companies abroad and acquiring energy assets domestically.

a lot of your peers in the space are kind of looking to a co-location model

Cloud & AICapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Management answered directly, favoring small edge inference sites over large training campuses and full co-location leasing.

APLDApplied Digital Corp.4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
APLD company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

can you provide an update on your expected capital needs over the next 12 to 18 months

Show response

Direct, confirmed CapEx is in line with past projections and quantified cadence at $30-50 million a month for the first building.

are you seeing faster diligence timelines or improved leasing momentum because of their support

DemandCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Partial, pointed to more interest and higher counterparty comfort from world-class financing partners, but gave no concrete diligence-timeline acceleration.

Calendar 2024 Q4

have you seen terms improve to a level where you get a yield on cost above the cost of the preferred?

PricingCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Wes said the preferred is only a sliver of the capital stack and the blended cost with project-level debt leaves returns well north of cost of capital.

is that just a ROFR on the perpetual preferreds or would you have to use that before

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Wes said the ROFR applies to asset-level preferred financing, not the parent's public equity, which carries no such restriction.

HOODRobinhood Markets, Inc.3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
HOOD company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

On the Robinhood Social, could you maybe just dive into that a bit deeper and when you expect for that to rollout and how you expect maybe users to begin using that

Product LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Vlad framed Social as closing the loop between idea generation and trade execution. Verified trades across equities, options, crypto, prediction markets, and futures create unique content. Jason positioned it as flywheel to attract more customers rather than direct monetization.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Curious what percentage of kind of crypto assets are currently being staked?

Product LaunchRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jason confirmed $6B in stakeable assets with rapid customer adoption. Broader opportunity framed as continuing to win crypto market share.

Could you maybe just talk about the pace of those maybe pricing gains that you guys have been taking?

PricingRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jason indicated current pricing levels are satisfactory with experimentation continuing. Suggests near-term take rate stability after several quarters of increases.

Show 3 more companies
COINCoinbase Global1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
COIN company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

Is there any change of control clause with Circle where that provides over would acquire Circle and out? Or what would happen in a scenario where Circle get acquired?

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Alesia gave a concise, definitive answer: the contract survives any change of control. No ambiguity.

CRWVCoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
CRWV company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

can you talk about the cadence of how you guys look to either recontract that or kind of put it on spot or in your inference products?

Show response

Management said off-line infrastructure is either placed back into term contracts when economics warrant or used for shorter-term contracts and managed inference to extract additional margin; answered directly.

NBISNebius Group N.V.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
NBIS company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Do we still expect to end the year with 800 megawatts to 1 gigawatt?

Capex InvestmentGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Andrey Korolenko reaffirmed the 800 megawatt to 1 gigawatt connected-power target for the year, noting Vineland is part of 2026 capacity and that connected power leads revenue by a few months given commissioning, network, cluster and onboarding steps.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
IREN IREN Limited119%1 of 11 questions
CLSK CleanSpark, Inc.90%none of 9 questions
RIOT Riot Platforms, Inc.813%1 of 8 questions
MARA Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.70%none of 7 questions
APLD Applied Digital Corp.40%none of 4 questions
HOOD Robinhood Markets, Inc.30%none of 3 questions
COIN Coinbase Global1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
CRWV CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
NBIS Nebius Group N.V.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • IREN
    IREN Limited · 11 questions
    9%1 of 11 questions
  • CLSK
    CleanSpark, Inc. · 9 questions
    0%none of 9 questions
  • RIOT
    Riot Platforms, Inc. · 8 questions
    13%1 of 8 questions
  • MARA
    Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • APLD
    Applied Digital Corp. · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • HOOD
    Robinhood Markets, Inc. · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • COIN
    Coinbase Global · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • CRWV
    CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • NBIS
    Nebius Group N.V. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q3520%1 of 5 questions2
2024 Q4130%none of 13 questions5
2025 Q130%none of 3 questions2
2025 Q260%none of 6 questions4
2025 Q350%none of 5 questions4
2025 Q420%none of 2 questions2
2026 Q150%none of 5 questions4
2026 Q2617%1 of 6 questions5
  1. 2024 Q35 questions · challenge rate 20% (1 of 5 questions) · 2 companies
  2. 2024 Q413 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 13 questions) · 5 companies
  3. 2025 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  4. 2025 Q26 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
  5. 2025 Q35 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 4 companies
  6. 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  7. 2026 Q15 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 4 companies
  8. 2026 Q26 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 5 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Capex Investment15
  • Cloud & AI14
  • Capital Allocation9
  • Demand8
  • Competitive Dynamics6
  • Pricing5
  • Geographic Expansion4
  • M&A3
  • Revenue Growth3
  • Innovation & R&D2
Show all 17 topics
  • Margin2
  • Product Launch2
  • Regulation Policy2
  • Cost Pressure1
  • Supply Chain1
  • Guidance Reliability1
  • Macroeconomic1