Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Brett Knoblauch
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (8 quarters).
- Questions
- 45on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 4%2 of 45 questions
- Companies
- 9questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 8with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 45 of 45 questions from 9 companies
IRENIREN Limited11 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Now it's kind of somewhere around $25 million. Is that -- over what duration could you clarify?
Show response
Kent Draper said pricing is consistent across live conversations and trending up; Dan clarified 3- to 5-year deals.
Are you seeing any design changes that might allow for lower PUEs at other sites that you guys have coming online
Show response
Kent Draper said PUEs are ambient-driven with incremental improvements; Dan noted spare-power headroom from conservative PUEs.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Could you maybe just elaborate how that fits into your go-to-market motion
Show response
Kent Draper said Mirantis brings faster deployment, the ability to service software-heavy enterprise customers, strong internal engineering, and a well-built customer-support function; also asked about the 730MW 2027 ramp split (450MW Childress, 280MW Sweetwater), which management confirmed.
Calendar 2025 Q4
what you are seeing from a pricing environment, I think we have a lot of data points on the colo pricing
Show response
Kent pointed to longer tenures, air-cooled interest and prepayments rather than a specific pricing figure.
Calendar 2025 Q3
can you maybe parse out how much of that is allocated to GPUs and the ancillary equipment?
Show response
Kent said GPUs are the vast majority of the $5.8B order, with substantial InfiniBand networking; reusability for future GPU generations remains to be seen.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Is the strategy to go out and order or purchase GPUs with a customer already in mind?
Show response
Daniel Roberts said customers want on-demand compute now, so ordering hardware ahead is warranted while each incremental order is a small share of overall risk; Kent added color on power-per-GPU rising.
Calendar 2024 Q4
is one way you think of Horizon as it's almost like a model home showcasing who would be the big tenant at Sweetwater
Show response
Kent agreed it demonstrates internal capability, pointing to building 50 MW of data centers a month as proof supporting customer conversations trending toward IREN retaining ownership.
Does that factor into maybe why you guys are announcing Horizon 1 after maybe just only recently
Show response
Kent confirmed the post-DeepSeek uptick factored in, citing a large demand uptick for liquid-cooled capacity across cloud and colocation and a delivery-timeline advantage.
Calendar 2024 Q3
are you guys concerned that those shipments could potentially not be delivered or held up at customs
Show response
Management dismissed Bitmain delivery concerns, citing six years without material issues and the last 31 exahash miners arriving within about seven days.
how do you view that or CapEx on GPUs relative to maybe some of the Bitcoin mining CapEx
Show response
Management said it is less inclined to invest in GPUs near term given cost of capital and softer demand ahead of the Blackwell transition, favoring Bitcoin CapEx.
Have you seen like a material increase in demand post that announcement given it kind of used Texas assets
Show response
Management acknowledged more perceived demand after the FERC decision but cautioned nothing is real until a deal is signed.
CLSKCleanSpark, Inc.9 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
walk us through how mining potentially could be incorporated into future site acquisitions and development?
Show response
Nathan Frankovitz, on for Brett Knoblauch, asked how mining could be incorporated into future site acquisitions and development; Matt described using modular immersion-cooled mining to monetize interruptible or early-energized power within 90 days, then converting sites to data centers.
Calendar 2026 Q1
does this portfolio approach potential maybe push back when the first lease signing could be?
Show response
Matt Schultz said the portfolio approach does not change lease timing and that assets have independent value, framing it as upside rather than a delay; a direct answer.
Calendar 2025 Q4
go into detail on the 2 new sites in Texas. When are you guys expecting to have power available on those sites
Show response
Asked by colleague Gareth on behalf of Brent Noble (operator-introduced). Management gave specifics on Sealy (285MW, first tranche 1H27) and Brazoria energization (Q4 27-Q1 28).
Calendar 2025 Q3
Could you comment on what you had to pay for the new site in Texas that you guys just announced?
Show response
Matt declined to disclose the exact price but said it was a mix of equity and cash at the low end of the market range.
Calendar 2025 Q2
with greater scale, would you be able to sell less Bitcoin to cover the same cash cost?
Show response
Knoblauch asked whether scale lets CleanSpark sell less Bitcoin to cover costs; Vecchiarelli cited operating leverage dropping to the bottom line.
Calendar 2024 Q4
what type of power capacity do you have in your pipeline? And maybe in which states would you look spend?
Show response
Zach said expansion is possible across all operating regions but expects the majority of growth in Tennessee and Wyoming, citing utility willingness to adopt interruptible-load energy tariffs.
Can you just maybe talk about the you guys deploy in managing OpEx while delivering such strong growth?
Show response
Gary attributed OpEx discipline to a strict budgeting process and low incremental corporate overhead, expecting indirect expenses to stay relatively flat with professional fees the only M&A-driven wildcard.
Calendar 2024 Q3
I guess post having FOB, there will be a lot more deals than we saw, and I know you guys have been aggressive
Show response
Zach expects a second wave of private-miner sales as held-back fleets age, but sees little public-to-public consolidation given premiums.
on the infrastructure side, the build-out in Wyoming and likely other locations
Show response
Zach declined to commit to one capital source, citing open capital markets, and quantified roughly $200 million of infrastructure spend to reach beyond 50 exahash.
RIOTRiot Platforms, Inc.8 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how would you describe the gating items on your end or what you and your prospective tenant need to do to convert it
Show response
Les declined to list specific gating items, describing the scale of the multi-year, 756 MW development and the design, legal, and commercial work required from both sides.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I'm curious if that is still the case. Do you have a preference if it's a single tenant or multi-tenant
Show response
Management confirmed full-site interest persists but noted 756 MW is unprecedented scale for a single lease. Core and shell procurement is well-advanced with the same AMD general contractor secured, and Tier 3 long-lead items (generators, chillers) already being procured.
Calendar 2025 Q3
the, call it, 400 megawatts being used for Bitcoin mining at Corsicana, is that maybe like the last source of power that you would draw as you kind of build up more on the AI side
Show response
Management confirmed Phase 1 builds on unused land preserving mining cash flows, with Phase 2 eventually supplanting mining buildings for the final 168 MW, paced by customer demand.
where else on the maybe the hiring front, you guys have made hires and to what extent there's more hires that you need to go out and make
Show response
Management described hiring as following a pendulum from engineering to sales to operations, with key development hires in place and recent SVP of AI and Hyperscale Sales addition shifting focus toward leasing.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Are you guys getting kind of like similar feedback when you guys are looking at potential customers or kind of what to do with maybe the remaining 600 or full gigawatt there
Show response
Management described phased approach to Corsicana development, noting large-scale capacity is attractive for growth-oriented tenants seeking expansion pipeline beyond initial lease.
where do you see network hash going? Is there a level where you think maybe it kind of plateaus a bit
Show response
Management noted 4% network share is not a mandate, expects miners face power constraints similar to data centers, and outlined ~26% YoY growth for 2025 followed by ~10% for 2026.
Calendar 2024 Q4
is all of Corsicana on the table if a hyperscaler wanted the full gigawatt there
Show response
Management confirmed openness to leasing the full 1 GW if the economics are accretive to shareholders.
on the power agreements place at these sites, do they need to be authored to support AI/HPC
Show response
Management clarified power supply agreements do not require demand response participation; all curtailment is voluntary and specific to Bitcoin mining.
MARAMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc.7 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
what's giving you the confidence that this could be executed as quickly as you're expecting?
Show response
Fred cited competition among multiple prospective tenants across 90% of MARA's capacity and surging demand for compute as model providers cap usage and raise prices.
you outlined like a path to get that to maybe like a 600-megawatt AI campus.
Show response
Fred said the first 200-megawatt facility would take roughly 18 to 24 months, with behind-the-meter capacity coming online soonest and grid interconnection following.
Calendar 2024 Q4
How should we be thinking about hash rate growth this year? I know your hash
Show response
Management declined to give a specific 2025 hash rate target, citing dependence on mining profitability and a focus on capital efficiency over scale.
why you chose to issue the converts to buy Bitcoin maybe rather than go out and buy energy generation assets
Show response
Management defended using convertible debt to buy an appreciating asset (Bitcoin) rather than depreciating miners, framing it as opportunistic capital allocation.
Bitcoin has certainly proven to be cyclical, what part of the cycle do you think we're in?
Show response
Management said Bitcoin is now highly correlated to equities and is in a near-term risk-off phase, but maintained the long-term adoption trend is intact.
should we expect you to go out and acquire as much power in 2025 as you did in 2024?
Show response
Management outlined a plan for roughly 50% international capacity by 2028, partnering with energy companies abroad and acquiring energy assets domestically.
a lot of your peers in the space are kind of looking to a co-location model
Show response
Management answered directly, favoring small edge inference sites over large training campuses and full co-location leasing.
APLDApplied Digital Corp.4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
can you provide an update on your expected capital needs over the next 12 to 18 months
Show response
Direct, confirmed CapEx is in line with past projections and quantified cadence at $30-50 million a month for the first building.
are you seeing faster diligence timelines or improved leasing momentum because of their support
Show response
Partial, pointed to more interest and higher counterparty comfort from world-class financing partners, but gave no concrete diligence-timeline acceleration.
Calendar 2024 Q4
have you seen terms improve to a level where you get a yield on cost above the cost of the preferred?
Show response
Wes said the preferred is only a sliver of the capital stack and the blended cost with project-level debt leaves returns well north of cost of capital.
is that just a ROFR on the perpetual preferreds or would you have to use that before
Show response
Wes said the ROFR applies to asset-level preferred financing, not the parent's public equity, which carries no such restriction.
HOODRobinhood Markets, Inc.3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
On the Robinhood Social, could you maybe just dive into that a bit deeper and when you expect for that to rollout and how you expect maybe users to begin using that
Show response
Vlad framed Social as closing the loop between idea generation and trade execution. Verified trades across equities, options, crypto, prediction markets, and futures create unique content. Jason positioned it as flywheel to attract more customers rather than direct monetization.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Curious what percentage of kind of crypto assets are currently being staked?
Show response
Jason confirmed $6B in stakeable assets with rapid customer adoption. Broader opportunity framed as continuing to win crypto market share.
Could you maybe just talk about the pace of those maybe pricing gains that you guys have been taking?
Show response
Jason indicated current pricing levels are satisfactory with experimentation continuing. Suggests near-term take rate stability after several quarters of increases.
Show 3 more companies
COINCoinbase Global1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
Is there any change of control clause with Circle where that provides over would acquire Circle and out? Or what would happen in a scenario where Circle get acquired?
Show response
Alesia gave a concise, definitive answer: the contract survives any change of control. No ambiguity.
CRWVCoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
can you talk about the cadence of how you guys look to either recontract that or kind of put it on spot or in your inference products?
Show response
Management said off-line infrastructure is either placed back into term contracts when economics warrant or used for shorter-term contracts and managed inference to extract additional margin; answered directly.
NBISNebius Group N.V.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Do we still expect to end the year with 800 megawatts to 1 gigawatt?
Show response
Andrey Korolenko reaffirmed the 800 megawatt to 1 gigawatt connected-power target for the year, noting Vineland is part of 2026 capacity and that connected power leads revenue by a few months given commissioning, network, cluster and onboarding steps.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| IREN IREN Limited | 11 | 9%1 of 11 questions |
| CLSK CleanSpark, Inc. | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions |
| RIOT Riot Platforms, Inc. | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions |
| MARA Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| APLD Applied Digital Corp. | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| HOOD Robinhood Markets, Inc. | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| COIN Coinbase Global | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| CRWV CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| NBIS Nebius Group N.V. | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- IRENIREN Limited · 11 questions9%1 of 11 questions
- CLSKCleanSpark, Inc. · 9 questions0%none of 9 questions
- RIOTRiot Platforms, Inc. · 8 questions13%1 of 8 questions
- MARAMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc. · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- APLDApplied Digital Corp. · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- HOODRobinhood Markets, Inc. · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- COINCoinbase Global · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- CRWVCoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- NBISNebius Group N.V. · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions | 2 |
| 2024 Q4 | 13 | 0%none of 13 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q1 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q2 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q3 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q4 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q1 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q2 | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions | 5 |
- 2024 Q35 questions · challenge rate 20% (1 of 5 questions) · 2 companies
- 2024 Q413 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 13 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q26 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q35 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q15 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q26 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 5 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Capex Investment15
- Cloud & AI14
- Capital Allocation9
- Demand8
- Competitive Dynamics6
- Pricing5
- Geographic Expansion4
- M&A3
- Revenue Growth3
- Innovation & R&D2
Show all 17 topics
- Margin2
- Product Launch2
- Regulation Policy2
- Cost Pressure1
- Supply Chain1
- Guidance Reliability1
- Macroeconomic1