Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Dan Perlin
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (8 quarters).
- Questions
- 30on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 7%2 of 30 questions
- Companies
- 6questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 8with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 30 of 30 questions from 6 companies
BRBroadridge Financial Solutions9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I wanted to just revisit the closed sales number. I know it can be lumpy quarter-to-quarter.
Show response
Tim attributed the record to large deals (including a communications deal) freeing up after Q3 market uncertainty, plus better mid-deal flow-through, with the pipeline up more than a third YoY.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Is it accelerating in terms of investment dollars that are going to be required to capture all these opportunities?
Show response
Ashima confirmed on track for 20-21% AOI margin for full year. Using elevated event revenue to accelerate investments in shareholder engagement, tokenization, and AI. Q4 EPS growth expected low to mid-single-digit reflecting investments. Tim added AI productivity gains help maintain right mix of investment and shareholder returns.
I was just hoping maybe you would go a little bit deeper into why you think you guys are in a really good position to win here, and it's not going to be problematic going forward
Show response
Tim outlined three SEC tokenization models: issuer-sponsored (partnering with Galaxy), intermediary-led (working with multiple parties), and synthetic (Ondo announcement). In all models, complexity of governance creates demand for Broadridge. DLR at $350B/day is largest tokenized platform. Wealth management opportunity in preventing dual infrastructure costs.
Calendar 2025 Q1
can you just maybe tease out a little bit the nuance there and how that is again going to impact the business maybe going forward?
Show response
Tim noted this is the first time direct indexing growth is visible in data. Small positions will scale to revenue positions over time, supporting long-term upper single-digit growth trajectory.
It sounds like there's this kind of like the economy where you've got you've got client demand that's there and now maybe you're starting to get a sense that there's a little bit of a pause
Show response
Tim explained only a few weeks of data since April 2, seeing elongation not cancellation. Clients continuing cost/simplification work but pausing new revenue investments. Pipeline remains strong.
Calendar 2024 Q4
How does that flow into the business, all else equal, if these deals start to flow in over the next six to nine months
Show response
Tim explained M&A impact minimal (mostly private), IPOs incrementally positive for positions, event-driven upside from shareholder votes. Also covered deregulatory tailwinds on digital assets and proxy reform.
you called out in GTO that there were lower license sales revenues, and that was a three-point headwind in the quarter
Show response
Ashima clarified license is ~5% of GTO revenue, Q3 will show low double-digit capital markets and low single-digit organic wealth growth due to license timing that evens out annually.
Calendar 2024 Q3
not raising the EPS again kind of suggests that the incremental margins associated with what's being brought on are lower
Show response
Ashima explained SIS is neutral to EPS in year one and higher event-driven revenue is being reinvested. Tim confirmed SIS expected EPS-neutral, organic trends leave EPS range unchanged.
I'm just curious where you are thinking you might want to place some incremental dollars this year?
Show response
Tim noted strong pipeline of PE-sponsored opportunities, framed M&A within mid to high-teens ROIC criteria and balanced capital allocation. Would repurchase shares if deals don't meet bar.
JKHYJack Henry & Associates7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
would you mind just kind of double-clicking a little bit on the commentary around revenues modestly below in 1Q and what the drivers and timing shift there was?
Show response
Mimi attributed Q1 softness to the Connect conference shifting to Q2 (a 1% impact, roughly $6 million in revenue and $10 million of expense) plus some one-time revenue timing.
part of it's maybe a reminder of what that new sales process was and how important that is, and then how does that dovetail into the trifecta opportunities?
Show response
Greg explained the new process discourages pulling renewals to hit quota, driving genuinely new sales (60% new versus 45% prior). Trifecta success is a separate dynamic driven by product parity in Banno and card; he expects new-sales mix north of 55% this year.
Calendar 2025 Q3
as you think about the strategy to increasingly sell outside the core, can you just maybe update us on where that progress is
Show response
Greg said 5-6 years of private cloud migration runway remain at current pace of 35-45 per year. All new Jack Henry platform components are core-agnostic and can sell outside the base. Banno outside-the-base selling starts January 2026. Victor acquisition creates additional non-Jack-Henry-core opportunities. Tap2Local and Rapid Transfers have companion apps for competing digital providers.
Calendar 2025 Q2
the revenue guidance range is a little bit wider. I think it's 120 basis points relative to 100 for the past several years
Show response
Mimi explained the wider range reflects larger total revenue base and desire for operational flexibility given macro variables beyond their control, not structural change.
try and reconcile that with maybe last quarter's commentary around some large capital purchase delays
Show response
Greg confirmed delays have significantly improved, especially consulting engagements around Financial Crimes Defender. Some implementation still slightly delayed but not to the same level as last quarter.
Calendar 2025 Q1
are you seeing similar restraints when it comes to your more modernized projects and cloud migration
Show response
Greg clarified delays are concentrated in nonrecurring items and some post-core complementary/payment products, not cloud migrations. Some clients delaying hardware as they evaluate private cloud move.
you took the opportunity to kind of throw out that there could be impacts to non-GAAP revenue growth for '26
Show response
Mimi noted ~30 clients in merger activity, majority Jack-Henry-to-Jack-Henry cloud customers retaining revenue. Convert-merge services and approval timelines mean more FY26 impact than FY25.
AFRMAffirm Holdings, Inc.5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
the gain on sale revenues, which once again was really the strongest line item for growth
Show response
Max tied lumpy gain-on-sale revenue to nonconsolidated ABS deal timing (2 in FY26) and expects a similar FY27 funding plan, not a mix-shift concern.
Calendar 2026 Q1
can you just speak, I think, maybe holistically to your expansion plans outside of North America?
Show response
Max deferred market specifics to the forum but flagged a possible small RLTC drag as Affirm ramps in new countries, minimal given US/Canada scale.
Calendar 2025 Q4
My bigger question is kind of the uplift in credit quality that comes with that consumer set.
Show response
Max said 0% Days skewed higher credit quality, drove outsized cardholder growth, and 0% users happily use interest-bearing loans too.
Calendar 2025 Q3
do you really think and see the overall health of kind of the less affluent consumer being as strong
Show response
Max said the consumer is healthy; shutdown data showed a few bps demand slowdown among government employees but no repayment loss.
Calendar 2025 Q2
what kind of like repeat rates are you able to, I guess, glean from those initial users coming in?
Show response
Max said 0%-acquired users repeat similarly and importantly convert to interest-bearing loans over time.
GPNGlobal Payments4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
are you thinking that there's other businesses specifically or geographies or maybe it's both?
Show response
Cameron confirmed portfolio reassessment underway given Worldpay changes strategic context, likely incremental divestitures with proceeds returned to shareholders.
I know when you had originally contemplated putting these things together, there was concerns that there might be some portfolio attrition or some noise in the book
Show response
Cameron noted some buying pause pre-launch but no meaningful base attrition. Bob clarified biggest attrition driver is business failure not competitive defection, and greenfield international markets reduce attrition concern.
Calendar 2024 Q4
In terms of your conviction level and visibility into the organization now, you're doing a lot of things
Show response
Cameron expressed high conviction with better visibility than September IC, citing early transformation results and improved organizational execution.
are you suggesting that we're at the low end of the range in kind of the first half and then you accelerate to the high end?
Show response
Cameron was very clear both halves are within 5-6% range with only tens of basis points difference, lower in H1 and higher in H2 with good exit rate into 2026.
VVisa Inc.3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
opportunities around value-added services, but specifically, around purpose-built offerings for events
Show response
McInerney described Olympics and FIFA as marquee global sponsorship assets with ability to pass rights through to clients and partners. VAS sales teams engage clients months in advance designing bespoke custom-built programs, advertising campaigns, sweepstakes for cardholders, private banking client events at FIFA games in US, Canada, Mexico. Described as very busy year with ton of client demand. Not only generating revenue but deepening partnerships, leading to more renewals and more business.
Calendar 2025 Q1
if it changes in any way your views of how you're placing like your investment bets
Show response
McInerney backed up to macro, more uncertainty among consumers and businesses than several months ago per consumer confidence metrics, but facts on spending remain strong and resilient. US employment strong, wage growth steady, inflation moderated, consumer balance sheets relatively healthy. Balancing uncertainty with facts of resiliency. Remain very committed to product roadmap and investment roadmap across all three growth levers. Constantly looking at scenarios and ready to make changes if and when facts lead to changes. On M&A, from position of strength optimistic that current situation could create more opportunities around the world than might otherwise have happened.
Calendar 2024 Q4
if you could just speak to the point around the strength of the dollar and really like the purchasing power
Show response
McInerney confirmed dollar has strengthened meaningfully and quickly. Stronger dollar means stronger purchasing power for Americans abroad and more expensive for inbound US travel. Historical periods of stronger dollar led to outbound US travel increases and some shift away from inbound US destinations to other places globally, but overall travel spending typically remained consistent as people plan holidays in different places. Still early with only a short period into stronger dollar period, will give more insight next quarter assuming conditions persist.
PYPLPayPal2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
But it also sounds like a lot of that benefit is potentially coming from what's happening in the United States.
Show response
Miller gave a region-by-region read: sequential U.S. growth, European improvement to a lesser extent, and travel-vertical pressure that moderated through the quarter.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how does the purchasing power parity associated with a weaker dollar typically play out for you guys in terms of cross-border behavior
Show response
Jamie highlighted diversification: 50/50 goods/services in U.S. TPV, cross-border largely intra-European corridors. Difficult to predict FX impact but well-diversified globally.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| BR Broadridge Financial Solutions | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions |
| JKHY Jack Henry & Associates | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| AFRM Affirm Holdings, Inc. | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions |
| GPN Global Payments | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| V Visa Inc. | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| PYPL PayPal | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- BRBroadridge Financial Solutions · 9 questions11%1 of 9 questions
- JKHYJack Henry & Associates · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- AFRMAffirm Holdings, Inc. · 5 questions20%1 of 5 questions
- GPNGlobal Payments · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- VVisa Inc. · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- PYPLPayPal · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2024 Q4 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q1 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q2 | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q4 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q1 | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q2 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 4 |
- 2024 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2024 Q45 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q16 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q25 questions · challenge rate 20% (1 of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q13 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q25 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 4 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Revenue Growth11
- Demand7
- Guidance Reliability6
- M&A5
- Competitive Dynamics4
- Capital Allocation3
- Margin3
- Macroeconomic3
- Geographic Expansion2
- Capex Investment2
Show all 19 topics
- Credit2
- Cloud & AI2
- Product Launch2
- Subscriber Growth2
- Fx2
- Innovation & R&D1
- Pricing1
- Trade Tariffs1
- Regulation Policy1