Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
David Arcaro
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 172on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 1%2 of 172 questions
- Companies
- 25questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 172 of 172 questions from 25 companies
SRESempra12 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Is there still a very big advanced pipeline of realistic data centers?
Show response
Allen reconciled the 44 GW Batch Zero figure against the 298 GW total queue and cited double-digit request growth; direct.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Any preview of your priorities and how you are positioning the GRC filings
Show response
Winn said filing expected next month, focusing on safety/reliability investments, technology innovation, and infrastructure modernization while improving affordability.
what you are seeing on the ground, physical progress, and any limiting factors that you see realistically
Show response
Martin emphasized base plan is not contingent on data center load. Nye noted 164 GW installed nameplate vs 85.5 GW peak and approximately 450 GW of generation in queue. Coordination and phasing will be key.
Calendar 2025 Q4
have you seen slippages, challenges in all of those data centers just physically getting built and online
Show response
Allen detailed the 273 GW queue (255 data centers), multiple avenues being worked beyond batch zero including a South Dallas 4 GW brownfield project, 10 additional GW in RPG process, and at least 38 GW meeting RTP 2026 criteria for the April 1 filing.
how your credit metrics maybe trend through the plan here through 2030? Are there peaks and troughs
Show response
Karen explained metrics will fluctuate slightly but be solid after SI transaction closes, targeting 50-150 bps cushion above FFO-to-debt thresholds on average, with $5B increase in operating cash flows further supporting credit.
Calendar 2025 Q3
what is the maximum amount of new load that you could connect, if we're thinking about kind of the 2030 time frame
Show response
Jeff noted Oncor expects to double its 31 GW peak load by end of decade. Allen detailed 210 GW data center queue, 19 GW signed under new interim FEA process with $2.7B collateral held, and over 600 active requests up 60% year-over-year.
curious if you could comment how that positions you in terms of achieving the 2025 guidance? And maybe as you look forward to 2026, are you seeing opportunities for expenses to be pulled forward
Show response
Jeff confirmed tracking to upper half of 2025 guidance range, affirmed 2026 guidance, and said both 2026 and 2027 guidance will be reviewed at the February call.
Calendar 2025 Q2
that pipeline has increased a lot, but the high confidence numbers seem to be consistent versus last quarter. So I'm wondering what the dynamic is there
Show response
Allen clarified the high-confidence load number is updated annually with ERCOT, not quarterly, and anticipated the numbers will continue to increase at the next update.
Wondering if you could give an update on the LNG market and contracting opportunities that you're seeing for Port Arthur
Show response
Justin outlined bullish LNG thesis driven by EU ban on Russian LNG transshipments, growing Asian gas demand displacing coal, and U.S. low-price/low-volatility natural gas advantage.
Calendar 2025 Q1
just what are the gigawatts of the LC&I pipeline currently and how much of that is data centers
Show response
Allen detailed 178 total gigawatts in queue (156 data centers, 22 traditional) with 29.5 gigawatts of high-confidence load by 2031, plus 9 gigawatts of signed agreements.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Would you be able to touch on your thoughts around potential impact or changes to the financial profile of Texas utilities
Show response
Allen detailed legislative tracking including capital structure bills, UTM concepts, and liability limitation proposals. Jeff discussed AB 1054 wildfire fund durability.
Is there a point in the plan where you expect that crossover to meet kind of when you catch back up
Show response
Jeff declined to specify the crossover year but emphasized the 2029 EPS number is well above last year's plan fifth-year figure.
VSTVistra Corp.12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
are you kind of intentionally moving more toward a new build strategy or looking more at hybrid offerings
Show response
Burke emphasized the 4,500 MW development pipeline is customer-driven, not a strategic pivot. Stressed disciplined capital stewardship and opportunistic approach.
where is the conversation on contracting your remaining nuclear fleet versus potentially making more progress
Show response
Dore declined to specify timing or priority, saying deals are complex and customer-driven. Confirmed progress across the portfolio.
Calendar 2025 Q4
any color on timing as to what we might expect for the next iteration of data center contracting activity
Show response
Dore declined specific timing but noted multiple conversations underway with motivated customers. Will announce when actual contract is executed, as demonstrated with Amazon and Meta.
what the -- maybe timing or milestones as to what would drive the uprate opportunity there?
Show response
Dore said priority is on-time delivery for Amazon. Uprate study continues in background. Site has gas access, ample land (previously evaluated for Comanche Peak Units 3&4), and potential for new generation development.
Calendar 2025 Q3
any comments as to whether that time frame is still looking possible for certain opportunities?
Show response
Burke confirmed some contracts closer to execution, others longer in development. Hopes to put more points on board by year-end but can't predict specific timing. Activity level at all-time high.
What are the prospects for contracting the second unit there?
Show response
Burke confirmed customer has expressed interest in expanding beyond initial 1,200 MW. Cautioned that getting first phase right is priority. Views this as relationship not transaction with multiple future opportunities.
Calendar 2025 Q2
how is the potential deal at Comanche Peak progressing and latest thoughts on timing there and any gating factors
Show response
Burke gave strongest signal yet on Comanche Peak, stating he feels 'very good' about the deal. Emphasized strategy of announcing only when completed agreement is reached. Team working hard on finalization.
is there anything else that's needed from a maybe Texas policy standpoint to move forward?
Show response
Burke stated deal meets current ERCOT requirements and would meet any new SB6 process. Binding deal before September 1 would not be subject to new rules. Does not view SB6 as gating item.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how much time are you spending in DC. recently, just given all the political gyrations going on?
Show response
Burke advocated for competitive market model over regulated model for AI buildout. Message: let shareholders bear risk rather than rate-basing infrastructure that may be overbuilt.
elaborate on your outlook for market prices, I guess, as you talk about better utilizing your existing fleet
Show response
Burke reiterated that forwards do not fully reflect 3-5% CAGR load growth in ERCOT. Demand response and backup generation should come in at higher price signals. Views these as complementary market-based solutions.
Calendar 2024 Q4
are you able to discuss or give a rough range of kind of what pricing levels that you might be thinking
Show response
Burke declined to discuss specific pricing, citing competitive sensitivity. Provided qualitative framework: virtual PPAs have lower margin, colocation on existing assets offers highest margin potential.
wondering if you could give an update on the prospects for potential gas plant colocation
Show response
Dore explained gas sites need grid connections and regulatory approval like front-of-meter. Conversations progressing on handful of sites at papering stage. Also discussing new gas builds for data centers.
CEGConstellation Energy11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Wondering if you could give your view on the Batch Zero process.
Show response
Asked about ERCOT's Batch Zero data center process and Constellation's projects; Joe confirmed some sites are in Batch Zero and expects prompt clarity from ERCOT and the Texas PUCT.
Calendar 2026 Q1
comment on the current level of state support in Pennsylvania, just a direction around favorability towards data center activity
Show response
Management confirmed Pennsylvania continues to be very constructive on data center development and reindustrialization under the right conditions, referencing Governor's leadership on cost cap in RPM.
your latest views on the power market, maybe ERCOT, in particular. Just curious your interpretation and viewpoint here as to the weakness in the forwards
Show response
Management explained ERCOT weakness is about timing, load isn't yet on the system. Andrew Novotny added specifics about 28-29+ period and 400K+ megs in queue vs forwards pricing only 10-15K megs.
Calendar 2025 Q4
what's the status of discussions you're having with other hyperscalers?
Show response
Joe avoided specifics or timelines but said momentum is resuming after executive order complications. Noted deal conversations grew more complex but multiple structures available.
Is flexibility and/or additionality, is that really the path forward here?
Show response
Joe confirmed flexibility is the path forward. FERC clarity on backstop capacity costs expected. Customers can bring batteries, demand response, gas gen, or AI-enabled load management to handle peaks.
Calendar 2025 Q3
One of your peers suggested that margins in PJM might be somewhat more competitive
Show response
Jim McHugh said retail margins at upper end of historical range. Wholesale auctions slightly more competitive with new participants. Sustainability products carry stronger margins than commodity.
Could you maybe also reflect on your demand response efforts and the initiative that you're pursuing there?
Show response
Joe explained 1,000 MW DR target has capacity value equivalent to a new nuclear plant. Partnering with GridBeyond for execution; strong pipeline with longer-tenor deals.
Calendar 2025 Q2
How are you seeing the balance between front of the meter virtual versus co-located on-site data centers?
Show response
Current deals are all front-of-meter given FERC ambiguity. Behind-the-meter remains longer-term option. Post-Calpine, gas+nuclear pairing enables differentiated product with 20-year price certainty.
What are you seeing in terms of some of these most recent discussions with regard to pricing versus previous?
Show response
Joe declined deal-specific pricing but said scarcity of capacity, higher capacity prices, renewables headwinds from OBBBA, and FEOC limitations on storage all point to rising prices.
Calendar 2025 Q1
is that diminishing here? Are you seeing those conversations shift and kind of move over to front-of-the-meter?
Show response
Joe confirmed current discussions are front-of-meter where clarity exists, but behind-the-meter will still be needed for massive training data centers of 4-5 GW.
what is your view on power prices from here, looking at the market?
Show response
Joe said next 5-7 years manageable using demand response, storage, and avoiding unnecessary generation investment. Expressed concern about 10-15 year outlook re: climate policy.
AEPAmerican Electric Power10 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
what types of agreements you're looking at for that 10 GW of turbines that you're kind of exploring access to
Show response
Bill cited framework agreements with GE Vernova and Mitsubishi; Trevor clarified the 10 gigs is an option AEP is not committed to and that it dovetails with aging plant retirements.
are there other incremental load opportunities coming between now and then, between now and 3Q?
Show response
Trevor said executed LOAs and ESAs have risen every quarter for 6, 7 quarters and expects the number to keep moving, limited mainly by generation availability in Texas and Ohio.
Calendar 2026 Q1
What does the equity financing need look like proportionally to that
Show response
Mihalik noted industry norm of 30-40% equity content vs AEP's 18% for the $6B increase, highlighting strong operating cash flows of $47B over 5 years.
looking at other strategies to or potentially expanding like pursuing on-site power anywhere else across your system
Show response
Fehrman described fuel cells, aero derivatives, and smaller interconnections as bridging strategies, plus Quanta partnership for transmission innovation.
Calendar 2025 Q4
is that also heavily weighted toward ERCOT? Or how is that split where you are seeing the incremental progress
Show response
Mihalik broke down ~180GW queue: ~70GW ERCOT, ~20-25GW Ohio, ~30GW PSO, ~30GW APCo, ~16GW I&M. Spread across core growth states of Texas, Oklahoma, Ohio, and Indiana.
are there physical constraints in the grid to consider with all that load coming on by 2030, or labor constraints?
Show response
Fehrman confirmed demand is real but timing depends on SB6 implementation. AEP is securing equipment and contractor capacity well ahead of need. Team is closely managing execution.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how do you manage the balance between how you're thinking about renewables, serving this new load versus gas?
Show response
Fehrman said major states are driven by gas but customers still interested in renewables. About $7B in capital plan for renewables. Approach follows state energy policy preferences through integrated resource plans.
are you able to keep up with the transmission capacity needs for data centers to handle all of this load growth? What's the wait time to connect that you're having to discuss with these customers?
Show response
Fehrman detailed 28GW breakdown: ~80% data centers, ~20% industrials; ~75% T&D, ~25% VIU; ~50% ERCOT, ~40% PJM, ~10% SPP. Working on behind-the-meter solutions including Bloom while building out transmission.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I mean, with such a rush of activity, like what is the wait time? How long does it take at this point to connect new data center load into your system?
Show response
Fehrman cited 5-7 year grid interconnection timelines in some areas, hence the Bloom fuel cell bridge. Some transmission capacity still available for quicker connections. Ohio, Indiana, Texas are primary hubs.
is this the new normal? Is there a limit in terms of what you're seeing around CapEx opportunities?
Show response
Mihalik framed the growth as unprecedented: 37GW peak, 24GW committed, 190GW in queue. Even a fraction of the queue is material. Disciplined approach to digesting growth.
BEBloom Energy Corporation10 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I was wondering if you could address your access to scandium, which has gotten a lot of attention.
Show response
Gave three takeaways including visibility for 25 GW of deployments and no China dependence, then said everything else is proprietary to the company.
I was wondering if you could characterize your financial exposure to project delays, any contractual protections
Show response
CFO explained master service agreement redeployment rights and financier obligations; CEO added guidance is not dependent on any single project.
Calendar 2026 Q1
could you also speak to how you're seeing the supply chain and its ability to ramp with you?
Show response
Sridhar answered the labor constraint directly with an automation and upskilling argument, and said suppliers were built custom under the same philosophy.
I'm wondering if you're seeing opportunities to hold pricing or potentially seeing projects with increased price
Show response
Sridhar reframed away from price benchmarking to value creation and reliability overbuild economics, without addressing realized pricing trends.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how have the initial projects gone, and how seriously are some of those customers now considering follow-on orders
Show response
Sridhar quantified the repeat-customer base and named Oracle as an example of a new-sector customer already returning with multiple projects.
what are the milestones or triggers that you'd be watching for and when do you think a decision could potentially
Show response
Sridhar described expansion as everyday business with a few-months payback but named no specific milestone, trigger or decision date.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I'm wondering if you could describe what you're seeing with the competitive environment, how your product compares
Show response
Sridhar conceded the market is large enough for all entrants, then differentiated on air pollution, load following without batteries, and watts-to-tokens.
I was wondering if you could talk about the pace of commercial activity that you're seeing.
Show response
Sridhar answered unambiguously that momentum is accelerating across AI and traditional C&I, though without quantifying pipeline or bookings.
Calendar 2025 Q2
could you see this Oracle partnership potentially act as an accelerant and spur more additional deals?
Show response
Sridhar confirmed Bloom is the primary and only power source, islanded and load following, and that Bloom is working with Oracle on many projects.
what gives you the confidence here now to double your production capacity? Are you -- do you also have kind
Show response
Sridhar tied the decision to pipeline visibility plus hyperscaler CapEx math, and framed 2 gigawatts as a start to multi-gigawatts.
ETREntergy10 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
what updates should we expect at the Investor Day coming up in June? Is that a natural time when you might expect more data center contracting clarity
Show response
CEO outlined Investor Day plans: longer 5-year outlook, more leadership exposure, jurisdiction detail. Timing of new data center contracts uncertain but possible. No guarantees on announcements.
what's the latest feedback that you're getting from the political and regulatory standpoint related to data center activity
Show response
CEO reported continued strong political and regulatory support. Louisiana Lightning Initiative cited as evidence. Some affordability concerns remain but $5B rate offset narrative helps maintain momentum.
Calendar 2025 Q3
What's the time frame for the 4.5 gigawatts of the power equipment that you secured
Show response
CEO confirmed 6 units at 750 MW standard design for 2031-2032 COD. Additional procurement depends on continued customer growth. Also evaluating nuclear, solar/battery, and system upgrades.
any reaction or impacts to your thinking from the recent Westinghouse and U.S. government announces -- I mean, announcements
Show response
CEO applauded Brookfield/Westinghouse/Cameco progress. All four states have nuclear commissions/task forces. Construction risk management remains key constraint.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Would you anticipate major changes at this point in terms of what you'd be requesting for the next kind of iteration of formula rate plans
Show response
CEO noted current FRP is forward-looking and successful. Recent legislative changes for economic development are key additions. Details still being developed.
I was wondering if you could elaborate on what boosted the cash flow -- the operating cash flow outlook cumulatively through 2028
Show response
CFO attributed cash flow improvement to two primary drivers: construction-period recovery mechanisms (Arkansas rider) and $570M nuclear PTCs monetized this year.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Would you consider -- I guess, do you think of the tariff exposure as being earnings exposure
Show response
CFO confirmed most tariff exposure in 2027-2028 tied to generation components. Time to find alternative suppliers means manageable, no real earnings effect expected.
how quickly can you offer them service to connect in -- time to power has been a focus among that cohort
Show response
CEO confirmed queue positions support 2028-2029 timeline for new customers. Noted entering queue today would push to 2030-2031.
Calendar 2024 Q4
any other color you would be able to provide on the availability of production slots for gas turbines and how the pricing has trended
Show response
CEO confirmed all equipment secured for announced projects plus capacity beyond. Acknowledged pricing getting tougher but nothing materially changing expectations.
would you be able to frame kind of the time to market that you’re able to offer for new data center customers as you look at that pipeline
Show response
CFO gave customer-specific answer rather than a firm timeline, noting strong vendor partnerships and Mississippi legislative progress on reducing build times.
Show 19 more companies
DTEDTE Energy9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
I was just curious if you could give any other details around how big of a potential data center project Vantage is going after here?
Show response
CEO described several-hundred-MW behind-the-meter primary power opportunity. Pipeline of similar projects identified across the country. Creative solution that could differentiate DTE as a provider for colocators nationally. CapEx update expected midyear.
how do you interpret the latest recommendation, the 8.2% ROE that we saw recently
Show response
CEO noted Commission Chair's comments support current ROE levels. ALJ in DTE's own case recommended 9.9% ROE. DTE expects flat ROE in its case and views 8.2% recommendation (for another utility) as not reasonable given borrowing costs.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is there any rough timing for when you'd expect the potential to finalize those deals and bring them forward or advance other projects
Show response
CEO indicated intent to firm up terms before IRP filing pulled forward to Q3 next year, settling on key terms and ramp rates with hyperscalers in active negotiations.
I was just wondering if you might be able to elaborate on maybe how big of a project that might be, what kind of power generation technology you're using?
Show response
CEO described behind-the-meter project as primary power using combustion turbines for a data center outside Michigan. Deal not yet fully closed but positioned as a new vertical for Vantage.
Calendar 2025 Q2
where do you stand in terms of how much flex you have here to absorb any volatility maybe in weather for the rest of 2025?
Show response
CFO confirmed strong position with warm July providing further upside; looking for opportunities to ensure great 2025 and help future years.
could you just frame any impacts on the renewable plans, any risk that you see from the executive order and continued uncertainty there?
Show response
COO confirmed bill supports plan, safe harbored ITCs through 2029, battery storage ITCs through 2036, transferability maintained. Safe harboring insulates from FIAC exposure.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how much you embed in your plan currently and how might you manage the financing outlook if transferability were to change or go away
Show response
CFO detailed $230M transferability used in 2024, safe harbored through 2027, with tax equity structure and strong balance sheet as fallback options if transferability were at risk.
Calendar 2024 Q4
learnings from the recent electric rate case in terms of what the commission you think wants to see in terms of affordability, you know, ROE, storm tracker, IRM
Show response
COO confirmed constructive order with no ROE/equity layer change, IRM extension, and positive commission tone on reliability progress.
would you be able to quantify how much of a pipeline, you know, in terms of gigawatts of data centers you might be seeing out there
Show response
COO quantified pipeline at 3 GW with up to 1 GW of existing excess capacity still available near-term.
NRGNRG Energy9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
how has activity in PJM been impacted by the whole backstop auction process and the general policy uncertainty
Show response
Management noted PJM conversations progressing but inherently slower than Texas due to more complex regulatory and policy framework.
Calendar 2025 Q3
your outlook for retail margins from here? Can they remain strong looking out at your forecast?
Show response
Brad Bentley noted strong Texas margins maintained competitively, slight East margin erosion managed closely with integrated value proposition.
What's that reflecting? Is that a reflection of where market prices have gone?
Show response
Management cited accelerating hyperscaler CapEx announcements, NRG's unique commercial capabilities, and heightened interest as pricing drivers.
Calendar 2025 Q2
can I bug you for just your current outlook for power prices in Texas?
Show response
Rob Gaudette noted off-peak prices moving up from industrial/AI loads, but forward curves still below fair value awaiting load announcements.
Could you clarify, is the margin fixed over the cost of supply for this agreement such that it's indexed to the market?
Show response
Management confirmed the margin is well-protected over the contract duration but declined to disclose the specific hedging/indexing structure.
Calendar 2025 Q1
How does your, how does the overall NRG portfolio look in your view right now? There have been, it seems like a bunch of transformations
Show response
Management expressed confidence in portfolio completeness across generation, large load, data center, and retail segments.
are you able to give, if you were to mark to market just what the EBITDA and cash flow output would be on the current forward curves
Show response
Management declined to mark-to-market but emphasized strong accretion across a wide variety of market scenarios.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Do those have transmission access in place? You know, can they offer the speed to market for large loads
Show response
Rob Gaudette noted interconnection typically faster than turbine delivery in ERCOT, and some sites already have existing equipment.
are you detecting any hesitation maybe around, you know, the legislative session in Texas or concerns with the supply-demand backdrop
Show response
Management reported seeing the opposite of hesitation, more inbound interest, and all hyperscalers reaffirming or expanding capital commitments.
AESAES Corporation8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
what are you seeing on the ground in terms of storage demand? How big an opportunity could that be for on-site storage development on your end and potentially at data centers?
Show response
Andres outlined multiple battery use cases: behind-the-meter at data centers, paired with solar for dispatchable energy, grid services, and even augmenting gas peakers. More than half of solar projects already include batteries.
whether you've seen an acceleration in demand following the treasury guidance a couple of months ago and generally what you're seeing from both the data center industry
Show response
Andres emphasized PPA signings are lumpy with fewer, larger projects. Focus is on quality and profitability rather than MW count, trending toward upper end of IRR guidance. Confident in hitting 4 GW for the year.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I was wondering if there's any inflection in those data center -- in that data center renewables demand, anything that might have kind of sparked the industry recently?
Show response
Ricardo emphasized no demand drop, citing faster time to power, 20-year price certainty, and cost competitiveness even without tax incentives vs any other electricity source.
what has the bookings trajectory been in July post the OBBB. I'm just wondering if there's any evidence of a pickup in activity now that the level of clarity has improved
Show response
Ricardo confirmed extremely strong demand with customers trying to lock in PPAs quickly before tax incentive phase-out. 4 GW of pipeline projects not yet contracted are attractive to customers.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Has there been any pull forward ahead of potential IRA changes here or any just general change in customer demand levels that you're seeing?
Show response
Andres reported no demand pull-forward, continued strong data center demand driven by time-to-power advantage. New contracts include change-in-law provisions for tariff/policy shifts.
You sold a minority stake. I'm just wondering, is there any strategic reason that you want to retain control in the remaining stake there?
Show response
Andres confirmed intent to retain control of AGIC, noting it was set up 15-20 years ago, is a unicorn, has lowered insurance costs and improved reinsurer quality.
Calendar 2024 Q4
it seems like you're increasing the asset sales target overall, but you're keeping coal in the plan for a bit longer than originally planned. Could you maybe talk about what the profile is of the a...
Show response
Steve indicated asset sales include coal exits, technology portfolio monetization, and partnership sell-downs, with a more conservative but confident execution view.
it seems like you're pulling back somewhat on the renewable CapEx in the forecast. Wondering from a high-level kind of strategic perspective, Andres, do you see this as a kind of a pause in, I gues...
Show response
Andres framed it as harvesting the existing 50 GW pipeline rather than a strategic retreat, noting they will build fewer GW but maintain financial results.
FEFirstEnergy8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
looks like you are you are assuming, you know, basically flattish, kinda holding ROEs steady throughout the plan
Show response
Taylor confirmed 9.5-10% ROE target maintained through planning period, supported by regular rate case filings and formula rate investments.
Wondering if you could touch on New Jersey and the backdrop there, kind of expectations, you know, for, timing of your next rate case
Show response
Tierney committed to constructive engagement with Governor Sherrill on affordability while maintaining investment for reliability. Rates significantly below in-state peers.
Calendar 2025 Q3
is there a way to give any rule of thumb for how much increased transmission CapEx you could see going forward, like on a per gigawatt basis
Show response
Taylor quantified about $1B currently identified for transmission interconnection across contracted and active customers; noted wide range depending on location and size.
How does that impact the earnings growth outlook and the range that you've got as you consider out closer to the end of the decade
Show response
Tierney characterized incremental CapEx as firming confidence in 6-8% range rather than raising the growth rate.
Calendar 2025 Q2
could there be further opportunities for upside as you get closer to your roll-forward period could that CapEx outlook rise further
Show response
Tierney confirmed upside likely from additional customer contracts, open window awards, and additional windows but won't include without line of sight.
I was just wondering if there's been any progression with the discussions around what the framework might be
Show response
Tierney noted lack of clarity in deregulated states but encouraged by governors' engagement in September technical conference.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Are you thinking about the potential solutions? Or how has that conversation evolved, whether it's contracted generation, utility-owned generation
Show response
Tierney pointed to models in NY, TX, and CA for adding generation without full reregulation, praised governors' leadership.
I was wondering if you could give a perspective on New Jersey and the recent commission efforts to look at cost efficiencies
Show response
Tierney was direct that capacity pricing is harmful if not bringing new generation, committed to working with NJ commission on mitigation.
PCGPG&E Corporation8 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how do you see the sustainability of the 2% to 4% savings? And any, potential areas of upside
Show response
Burke expressed high confidence in the 2% to 4% O&M target, citing strategic sourcing and early AI adoption as areas of upside.
Calendar 2026 Q1
When might you expect to refill that bucket of application and preliminary engineering within a pipeline
Show response
CEO said Cluster 26 engineering takes 6-8 months. Seeing interest beyond Bay Area in Central Valley. Major developer at EEI conference was unaware of California capacity. 33 GW added to grid since 2020.
could you just help with a sense of when those data centers are coming online and when customers would end up seeing some of that bill reduction
Show response
CEO emphasized current 23% rate reduction for vulnerable customers has been achieved through O&M savings alone with limited large load contribution. Load growth impact in latter half of plan as path to flat.
Calendar 2025 Q3
would you expect the policy reform recommendations next April to be prescreened with like the legislature and kind of have buy in
Show response
CEO provided detailed SB 254 Phase 1 benefits before addressing Phase 2: disallowance cap moved to ignition date, no upfront contributions, contingent call only, credits against future disallowances, 25% funding rebalance.
is the undergrounding decision still on track for this year
Show response
CEO confirmed October 30 commission meeting agenda includes undergrounding recommendations. GRC includes bridging strategy of 300 miles/year if 10-year plan delayed. Hit 1,000 miles at 25% lower cost.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Edison had an ALJ proposed decision that had recommended lower wildfire mitigation CapEx. I was just wondering if you think that has any read across to you
Show response
CEO defended undergrounding as permanent solution in highest risk areas with declining unit costs. Still intends to file 10-year undergrounding plan this year.
Calendar 2025 Q1
whether shareholder contributions would be a part of the future discussion around the AB 1054 framework
Show response
CEO reiterated opposition to shareholder contributions citing inverse condemnation and that increased cost of capital would harm customer affordability.
where does the conversation with rating agencies stand at this point in terms of the path and timing
Show response
CFO noted Moody's utility upgrade was positive but parent still below IG. All financial metrics in line with IG. AB 1054 resolution is the key remaining catalyst.
PEGPublic Service Enterprise Group8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
I was just wondering what the level of mature applications would be in that data center activity
Show response
LaRossa confirmed mature applications increased from 2,600 MW to approximately 2,800 MW out of the 11,500 MW total pipeline.
How are you weaving in just considerations around affordability
Show response
LaRossa pointed to flat O&M management, past mechanisms with the regulator (e.g., changing depreciable life of gas assets), and AMI rollout design. Emphasized the issue is quickly becoming a reliability problem requiring new supply.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I was just wondering if you could give a sense of where conversations stand with regard to the future of generation build in New Jersey
Show response
LaRossa emphasized PSEG is pushing for state decisions on four dimensions: load forecasts, reliability targets, affordability goals, and environmental policy. BPU technical conference occurring same day.
an update on data center conversations there, what is the interest level that you're seeing in the site most recently and then thoughts on timing
Show response
Cregg confirmed continued interest across both New Jersey and Pennsylvania assets. Declined to provide specific timing, saying they will let timing speak for itself.
Calendar 2025 Q1
if you could elaborate on your strategy or approach to managing affordability just given some of the concerns I think stemming from PJM capacity pricing
Show response
LaRossa outlined three-pronged approach: BPU deferral mechanisms, energy efficiency programs, and long-term generation supply legislation. Emphasized unique regulated utility sites with pipes and wires.
are you discussions and negotiations contingent on the FERC process and figuring out behind-the-meter co-location arrangements
Show response
Cregg gave an unambiguous no, nuclear contracting does not depend on the FERC colocation proceeding, though resolution would be helpful.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I was wondering if you could comment on how you're thinking about the outlook for the PJM market, you know, what could change?
Show response
LaRossa questioned whether a functioning PJM market still exists, expressing reliability concerns. Cregg noted the collar provides near-term stability while targets remain at PTC floor.
is the uncertainty a deterrent broadly looking at the market?
Show response
LaRossa directly refuted any slowdown by pointing to the 12x increase in large load inquiries in New Jersey alone.
SOSouthern Company7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
When would new generation be needed as you sign more large load contracts? How do we think about the next round of an all-source RFP?
Show response
CEO outlined generation pipeline: 10GW building now through end of decade, certified RFP for early 2030s, new 2-6GW RFP for 2032-2033. Alabama also active on RFPs.
Wondering if you could speak to the supply chain and where you stand currently in terms of access to some of the tight areas like turbines and labor
Show response
CEO said company is well positioned with turbines identified for RFPs and strong labor relationships from Vogtle construction (10,000 workers at peak), but acknowledges market tightness.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I was just wondering if there's still a further opportunity to add on more gigawatts there to bring on more large load by the 2029 time frame
Show response
Womack confirmed upside opportunities exist for the latter part of the decade, with advanced discussions ongoing with other large load companies.
could you characterize just maybe the plan for the next set of RFPs? Just looking forward for future generation needs
Show response
Poroch said another all-source RFP could begin as early as 2026 per the IRP approval, targeting the early 2030s (perhaps 2032). Size and parameters still being assessed.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I was just wondering if there had been any changes following the modifications of the rate structure that you've now implemented in Georgia
Show response
Tucker noted the detailed tariff framework was only finalized April 15 so reaction is early. Despite the rules being known, pipeline has grown over the past three months.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I was wondering if you could touch on what you're seeing in terms of the availability of gas turbines and what the pricing backdrop is looking like
Show response
Womack expressed confidence in turbine access due to diversified supplier relationships and history with OEMs, while acknowledging heavy demand and reservation fees required.
could you talk about the trajectory when you'd be aiming for that 17% FFO to debt level and kind of describe the path to get there
Show response
Tucker said 17% FFO to debt achievable by middle to late part of 5-year plan, with 2025 expected to be flattish due to storm cost recovery lag.
CMSCMS Energy6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
has there been support from data centers on the large load tariff, just in terms of continued interest in coming to Michigan
Show response
Garrick confirmed the pipeline has advanced and grown, with both positive indicators of support for the data center tariff and Michigan's growth.
how do you plan to insulate customers from large loads of the strategy that you'd take beyond the large load tariffs
Show response
Garrick said the rate construct requires data centers to pay for all capacity, energy, transmission, and distribution on their own. Aligns with Microsoft's public commitment to protect residential customers. Contracts require MPSC approval. Data center can be online as early as 2028.
Calendar 2025 Q1
did you see a big change in interest after the state approved the tax exemptions late last year?
Show response
Garrick confirmed pipeline flipped from 65% manufacturing to 65% data centers after tax exemption, aided by challenges at other RTOs making MISO more attractive.
the strategy going forward to get it approved? Is there any specific changes you plan to make to address the pushbacks?
Show response
Garrick noted past storm tracker proposals lacked commission support. Now pursuing deferred accounting order for this historic storm, leveraging Liberty Audit best practice recommendations.
Calendar 2024 Q4
is there excess capacity as you see it in Michigan or in your own fleet of on the generation side
Show response
Garrick noted surplus from last IRP helps attract business, with the REP and upcoming IRP filing addressing incremental supply needs. Load comes on in stages.
going back to the rate case. I know it's late in the process, but are there opportunities here to still settle broadly or individual pieces
Show response
Garrick acknowledged settlement is unlikely given timing but expressed confidence in constructive outcome through staff's constructive starting position.
CNPCenterPoint Energy6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
Was that something that was already done and reflecting the 765 kV line that you added to the plan here? Or is that yet to come
Show response
Wells separated the $500M 765 kV line (already filed at ERCOT) from incremental transmission needs from accelerated large loads. Update on incremental transmission projects expected in second half of the year.
does that could that potentially formally reduce the equity needs in the plan versus what you've got baked in there
Show response
Foster confirmed CAMT benefit provides 60-70 bps near-term balance sheet improvement and unlocks ~$1B incremental CapEx without adding equity. Guidance just released the prior afternoon.
Calendar 2025 Q1
could give some color maybe around what gives you confidence in the load growth forecast
Show response
Wells detailed conservative approach: 75% haircut vs ERCOT's 33%. Of 1.5 GW data center assumption, already working on connecting ~1 GW. Of 2 GW hydrogen assumption, customers breaking ground on 1.5 GW.
Is that going to be directly applicable to you, in terms of potentially weaving it in and updating that
Show response
Wells noted CNP substations are currently included in the statewide 765 kV proposal. Right of first refusal applies. Being conservative on timing since policy could change.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how much of a data center pipeline that you're seeing, any refresh numbers versus the 8-gigawatts
Show response
Data center demand accelerated from 8 GW to north of 11 GW in Houston alone. Indiana also seeing hyperscaler interest with vertically-integrated business and conversion capacity.
could you frame the status of the projects and the customer requests in that 61 gigawatt load growth level
Show response
Wells explained 40 GW of interconnection requests received, some exploratory. 10 GW reflects realistic materialization through 2031, to be updated annually. Remaining 30 GW may come over time.
DDominion Energy6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
Is that crowding out any other customer activity, whether it would be, you know, large industrial or commercial projects
Show response
Blue cited Eli Lilly facility west of Richmond as example of meeting large non-data-center customer with aggressive timeline. Economic development team continues to see exciting possibilities outside data centers.
When might the next iteration be of your generation outlook in Virginia in terms of the next slice at the IRP
Show response
Blue confirmed biennial IRP cycle with annual updates in between.
Calendar 2025 Q1
what you're seeing in terms of data center demand. You mentioned that it has kind of continued from last quarter
Show response
Blue confirmed demand remains very high with continued focus on traditional cloud and inference workloads, customers planning well into the 2030s based on existing commitments.
is there any progress or any further clarity around the Millstone and the potential contracting opportunities there
Show response
Blue confirmed no new developments. Current 55% fixed-price contract runs through August 2029. Rhode Island legislative activity is encouraging but no timeline for action.
Calendar 2024 Q4
the PJM forecast for the 2034 forecast, they've only gone up a little bit. Do those numbers have to rise from here
Show response
Ridge noted PJM's forecast is backward-looking and doesn't fully reflect Dominion's queue increases, with conversion rates approaching 100% from construction LOA to ESA stage.
I was just wondering your interpretation and a few points on what that could mean for existing leases like CVOW
Show response
Blue was emphatic that CVOW has all federal permits, is authorized by Virginia law, has bipartisan support, and stopping it would be the most inflationary action for Virginia energy.
EXCExelon6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
what is the time to connect that you're seeing for new data center projects that are kind of getting into that 47 gigawatt
Show response
Mike cited NorthPoint example at PECO where existing infrastructure enabled rapid connection. Calvin described centralized large account strategy with 25 largest customers meeting in Chicago.
I was just wondering if you could just maybe characterize how you probability weight that 47 gigawatt pipeline
Show response
Jeanne described two-step process: cluster study completion then TSA signing before moving to high probability column. 6GW studied awaiting TSA, 20GW actively being studied, 20GW awaiting next cluster.
Calendar 2025 Q2
we've obviously seen some of your peers express a willingness to build regulated like or contracted generation. So I'm wondering your current thoughts on whether that might kind of fit into your mo...
Show response
Calvin gave clear affirmative on utility-owned generation, emphasizing portfolio approach and partnership with states. Jeanne cited cost of capital advantage and customer benefits.
wondering if you could elaborate on how data center discussions have been progressing recently. How quickly do you anticipate firming up more megawatts
Show response
Calvin noted data center activity across multiple jurisdictions beyond Illinois. Mike mentioned active cluster studies with results expected in Q3-Q4.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Could you give a sense as to the timing of when that load looks to be ramping up within your forecast period?
Show response
Jeanne provided detailed load ramp timeline. Calvin described centralized customer strategy organization and EEI-hosted meeting with 25 largest customers.
wondering how you're kind of approaching that, getting ahead of that and managing affordability challenges and concerns broadly across your portfolio
Show response
Calvin outlined proactive customer support measures including suspended disconnections, extended payment plans, community forums, and connecting customers to state/local assistance.
ATOAtmos Energy4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
I wanted to check in to see whether you're seeing any inflection or meaningful projects on the gas power side of things, either major power plants moving forward or what we're seeing is on-site pow...
Show response
CEO confirmed continued data center and power generation inquiries with engineering teams investigating, but declined to provide specifics until contracts are signed. APT already serves some power gen facilities.
I was wondering if you could maybe touch on what you're hearing maybe on the ground and in some of your regulatory proceedings going on with regard to affordability pressures
Show response
CEO confirmed affordability is an ongoing conversation with regulators but emphasized no negative feedback. Regulators understand the reliability investment need, reinforced by Winter Storm Fern. Natural gas bills remain the lowest utility bill in the household.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Just wondering if there's any anticipated areas of focus in terms of challenges or any issues that you think with getting the grip re-upped
Show response
CFO described rate case filings as routine regulatory process focused on refreshing ROE, cap structure, and riders. Expects completion by end of spring.
are any of those eleven new industrial customers power plants? And then maybe more broadly, are you seeing more opportunities on the customer side of things from power generation?
Show response
CEO confirmed none of the eleven are power plants, described diverse industrial mix across eight states, and declined specifics on unsigned prospects.
DUKDuke Energy4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
have you seen any acceleration in that activity in terms of top of the funnel interest in your service territory?
Show response
Sideris confirmed accelerating interest, highlighting Charlotte area as emerging hub plus growing Florida and Southern Indiana demand. Cited vertically integrated model as competitive advantage.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Are you evaluating or flexibility as kind of one of the characteristics, you know, as a way to speed up interconnection?
Show response
Harry confirmed flexibility provisions are already in signed contracts, including ability to curtail load or use backup generation for about fifty hours per year. Data centers agree because it speeds power delivery.
Calendar 2024 Q4
is the top end possible in 2027? Specifically? Or how are you thinking about it? Just do it within the specifics of the five-year plan
Show response
Brian declined to pinpoint 2027 specifically but confirmed load growth step-up that year creates the opportunity for top-half earnings.
could you speak to just how much of a pipeline of data center activity that you're kind of seeing and working on in the background
Show response
Harry cited 7GW+ advanced stage pipeline with broader pipeline at least double that. Lynn added that 50% of the pipeline to 2029 is now data centers.
EIXEdison International4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
are you seeing third-party estimates of potential damages that suggested that the entire fund or something close to the size of the current fund
Show response
CEO acknowledged reading various third-party estimates but noted they appear within the fund's envelope, though hard to aggregate as they cover different loss types.
would there be any considerations from like a balance sheet perspective from either the CPC or credit rating agencies
Show response
CFO explained gross-up approach with offsetting receivables, no earnings impact. From regulatory capital and rating agency perspective, bases are covered.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Do you think it would make sense to pivot incremental CapEx back toward fire risk reduction?
Show response
CFO noted GRC provides flexibility to reprioritize capital. SVP Powell said risk models will be re-evaluated; rebuild areas likely to see more undergrounding. CEO noted rebuild projects check multiple boxes.
What do you think is the solution here? What are you advocating for, I'm thinking in the legislative backdrop?
Show response
CEO discussed multiple potential levers including fund scaling, liability cap durability, but declined to specify preferred path. Noted Senate announced insurance reform package.
GEVGE Vernova4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I was wondering if you could characterize whether 2026 could be the year of peak orders for gas turbines.
Show response
Pushed back on the peak-orders framing, citing 116 GW now rising to at least 125 GW by year-end and continued backlog growth over the next six quarters; answered directly.
Calendar 2026 Q1
your progress and the customer appetite for framework agreements around turbine orders
Show response
Scott reported ~30-35 framework agreement conversations ongoing but none closed yet. Customers continue ordering by the drink instead, including large 2030 contracts in Q1. Expanded scope including Electrification in some discussions is elongating but productively enriching negotiations.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Wondering if you could talk to your project opportunities. Have things accelerated? Could there be opportunities for more SMR deals to come?
Show response
Strazik noted nuclear discussions progressing with U.S. administration, Sweden, and Poland but sequential in nature with longer close timelines than gas/grid. Hyperscaler conversations active for first-half-of-next-decade delivery. Pipeline growing but announcement timing uncertain.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I was wondering if you could maybe just elaborate a little bit more on how you think about modular power, this behind the meter power that we're seeing, things like your aero derivatives, but also ...
Show response
Strazik emphasized 20+ year economics favor large frame gas turbines for baseload. Near-term surge drives smaller modular/aero applications as bridge power, transitioning to backup over medium term replacing legacy diesel gen sets. GEV positioned across both segments.
PPLPPL Corporation4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
what might that mean for generation resources? Timing of when you would need new generation, and whether it is peak or baseload
Show response
Bergstein and Sorgi indicated another Kentucky CPCN filing is increasingly likely this year, with battery coming first as quickest resource, plus potential Rye hydro and additional gas.
Curious about your reaction to the contents of the governor's letter—different approaches proposed around ROE, debt and equity ratios
Show response
Sorgi expressed confidence that PPL is aligned with the governor's affordability goals given its sub-4% bill increase after a decade stay-out, and sees no need to alter stance in Pennsylvania.
Calendar 2025 Q4
as you look out to another 1% kind of inflationary rate, wondering if you could just talk to levers to manage that and look for more cost-cutting opportunities
Show response
Bergstein cited smart grid deployment, IT upgrades, and AI across O&M as levers. Some already in the 1% plan with more potential upside.
does it go above the top end of the annual kind of growth rate at some point looking out through the forecast? And how does that shaping look?
Show response
Bergstein confirmed growth accelerates starting 2027 after full rate case impacts, with 2027-2029 growth pretty linear. Not back-end loaded.
NEENextEra Energy3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
I was wondering if you could talk about how renewables are interacting with data centers, especially over the next couple of years
Show response
Data center campuses can be 1,000-5,000 acres with ~1 GW per 1,000 acres. Renewables and storage provide initial load interconnect with baseload gas following. Grid Alliance upgrades can free additional megawatts. Returns described as higher than ever seen in industry from supply-demand imbalance.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I'm curious if you're booking 2029 volumes at this point
Show response
John confirmed 2029 program on track with tax and trade protections in contracts. 2030 still too early for most customer focus as demand concentrated in 2027-2029 timeframe. Mike emphasized demand picture unchanged despite changing tax law framework.
Calendar 2025 Q1
what the contingency plan might be if there were changes or restrictions on the use of tax credit transfers
Show response
John pointed to 20-year track record with tax equity pre-IRA. Tax equity providers doubling interest in NextEra due to flight to quality. Transfer program allows picking best returns between transferability and tax equity. Data center demand unchanged with continued strong appetite for renewables.
XELXcel Energy2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
Does that consider all of the renewables investment as well? And like specifically the AD CVD ruling
Show response
2-3% focused on base $45B plan; no AD/CVD impact expected; OEM agreements give comfort on managing wind and solar tariff impacts.
what's the cadence of how you would update that more firm pipeline forecast
Show response
Pipeline unchanged at 8,900 MW; no update to pipeline expected until Q3 per normal five-year sales cycle.
FSLRFirst Solar1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
I was just wondering if you could give a little color on your confidence level in the 54.5 gigawatts backlog now
Show response
Mark acknowledged ongoing risk from European oil/gas companies (NatGrid, Enel, EDF) but noted project-specific terminations have resulted in customers rebooking. Sponsor-backed portfolios carry inherent risk but fundamentals remain strong with positive policy environment and growing load profile.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| SRE Sempra | 12 | 0%none of 12 questions |
| VST Vistra Corp. | 12 | 0%none of 12 questions |
| CEG Constellation Energy | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions |
| AEP American Electric Power | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions |
| BE Bloom Energy Corporation | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions |
| ETR Entergy | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions |
| DTE DTE Energy | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions |
| NRG NRG Energy | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions |
| AES AES Corporation | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions |
| FE FirstEnergy | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
- SRESempra · 12 questions0%none of 12 questions
- VSTVistra Corp. · 12 questions0%none of 12 questions
- CEGConstellation Energy · 11 questions0%none of 11 questions
- AEPAmerican Electric Power · 10 questions0%none of 10 questions
- BEBloom Energy Corporation · 10 questions0%none of 10 questions
- ETREntergy · 10 questions0%none of 10 questions
- DTEDTE Energy · 9 questions11%1 of 9 questions
- NRGNRG Energy · 9 questions0%none of 9 questions
- AESAES Corporation · 8 questions13%1 of 8 questions
- FEFirstEnergy · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
Show all 25 companies
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| PCG PG&E Corporation | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| PEG Public Service Enterprise Group | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| SO Southern Company | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| CMS CMS Energy | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| CNP CenterPoint Energy | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| D Dominion Energy | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| EXC Exelon | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| ATO Atmos Energy | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| DUK Duke Energy | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| EIX Edison International | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| GEV GE Vernova | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| PPL PPL Corporation | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| NEE NextEra Energy | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| XEL Xcel Energy | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| FSLR First Solar | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- PCGPG&E Corporation · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- PEGPublic Service Enterprise Group · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- SOSouthern Company · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- CMSCMS Energy · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- CNPCenterPoint Energy · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- DDominion Energy · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- EXCExelon · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- ATOAtmos Energy · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- DUKDuke Energy · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- EIXEdison International · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- GEVGE Vernova · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- PPLPPL Corporation · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- NEENextEra Energy · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- XELXcel Energy · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- FSLRFirst Solar · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 28 | 0%none of 28 questions | 14 |
| 2025 Q1 | 32 | 3%1 of 32 questions | 18 |
| 2025 Q2 | 26 | 0%none of 26 questions | 14 |
| 2025 Q3 | 31 | 3%1 of 31 questions | 17 |
| 2025 Q4 | 29 | 0%none of 29 questions | 16 |
| 2026 Q1 | 18 | 0%none of 18 questions | 10 |
| 2026 Q2 | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions | 6 |
- 2024 Q428 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 28 questions) · 14 companies
- 2025 Q132 questions · challenge rate 3% (1 of 32 questions) · 18 companies
- 2025 Q226 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 26 questions) · 14 companies
- 2025 Q331 questions · challenge rate 3% (1 of 31 questions) · 17 companies
- 2025 Q429 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 29 questions) · 16 companies
- 2026 Q118 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 18 questions) · 10 companies
- 2026 Q28 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 6 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand74
- Regulation Policy52
- Cloud & AI48
- Capex Investment37
- Pricing16
- Supply Chain15
- Capital Allocation13
- Revenue Growth12
- Competitive Dynamics12
- Innovation & R&D10
Show all 18 topics
- Cost Pressure9
- Guidance Reliability7
- Margin7
- Credit4
- Macroeconomic4
- Labor Market2
- Trade Tariffs2
- M&A1