Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

David Raso

Evercore ISI · covers Industrials

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).

Questions
66on tracked calls
Challenge rate
12%8 of 66 questions
Companies
9questioned at least once
Reporting periods
9with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 66 of 66 questions from 9 companies

PCARPaccar13 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 13 challenging
PCAR company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Can you help us get a little more comfort with the parts growth exiting 2026?

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Baney gave concrete leading indicators including the 8% fleet services increase and European strength.

Can you take us through your thoughts right now when you are speaking to your suppliers about the cadence Q4 into Q1?

Supply ChainDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Feight quantified build slot fill and pointed to carryover demand into 2027.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Sequentially, the truck revenues went up $11 million, but your gross profit went up $73 million

Show response

Management confirmed clean quarter with no AIPA benefit, attributing margin gains to volume leverage, price/cost advantage, and favorable product mix

1Q to 2Q seems a lot more muted despite this being the quarter you get a bigger revenue move

MarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Management explained Q2 margin growth tempered by competitive pricing and parts growth at 3% lagging truck volume growth of 6-7K units

Calendar 2025 Q4

can you give us some sense of the price-cost dynamic in truck in the fourth quarter

PricingTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Feight confirmed net positive price-cost in Q1. Q4 was impacted by factory conversion costs and overtime to get trucks out.

What is the translation from those orders into when you expect to produce those trucks

DemandSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Feight noted Q4 orders include spread-delivery fleet orders; recent intake is closer-in, building backlog for higher builds in outer quarters.

can you walk us through the margin improvement you expect from 4Q to 1Q despite the flat deliveries

MarginTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Feight cited full 232 benefit, NOx clarity improving demand, strong December/January orders, and elimination of Q4 local-for-local transition costs.

Calendar 2025 Q3

You mentioned last quarter about some bonus depreciation order, potential. Just curious, what are you hearing from the customer base

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Poplawski confirmed bonus depreciation programs in place. Feight noted mixed customer response: vocational and LTL ordering, TL still hesitant.

Is there a deadline of some kind that you feel like the EPA has to communicate

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Feight emphasized 35mg is the law; as time passes it becomes harder to revert. PACCAR prepared for either outcome with products ready.

the cadence of the clarification on the deliveries for the fourth quarter being roughly flat, any color you can provide geographically

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Q4 shifts volume toward Europe (fewer holidays) from North America (more holidays). Order book 60-70% full for Q4.

Calendar 2025 Q1

production versus retail 2Q, how are you thinking about your deliveries, your production versus retail

DemandSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Feight confirmed production and retail sales well aligned with healthy inventory levels, mainly applicable to Q2 but generally for full year.

Is the second quarter getting full tariff impact from what we know now, not speculating about future tariffs

Trade TariffsPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Feight confirmed Raso's thesis: Q2 has full tariff cost without full price pass-through. As tariff policy stabilizes, price and cost should align.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how is that influencing how you're pricing the 2026 model years that start shipping in April

PricingRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Feight expects strengthening pricing through 2025 and beyond as customers experience great truck performance. Ready for any regulatory scenario.

CMICummins12 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 12 challenging
CMI company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

can you help us with power gen next year, the level of capacity versus this year, just so we have a sense of volume

Capex InvestmentGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

CFO deflected on quantifying 2027 power gen capacity, saying it would be too much guidance now, but confirmed capacity will be higher.

are you finding customers have more desire to buy the 200-milligram full penalty engine, so no tech change

DemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

CEO cautioned final rule details may shift but said customers want both current and new products, expecting more current-product buying initially with a ramp into new engines.

Calendar 2026 Q1

I was curious why Distribution, the incremental for the rest of the year are only 7% and Component are 19%

ChallengingMarginRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Mark explained Distribution mix shift toward whole goods over higher-margin parts, plus tough pricing comparisons from mid-2025. Long-term bullish on Distribution margin expansion.

What are your customers telling you for '26 build slots? And when would they expect to be sold out

DemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Rumsey noted strong order trends, improving spot rates, and supply base constraints potentially limiting upside. Adding third shift for medium-duty at Rocky Mount plant.

Calendar 2025 Q4

I think you alluded to the fourth quarter was your highest gross impact. The 50 bps that you gave is the drag. I assume that was a net number

Trade TariffsPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Smith clarified the 50bps is EBITDA percent dilution from inflated revenues and costs, not a dollar P&L hit. Raso pushed for exit rate clarity. Smith confirmed pricing ex-tariffs is not a big feature of 2026; new product pricing comes in 2027.

Calendar 2025 Q3

What percent of the losses right now are electrolyzers? How should we think about the actions taken

Innovation & R&DCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Smith noted electrolyzer losses are less than half of Accelera total. Impairment doesn't change cost trajectory much, further actions under review for cost reduction.

Calendar 2025 Q2

is the idea of the decremental margins and EBITDA for engines for the third quarter, it's that 35-ish, 40% kind of range

Show response

Smith confirmed heavy decrementals ahead with recent truck orders among weakest 3-4 month periods in 20 years. Customer down days described as 'a sea of red' for Q3.

how are you thinking about that relative to -- we've been above 13% now for a while, haven't been below 12%, 11%

Show response

Smith was transparent about significant margin pressure ahead but emphasized nothing structural. Decrementals consistent with prior cycles on full-year basis.

Calendar 2025 Q1

can you help us with your greatest exposures to cost, be it 6%, 7% of global COGS is Mexico and China

Trade TariffsSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Smith confirmed USMCA compliance for on-highway engine plants but declined to quantify Mexico/China exposure, promising quarter-by-quarter disclosure.

are these comments based off of already communicating maybe what your cost increases would need to be and a pushback from your truck customers

Trade TariffsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Rumsey clarified it's broad uncertainty causing customers to pause, not specific price pushback. OEMs and fleets in wait-and-see mode.

Calendar 2024 Q4

it looks like there still is some slight operating, let's say, non-D&A margin improvement in Engines. What's driving that?

MarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Smith cited aftermarket pricing opportunity, engineering cost normalization post-peak, and potential China upside. Cost control and aftermarket are near-term drivers.

the D&A, the growth in the D&A, is that mostly in Engines or Components?

Capex InvestmentMarginTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Smith confirmed most D&A increase flows through Engines and Components from HELM platform investment, with modest Power Systems share.

URIUnited Rentals9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 9 challenging
URI company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Are you starting to get a better look at '27 on the demand at this high time U can stay at a pretty high level

DemandCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Matt gave demand color, declined 2027 guidance but expressed confidence the large-project tailwinds carry into next year, justifying more fleet.

Calendar 2026 Q1

can you give us any sense of how you're thinking about fleet productivity after the 2.3% in the first quarter? Cadence full year, whatever you want to provide us would be great

Show response

Matt confirmed goal to exceed 1.5% inflation hurdle for full year. Rate remains positive, time utilization high and not a headwind. Q4 mix anomaly did not repeat. Guidance embeds positive fleet productivity.

The amount of savings in the first quarter, be it labor, some of the real estate you spoke of, I'm coming up with something like $10 million. So even without that, margins were up 40 bps, increment...

ChallengingMarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Ted said Q1 benefit from restructuring was around $10M. Broad cost leverage across labor, delivery, and R&M. Key challenge is sustaining through busy season, especially delivery. Matt emphasized cost mitigation efforts are working.

Calendar 2025 Q3

How do we think about pricing for those services? I know -- I appreciate the comment, providing those services is partly why you win more than your fair share

Show response

Matt noted delivery is largely a pass-through and fuel has little markup. Fleet productivity gap between Q2 (3.3%) and Q3 (2%) was entirely mix variability. Rate and time both up.

is any of this '25 CapEx increase pulling forward 2026. And if not, just thinking about the cadence of sort of the CapEx for '26

Capex InvestmentDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Matt clarified CapEx was not a 2026 pull-forward but a response to current large project wins. Expects 2026 to include replacement CapEx of $3-4B+ plus growth CapEx. Planning in progress.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Can you help us how you're thinking about price cost for the second half of the year? Any actions you're taking on the cost side

Show response

Matt noted ancillary drag should moderate as Yak laps, with less ancillary impact on margins in H2. Matt confirmed this is the biggest mover for improved incrementals.

How would you describe your visibility on '26 versus, say, this time last year looking at '25?

DemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Matt acknowledged good visibility for large projects but declined to comment on 2026 broadly. Expects mega project, power, and infrastructure tailwinds to continue.

Calendar 2025 Q1

it seems like the average fleet size growth is going to be 3%. So that one supplies no meaningful help at all from fleet productivity. Is that conservatism

Revenue GrowthPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Ted noted David's math didn't adjust for fleet inflation. Embedded in midpoint is continuation of positive fleet productivity. Not signaling weakness.

does the potential inflation from tariffs on new equipment sales, right, meaning for an OEM raising price, does your customer then look at rental as a better alternative

Trade TariffsPricingDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Matt confirmed 2025 CapEx fully negotiated, 80%+ with POs, no tariff impact. Multiple non-tariff vendors available in each equipment category. Ted added uncertainty favors rental.

DEDeere & Company8 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 8 challenging
DE company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

The cadence of the orders being up mid-single-digit. I am just curious, was there anything you can note

Show response

Management said the order cadence was as expected and pointed to strong technology take rates as the best signal.

Calendar 2026 Q1

that order book, is it coming in just in a sense earlier than you would have thought in the sense of you have the same view and the order book just came in at a level where now you feel you have ju...

Show response

Sprayers/planters down ~20% (upper range). Tractors improving to ~down 15% (lower range) on pickup in order velocity. Combines finishing better at down 10-15%. Ag fundamentals still challenged but more stable vs late summer. Used MY22-23 tractors down 20% sequentially. Fleet aging driving replacement demand. Back-half production rates increasing on actual orders.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Given the full-year large ag sales guide in the first quarter implied a flat, It's implying the rest of the year down 9%. I was just curious when you think of PP and A for the rest of the year afte...

Revenue GrowthMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Large ag down YoY every quarter but margins improve significantly from Q1. Q2 highest net sales and margin quarter with more traditional seasonality post-Q1. Q4 particularly strong on shipment timing. Q1 margin impact driven by lean production, not structural.

Calendar 2025 Q3

how much are you embracing some of the international to still think about those seasonal patterns are still holding as we start to model '26?

Geographic ExpansionDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Q4 sequentially up high single digits in large ag, driven by increasing Brazil shipments. Green shoots in Europe and South America, but NA remains uncertain for FY2026.

Calendar 2025 Q2

can you help us understand why the margins are that soft in the second half? It just strikes me as very conservative

ChallengingMarginTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Detailed breakdown: $400M tariff cost in H2 = 2-2.5pp margin drag. Less price favorability, less material favorability vs H1. Small YoY sales change amplifies decremental math.

Calendar 2025 Q1

does that mean do we not plan to reduce any more new inventory from this point forward for the year

Show response

Confirmed fiscal year-end inventory target roughly flat YoY. Normal seasonal build in H1 then drawdown in H2. Significant portion is in-transit already retail sold.

The row crop inventory does seem a bit high relative to history for where we are in the year

ChallengingInventoryTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Distinguished 220+ hp (below 10-year average I/S ratios) from mid-range 6000 series (higher than desired, being underproduced at Mannheim).

Calendar 2024 Q4

Are we back to growth year-over-year by the third quarter? And then second, not to get you in trouble, just curious your thoughts

Revenue GrowthTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

On quarterly cadence, confirmed Q3/Q4 roughly flat to slightly up YoY. On tariffs/administration, deflected with 'too early to know' but May emphasized 75%+ US assembly and net exporter status.

CATCaterpillar Inc.7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 3 of 7 challenging
CAT company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

the volume growth there, understandably from these high levels, was better than I would’ve thought in 2Q, will slow

DemandCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Raso probed the CI-versus-P&E volume trade-off; Creed said P&E growth is production-constrained, not demand-constrained, and CI inventory should draw down in Q4.

Calendar 2026 Q1

I'm just curious why you left every other part of the business with the same view

ChallengingRevenue GrowthCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Joe explained all 3 segments already had growth ambitions from Investor Day. The change from 6% to 6-9% CAGR is driven by the incremental power gen opportunity. Joe expressed satisfaction at being able to raise targets so soon after November Investor Day.

Calendar 2025 Q4

trying to reconcile the sales guide for '26

ChallengingRevenue GrowthTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Bonfield clarified $800M tariff cost is incremental dollar cost before any pricing mitigation with 2% pricing action completely separate. On backlog versus sales guide Bonfield noted 62% of backlog deliverable in next twelve months is lower than historical average reflecting longer-dated P&E orders. Revenue guide conservative relative to backlog growth reflecting capacity constraints in P&E rather than demand weakness.

Calendar 2025 Q3

The real debate is going to be the incremental margin

MarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Bonfield acknowledged question covered full 2026 guidance and deferred to January update. Noted positive that price headwind lapped in Q4. Tariffs still headwind into 2026. Tax rate increased this year from R&D capitalization legislation but expected to improve from foreign tax adjustments. Promised more color at Investor Day next week. Still in planning process for 2026.

Calendar 2025 Q2

we're definitely focused on margins, but our ultimate goal is dollar OPACC

Show response

Creed reiterated pricing flexibility in backlog. Merchandising price headwind will lessen as programs are lapped with halving in Q3 and further narrowing in Q4. Prefer to mitigate tariffs through other means before using pricing lever. Net impact of merchandising plus volume in CI expected positive in H2. Two years ago in constrained environment pulled back on discounting so current programs represent return to normalized competitive levels. Bonfield emphasized operating leverage as most optimal margin management tool.

Calendar 2025 Q1

are we price protecting the backlog or not

ChallengingDemandPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Creed said some contractual arrangements exist for frame agreements and solar long orders but generally company has pricing flexibility in backlog. No evidence of widespread pre-buying based on dealer visits. E&T and RI backlog orders mostly backed by true customer orders not dealer inventory. CI customers unlikely to buy machines ahead of pricing if uncertain about future work.

Calendar 2024 Q4

does that imply CI and RI manufacturing costs were still a benefit year-over-year, and all the cost is in E&T?

PricingCost PressureTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Bonfield explained CI had negative absorption in Q4 as inventory declined and E&T had higher labor costs from adding workers to increase output. Material costs will decline in 2025 but offsets within manufacturing costs from volume absorption. Depreciation mostly within manufacturing costs from investment spending. Price cost will not see the offset seen in previous years.

IRIngersoll Rand7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
IR company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

is that pricing you put in against tariffs and they're dropping revenues at 0 margin

Trade TariffsMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Vik confirmed tariff pricing is dollar neutral but margin dilutive. All tariff-related pricing actions taken through 2025 are in the numbers. YoY tariff headwind normalizes Q2-Q4 as prior year had same tariffs. Mitigation plus in-year pricing drives Q4 positive momentum.

where do you think that growth will come from organically between compressors, vacuum and blowers

Revenue GrowthMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Vik confirmed margins comparable across product lines with no dramatic mix impact. Compressors ~65% of revenue so naturally the biggest driver. Positive contributions expected from all technologies. Short-cycle momentum in vacuum/blower and compressor segments encouraging.

Calendar 2025 Q4

are there any timing of shipments that benefited 4Q that informs that view

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Vik confirmed January orders playing out as expected with nothing atypical from seasonality or guidance framework perspective.

EMEA was down mid single digit. Just we have heard generally more constructive things out of Europe

ChallengingDemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Vicente confirmed pure project timing. Full year EMEA ITS orders were positive low single digits organically despite Q4 weakness. Mediterranean countries (Spain, Italy, France) growing faster than Central Europe (Germany) but good activity pipeline.

Calendar 2025 Q3

is there any opportunities to reprice some of the longer-dated backlog

Show response

Vicente confirmed long-cycle projects (12-18 months) have contractual clauses allowing adjustments for special alloys and material changes. Also opportunity for supply chain cost mitigation on long cycle. Short and medium cycle difficult to reprice retroactively.

how that plays into your competitive dynamic and maybe also thinking through your ability to make some of these price increases stick

Trade TariffsCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Vicente noted Section 232 removes exclusions putting strain on competitors importing product. In-region-for-region manufacturing creates competitive advantage. Opportunity to accelerate market share and penetration, though still too early to see full impact.

Calendar 2024 Q4

The acceleration that you're expecting in pricing, where are you seeing that? And is that a midyear price increase

Show response

Vik confirmed midyear pricing actions drive H2 acceleration. Multiple pricing actions taken through the year across both segments.

Show 3 more companies
PHParker Hannifin5 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
PH company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

Of the organic guide raise, how much was volume versus a change in price? And of the 50 bps margin improvement

Show response

Jenny declined to break out pricing vs volume but noted 2 years of negative industrial growth now turning positive. The Win Strategy drives margin expansion regardless of the mix.

Calendar 2025 Q1

is that a number that is expected to go up for the new fiscal year? Meaning you would think the first quarter, there's some inventory on the ground

Trade TariffsCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Todd confirmed $375M is annualized based on all announced tariffs and current run rate. Would not increase unless new tariffs are announced. Actions are already in place.

Calendar 2024 Q4

the cadence seems to have a very light organic growth for aero in the third quarter to foot to the full company third quarter organic, but then a big bounce

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jenny provided specific quarterly aerospace growth rates and Todd noted Q4 would be highest absolute aerospace shipments ever despite lower YoY growth.

where are you seeing that? Are there already conversations, some stocking levels, maybe on some of the short cycle

Show response

Jenny pointed to positive distributor sentiment and historical cycle averages (5-6 quarters negative) as basis for expected recovery but acknowledged it's been pushed out.

Calendar 2024 Q3

North America you raised the margins 50 bps, but lowered the organic sales, and the buckets are right

Show response

Parmentier said channel destocking that began over a year ago continues with no restocking yet, but distributor sentiment is very positive with heavy quote activity.

ITWIllinois Tool Works4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
ITW company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

you're going to try to price for price/cost still being that kind of 10 to 15 bps improvement

PricingMarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Confirmed the 10-20bp historical range as a reasonable 2027 base case and committed to flagging any change at January guidance.

When you're exiting the year, what's sort of baked into the guidance for price/cost impact, say, in the fourth quarter?

Cost PressurePricingMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Gave a quarter-by-quarter price/cost cadence and a roughly 20bp full year headwind versus a normal 10-20bp tailwind.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Is semi a big part of that incremental margin improvement?

Show response

Michael confirmed semi delivers above-average incrementals when cycle picks up. Semi is 15% of T&M, ~3% of ITW. Fab utilization, order activity, and +5% at attractive margins in Q4 look promising. Cautioned things can change quickly but feels confident in guidance.

How is January playing out versus the 1% to 3% guide?

DemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Michael said January on track. Q1 revenue growth in 3-4% range (total) but organic lower than other quarters due to seasonality. Inventory drawdown is typical Q4 cadence, not demand signal, actually added inventory mid-year in some segments for supply chain risk mitigation.

ETNEaton Corporation1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
ETN company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

can you quantify to any degree across Electrical? I don't think you've ever actually heard what percent capacity do we think is coming on

Capex InvestmentRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Craig declined to express capacity as a percentage but reiterated $1.5B incremental growth capacity covers forecast with upside room.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
PCAR Paccar130%none of 13 questions
CMI Cummins128%1 of 12 questions
URI United Rentals911%1 of 9 questions
DE Deere & Company825%2 of 8 questions
CAT Caterpillar Inc.743%3 of 7 questions
IR Ingersoll Rand714%1 of 7 questions
PH Parker Hannifin50%none of 5 questions
ITW Illinois Tool Works40%none of 4 questions
ETN Eaton Corporation1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • PCAR
    Paccar · 13 questions
    0%none of 13 questions
  • CMI
    Cummins · 12 questions
    8%1 of 12 questions
  • URI
    United Rentals · 9 questions
    11%1 of 9 questions
  • DE
    Deere & Company · 8 questions
    25%2 of 8 questions
  • CAT
    Caterpillar Inc. · 7 questions
    43%3 of 7 questions
  • IR
    Ingersoll Rand · 7 questions
    14%1 of 7 questions
  • PH
    Parker Hannifin · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • ITW
    Illinois Tool Works · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • ETN
    Eaton Corporation · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q310%none of 1 question1
2024 Q490%none of 9 questions7
2025 Q11020%2 of 10 questions6
2025 Q2617%1 of 6 questions4
2025 Q3110%none of 11 questions7
2025 Q41020%2 of 10 questions6
2026 Q11030%3 of 10 questions6
2026 Q280%none of 8 questions5
2026 Q310%none of 1 question1
  1. 2024 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2024 Q49 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 9 questions) · 7 companies
  3. 2025 Q110 questions · challenge rate 20% (2 of 10 questions) · 6 companies
  4. 2025 Q26 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 4 companies
  5. 2025 Q311 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 11 questions) · 7 companies
  6. 2025 Q410 questions · challenge rate 20% (2 of 10 questions) · 6 companies
  7. 2026 Q110 questions · challenge rate 30% (3 of 10 questions) · 6 companies
  8. 2026 Q28 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 5 companies
  9. 2026 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand29
  • Margin24
  • Pricing19
  • Trade Tariffs13
  • Revenue Growth11
  • Guidance Reliability7
  • Capex Investment6
  • Cost Pressure5
  • Supply Chain4
  • Inventory3
Show all 16 topics
  • Competitive Dynamics3
  • Geographic Expansion3
  • Regulation Policy3
  • Product Launch2
  • Cloud & AI1
  • Innovation & R&D1