Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Ittai Kidron

Oppenheimer · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q3 (8 quarters; questions recorded in 7).

Questions
21on tracked calls
Challenge rate
24%5 of 21 questions
Companies
7questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 21 of 21 questions from 7 companies

DDOGDatadog5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
DDOG company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

could this be evolving into a broader AI SOC automation kind of platform? Is that a reasonable direction

Cloud & AIProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Olivier said Datadog is moving toward an AI SOC, having separated the Bits AI Security Analyst agent from its SIEM so customers can use it with other SIEMs, broadening the addressable market beyond SIEM re-platforming.

This probably was the weakest quarter I ever remember for you guys, especially in the quarter where you had DASH

ChallengingSubscriber GrowthRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

David said gross customer additions remain strong and on trend, attributing the reported net customer-count variability to the low-end free-to-contract border, which has very little effect on revenues. Olivier noted customers above the $100,000 and $1 million thresholds are trending very well.

Calendar 2025 Q4

maybe you could talk about the level of conservatism that you've built into the guide for the year

Guidance ReliabilityCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Obstler explained same guidance methodology with discounted trends. The 18-20% guide with 20%+ core business growth implies conservative assumptions for largest customer. AI cohort of 650 is highly diversified with no concentration concerns.

can you give us the percent of revenue of the AI cohort this quarter

Cloud & AISubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Obstler declined to disclose the Q4 AI native revenue percentage, having previously shared it through Q3 (12%).

Calendar 2025 Q3

Is there a way you can give us some color on where do you stand on percent of salespeople that are hitting quota

Capex InvestmentRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Pomel noted good sales productivity with ongoing comp plan tweaks to balance upsell vs new customer acquisition. Highlighted new multi-year plans for larger customers that take longer to land, with initial success from new go-to-market motions.

ZSZscaler5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
ZS company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

I want to dig into your outlook for fiscal '27, specifically on the ARR front

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Kevin said the guide balances strong momentum against the time needed for the geo and vertical sales leadership transition and the pace of integrated SecOps uptake. He expects continued 115% NRR, an opportunity to accelerate new logo growth with dedicated executives, and a broader product set to land new logos. Jay and Kevin added AI security is a durable tailwind though not specifically called out in the guidance.

Calendar 2026 Q2

outside of the sales leadership that you have talked about, are there any other elements to take into account here

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Kevin identified two factors: sales leadership transitions under Mike Rich and uncertain pace of integrated SecOps product uptake for Red Canary. Noted Q4 implied 9.5% organic net new ARR growth is still an acceleration versus prior year.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Can you give us a little bit more color what was that growth rate over the last 2, 3 quarters perhaps?

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Kevin said ZIA/ZPA ARR grew mid-teens, consistent over recent quarters. Only 4,400 of 20,000+ target enterprises on platform. Over half of Fortune 500 still to prospect. Jay added customers on avg triple initial ZIA purchase in 4 years.

Calendar 2025 Q2

You have a portfolio that's expanding at warp speed. You have a new purchasing mechanism through Z Flex. How do you get people, how do you get customers focused

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jay explained two-tier go-to-market model: broad account-centric sales team plus specialist takeoff teams for emerging products. Red Canary acquisition brings a seasoned SOC go-to-market team. Z Flex starting with larger customers, will expand prudently after learning.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I was wondering if you can give us an update on ARR here and now in the target for year-end

Revenue GrowthProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Confirmed $3B ARR target on track. Net retention 114%. Emerging products expected to be mid-20s% of new and upsell, up from 22% last year.

MDBMongoDB, Inc.4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 2 of 4 challenging
MDB company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

In what way do you think your go-to-market needs to evolve to address them differently?

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

CJ said the AI-native GTM motion is a work in progress; many arrive via self-serve and MongoDB is refining when to add direct field coverage.

Calendar 2026 Q1

is there any more level of conservatism built in your guide because of this transition?

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Mike acknowledged the leadership transition was a factor in guidance but said the team in place is strong and no material disruption is expected.

why low mid is still the target for '27, why we hold this momentum in the fourth quarter

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Mike defended the conservative FY27 EA guide: variability comes from multiyear vs 1-year deal timing, and MongoDB deliberately bakes in more upside than downside.

Calendar 2025 Q3

how do you think about targeting the AI opportunity from go-to-market motion?

Show response

Dev said MongoDB transitions self-serve customers to high-touch sales as they scale (as it did with cloud), and reiterated enterprise AI adoption remains early and productivity-focused.

FTNTFortinet3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
FTNT company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

is it fair to say that the product growth potentially decelerates in the second half of next year?

ChallengingRevenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Christiane declined to guide specifically for 2026 but expressed confidence in solid product growth trajectory. Ken cited fragmented market with no player above 10-20% share, seeing greenfield opportunity across all three pillars.

Calendar 2024 Q4

can't you just be a little bit more specific on what was the contribution exact dollar contribution you expect from the upgrade in your twenty-five guide

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Keith deflected the specific dollar question by citing data quality challenges with two-tier distribution model, particularly in SMB where end-user device registration is unreliable.

how much of your footprint in your opinion has something that you need to displace versus you're stepping into a vacuum

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Ken confirmed biggest SASE deals are displacements of legacy VPN and SaaS providers, and referenced the presentation showing ~10% large enterprise SASE penetration with ~70% SD-WAN penetration.

TWLOTwilio Inc.2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
TWLO company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

whether macro is having any impact at all either on a regional basis or on a vertical basis?

MacroeconomicDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Asked by George Iwanyc on for Ittai Kidron. Khozema called the macro super dynamic, citing consumer pressure, the Middle East and inflation, but said it is not affecting results.

can you give us some color on what you're seeing from a multiproduct adoption standpoint

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Asked by George Iwanyc on for Ittai Kidron. Thomas said the multiproduct customer count rose 29% in Q1 and revenue from those customers is accelerating.

CRWDCrowdStrike1 question · 1 reporting period · 1 of 1 challenging
CRWD company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

it seemed like it's significantly decelerated. Was growing 18% plus year ago. It's growing 11% now. How should we think about your core business growth

ChallengingRevenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Kurtz pushed back on separating core vs emerging, arguing EDR telemetry is foundational to all modules and the business should be viewed holistically as a platform.

Show 1 more company
TEAMAtlassian1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
TEAM company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

if you could break down the seat expansion, if there is a way, that internally you look at this in context of new customer additions, expansion with existing customers

Subscriber GrowthCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Joe described broad-based expansion across tech and non-tech users, stable for 4-6 quarters in both enterprise and SMB. Mike added growth in service collection HR/finance teams, customer service management GA, and Teamwork Collection driving double-digit seat expansion versus standalone apps.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
DDOG Datadog520%1 of 5 questions
ZS Zscaler50%none of 5 questions
MDB MongoDB, Inc.450%2 of 4 questions
FTNT Fortinet333%1 of 3 questions
TWLO Twilio Inc.2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
CRWD CrowdStrike1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
TEAM Atlassian1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • DDOG
    Datadog · 5 questions
    20%1 of 5 questions
  • ZS
    Zscaler · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • MDB
    MongoDB, Inc. · 4 questions
    50%2 of 4 questions
  • FTNT
    Fortinet · 3 questions
    33%1 of 3 questions
  • TWLO
    Twilio Inc. · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • CRWD
    CrowdStrike · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • TEAM
    Atlassian · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q430%none of 3 questions2
2025 Q1No questions recorded——
2025 Q210%none of 1 question1
2025 Q3450%2 of 4 questions4
2025 Q430%none of 3 questions2
2026 Q1540%2 of 5 questions3
2026 Q2425%1 of 4 questions3
2026 Q310%none of 1 question1
  1. 2024 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  2. 2025 Q1No questions recorded
  3. 2025 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  4. 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 50% (2 of 4 questions) · 4 companies
  5. 2025 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  6. 2026 Q15 questions · challenge rate 40% (2 of 5 questions) · 3 companies
  7. 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 3 companies
  8. 2026 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Revenue Growth11
  • Guidance Reliability7
  • Cloud & AI6
  • Competitive Dynamics5
  • Demand5
  • Subscriber Growth3
  • Product Launch2
  • Macroeconomic1
  • Capex Investment1