Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Ittai Kidron
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q3 (8 quarters; questions recorded in 7).
- Questions
- 21on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 24%5 of 21 questions
- Companies
- 7questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 21 of 21 questions from 7 companies
DDOGDatadog5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
could this be evolving into a broader AI SOC automation kind of platform? Is that a reasonable direction
Show response
Olivier said Datadog is moving toward an AI SOC, having separated the Bits AI Security Analyst agent from its SIEM so customers can use it with other SIEMs, broadening the addressable market beyond SIEM re-platforming.
This probably was the weakest quarter I ever remember for you guys, especially in the quarter where you had DASH
Show response
David said gross customer additions remain strong and on trend, attributing the reported net customer-count variability to the low-end free-to-contract border, which has very little effect on revenues. Olivier noted customers above the $100,000 and $1 million thresholds are trending very well.
Calendar 2025 Q4
maybe you could talk about the level of conservatism that you've built into the guide for the year
Show response
Obstler explained same guidance methodology with discounted trends. The 18-20% guide with 20%+ core business growth implies conservative assumptions for largest customer. AI cohort of 650 is highly diversified with no concentration concerns.
can you give us the percent of revenue of the AI cohort this quarter
Show response
Obstler declined to disclose the Q4 AI native revenue percentage, having previously shared it through Q3 (12%).
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is there a way you can give us some color on where do you stand on percent of salespeople that are hitting quota
Show response
Pomel noted good sales productivity with ongoing comp plan tweaks to balance upsell vs new customer acquisition. Highlighted new multi-year plans for larger customers that take longer to land, with initial success from new go-to-market motions.
ZSZscaler5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
I want to dig into your outlook for fiscal '27, specifically on the ARR front
Show response
Kevin said the guide balances strong momentum against the time needed for the geo and vertical sales leadership transition and the pace of integrated SecOps uptake. He expects continued 115% NRR, an opportunity to accelerate new logo growth with dedicated executives, and a broader product set to land new logos. Jay and Kevin added AI security is a durable tailwind though not specifically called out in the guidance.
Calendar 2026 Q2
outside of the sales leadership that you have talked about, are there any other elements to take into account here
Show response
Kevin identified two factors: sales leadership transitions under Mike Rich and uncertain pace of integrated SecOps product uptake for Red Canary. Noted Q4 implied 9.5% organic net new ARR growth is still an acceleration versus prior year.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can you give us a little bit more color what was that growth rate over the last 2, 3 quarters perhaps?
Show response
Kevin said ZIA/ZPA ARR grew mid-teens, consistent over recent quarters. Only 4,400 of 20,000+ target enterprises on platform. Over half of Fortune 500 still to prospect. Jay added customers on avg triple initial ZIA purchase in 4 years.
Calendar 2025 Q2
You have a portfolio that's expanding at warp speed. You have a new purchasing mechanism through Z Flex. How do you get people, how do you get customers focused
Show response
Jay explained two-tier go-to-market model: broad account-centric sales team plus specialist takeoff teams for emerging products. Red Canary acquisition brings a seasoned SOC go-to-market team. Z Flex starting with larger customers, will expand prudently after learning.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I was wondering if you can give us an update on ARR here and now in the target for year-end
Show response
Confirmed $3B ARR target on track. Net retention 114%. Emerging products expected to be mid-20s% of new and upsell, up from 22% last year.
MDBMongoDB, Inc.4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 2 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
In what way do you think your go-to-market needs to evolve to address them differently?
Show response
CJ said the AI-native GTM motion is a work in progress; many arrive via self-serve and MongoDB is refining when to add direct field coverage.
Calendar 2026 Q1
is there any more level of conservatism built in your guide because of this transition?
Show response
Mike acknowledged the leadership transition was a factor in guidance but said the team in place is strong and no material disruption is expected.
why low mid is still the target for '27, why we hold this momentum in the fourth quarter
Show response
Mike defended the conservative FY27 EA guide: variability comes from multiyear vs 1-year deal timing, and MongoDB deliberately bakes in more upside than downside.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how do you think about targeting the AI opportunity from go-to-market motion?
Show response
Dev said MongoDB transitions self-serve customers to high-touch sales as they scale (as it did with cloud), and reiterated enterprise AI adoption remains early and productivity-focused.
FTNTFortinet3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
is it fair to say that the product growth potentially decelerates in the second half of next year?
Show response
Christiane declined to guide specifically for 2026 but expressed confidence in solid product growth trajectory. Ken cited fragmented market with no player above 10-20% share, seeing greenfield opportunity across all three pillars.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can't you just be a little bit more specific on what was the contribution exact dollar contribution you expect from the upgrade in your twenty-five guide
Show response
Keith deflected the specific dollar question by citing data quality challenges with two-tier distribution model, particularly in SMB where end-user device registration is unreliable.
how much of your footprint in your opinion has something that you need to displace versus you're stepping into a vacuum
Show response
Ken confirmed biggest SASE deals are displacements of legacy VPN and SaaS providers, and referenced the presentation showing ~10% large enterprise SASE penetration with ~70% SD-WAN penetration.
TWLOTwilio Inc.2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
whether macro is having any impact at all either on a regional basis or on a vertical basis?
Show response
Asked by George Iwanyc on for Ittai Kidron. Khozema called the macro super dynamic, citing consumer pressure, the Middle East and inflation, but said it is not affecting results.
can you give us some color on what you're seeing from a multiproduct adoption standpoint
Show response
Asked by George Iwanyc on for Ittai Kidron. Thomas said the multiproduct customer count rose 29% in Q1 and revenue from those customers is accelerating.
CRWDCrowdStrike1 question · 1 reporting period · 1 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
it seemed like it's significantly decelerated. Was growing 18% plus year ago. It's growing 11% now. How should we think about your core business growth
Show response
Kurtz pushed back on separating core vs emerging, arguing EDR telemetry is foundational to all modules and the business should be viewed holistically as a platform.
Show 1 more company
TEAMAtlassian1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
if you could break down the seat expansion, if there is a way, that internally you look at this in context of new customer additions, expansion with existing customers
Show response
Joe described broad-based expansion across tech and non-tech users, stable for 4-6 quarters in both enterprise and SMB. Mike added growth in service collection HR/finance teams, customer service management GA, and Teamwork Collection driving double-digit seat expansion versus standalone apps.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| DDOG Datadog | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions |
| ZS Zscaler | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| MDB MongoDB, Inc. | 4 | 50%2 of 4 questions |
| FTNT Fortinet | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions |
| TWLO Twilio Inc. | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| CRWD CrowdStrike | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| TEAM Atlassian | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- DDOGDatadog · 5 questions20%1 of 5 questions
- ZSZscaler · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- MDBMongoDB, Inc. · 4 questions50%2 of 4 questions
- FTNTFortinet · 3 questions33%1 of 3 questions
- TWLOTwilio Inc. · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- CRWDCrowdStrike · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- TEAMAtlassian · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q1 | No questions recorded | — | — |
| 2025 Q2 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2025 Q3 | 4 | 50%2 of 4 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q4 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q1 | 5 | 40%2 of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q2 | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q3 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
- 2024 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q1No questions recorded
- 2025 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 50% (2 of 4 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q15 questions · challenge rate 40% (2 of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Revenue Growth11
- Guidance Reliability7
- Cloud & AI6
- Competitive Dynamics5
- Demand5
- Subscriber Growth3
- Product Launch2
- Macroeconomic1
- Capex Investment1